|
|
|
|
Collapse all descriptions
|
|
1 |
Politics Rest of the World- ABC- Date with Assad - Everyone but me is a fruit and nut case ?
Updated: 08 Dec 2011
Bashar al-Assad insists killings and torture in Syria are beyond his control
Syria's president rebuffs UN claims of bloody repression, telling US TV host 'we don't kill our own people'
guardian.co.uk,
Syria's embattled president, Bashar al-Assad, has defiantly rebuffed allegations from around the world that his government is waging a bloody crackdown on protesters, which the UN says has led to the deaths of 4,000 people.
Assad used an interview with Barbara Walters, who hosts the US ABC news network, to insist that documented cases of killings, torture and other maltreatment, characterised by the UN as "crimes against humanity", were carried out by individuals outside his control.
"They're not my forces," he insisted.
"They are military forces who belong to the government. I don't own them. I'm president. I don't own the country."
In response to the interview, the Syrian National Council, the largest opposition group, said: "Assad has proved he is delusional and mixed up.
By law, Assad is the commander in chief of the army and responsible for every bullet fired at a civilian in Syria. He will be tried and brought to justice, sooner or later."
The White House dismissed the president's comments as "just not credible".
In Britain the Foreign Office condemned "the bloody repression of peaceful and courageous demonstrators and massive violations of human rights".
In recent weeks Assad has given several interviews warning of the consequences of outside intervention while severely restricting the access of news organisations to Syria.
ABC said this was his first interview for a US TV network since the Arab spring unrest began in March.
"Every 'brute reaction' was by an individual, not by an institution, that's what you have to know," Assad told Walters.
"There is a difference between having a policy to crack down and between having some mistakes committed by some officials."
The president flatly denied giving orders to his security forces "to kill or be brutal".
He said: "We don't kill our people … no government in the world kills its people, unless it's led by a crazy person."
Videos posted on YouTube have shown Syrian police, soldiers and Shabiha militiamen opening fire on crowds of unarmed protesters, though armed attacks by the opposition have increased in recent weeks.
The UN Human Rights Council reported last week that "at least" 4,000 had been killed. Assad dismissed the figure and questioned the UN's credibility.
"Most of the people that have been killed are supporters of the government, not vice versa," he said, adding that 1,100 police and soldiers had been killed.
Assad's remarks fuelled speculation that he might have been trying to shift the blame on to his brother Maher, who commands the Republican Guard and the Syrian army's fourth mechanised division, both said to have played key roles in the repression.
Hopes for increasing pressure on Damascus to end the violence have meanwhile been dealt a blow by the refusal of the Arab League to refer the crisis to the UN security council.
The secretary general of the pan-Arab body, Nabil al-Arabi, revealed that he had rejected a request from the EU to take the issue to the UN. Western nations would like the UN to see impose sanctions on Syria.
But any such moves have been blocked by Russia and China, which wield veto power.
The theory is that only an Arab request would change their minds.
The request was made by EU foreign ministers at a meeting in Brussels last week, Arabi told the pan-Arab newspaper al-Sharq al Awsat.
Arabi said: "I confirmed to the ministers that we are working [on the Syrian crisis] within an Arab framework to find a solution."
The league would not give the Syrian government a new deadline to accept monitors or face sanctions.
The Local Coordination Committees of Syria, an opposition network, reported nine people killed on Wednesday by security forces, seven in the flashpoint city of Homs.
|
35 |
|
2 |
Politics Rest of the World- Afganistan- Now you know what our soldiers are dying for
Updated: 08 Dec 2011
Karzai invites gold and copper bidders
Wednesday 07 December 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
The Karzai administration opened bids yesterday on billions of dollars worth of copper and gold deposits in four areas of occupied Afghanistan.
The Afghan Ministry of Mines invited foreign transnationals to bid on multiple contracts to unearth copper and gold buried in Badakhshan, Ghazni and Herat provinces and a fourth area that spans both Balkh and Sar-e-Pul provinces.
Companies will have until March 9 to submit preliminary bids and a preferred bidder will be selected in 2012.
Afghan Minister of Mines Wahidullah Shahrani said in a telephone interview from London, where he was speaking at a mining conference, that the value of the deposits was “in the billions.”
Geologists have known for decades about Afghanistan’s vast deposits of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and other prized minerals, including rare earth minerals used in mobile phones, hybrid car batteries, the arms industry and wind turbines.
The US Defence Department put a mindboggling $1 trillion (£635bn) price tag on the vast mineral reserves, but the Afghan minister said other geological assessments and industry reports estimate the nation’s mineral wealth at $3 trillion (£1.9tr) or more.
Mr Shahrani said that he and his fellow ministers plan to sell the rights for up to five mines every year until 2014, when most occupation forces are scheduled to go home.
Afghan officials approved a multimillion-dollar contract in December 2010 to mine gold in Dushi district of Baghlan province.
It was the first mining project in Afghanistan backed by private investors from the West, who pledged $50 million (£32m) for the project.
The Afghan government gave investors from India and Canada permission last month to mine an estimated 1.8 billion tons of iron ore in Bamiyan province.
Meanwhile 19 were killed by a road bomb blast in Helmond province today.
A minibus struck the bomb while driving in Sangin district, triggering an explosion that killed 19 Afghan civilians, officials said.
The blast follows twin bombings on Shi’ite Muslims in Kabul yesterday that left 60 dead and sparked fears that attacks in Afghanistan might be taking on a sectarian dimension.
The Taliban condemned the atrocity as “inhumane and un-Islamic.”
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
38 |
|
3 |
Politics Rest of the World- God is not merciful in Saudi ?- As Aussie sentenced to get 500 lashes?
Updated: 08 Dec 2011
Man gets 500 lashes for blasphemy
SAUDI ARABIA:
An Australian man has been sentenced to 500 lashes and a year in jail after being convicted of blasphemy, officials said today.
Mansor Almaribe was detained in Medina last month while making the Muslim pilgrimage of hajj.
Family members told Australian media that Saudi officials accused him of insulting the companions of the Prophet Muhammad, a violation of Saudi Arabia’s strict blasphemy laws.
Australia’s ambassador in Saudi Arabia has contacted Saudi authorities in a bid for leniency.
|
35 |
|
4 |
Politics Rest of the World- A Second Russian Revolution ?
Updated: 08 Dec 2011
Kremlin floods Moscow with police
Wednesday 07 December 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
The Kremlin flooded Moscow with over 53,000 police and armed Interior Ministry troops today on the third consecutive day of protests over scandal-marred elections.
Hundreds of opposition supporters, including scores of communists were detained on Monday and yesterday, but that did not deter the approximately 2,000 citizens who turned out in Moscow and St Petersburg today, apparently emboldened by the result of Sunday’s parliamentary election.
Preliminary results indicate that the United Russia party won 49 per cent of the vote, down from 64 per cent in the last parliamentary poll in 2007.
The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) saw its share of the vote almost double and is sending 92 deputies to the new State Duma.
It previously held 57 seats.
The CPRF contends that it would have even more clout in the new legislature if United Russia hadn’t indulged in systematic vote-rigging, as apparently evidenced by a slew of videos posted to the internet.
The CPRF contends that the campaign was “riddled with gross violations of the law by the authorities, anti-communist pronouncements and numerous cases of vote rigging.”
Over 14,000 people have already signed up to a page on Facebook announcing an opposition rally for Saturday.
Meanwhile a navy squadron led by the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft cruiser set off from the Arctic base of Russia’s Northern Fleet yesterday for the Mediterranean.
The squadron from Severomorsk is to make a call at the Syrian port of Tartus to replenish supplies.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
55 |
|
5 |
Politics Rest of the World- UN General Secretary on establishing a Palestinian State
Updated: 05 Dec 2011
UNITED NATIONS -THE SECRETARY-GENERAL --- MESSAGE ON THE INTERNATIONAL DAY OF SOLIDARITY
WITH THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE
29 November 2011
Sixty-four years ago on this day, the General Assembly adopted resolution 181, proposing the partition of the mandate territory into two States.
The establishment of a Palestinian State, living in peace next to a secure Israel, is long overdue.
The need to resolve this conflict has taken on greater urgency with the historic transformations taking place across the region.
I call on the Israeli and Palestinian leadership to show courage and determination to seek an agreement for a two-State solution that can open up a brighter future for Palestinian and Israeli children.
Such a solution must end the occupation that began in 1967, and meet legitimate security concerns.
Jerusalem must emerge from negotiations as the capital of two States, with arrangements for the holy sites acceptable to all.
And a just and agreed solution must be found for millions of Palestinian refugees scattered around the region.
While there are many challenges to this goal, let me stress an important, indeed historic, achievement of the Palestinian Authority during the past year.
The Palestinian Authority is now institutionally ready to assume the responsibilities of statehood, if a Palestinian state were created.
This was affirmed by a wide range of members of the international community at the meeting of the Ad-Hoc Liaison Committee in September.
I commend President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad on this remarkable success.
These efforts should continue and be supported.
In this regard, the current suspension by Israel of customs and tax transfers owed to the Palestinian Authority risks undermining these gains.
These revenues must be transferred without delay.
Above all else, a political horizon is vital.
I am deeply concerned that Israeli-Palestinian negotiations are not taking place, while trust between the parties continues to fade.
A glimpse of hope comes from their engagement with the Middle East Quartet.
I call on both sides to develop serious proposals on borders and security, and to discuss them directly with each other, with active Quartet support, in the context of a shared commitment to reach an agreement by the end of 2012.
The parties have a particular responsibility to cease provocations and create a conducive environment for meaningful negotiations.
Israel’s recently intensified settlement activity in East Jerusalem and the West Bank is a major obstacle. Settlement activity is contrary to international law and the Roadmap, and must cease.
Unilateral actions on the ground will not be accepted by the international community.
For its part, the Palestinian Authority should also find ways to help de-escalate the situation and improve the prevailing divisive climate, and to be ready to engage directly in the search for a negotiated solution.
I also urge the Palestinians to overcome their divisions, based on the commitments of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the positions of the Quartet and the Arab Peace Initiative.
I take note of President Abbas’s continuous efforts towards a transitional government that will prepare for presidential and legislative elections in May.
Palestinian unity that supports a negotiated two-State solution is essential for the creation of a Palestinian State in Gaza and the West Bank.
The United Nations continues to be strongly committed to the population in Gaza, and to implementing all aspects of Security Council resolution 1860.
I appreciate efforts undertaken by Israel to ease the closure, and continue to call for removing the numerous remaining measures that severely restrict the movement of people and goods and limit the ability of the United Nations to support Gaza’s economic recovery and reconstruction.
I also take this opportunity to remind those in Gaza who fire rockets at Israel or continue to smuggle weapons that these actions are both unacceptable and completely contrary to Palestinian interests.
I call for an end to rocket fire from Gaza into Israel, and for Israel to exercise maximum restraint.
Both parties should fully observe calm and respect international humanitarian law.
I welcome the recent prisoner exchange that saw the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and an Israeli soldier.
This significant humanitarian breakthrough should be followed by further steps to consolidate calm and end the closure of Gaza.
Amid these many challenges to the realization of their legitimate aspirations for statehood, the Palestinian leadership submitted an application for membership in the United Nations.
This is a matter for the Member States to decide.
Whatever view of this matter is taken, we should not lose sight of the ultimate goal of reaching a negotiated peace agreement on all final status issues, including borders, security, Jerusalem and refugees.
Let us, on this International Day, reaffirm our commitment to translating solidarity into positive action.
The international community must help steer the situation towards a historic peace agreement. Failing to overcome mistrust will only condemn further generations of Palestinians and Israelis to conflict and suffering.
A just and lasting peace in the Middle East based on Security Council resolutions 242, 338, 1397, 1515 and 1850, previous agreements, the Madrid framework, the Road Map and the Arab Peace Initiative is critical to avoid this fate.
For my part, I pledge to continue pursuing my efforts with all the means available to me.
|
41 |
|
6 |
Politics Rest of the World-Thailand hosts UN International Day of Palestine Solidarity
Updated: 05 Dec 2011
Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) Thailand,
P.O. Box 1199, Nana Post Office, Bangkok 10112
palestinesolidaritythailand@gmail.com
www.palestinesolidaritythailand.org
Bangkok, 1st December 2011
Press Release: Commemoration of the UN International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, 29th November 2011
On 29th November, the UN hosted the annual UN International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People at their headquarters in Bangkok, commemorating the promise given to the Palestinians in 1947 that they too would have their own independent sovereign state. 64 years later, in direct breach of the fine words spoken, this state has yet to emerge. The event was graciously hosted and supported by UNESCAP, and the UN Conference Centre, and was co-sponsored by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) Thailand, and the Foundation of Islamic Centre of Thailand.
The ambassadors of China, Malaysia and Cuba were in attendance, as were diplomatic representatives of Pakistan, Morocco, Iran and Qatar.
Almost 70 people participated, including media and the majority of the audience were Thai citizens. Mr. Stuart Ward, PSC Thailand Chairperson, opened the event with his welcoming remarks, and noted that this was the first time the event had been commemorated at the UN in Bangkok.
He hoped that it would continue to host the event for as long as the Palestinians remain in captivity. The statement by the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was then read out.
The Secretary-General reaffirmed that the Palestinian Authority had all the institutional arrangements in place for statehood.
He then requested that Israel, which exercises total control over the entire Palestinian banking system – as it does with nearly every aspect of Palestinian daily life - unfreezes Palestinian tax remittances which run into the hundreds of millions of dollars.
These were seized in reprisal for the admittance of Palestine to UNESCO. The first keynote speaker was Mr. Imtiaz Muqbil, columnist with the Bangkok Post, who used the title of Mohammed El Elbaradei’s book, The Age of Deception, to focus on the “treachery and deception that lies at the heart of the Palestinian conflict”.
He expressed his admiration for Mahatma Gandhi saying that “there is no difference between the freedom sought by Gandhi for India and the freedom that I pursue for the Palestinians”. Dr. Somchai Virunhaphol, the second keynote speaker, and columnist with newspaper Siam Rath, likened the Israel-Palestine conflict to a mismatch between a professional heavyweight boxer and an amateur flyweight.
He asked why the Israelis were being allowed to paint themselves as the victims, when they were the ones running the world’s longest occupation.
Dr. Somchai quoted from the UN Charter whose Article 51 grants states the right to self-defence only when attacked by another state.
Palestine for all its aspirations is not a nation state, so Israeli attacks on Palestinians, as in Operation Cast Lead, can never be justified as self-defence. 2 (2)
Stuart Ward then announced the launch of the Thailand-Palestine Friendship Society (TPFS) to deepen and broaden ties between Thailand and the Palestinians.
He thanked lawyer Mr. Siripong Toleb for his work on nurturing this project through to its naissance. Next, poet Mr. Zakariya Amataya, South-East Asia Write Award Winner 2010, gave a passionate rendition of three of his poems on Palestine, skilfully translated into English by Thai Liaison Officer Mr. Marut Mekloy.
To a world which prefers to forget, the poems were a reminder of the emotional and psychological trauma inflicted on the Palestinians by their removal and occupation. The second half of the event was devoted to the screening of The Land Speaks Arabic, provided by the Committee for the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People based at the UN in New York.
This award-winning documentary uses original documents, archival footage, and eye-witness accounts to show that the expulsion of the indigenous Arab population in 1948 was far from being an accidental result of war.
It was a core Zionist objective, decades-long in the planning and gestation. The event was brought to a close by the Vice-Chairperson of PSC Thailand, Mr. Nick Ferriman.
He reminded the audience that the UN has been a defender of the Palestinians to whom it provides material support for 4 million of their refugees across the Middle East.
He added that by reaching out to global civil society, the UN buttresses its legitimacy, as it is the citizenry and them alone who invest institutions with their authority.
The event is being posted on YouTube at address PSCThailand.
End
Note The PSC Thailand exists to create awareness in Thailand of the injustices being constantly inflicted on the Palestinians since the imposition of Israel more than sixty years ago and to solicit support for them in their struggle for their human rights, their human dignity and the creation of a viable, sovereign and contiguous state of Palestine.
|
51 |
|
7 |
Politics Rest of the World- Israeli Zionist take leaf out of Hitlers book to curb Civil Liberties
Updated: 05 Dec 2011
Israel moves towards curbing civil liberties Knesset debates wave of government bills that would allow for harsh penalties to be imposed on media and NGOs. Last Modified: 04 Dec 2011 14:06
As millions of people in the Arab world fight for greater democratic rights, Israel appears to be restricting some of its freedoms.
Proposed laws would allow for harsh penalties to be imposed on media organisations, which some claim to be a right-wing attack on civil liberties and free speech.
There is a wave of government bills in the pipeline that would effect a whole range of civil liberties in Israel.
The changes include much bigger penalties for defamation that could gag the media, and foreign donations to Israeli non-governmental organisations would be subject to a huge 45 per cent tax.
Tony Birtley reports from Tel Aviv. Source: Al Jazeera
|
47 |
|
8 |
Politics Rest of the World- If Iraq was a "Cakewalk" - Iran could become WW3 as US Hawks fly
Updated: 05 Dec 2011
US: Edging closer towards war with Iran? The biggest problem for the US is not Iran getting a nuclear weapon and testing it,
but getting it and not using it.
MJ Rosenberg Last Modified: 04 Dec 2011 12:25 An attack on Iran would only delay development of an Iranian bomb, believes Max Boot
Suddenly the struggle to stop Iran is not about saving Israel from nuclear annihilation.
After a decade of scare-mongering about the second coming of Nazi Germany, the Iran hawks are admitting that they have other reasons for wanting to take out Iran, and saving Israeli lives may not be one of them.
Suddenly the neo-conservatives have discovered the concept of truth-telling, although, no doubt, the shift will be ephemeral.
The shift in the rationale for war was kicked off this week when Danielle Pletka, head of the American Enterprise Institute's (AEI) foreign policy shop and one of the most prominent neo-conservatives in Washington, explained what the current obsession with Iran's nuclear programme is all about:
The biggest problem for the United States is not Iran getting a nuclear weapon and testing it, it's Iran getting a nuclear weapon and not using it.
Because the second that they have one and they don't do anything bad, all of the naysayers are going to come back and say, "See, we told you Iran is a responsible power.
We told you Iran wasn't getting nuclear weapons in order to use them immediately." ...
And they will eventually define Iran with nuclear weapons as not a problem.
Watch here.
Hold on. The "biggest problem" with Iran getting a nuclear weapon is not that Iranians will use it, but that they won't use it and that they might behave like a "responsible power"?
But what about the hysteria about a second Holocaust?
What about Prime Minister Netanyahu's assertion that this is 1938 and Hitler is on the march?
What about all of these pronouncements that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon because the apocalyptic mullahs would happily commit national suicide in order to destroy Israel?
And what about AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and its satellites, which produce one sanctions bill after another (all dutifully passed by Congress) because of the "existential threat" that Iran poses to Israel?
Did Pletka lose her talking points?
Apparently not.
Pletka's "never mind" about the imminent danger of an Iranian bomb seems to be the new line from the bastion of neo-conservativism.
Earlier this week, one of Pletka's colleagues at AEI said pretty much the same thing.
Writing in the Weekly Standard, Thomas Donnelly explained that we've got the Iran problem all wrong and that we need to "understand the nature of the conflict."
He continued:
We're fixated on the Iranian nuclear programme while the Tehran regime has its eyes on the real prize: the balance of power in the Persian Gulf and the greater Middle East.
This admission that the problem with a nuclear Iran is not that it would attack Israel, but that it would alter the regional balance of power is incredibly significant.
The American Enterprise Institute is not Commentary, the Republican Jewish Coalition, or the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, which are not exactly known for their intellectual heft.
It is, along with the Heritage Foundation, the most influential conservative think-tank.
That is why it was able to play such an influential role in promoting the invasion of Iraq.
Take a look at this page from the AEI website from January 2002 (featuring, no surprise, a head shot of Richard Perle).
It is announcing one of an almost endless series of events designed to instigate war with Iraq, a war that did not begin for another 14 months.
(Perle himself famously began promoting a war with Iraq within days of 9/11, according to former CIA director George Tenet.) AEI's drumbeat for war was incessant, finally meeting with success in March 2003.
And now they are doing it again. On Monday, Republican Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois - AIPAC's favourite senator - will keynote an event at AEI, with Pletka and Donnelly offering responses. It will be moderated by Fred Kagan, another AEI fellow and Iraq (now Iran) war hawk.
The event is built on the premise that "ongoing efforts to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons have failed".
We all know what that means. AEI will, no doubt, continue to host these "it's time for war" events through 2012 and beyond, or until President Obama or his successor announces either that the US has attacked Iran or that Israel has attacked and we are at her side.
If you didn't know any better, you might ask why - given that Pletka and Donnelly are downgrading the Iranian nuclear threat - AEI is still hell-bent on war.
If its determination to stop Iran is not about defending Israel from an "existential threat", what is it truly about?
Fortunately, Pletka and Donnelly don't leave us guessing.
It is about preserving the regional balance of power, which means ensuring that Israel remains the region's military powerhouse, with Saudi Arabia playing a supporting role.
That requires overthrowing the Iranian regime and replacing it with one that will do our bidding (like the Shah) and will not, in any way, prevent Israel from operating with a free reign throughout the region.
This goal can only be achieved through outside intervention (war), because virtually, the entire Iranian population - from the hardliners in the reactionary regime to reformists in the Green Movement working for a more open society - are united in support of Iran's right to develop its nuclear potential and to be free of outside interference.
What the neo-conservatives want is a pliant government in Tehran, just like we used to have, and the only way to achieve this, they believe, is through war.
At this point, it appears that they may get their wish.
The only alternative to war is diplomacy, and diplomacy, unlike war, seems to be no longer on the table.
At a fascinating Israel Policy Forum (IPF) this week, Barbara Slavin, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a longtime journalist and author who specialises on Iran, noted that the Obama administration has spent a grand total of 45 minutes in direct engagement with the Iranians.
Forty-five minutes! Just as bad, the administration no longer makes any effort to engage.
This is crazy.
Of course, there is no way of knowing if the Iranian regime wants to talk, but what is the harm of trying?
If they say no, they say no.
If we talk and the talks go nowhere, then at least we tried. But we won't try out of fear of antagonising campaign donors who have been told that the alternative to war is the destruction of Israel.
(Thanks to those same donors, Congress is utterly hopeless on this issue.)
So, instead of pursuing diplomacy, we are inching closer toward war.
At IPF, Slavin predicted what the collateral results of an attack on Iran would be:
What's the collateral damage?
Oh my lord. Well, you destroy the reform movement in Iran for another generation because people will rally around the government; inevitably they do when country is attacked.
People always talk about the Iranians being so irrational and wanting martyrdom. That's bull. They're perfectly happy to fight to the last Arab suicide bomber. But they don't put their own lives on the line unless their country is attacked.
So, you know, they would rally around the government and that would destroy the reform movement. And of course the price of oil would spike.
The Iranians will find ways to retaliate through their partners like Hezbollah and Hamas.
I think the Israelis would have to attack Lebanon first, to take out Hezbollah's 40,000 rockets.
It's not just a matter of a quick few hops over Saudi Arabia and you hit Natanz, you know, and a few other places.
That's why the Israelis want the United States to do it, because they can't do it, frankly. The US does it? Okay, the remaining US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are sitting ducks.
Iran is already playing footsie with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
That will become much more pronounced.
They will perhaps attack the Saudi oil fields.
Slavin continues, but the point is clear.
An Iran war would make the Iraq war look like the "cakewalk" neo-conservatives promised it would be.
And for what?
To preserve the regional balance of power?
How many American lives is that worth?
Or Israeli lives?
Or Iranian? (It is worth noting that this week, Max Boot, the Council on Foreign Relations' main neo-con, wrote that an attack on Iran, which he advocates, would only delay development of an Iranian bomb.)
Nonetheless, at this point war looks likely. Under our political system, the side that can pay for election campaigns invariably gets what it wants.
There is, simply put, no group of donors who are supporting candidates for president and Congress based on their opposition to war, while millions of organised dollars are available to those who support the neo-con agenda. Pundits used to say: As Maine goes, so goes the country.
It's just as simple today: As the money goes, so goes our policy. MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Media Matters Action Network.
A version of this article first appeared on Foreign Policy Matters.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
|
44 |
|
9 |
Politics Rest of the World- US Drone Spying on Iran "shot down" invites reprisals
Updated: 05 Dec 2011
| Drone 'shot down' in Iran may belong to US |
|
NATO-led military force in Afghanistan says the unmanned aerial vehicle had gone out of control late last week.
Last Modified: 04 Dec 2011 19:36
|
|
| Iran's Fars news agency said the drone had been brought down after it violated the country's airspace [Fars website] |
A surveillance drone flying over western Afghanistan had gone out of control late last week and may be the one Iran said it had shot down over its own airspace, the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) has said.
"The UAV to which the Iranians are referring may be a US unarmed reconnaissance aircraft that had been flying a mission over western Afghanistan late last week.
The operators of the UAV lost control of the aircraft and had been working to determine its status," an ISAF statement said on Sunday. The statement was issued in Kabul and released to reporters covering an international conference on Afghanistan in the German city Bonn.
A US official told the Reuters news agency that there is "absolutely no indication" up to this point that the drone that crashed in Iran was shot down.
Iranian media reported on Sunday that its forces had brought down an unmanned US spy plane. "Iran's military has downed an intruding RQ-170 American drone in eastern Iran," Iran's Arabic-language Al Alam state television network quoted an unnamed source as saying on Sunday. The state news agency IRNA and the the semiofficial Fars news agency reported that the plane is now in the possession of Iran's armed forces. The Fars news agency is close to the powerful Revolutionary Guard.
Fars reported that the drone had been brought down through a combined effort by Iran's armed forces, air defence forces and its electronic warfare unit after the plane briefly violated the country's airspace at its eastern border.
The drone "was downed with slight damage. It is now under the control of our forces," Fars reported, quoting an unnamed military source.
The source warned that Iran's armed response would "not be limited to our country's borders" for the "blatant territorial violation".
Al Alam state television network reported the same news on Sunday.
Other 'downed drones'
Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, told Al Jazeera that Iran has made similar claims even as recently as July.
"It could be quite feasible but we don’t know yet.
What we do know is that in the absence of any diplomatic channels incidents like this can have tremendous repercussions, far greater then when there were some de-escalatory mechanisms in place between the United States and Iran."
In January, Iran also announced that its forces had downed two US drones after they violated Iranian-controlled airspace.
It said it would put the aircraft on display to the public, but there has been no indication it ever did so.
In June, Brigadier General Amir-Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Guards' aerospace unit, said Iran had shown Russian experts the US drones in its possession.
"Russian experts requested to see these drones and they looked at both the downed drones and the models made by the Guards through reverse engineering," he said.
Hajizadeh did not specify how many US drones were shown nor gave any details of the copies Iran was said to have made of the aircraft.
The US military and the CIA routinely use drones to monitor military activity in the region.
They have also reportedly used them to launch missile strikes in Yemen as well as in Afghanistan and in Pakistan's lawless tribal belt.
Iran holds frequent military drills, primarily to assert an ability to defend against a potential US or Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities.
Iran is locked in a dispute with the US and its allies over Tehran's disputed nuclear programme, which the West believes is aimed at the development of nuclear weapons.
Iran denies the accusations, saying its programme is entirely peaceful.
|
|
|
Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
|
|
53 |
|
10 |
Politics Rest of the World- Putin's United Russian Elections-A story of Mass Violations and Fraud
Updated: 05 Dec 2011
Putin party suffers setback in Russia vote Partial results show United Russia with less than half of votes, as leader claims victory in legislative election.
Last Modified: 05 Dec 2011 02:17
Russia's central election commission has said Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's party leads the country's legislative elections with around 49.99 per cent of the vote, with over 75 per cent of precincts reporting.
Although the party chairman declared victory on Sunday night, the results represent a surprise drop in support for United Russia compared to the previous election four years ago when it won over 64 per cent of the vote nationwide.
Putin's United Russia party was ahead of the Communist Party, which was placed second with 19.35 per cent of the vote, the central election commission said on Monday.
The populist A Just Russia group was coming in third with 12.98 per cent while the ultra-nationalist Liberal Democratic Party polled 11.8 per cent.
"We are watching and hope that we shall get a majority of the mandates in the Duma," Boris Gryzlov, head of the United Russia party's supreme council, told reporters. "We can say that United Russia remains the ruling party."
Russia's Communist Party denounced the elections after polls closed,
saying "mass fraud" has turned them into a "war zone".
"We have received thousands of calls from regional offices,
confirming massive violations and fraud,"
said deputy head of the Communist party, Ivan Melnikov.
"Even in difficult times, the people have declared that they believe in our potential to build a prosperous country," Putin said as preliminary results were released.
"It reflects the real set of moods in our country," President Dmitry Medvedev said, adding that the vote showed "democracy in action".
ELECTION COVERAGE
In Russia: The end of an era Putin regime faces resistance How to be in opposition in Russia United Russia's campaign
But early returns from the vote signal the ruling party may lose its current two-thirds majority that allowed it to change the constitution unchallenged, with a decline from 315 seats to around 220 in the Duma - lower house of parliament.
The drop reflects a sense of disenchantment with Putin's authoritarian course, rampant corruption and the gap between ordinary Russians and the super-rich.
"There is quite a subtle shift in the political mood here in Russia," Andrew Osborn, the Telegraph Moscow correspondent, told Al Jazeera. "This is the first sign things might be changing. People are not willing to put up with the total dominance of one party any more."
United Russia is followed by the Communist Party with nearly 20 per cent of the vote, according to two separate exit polls cited by Channel One and Rossiya television.
The All-Russian Public Opinion Research Centre said the opposition A Just Russia party would gain 12.8 per cent and the ultra-nationalist Liberal Democratic Party 11.4 per cent - with other parties not polling enough to make parliament.
A second exit poll by the Foundation for Public Opinion (FOM) predicted that United Russia would receive 46 per cent and the Communist Party 21 per cent, state television said.
Rigging allegations
Several parties on Sunday complained of irregularities aimed at boosting United Russia's vote count, including intimidation of voters and other accusations of unprecedented dirty tricks by the authorities.
In Vladivostok in the east, voters complained to police that United Russia was offering free food in exchange for promises to vote for the party.
Turnout was low in many areas was lower Sunday compared to the previous election.
The vote is seen as an important test of Putin's popularity, just three months before he is due to stand in presidential elections.
Only seven parties had been allowed to field candidates for parliament this year, while the most vocal opposition groups have been denied registration and barred from campaigning.
Al Jazeera's Neave Barker, reporting from Moscow, said: "The country's only independent election observer called Golos reported that more than 5,000 irregularities have been recorded, many of them connected with people pressured to vote mainly for the country's biggest and most powerful party, United Russia".
"There have been some skirmishes today in and around Red Square," our correspondent said. "The capital is on lockdown, and the police are looking for any sign of trouble, with more protests expected later on."
Speaking to Al Jazeera, Garry Kasparov, a political activist and former world chess champion, said: "All the other parties participating in this so called election are 100 per cent under the Kremlin's control.
"Voting for them is to vote for puppets in the theatre of the absurd."
In Video
About 30 opposition protesters gathered by the Kremlin screaming: "Your elections are a farce!" through loudspeakers. Twelve were detained by police, Reuters witnesses said.
Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov said his party monitors thwarted an attempt to stuff a ballot box at a Moscow polling station where they found 300 ballots already in the box before the start of the vote.
He said incidents of ballot-stuffing were reported at several other stations in Moscow, Rostov-on-Don and other areas. In the southern city of Krasnodar, unidentified people posing as Communist monitors had shown up at polling stations and the real observers from the party were not allowed in, Zyuganov said.
Golos, the country's only independent election-monitoring group, and two liberal media outlets said their sites had been shut down by hackers intent on silencing allegations of violations.
Golos said its "Map of Violations" website documenting reports of fraud was inaccessible due a cyber-attack and its email was paralysed.
Golos also said it was excluded from several polling booths in the Siberian Tomsk region.
Many election violations involved absentee ballots, Golos director Liliya Shibanova said. People with absentee certificates were being bused to cast ballots at multiple polling stations, he said.
Moscow prosecutors launched an investigation last week into Golos' activities after legislators objected to its Western financing.
Russian customs officers held the director of Golos for 12 hours at a Moscow airport on Saturday, seizing her laptop computer in what the group said was an attempt to stop it monitoring the election.
Russians voted across nine time zones across the 9,000km-wide country, with the first voters in far eastern regions going to the polls at 20:00 GMT on Saturday and voting stations closing at 17:00 GMT on Sunday in the enclave of Kaliningrad, wedged between Poland and Lithuania. Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
|
51 |
|
11 |
Politics- The War of Words against Iran -a casualty of the truth
Updated: 03 Dec 2011
The media war turns against Iran
Friday 02 December 2011
by John Pilger
On May 22 2007 the Guardian's front page announced: "Iran's secret plan for summer offensive to force US out of Iraq."
Writer Simon Tisdall claimed that Iran had secret plans to defeat US troops in Iraq, which included "forging ties with al-Qaida elements."
The coming "showdown" was an Iranian plot to influence a vote in the US Congress.
Based entirely on briefings by anonymous US officials, Tisdall's "exclusive" rippled with lurid tales of Iran's "murder cells" and "daily acts of war against US and British forces."
His 1,200 words included just 20 for Iran's flat denial.
It was a load of rubbish - in effect, a Pentagon press release presented as journalism and reminiscent of the notorious fiction that justified the bloody invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Among Tisdall's sources were "senior advisers" to General David Petraeus, the US military commander who in 2006 described his strategy of waging a "war of perceptions ... conducted continuously using the news media."
The media war against Iran began in 1979, when the West's placeman Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi was overthrown in a popular Islamic revolution.
The "loss" of Iran, which under the shah was regarded as the "fourth pillar" of Western control of the Middle East, has never been forgiven in Washington and London.
Last month the Guardian's front page carried another "exclusive" - "MoD prepares to take part in US strikes against Iran."
Again only anonymous officials were quoted.
This time the theme was the "threat" posed by the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon.
The latest "evidence" is warmed-over documents obtained from a laptop in 2004 by US intelligence and passed to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Numerous authorities have cast doubt on these suspected forgeries, including a former IAEA chief weapons inspector.
A US diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks describes the new head of the IAEA Yukiya Amano as "solidly in the US court" and "ready for prime time."
The Guardian's November 3 "exclusive" and the speed with which its propaganda spread across the media were also prime time.
This is known as "information dominance" by the media trainers at the Ministry of Defence's psy-ops (psychological warfare) establishment at Chicksands, Bedfordshire, who share their premises with the instructors of the interrogation methods that have led to a public inquiry into British military torture in Iraq.
Disinformation and the barbarity of colonial warfare have historically had much in common.
Having beckoned a criminal assault on Iran, the Guardian opined that this "would of course be madness."
Similar arse-covering was deployed when Tony Blair, once a "mystical" hero in polite liberal circles, plotted with George W Bush and caused a bloodbath in Iraq.
With Libya recently dealt with - "It worked," said the Guardian - Iran is next, it seems.
The role of respectable journalism in Western state crimes - from Iraq to Iran, Afghanistan to Libya - remains taboo.
It is currently deflected by the theatre of the Leveson inquiry, which the Telegraph's Benedict Brogan describes as "a useful stress test."
Blame Rupert Murdoch and the tabloids for everything and business can continue as usual.
As disturbing as the stories are from Lord Leveson's witness stand, they do not compare with the suffering of the countless faraway victims of journalism's warmongering.
The lawyer Phil Shiner, who has forced a public inquiry into the British military's criminal behaviour in Iraq, says that embedded journalism provides the cover for the killing of "hundreds of civilians ... by British forces when they had custody of them, [often subjecting them] to the most extraordinary, brutal things, involving sexual acts ... Embedded journalism is never ever going to get close to hearing their story."
It is hardly surprising that the MoD, in a 2,000-page document leaked to WikiLeaks, describes investigative journalists - that is, journalists who do their job - as a "threat" greater than terrorism.
In the week the Guardian published its "exclusive" about Iran, General Sir David Richards, Britain's highly political military chief, went on a secret visit to Israel, a genuine nuclear weapons outlaw that is exempt from media opprobrium.
No national newspaper in Britain revealed that he went to Israel to discuss plans for an attack on Iran.
Honourable exceptions aside - such as the tenacious work of the Guardian's Ian Cobain and Richard Norton-Taylor - our increasingly militarised society is reflected in much of our media culture.
Two of Blair's most important functionaries in his mendacious, blood-drenched adventure in Iraq, Alastair Campbell and Jonathan Powell, enjoy a cosy relationship with the liberal media, their opinions sought on worthy subjects while the blood in Iraq never dries.
For their vicarious admirers, as Harold Pinter put it, the appalling consequences of their actions "never happened."
On November 25, the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, the feminist scholars Cynthia Cockburn and Ann Oakley attacked what they called "certain widespread masculine traits and behaviours," demanding that a "culture of masculinity ... should be addressed as a policy issue."
Testosterone was the problem.
They made no mention of a system of rampant state violence that has created 740,000 widows in Iraq and threatens whole societies, from Iran to China.
Is this not a "culture," too?
Their limited though not untypical indignation says much about how media-friendly identity or issues politics distracts from the systemic exploitation and war that remain the primary source of violence against both women and men.
This article appeared in the New Statesman.
|
41 |
|
12 |
Politics Rest of the World-The US Defence Bill -$662 Billion to police the world and its own people
Updated: 03 Dec 2011
Senate gives Defence Bill green light
Friday 02 December 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
US senators ignored a presidential veto
by approving a massive $662 billion (£421bn) Defence Bill yesterday.
The Bill seeks to set in stone widely disputed and internationally discredited tactics by the US legal and military Establishment, some of which the White House has been gradually retreating from.
It would require the military to hold suspected terrorists supposedly linked to al-Qaida or its affiliates, even those captured on US soil, and detain some indefinitely.
The vote was 93-7 for the Bill authorising money for military personnel, weapons systems, national security programmes in the Energy Department and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the fiscal year that began on October 1.
The Senate’s version of the Defence Bill must still be reconciled with the house-passed measure in the final weeks of the congressional session.
The subject of an escalating fight between the White House and Senate Republicans, the Bill would increase the role of the military in handling terror suspects.
The White House opposes the provisions, saying that it cannot accept any legislation that “challenges or constrains the president’s authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists and protect the nation.” It insists that the veto threat still stands.
The Bill would require military custody of a suspect deemed to be a member of al-Qaida or its affiliates and involved in plotting or committing attacks on the United States.
US citizens would be exempt.
The Bill does allow the executive branch to waive the authority based on national security and hold a suspect in civilian custody.
The legislation would also deny suspected terrorists, even US citizens seized within the nation’s borders, the right to trial and subject them to indefinite detention.
The series of detention provisions challenges citizens’ rights under the constitution, tests the boundaries of executive and legislative branch authority and sets up a showdown with the Democratic commander in chief.
Civil rights groups fiercely oppose the Bill.
“Since the Bill puts military detention authority on steroids and makes it permanent, US citizens and others are at even greater risk of being locked away by the military without charge or trial if this Bill becomes law,” said Christopher Anders of the American Civil Liberties Union.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
37 |
|
13 |
Politics Rest of the World- 33 Latin American and Carribean States Alliance counter US power
Updated: 03 Dec 2011
Chavez lauds new Latin American alliance Venezuelan president, battling cancer,
appears energetic at founding of 33-member bloc meant to counter United States.
Last Modified: 03 Dec 2011 05:12 Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega called CELAC a "death sentence" for the Monroe Doctrine [EPA]
Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez has exuberantly hosted Latin American leaders in a bid to create a new regional body that is intended to counter the United States.
The Friday inauguration of the 33-member Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), which deliberately excludes Canada and the United States, was also Chavez's biggest moment on the world stage since he underwent cancer surgery in June.
The 57-year-old Chavez, who wants to win re-election next October, warmly welcomed other leaders, including Dilma Rousseff of Brazil, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Cuba's Raul Castro.
"As the years go by, CELAC is going to leave behind the old and worn-out OAS," Chavez said, referring to the hemisphere-wide Organisation of American States that leftist nations say is under Washington's thumb.
Chavez called the foundation of CELAC an achievement 200 years in the making, the realisation of the ambitions of independence hero Simon Bolivar.
"Only unity will make us free,'' Chavez said to applause at the opening ceremony. "This is the path: Unity, unity, unity!''
Al Jazeera's Dima Khatib in Caracas said the leaders were trying to send a message to the US that they are not Washington's "backyard anymore".
"For some of them, there might be a little bit of anti-Americanism but for many - and they have said it - this is just a very important step for them to be together," she said.
"Usually all these countries, whenevever they would have met, it would have been the US and Canada. This is the first time they're doing it without these two countries, and their aim is to foster regional integration."
Chemotherapy joke
The new group has lofty aims including the creation of a regional reserves fund for economic crises and a body for human rights monitoring.
But critics say it unnecessarily adds yet another acronym to the plethora of overlapping, "alphabet soup" organisations that already exist around Latin America.
Exuding joy at the event, Chavez spoke at length and even made light of his health problems - a sensitive issue that will play a role in his electoral fate next year.
"Whose bald head is the most elegant? Lula's or mine?" he joked of the chemotherapy treatment he and former Brazilian leader Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva have undergone.
Chavez also showed off the artistic skills he developed during his recuperation.
Argentina's Fernandez shed a tear when Chavez presented her with a large painting he did depicting himself with her late husband.
"It is the best picture I've ever painted," he said.
US disengagement
The countries of CELAC have nearly 600 million people and comprise the world's number one food exporter.
They have a combined GDP of about $6 trillion - roughly a third of the combined output of the US and Canada.
Cuba, suspended from the Washington-based OAS in 1962, is a CELAC member. Analysts say the new body shows the wish of Latin America and the Caribbean to move out of the shadow of Washington.
"This has been aided by a progressive disengagement from the region by the US since the end of the Cold War, allowing other countries - most notably China - to increase their footprint in primarily economic, but also political terms," said Robert Munks of global think tank IHS Janes.
Chavez's fellow leftists gave the meeting an immediate political slant.
"It's the death sentence for the Monroe Doctrine," said Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega, referring to a hated 19th- century US policy that many Latin Americans regard as justifying meddling in their region.
More conservative leaders, though, are believed to have watered down the summit's final declarations. The next meeting will be hosted by Chile's right-wing government.
'More patient' Chavez
The two-day summit was meant to be held six months ago to coincide with Venezuela's 200th anniversary of independence but was called off at the last minute as Chavez recovered in Havana following surgery to remove a baseball-sized tumor.
Chavez says he is cured after four chemotherapy sessions, although cancer specialists say it is too early to make such a call. Privately, people close to his administration say there remains great concern about the secrecy around his health.
"I feel good, but of course, slowly by slowly putting the brakes on," he said. "It's a new Chavez, more patient."
Chavez's health is the great unknown in the 2012 election. A newly united opposition believes it has the best chance yet of unseating him since he won power in a 1998 vote.
One opposition candidate, Maria Corina Machado, urged supporters to greet the CELAC leaders late on Friday with a noisy "cacerolazo" - the beating of pots and pans which is a traditional form of popular protest here.
Analysts said that right now Chavez looks a good bet to win in 2012, albeit by a narrow margin. He still has widespread support among the poor, while an economic upturn and heavy state spending have been fuelled by oil.
But they warned that many unknown factors - like his health and the strength of the opposition campaign - could change the picture before October 7. Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
|
40 |
|
14 |
Politics Rest of the World- Israeli Zionists crimes against the Palestinian people-a Crime of Racism
Updated: 02 Dec 2011
Delegates hit out at West’s protection for Tel Aviv
Thursday 01 December 2011
Cuba slammed the US and other Western states yesterday for shielding Israel from sanctions for its “crimes against the Palestinian people.”
In a UN general assembly session the Cuban delegates criticised the security council’s “passivity in relation to the zionists’ crimes against the Palestinian people” and said it wouldn’t turn a “blind eye” as certain countries had.
They called on the UN to recognise Palestine as a sovereign state.
The Cubans spoke out after UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon failed to condemn Israel’s “illegal actions and crimes against Palestine” on Tuesday, the annual UN day of solidarity with the Palestinian people.
Cuba co-sponsored United Nations resolution 3379 in 1975, declaring that “zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”
That resolution was revoked in 1991, but Cuba and 24 other states including Vietnam, Iran and Libya tried to keep it on the books.
|
37 |
|
15 |
Politics Rest of the World- Occupy USA - Harrassed and arrested by Police
Updated: 01 Dec 2011
Police arrest hundreds in midnight raid
Wednesday 30 November 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Nearly 1,500 police officers stormed the Occupy Los Angeles camp in the early hours of this morning, driving peaceful protesters from a park around City Hall and arresting more than 200 who defied orders to leave.
Similar raids in Philadelphia resulted in 52 arrests.
In both cities officers invaded the Occupy Wall Street encampments under cover of darkness as they began operations to close some of the longest-enduring protest sites since crackdowns ended similar occupations elsewhere in the country.
In LA riot police fired beanbags from shotguns to subdue the final three protesters in a makeshift tree house outside Los Angeles City Hall. No serious injuries were reported.
Officers flooded down the steps of City Hall just after midnight and started dismantling the two-month-old camp two days after a deadline passed for campers to leave the park.
Police in helmets and wielding batons and guns with rubber bullets converged on the park from all directions with military precision and began making arrests after issuing several orders to leave.
There were no injuries and no drugs or weapons were found during a search of the emptied camp.
The raid in Los Angeles came after demonstrators with the movement in Philadelphia marched through the streets upon being evicted from their site.
More than 40 protesters were arrested after refusing to clear a street northeast of City Hall, said Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey.
They were lined up in handcuffs and loaded on to buses.
Six others were arrested earlier after remaining on a street that police tried to clear.
Members of the National Lawyers guild had legal observers on hand.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
35 |
|
16 |
Politics Rest of the World- CLAIMING DATE 23rd NOV. Rally for Palestine- Palestine in Parliament
Updated: 17 Nov 2011
Rally for Palestine: Palestine in Parliament
this Wednesday 23rd November
You can book online for our inspiring evening rally following the Lobby of Parliament,
from 6.30-8pm.
Join some of the the most committed activists in the UK to hear from Palestine’s Ambassador
to the UK and some of the best MPs in Parliament. Don't miss it!
Book now>>
National Lobby of Parliament for Palestine - have you signed up yet?
PSC, CAABU, JfJfP, Amos Trust, Friends of Sabeel, Israeli Committtee Against House Demolitions, Friends of Al Aqsa, Liberal Democrat Friends of Palestine, PCS and Unite unions are all supporting the National Lobby of Parliament for Palestine – are you?
What you can do: 1. Email your MP asking for a meeting>>
2. Come to Parliament next Wednesday between 2pm and 6pm (if you come to the visitors' entrance at Parliament you will find us there and we will be happy to prepare you for the day).
3. Read more information about the lobby and how you can get involved>>
Hanna Braun 1927-2011
PSC is saddened by the death of key Palestinian solidarity activist and PSC member, Hanna Braun: read Hanna's obituary here>>
|
52 |
|
17 |
Politics Rest of the World- Is a Holy WW3 imminent ?
Updated: 16 Nov 2011
Danger of war grows by the day
Tuesday 15 November 2011
by Jeremy Corbyn
It's beginning to feel awfully like November 2002 - just substitute "Iraq" for "Iran."
We've seen persistent claims of Iran's development of weapons of mass destruction, endless media comment on what may or may not happen and military analysis of what a bombing campaign would look like and how it could be achieved.
Just like in 2002, there is already a huge US naval deployment in the gulf, British troops are in the area and Nato, fresh from its "triumph" in Libya, stands ready to offer itself for military action.
Also, again a parallel with Iraq, there are huge and wholly legitimate concerns about human rights in Iran including the treatment of minorities, trade unionists and women.
What is less frequently reported by the media is the growing strength of opposition forces in Iran and some of the successes they have achieved.
The media has also mainly ignored tensions between President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government and the Guardian Council on the direction that the country should take.
The issues of nuclear power and nuclear weapons are inextricably linked.
It is impossible to have nuclear weapons and weapons-grade plutonium without a nuclear reactor that can produce enriched uranium, as well as the processing system that can further refine it.
In law, Iran clearly has the right to develop nuclear power, however environmentally unsustainable and dangerous that might be.
However, to develop nuclear weapons is clearly illegal within the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which Iran remains a signatory to.
The International Atomic Energy Authority has inspected and monitored Iran ever since it started developing a nuclear power facility and the most recent report indicated concerns over the production of quantities of enriched uranium.
This has led to speculation as to whether Iran is about to develop a nuclear weapon or not.
At its five-yearly review conference in 2010 the NPT signatories agreed, without dissent, to promoting a nuclear weapons-free Middle East which would include all countries in the region.
Most countries are already signatories to the NPT and therefore bound by law to refrain from developing nuclear weapons. With one exception - Israel.
The world came to know of Israel's nuclear weapons through the bravery of whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu and since then, Israel's ability to manufacture nuclear weapons and a delivery system to target them, have been developed and enhanced.
Thus the attempt at a nuke-free Middle East is a significant development.
To ensure no country develops nuclear weapons, Israel must join the discussions to cease the rush toward the possession of nuclear armaments in the region.
This cannot be done within the framework of the NPT as Israel is not a signatory, and as a possessor of nuclear weapons out with the treaties arrangements, it cannot join.
Therefore the only option is an international nuclear weapons' convention, which is what was envisaged at the end of the 2010 review conference.
However, none of this works in isolation.
The US has made huge military deployments within the region and successive statements by Nato and US officials about the possibility of war with Iran make the situation ever more dangerous.
Britain has a special role in this. As a 19th century colonial power it constantly sought to undermine Iran and following the discovery of oil it established the Anglo-Persian Oil Company which later became British Petroleum under state ownership from 1909.
Britain made huge amounts of money out of Iran's oil, but after the Iranian people elected the nationalist government in 1952, Britain conspired with the US to mount a coup which overturned the will of the people and established the Shah in power.
He then ruled with great brutality with the support of an aggressive secret service until the Islamic revolution in 1979.
We would do well to understand that the popular feeling about Britain in Iran is far from sympathetic, owing to our colonial past within the region.
While there are huge political differences within Iran, an external attack is likely not to exacerbate those.
Rather it would bring about an enormous sense of national unity against external aggression.
The dangers are huge and increasing. In the current febrile atmosphere of US politics there seems to be a cavalier approach to defence issues among the Republican candidates.
Most support waterboarding as a legitimate form of torture against suspects and in a recent debate most candidates supported military action against Iran, with the exception of Ron Paul who said "it's not worthwhile to go to war."
Barack Obama has demonstrated that apart from his opposition to the Iraq war in 2003, before his election to the senate, he has been just as prepared as George W Bush to act illegally in targeted assassinations of perceived opponents and in the continuation of the travesty of international law at Guantanamo Bay.
The danger is that the US presidential debate will degenerate into name-calling between Obama and whoever the Republican candidate turns out to be and the US will be goaded into the diversion of yet another foreign war.
The most likely source of an attack on Iran is not necessarily an overt Nato/US operation but Israel acting as a proxy.
The numerous meetings Liam Fox and Adam Werrity had with the Israeli military and their unabashedly staunchly zionist approach to Israel's relations with the rest of the region, increased the concerns even more.
Werrity for example, is reported by Craig Murray, former ambassador and now human rights activist, to have told the Israeli government that Britain supported plots against Ahmadinejad, which would therefore directly implicate Britain in the further degeneration of relations with Iran.
There has to be a different way. Surely we have learned the lessons of 10 years of occupation of Afghanistan, with desperate poverty, appalling abuses of human rights especially of women and children, the protected power of the warlords and the damage and destruction to the lives of poor people.
The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have cost the British taxpayer £9 billion and left behind a residue of pollution, corruption, violence and danger from unexploded weapons and depleted uranium.
To commit human rights abuses in the name of eliminating someone else's human rights abuses is hardly a way forward.
In reality, it is popular movements from within that change societies and not external aggression which profits the arms companies and weapons suppliers.
Opposition to the danger of a war with Iran needs to be mobilised and support given to organisations such as the Stop the War Coalition, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, which has established a serious campaign throughout the Middle East to bring about a nuclear weapons-free region.
Ever since September 11 2001 the Western public has been fed an unrelenting diet of opinion that only military power solves any problem.
The dead might be in flag-draped coffins or they might be lying by a roadside in Iraq or Afghanistan but they are all lives lost, families bereaved and hopes wrecked.
That is what war leaves behind - and that's why we should be promoting dialogue and peace with Iran, not reaching once again for the gun to start another conflict.
Jeremy Corbyn is Labour MP for Islington North
|
63 |
|
18 |
Politics Rest of the World- Syria-Assad- Murderer most foul- but with who is on his side
Updated: 16 Nov 2011
Turkish PM says Syria on 'knife edge' Scores of people reported killed over the past 24 hours in one of the country's bloodiest days of violence. Last Modified: 15 Nov 2011 23:53 Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey's prime minister, has increased pressure on Damascus over its crackdown on protesters, warning President Bashar al-Assad that Syria is on a "knife edge".
Erdogan said he no longer had confidence in the Syrian regime, saying Assad's actions threatened to place him on a list of leaders who "feed on blood".
Turkey also threatened to cut electricity supplies to neighbouring Syria if the violence did not stop.
"Right now, as of Tuesday, we are supplying electricity there [to Syria], but if this course continues, we may have to review all of these decisions," Taner Yildiz, Turkey's energy minister, said.
Al Jazeera's Rula Amin, reporting from Beirut, the Lebanese capital, said she spoke to an opposition activist who told her it was the Syrian people who would be affected the most if Turkey cut electricity to Syria "so he [the opposition activist] didn't get what type of logic was behind it".
Turkey's warnings come as at least 70 people were killed in violence across Syria over the past 24 hours, in one of the bloodiest days since an anti-government uprising began eight months ago, activists said.
The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Tuesday that 27 civilians had been shot dead by security forces, and that 34 soldiers, as well as 12 suspected army deserters, were killed in clashes.
Most of the victims were killed in the southern flashpoint province of Deraa, the observatory said in a statement.
"Twenty-three people were shot dead by security forces posted along the road between the towns of Kherbet Ghazale and Hirak," the statement said.
At least four other civilians were killed by security force fire in the city of Homs, a protest hub in central Syria, the rights group reported.
Syrian state television reported on Tuesday that the government had released 1,180 prisoners.
The prisoners released "were described as having no blood on their hand," Amin said.
Human rights activists inside Syria told our correspondent that "there are about 30,000 prisoners still in jail in Syria so this number is a drop in the bucket".
Russian stance 'shameful'
A delegation from the main Syrian opposition bloc, the Syrian National Council (SNC), visited Moscow on Tuesday for talks with Russian diplomats.
Burhan Ghalioun, the Paris-based head of the SNC who led the delegation, said: "The Russian foreign minister has confirmed the need for an Arab initiative because decisions by the ministerial meeting of the Arab League uphold the Arab peace initiative and don't contradict it."
Russia has repeatedly opposed Western efforts to impose sanctions against its traditional Middle Eastern ally over its lethal crackdown, insisting on the need for dialogue.
Al Jazeera's Nisreen el-Shamayleh, reporting from the Jordanian capital, Amman, spoke to activists who told her they consider the position of Russia "shameful".
"They also said that there are reports that early on Tuesday a new shipment of tanks arrived at the Port of Latakia in Syria and that it could be traced back to Russia," El-Shamayleh said.
The latest developments come ahead of an Arab League meeting in Cairo on Wednesday where the bloc is expected to suspend Syria’s membership over the government’s crackdown.
However, late on Tuesday the official Syrian news agency reported that Syria would not be sending a representative to the Arab League meeting, ensuring Syria's suspension from the bloc.
Embassies stormed
A Jordanian official said on Tuesday that his country's embassy in Damascus was attacked after Jordan's king criticised Assad over the crackdown.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Kayed said about 100 demonstrators gathered outside the embassy on Monday after King Abdullah told the BBC that Assad should step down.
Three protesters scaled the embassy fence and took down the Jordanian flag, Kayed said on Tuesday. He said that no one entered the embassy, nor were there any injuries.
Erdogan also urged Assad to punish those responsible for attacks on Sunday on Turkish diplomatic missions in Syria.
Addressing Assad by his first name, Erdogan said: "Bashar, you who have thousands of people in jail, must find the culprits and punish them."
Our correspondent said: "This [remark] is not coming out of the blue we are seeing pressure mounting from all sides."
The UN says at least 3,500 people have been killed in Assad's crackdown on the protests and human rights groups say security forces have carried out killings and torture which constitute crimes against humanity.
Authorities blame armed groups for the violence, saying at least 1,100 soldiers and police have been killed since the uprising broke out in March. Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
|
44 |
|
19 |
Politics Rest of the world- China -Dialogue not Sanctions with Iran
Updated: 12 Nov 2011
China: No more Iran sanctions
Friday 11 November 2011
by Tom Mellen
Beijing rebuffed Western demands for more United Nations sanctions against Iran yesterday, insisting that they wouldn't "fundamentally resolve" the nuclear issue.
Calls for further punishment of the country have grown louder since the International Atomic Energy Agency said this week that Iran had conducted experiments relevant to developing nuclear weapons.
But Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said that "dialogue and co-operation are the only effective approaches" to end the standoff over Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology.
He emphasised that China, which can veto UN security council resolutions, wants to work with the international community to bring about a peaceful resolution.
And US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta conceded on Thursday that a US attack on Iran could have "unintended" consequences.
"Those consequences could not only really deter Iran from what they want to do, but more importantly, it could have a serious impact in the region and it could have a serious impact on US forces in the region," he said.
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on the same day that "anybody who takes up the idea of an attack on Iran should get ready to receive a strong slap and an iron fist."
He told officers at a Tehran military academy: "The enemies, particularly the United States and its pawns and the zionist regime, should know that the Iranian nation does not seek to invade any country or nation.
"But Iran will strongly respond to any invasion or attack with such power and in a way that the aggressors and invaders will be smashed from the inside."
Meanwhile France's Communists condemned Israel and its Western allies for singling out Iran for sanctions while turning a blind eye to Israel's nuclear arsenal.
The French communist Party said in a statement that a lasting solution to the problem of nuclear weapons in the Middle East "can only lie in the negotiation, the spirit of collective responsibility and the will to achieve genuine disarmament, in connection with the resolution of conflicts, including the Palestinian question."
|
37 |
|
20 |
Politics Rest of the World- Western leaders gang up against UN Palestine Statehood
Updated: 12 Nov 2011
UN vote on Palestinian state put off amid lack of support
Palestinians to decide whether to press statehood issue after mustering only eight of nine votes needed to win approval
Chris McGreal in Washington
guardian.co.uk,
A Palestinian boy holds a picture reading in Arabic, "it is our right to have a state", as he stands in front of Israeli troops on Friday.
The UN security council on Friday put off a decision on admitting Palestine as a state while the Palestinian leadership considers whether to press for a vote it is all but certain to lose.
The UN went through the ritual of adopting a confidential report from the admissions committee – which is the security council in another guise – that was unable to reach a common position on whether to recognise a Palestinian state in the face of strong US opposition.
But a vote was put off while the Palestinians decide whether to press the issue after concluding that they do not have enough support in the security council even to claim a moral victory in the face of a US pledge to veto recognition of a state.
The Palestinians appear able to muster only eight of the nine votes they need to win approval after France joined Britain in saying it would abstain even though Paris last week backed recognition of a Palestinian state by Unesco.
That would save the US having to wield its veto and deny the Palestinians the moral victory they hoped to take to a UN general assembly vote where they are expected to win the lesser position of enhanced observer status.
One option under consideration by the Palestinians is to force the vote anyway and let the US, Britain and France, among other countries, explain why they have not supported it.
But there is also a view within the Palestinian Authority that it may be better to go direct to the general assembly where support is assured and they will avoid antagonising the US and Europe.
One diplomatic source at the UN said he expects that there will be no decision on the next move until the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, meets the Arab League on Wednesday.
The Portuguese ambassador, José Filipe Moraes Cabral, who is the security council president, suggested that it was in no hurry to get to a vote. He said the council faces a "very busy workload" and has yet to decide when it will meet to discuss the application.
"We're consulting with other members of the council and other interested parties and then we'll see the way forward," he said.
The eight security council members expected to back the Palestinian bid are Russia, China, South Africa, India, Brazil, Lebanon, Nigeria and Gabon.
Britain and France say they will abstain on the grounds that recognition of a Palestinian state at this time would undermine the prospects for a negotiated political solution.
Critics have accused the two security council permanent members of effectively siding with Israel because the peace process is dead in the water. Colombia, Portugal, Bosnia and Germany are also not expected to support the Palestinian application.
|
38 |
|
21 |
Politics Rest of the World- Nicaraguan Ortega- a reward for a lifetime of struggle
Updated: 09 Nov 2011
Daniel Ortega wins landslide victory
Tuesday 08 November 2011
by Tom Mellen
Nicaraguan citizens have re-elected left-wing President Daniel Ortega by a landslide, election authorities confirmed on Monday.
Supreme Electoral Council President Roberto Rivas announced that Mr Ortega of the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) won Sunday's elections with a massive 63 per cent of the vote.
"The will of the Nicaraguans spoke through the mouth of the ballot box," Mr Rivas said, congratulating Mr Ortega on his re-election for another five-year term of office.
Independent Liberal Alliance (PLI) candidate Fabio Gadea came second with 31 per cent, followed by Liberal Constitutionalist Party candidate Arnoldo Aleman who got 6 per cent.
The FSLN-led Nicaragua Triumphs election alliance also won a majority in the national assembly, winning 62 per cent of the total seats.
Just 37 per cent of votes cast went to the opposition parties, some of which are now alleging that the elections were tainted by fraud.
But the Washington-based Organisation of American States, which sent an observer mission, said the election had been fair.
"Despite certain predictions of possible tensions and acts of violence the maturity of the Nicaraguan people marked the peaceful character with which the general elections closed on Sunday," OAS secretary general Jose Miguel Insulza said.
Mr Ortega led the Sandinista movement that overthrew US-backed dictator Anastasio Somoza in 1979.
The FSLN went on to establish a socialist-oriented government that launched a radical land reform programme, poverty alleviation projects and literacy campaigns - all while fending off a bloody insurgency sponsored by the Reagan government in the US.
The decade-long right-wing uprising killed around 30,000 people and hindered the FSLN's efforts to alleviate poverty and develop the national economy.
The FSLN government won a formal democratic mandate in 1984 elections but was defeated after one term in 1990 before returning to power in 2007.
The Congress of South African Trade Unions congratulated Nicaragua Triumphs today on its election win. "Leaders like Daniel Ortega prove that there is an alternative route for the developing south, to escape from the clutches of the rich and powerful ruling elites of the developed north," it said.
|
41 |
|
22 |
Asia Other - Tibet - A cry for help
Updated: 08 Nov 2011
Tibet's cry for help
Tuesday, 8 November, 2011 0:36
From:
This sender is DomainKeys verified
Dear friends,
Days ago, Palden Choetso set herself alight and died. In the past month, nine Buddhist monks and nuns have self-immolated to protest a growing Chinese crackdown in Tibet. These tragic acts are a desperate cry for help -- and we can answer their call. China restricts access to the region, but if we can persuade six key governments with close ties to China to send diplomats to the area, it will expose this escalating repression, and save lives. Sign the urgent petition now!
|
Days ago, Palden Choetso walked out of her nunnery, covered herself in petrol and set herself on fire while pleading for a 'free Tibet'.
Minutes later she died.
In the past month, nine monks and nuns have self-immolated to protest a growing Chinese crackdown on the peaceful Tibetan people.
These tragic acts are a desperate cry for help. Machine gun-toting Chinese security forces are beating and disappearing monks, laying siege to monasteries, and even killing elderly people defending them -- all in an effort to suppress Tibetan rights.
China severely restricts access to the region.
But if we can get key governments to send diplomats in and expose this growing brutality, we could save lives.
We have to act fast -- this horrific situation is spiraling out of control behind a censorship curtain.
Over and over we have seen that when diplomats themselves bear witness to atrocities, they are motivated to act, and increase political pressure.
Let’s answer Palden's tragic cry and build a massive petition to the six world leaders with the most influence in Beijing to send a mission to Tibet and speak out against the repression. Sign the urgent petition: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_tibetan_lives/?vl Tibetans are suffocating under China’s stranglehold.
They are unable to practice their religion freely -- just downloading a photograph of the Dalai Lama can land a Tibetan in prison.
And it is getting worse as columns of Chinese troops have blockaded the largest monasteries and are abducting monks into "patriotic re-education" programmes. This horrific situation is spiraling out of control.
Since the beginning of the year, eleven monks and nuns have set themselves alight and with every protest China tightens its grip.
For Tibetans, self-immolations are a very severe sacrifice that reveal their level of despair.
They believe that committing suicide has a devastating impact on the cycle of re-incarnations and may even put you back 500 lifetimes. But Tibet's situation is so horrific that monks and nuns are forfeiting their positions in the cycle in exchange for the hope of international attention and freedom for their brothers and sisters.
The Chinese government won't allow journalists and human rights monitors into the region -- just days ago Sky news and AFP journalists were forced out. But diplomats can request access and get in.
And, as we have recently seen in Syria, they are the best way to get firsthand reports, let China know that the world is watching and start high-level political conversations on Tibetans’ human rights. It’s up to us to raise the global alarm. If we can get the US, UK, Australia, India, France and the EU to send a delegation now, they could push China to action. We have no time to lose -- sign the urgent petition: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_tibetan_lives/?vlAvaaz members have supported projects that are piercing the blackout and defending Tibetan culture and religious practice.
But China’s ruthless crackdown is escalating. It’s time for our whole community to take a stand together with these peaceful people sacrificing their own lives for basic rights.
Let’s show them that the world has not forgotten them.
With hope and determination,
Emma, Iain, Dalia, Ricken, Diego, Shibayan, Giulia, and the whole Avaaz team
|
100 |
|
23 |
Politics Rest of the World- Italians tell Berlusconi to go home ( to stay in bed?)
Updated: 07 Nov 2011
Rally puts pressure on Berlusconi to go
Sunday 06 November 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Tens of thousands of citizens from across Italy flocked to an opposition-organised protest in Rome on Saturday to press Premier Silvio Berlusconi to step down.
Democratic Party leader Pierluigi Bersani called on the billionaire media mogul to resign.
To roars of approval from the crowd in Piazza San Giovani he declared: "Berlusconi should go home.
"Either he goes alone or we send him home, in parliament or through elections. But he has to go home."
Mr Bersani said that his party was prepared to work with other opposition parties to lead a new government.
"We are ready to create a new government with the other opposition parties," Mr Bersani a crowd which included Socialist and social-democratic politicians from France and Germany.
Mr Berlusconi's grip on power has been weakened by the ongoing financial crisis and infighting in his right-wing coalition.
Six members of his People of Freedom (PF) party this week urged him to step aside to allow the formation of a broader coalition with the Union of Christian and Centre Democrats.
Italian newspapers reported today that a group of 20 PF politicians were poised to pull out of the governing coalition, which has seen its popularity plummet since it began imposing EU mandated "deficit reduction" measures.
Mr Berlusconi has promised a confidence vote on new legislation that Brussels wants his administration to implement.
The proposed measures include a privatisation spree, tax breaks for corporations and the "liberalisation" of shop opening hours.
|
50 |
|
24 |
Politics Britain- Immigration checks-Brodie Clark is May's whipping boy.
Updated: 05 Nov 2011
5 November 2011 Last updated at 10:19
Head of UK border force Brodie Clark suspended
Radical says:-
Clean Non EU immigrants are given ILR -(Indefinite leave to remain) after 10 years in any case.
Home Secretary May's problems are the EU immigrants she has little control over.
Most Non EU immigrants are non "white" and come on legal visa's which need renewing.
If May didn't put so many hurdles in their way many more would abide by her rules.
As it is she is nothing but a closet racist,anti immigrant and will do anything to restrict Non EU citizens from legitimately entering the UK or make it extremely restrictive and expensive
The head of the UK border force has been suspended by the Home Office following claims some passport checks were not carried out during the summer.
Brodie Clark also sits on the board of the UK Border Agency, of which the border force is part. Two other UKBA officials have also been suspended.
It is alleged staff were told to relax identity checks on non-EU nationals.
The Home Office is investigating. In July it said EU national checks could be reduced in "limited circumstances".
Senior UKBA official Graham Kyle, who is director of operations at Heathrow Airport, is one of the two others suspended.
Staff working for the UK border force are responsible for checking passports and conducting immigration raids.
In a statement, the Home Office said ministers had agreed in July that EU nationals could have their biometric passport checked "upon the discretion of a UKBA official" instead of automatically.
The border police are supposed to keep people out, not let people in”
End Quote Keith Vaz Home Affairs Select Committee chairman
In addition, European school children travelling with their families or in groups would not automatically be checked against watch-lists - known as the warnings index - aimed at flagging up those who may be "of interest" to the border agency.
The Home Office statement added: "Instead, Brodie Clark is alleged to have authorised UKBA officials to abandon biometric checks on non-EEA (European Economic Area) nationals, the verification of the fingerprints of non-EEA nationals and warnings index checks on adults at Calais."
BBC home affairs correspondent Tom Symonds said the mention of Calais referred only to the warnings index checks. The other checks were allegedly abandoned elsewhere.
He said the Home Office did not know the precise extent to which checks were relaxed.
'Cut corners'
Biometric passports contain a digital image of the holder's face which can be used to compare with the printed version and check the passport has not been forged.
Home Secretary Theresa May's reaction to the developments was "incredulity and fury", a source told our correspondent.
Mr Clark was at first offered the opportunity of retiring by the UK Border Agency, but, following the intervention of the Home Office, was suspended pending an investigation.
Two investigations have been ordered.
Labour MP Keith Vaz: "We will want to investigate this"
Dave Wood, who heads the enforcement and crime group at the UKBA, will carry out a two-week inquiry designed to discover to what extent checks were scaled down and what the security implications might have been.
Ex-MI6 official Mike Anderson, director general of the strategy, immigration and international group at the Home Office, will investigate wider issues relating to the performance of UKBA.
Our correspondent said one Home Office source had labelled the border agency a "massive problem".
Sue Smith, of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) Union, said job cuts had led to staffing shortages which forced rules to be relaxed in a bid to "give the travelling public what they wanted".
"The travelling public, understandably, want to have a fast and efficient service, and yet we are also under a reduced work force," she said.
Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper accused the government of making borders less secure, and said it needed "to get a grip of illegal immigration and border security fast".
The home secretary "needs to answer whether the cuts to 5,000 staff from the borders agency is increasing pressure on officials to cut corners on border security and illegal immigration", Ms Cooper said.
'Extraordinary' suspensions
Labour MP Keith Vaz, who chairs the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, said the allegations were "extraordinary" because they involved such senior members of UKBA.
An MPs' report published on Friday was critical of UK Border Agency performance
On Friday, the Home Affairs Select Committee reported that 124,000 deportation cases had been shelved by UKBA.
The cases had been "dumped" in a "controlled archive", a term used by UKBA to try to hide the fact that it was a list of lost applicants, the MPs said.
Ministers and the opposition blamed each other for the reported failings.
Mr Vaz said: "Only a day after the publication of our report, which concluded that the Border Agency continues to fail, we have this remarkable news.
"We will question the home secretary about this on Tuesday when she comes before the committee. If her answers do not satisfy us, I am sure the committee will want to conduct its own inquiry.
"The border police are supposed to keep people out, not let people in."
|
67 |
|
25 |
Politics Rest of the World- Syria- Assad the Butcher -Executing and Decapitating Protestors
Updated: 04 Nov 2011
Tank fire in Homs mocks Arab League peace deal
Thursday 03 November 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Syrian tanks mounted with machine-guns fired into crowds in the central city of Homs today - a day after the government said it had accepted an Arab League appeal to withdraw armoured vehicles from its streets.
At least four people were killed in the city's Baba Amr district, according to the opposition local co-ordination committees.
Wednesday's agreement committed the Bashar Assad administration to remove its armed forces from the streets, release all political prisoners and begin a dialogue with the opposition within two weeks.
The government also agreed to allow journalists, rights groups and Arab League representatives in to monitor the situation in the country.
Restrictions on independent reporting have left foreign journalists dependent on the government and opposition's accounts of each others' actions.
Anti-government forces remained sceptical, saying that even as the proposal was negotiated in Cairo gunmen were attacking factory workers in Homs's Houla district.
Local activist Majd Amer accused the unidentified gunmen of summarily executing 11 workers.
"Some of the men were decapitated and others were shot in the head, their hands tied behind their backs," he said, a claim which amateur videos posted on YouTube appeared to support.
Locals said they believed the killings were a revenge attack after opposition fighters dragged nine members of the Alawite religious minority, to which Mr Assad belongs, off a bus and shot them on Tuesday.
The Syrian government maintains that it is battling "armed gangs" acting for foreign interests.
|
43 |
|
26 |
Politics Rest of the World- Egypt - 5000 Protest over arrest of activist
Updated: 02 Nov 2011
5,000 Egyptians march against activist's detention
Tuesday 01 November 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Five thousand Egyptians marched through central Cairo on Monday to protest against the junta's arrest of a prominent blogger and activist.
Alaa Abdel-Fattah had been detained by the military a day earlier for questioning.
The junta says he is suspected of inciting Christian protesters to attack soldiers during an October 9 protest in Cairo that saw the bloodiest violence since the fall of ex-president Hosni Mubarak in February.
Mr Abdel-Fattah's supporters dismiss the claim, claiming that the military is trying to silence a prominent critic and to deflect blame from its soldiers for the violence, which left 27 mostly Christian citizens dead when troops cracked down on the protest.
In Monday evening's march the crowd shouted:
"Down, down with military rule" and "Alaa, we're behind you, don't stop" as they moved into central Tahrir Square before heading towards Cairo's main police station where Mr Abdel-Fattah is being held.
About 200 police formed a line around the station.
There were no clashes.
Mr Abdel-Fattah was apparently Egypt's first blogger activist, launching a blog years ago organising opposition to Mr Mubarak.
Since Mr Mubarak's overthrow he has been a vocal critic of the military's rule.
"Alaa is causing them trouble because he's been an activist for so long. He has many people around him he can influence.
They don't want this voice now," said protester Andy Ishaq, referring to the military leadership.
Like others on the march he wore a yellow sticker reading "I am against military trials for civilians."
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
43 |
|
27 |
Politics Rest of the World- Cuban Economy set to grow by 2.9%
Updated: 02 Nov 2011
Minister forecasts speedier growth
CUBA: Minister for Foreign Trade and Foreign Investment Rodrigo Malmierca announced today that the country’s economy is set to grow by 2.9 per cent this year, up from 2.1 per cent in 2010.
Mr Malmierca said there had been a 27 per cent increase in trade in the third quarter of the year compared to the same period last year.
The minister said that the economy was becoming more efficient as officials implemented measures to boost labour discipline and “correct planning errors.”
But Mr Malmierca warned that “deficiencies” were still hampering progress in “certain sectors.”
|
43 |
|
28 |
Politics Rest of the World- Does Assad need a pair of specs,or is he blind ?
Updated: 30 Oct 2011
Syria warns against foreign intervention President Bashar al-Assad tells a British newspaper
that any intervention in Syria would "burn the whole region". Last Modified: 30 Oct 2011 14:08
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has warned of an "earthquake" if the West intervenes in his country.
In an interview with Britain's Sunday Telegraph newspaper, Assad said international involvement risked transforming Syria into "another Afghanistan".
Assad's comments on Saturday came as reports emerged of heavy fighting and mounting casualties in the city of Homs over the past few days.
He also stressed Syria was key to keeping the peace in the region.
Assad has drawn repeated condemnation from the United Nations, Arab League and Western governments for the violent manner in which he has attempted to crush a seven-month uprising against his rule.
Assad said in the interview that Western countries "are going to ratchet up the pressure, definitely... but Syria is different in every respect from Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen", comparing his countries to others affected by 'Arab Spring' uprisings.
"The history is different. The politics is different. Syria is the hub now in this region. It is the fault line, and if you play with the ground you will cause an earthquake," he said.
"Do you want to see another Afghanistan, or tens of Afghanistans?
Any problem in Syria will burn the whole region.
If the plan is to divide Syria, that is to divide the whole region," Assad added.
'Not the stereotypical Arab dictator'
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Andrew Gilligan, the Telegraph journalist who met Assad, said the Syrian president seemed "reasonably relaxed, and quite personable" during their interview.
Andrew Gilligan talks to Al Jazeera about Assad
"He is not the stereotypical Arab dictator," said Gilligan. "He is not blustering, or aggressive."
When discussing reforms, Assad "said to me he had made a number of concessions already", Gilligan continued. "He said he announced several new laws."
On Sunday, Assad gave an interview to a Russian TV channel, where he said he expected continued support from Moscow.
"First and foremost, we are relying on Russia as a country with which we are bound by strong ties, in the historic perspective," he told Channel One.
"Starting from the first days of the crisis, we remained in constant contact with the Russian government.
We give a detailed account to our Russian friends of the latest developments."
The UN estimates that more than 3,000 people,
including nearly 200 children, have been killed in the unrest.
Since the start of protests in March, Syrian authorities have blamed the violence on gunmen
they say have killed 1,100 soldiers and police.
Syria has barred most international media, making it hard to verify accounts from activists and authorities.
'Inviting an intervention'
Louay Safi, a member of the opposition Syrian National Council,
said Assad has to understand that he is "inviting an intervention".
"There's only so much the world can bear in terms of force against unarmed civilians," he told Al Jazeera.
"If he continues on the same path, then he will be responsible for inviting an invention."
Safi said a no-fly zone "could be considered, but we would like to see first the Arab League, Arab countries and neighbouring countries starting to put more pressure on the government of Syria and tightening sanctions, both diplomatic and economic".
Assad said that Syrian authorities had made "many mistakes" in the early part of the uprising, but that the situation had now improved.
"We have very few police, only the army, who are trained to take on al-Qaeda," he said.
"If you sent in your army to the streets, the same thing would happen.
Now, we are only fighting terrorists.
That's why the fighting is becoming much less."
Assad said he had responded differently to calls for political change than other, now-deposed Arab leaders.
"We didn't go down the road of stubborn government," he said.
"Six days after [the protests began], I commenced reform.
People were sceptical that the reforms were an opiate for the people, but when we started announcing the reforms, the problems started decreasing.
This is when the tide started to turn.
This is when people started supporting the government," Assad told the Sunday Telegraph
|
42 |
|
29 |
Politics Rest of the World- The Jew or Zionists of America - a far right Republican pressure group
Updated: 29 Oct 2011
Is new Israel lobby bad for Jews? The Emergency Committee for Israel is an organisation that does not represent Jews,
but rather its Republican funders.
MJ Rosenberg Last Modified: 28 Oct 2011 15:38 In a recent poll, only three per cent of US Jews vote based on Israel rather than domestic issues
The Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI), a far-right Republican pressure group,
knows that it is still too early to roll out its full "Obama hates Israel" campaign.
However, considering all the money in its coffers, it has found a cause that serves its purpose just as well: assailing the Occupy Wall Street movement as anti-Semitic.
No matter that its evidence is the presence of a total of three lunatics in the Wall Street crowds in contrast to thousands of Jews (see this video).
It makes sense for ECI to libel a movement that threatens its wealthy donors' interests far more than Obama threatens Netanyahu's.
That is because ECI is not really about Israel. It is all about defending the political and economic interests of its millionaire donors by electing Republicans.
That means smearing Democrats who might raise its sponsors' taxes.
And it means lying about the Occupy Wall Street movement which defends working people and excoriates the one per cent Theodore Roosevelt called "malefactors of great wealth".
Republican support
How do we know that ECI's supposed devotion to Israel is nothing but a pretext for its defence of the GOP? (See this J Street paper on ECI, for example.)
Because the Emergency Committee for Israel consistently attacks Democrats as anti-Israel while praising Republicans as if they were virtual members of the Israeli military.
To date - in addition to its incessant sniping at the president - it has run ads for one candidate and against four.
Most recently, it launched a campaign to elect Bob Turner, the Republican candidate for Congress in New York who successfully campaigned to win the seat formerly held by Anthony Weiner.
ECI filled the airwaves with a video purporting to show that the Democratic candidate, Orthodox Jew David Weprin, was no friend of Israel because, as a Democrat, he was associated with President Obama.
In 2010, ECI ran similar ads against Pennsylvania Senate candidate Joe Sestak and three incumbent House members: Rush Holt of New Jersey, Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio and Glenn Nye of Virginia. Needless to say, all the candidates ECI targeted were Democrats.
And now, the group is virulently and incessantly attacking the people who are demonstrating against economic policies that exploit working people in favour of people who live off their capital gains.
Not exactly a surprise.
But it is still rather disgusting.
The group, in its never-ending exploitation of Israel to advance Republicans and right-wing economics, repeatedly sends the message that all American Jews care about is Israel.
No matter what the issue, the Emergency Committee for Israel, the Commentary crowd, and pretty much all neocons, convey to the public at large that American Jews are only concerned about an imagined "Jewish angle", as if we are some kind of unique enclave who live in the US but aren't really Americans.
Reinforcing stereotypes
Even if ECI and its allies believed its propaganda and were not simply exploiting genuine concern about Israel and anti-Semitism to advance a GOP agenda, it would be wrong to convey that impression.
That is because it reinforces the most virulent anti-Semitic canard that still circulates in this country: that American Jews are disloyal citizens whose primary allegiance is to Israel and not America.
God knows, there are organisations that do indeed put Israel first, but - despite their loud voices and political clout - they represent a tiny minority of US Jews. According to an American Jewish Committee poll, only three per cent of Jews cast their votes based on Israel - rather than on American issues.
ECI knows all that but doesn't care.
So what if it reinforces the ugly view that American Jews are bad Americans, so long as it succeeds in moving some votes and money toward the Republicans?
Making Jews look bad is not something it worries about.
Obviously it doesn't worry one of ECI's three board members, Rachel Decter Abrams, wife of the disgraced former Assistant Secretary of State Elliot Abrams.
Like Abrams, the other two board members are right-wing Republican activists: William Kristol and Gary Bauer.
Support for genocide
On October 18, Abrams wrote a blog post celebrating the return of Gilad Shalit.
However, rather than simply express joy and relief at the release of the Israeli soldier, she published a call for genocide against Palestinians. Read it.
Then, to make sure that the post would be seen well beyond the readers of one blog, Jennifer Rubin, a Washington Post columnist, tweeted it.
It is no surprise that Rubin, a former Commentary writer, has no problem with Abrams' call for genocide. But shouldn't the Washington Post have a problem with Rubin?
And on October 25, a Beirut newspaper headlined the story of Abrams' blog and Rubin's endorsement of it. The headline reads: "Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin promotes call for Palestinian genocide."
This story will have legs and its legacy will be an ugly one.
To put it simply, these neocons are bad for everyone - but especially for Jews.
It is almost as if reinforcing the ugliest and most libelous stereotypes about Jews is their goal.
To its credit, J Street has condemned Abrams and called on the ECI to kick her off their board.
But I would not go that far simply because I think that Rachel Decter Abrams and her call for genocide fits in well with ECI. She belongs there, along with Kristol and Bauer.
As for Jennifer Rubin and the Post, they represent a different kettle of fish.
One thing is certain: If the great Katherine Graham, publisher of the paper when it brought down Richard Nixon by exposing Watergate, were still around, Jennifer Rubin wouldn't be.
Does she really belong at the once-great Washington Post?
No, she doesn't. She belongs back at Commentary.
But the Emergency Committee for Israel is just another Republican organisation, and we do have a two-party system.
They are entitled to be right-wing Republicans - just so long as no one believes they represent Jews.
MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at the Media Matters Action Network.
You can follow MJ on twitter @MJayRosenberg
A version of this article previously appeared on Foreign Policy Matters, a part of the Media Matters Action Network.
|
41 |
|
30 |
Politics Rest of the World- Chile- Revolting Students- "Educational Apartheid"
Updated: 27 Oct 2011
Education in Chile
We want the world
A trial of strength between students and the government
Aug 13th 2011 | SANTIAGO | from the print edition
They’re the ones with the kryptonite
IT BEGAN on August 4th with the metallic clink of a few pots and pans.
By nightfall, thousands of people were on the streets of Santiago banging kitchenware, a form of protest last heard under the dictatorship of General Pinochet.
This time the cacerolazos, as they are called, are being staged in the name of educational Utopia—and in response to a cack-handed government ban on marches.
Chile’s school system is the least bad in Latin America, according to the OECD’s PISA tests, which compare educational attainment across countries.
But that does not make it good.
And the overall performance hides huge disparities.
Analysis done in Chile of the test results in the 65 countries that took part finds that it ranked 64th in terms of the variance of the results according to social class.
Rich pupils get good private education; poor ones are condemned to underfunded, dilapidated state-funded schools.
This “educational apartheid” as Mario Waissbluth, a campaigner, puts it, is widely blamed for the fact that Chile remains a highly unequal society, despite its dramatic progress over the past quarter of a century in reducing poverty.
“The kids from the posh suburbs study in those suburbs, go to university in those suburbs, get jobs as company executives in those suburbs and employ friends from the schools they went to themselves,” says Mr Waissbluth.
The centre-right government of President Sebastián Piñera agrees. Chile inherited from the dictatorship a voucher system under which the government pays money to the school of the parents’ choice.
In November the government unveiled a plan to increase the value of the voucher, especially for the poorest children.
As well as trying to attract better teachers to state schools, the government will set up 60 lycée-style “schools of excellence” aimed at bright children from poor families.
Students and teachers responded by demanding the abolition of all for-profit education.
After they staged big marches along the Alameda, Santiago’s main thoroughfare, Mr Piñera last month sacked his unpopular education minister.
The government also said it would draw some $4 billion from its reserve fund of windfall copper revenue to pay for better schools.
On August 1st the new minister, Felipe Bulnes, published new proposals.
He proposes to put the national government, rather than municipalities, in charge of state schools.
Any chance that this would settle the dispute was scotched when the government decided to ban protests in the Alameda.
The students have since twice marched anyway.
On August 4th breakaway groups of masked youths, with little apparent interest in learning, set up barricades, fought police and looted. Five days later the pattern was repeated.
But many of the student leaders appear articulate and reasonable.
For now they seem to have public opinion on their side.
A recent opinion poll gave Mr Piñera an approval rating of just 26%, the lowest of any president since Chile returned to democracy in 1990.
The students are unlikely to win their demand in full.
But they have damaged Mr Piñera, perhaps permanently.
|
46 |
|
31 |
Politics Rest of the World- Assad - Its your turn next- Protests inspired by Libyans
Updated: 22 Oct 2011
More deaths in Syria following fresh protests Protesters chant for President Bashar al-Assad to go, some inspired by the fate of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.
Last Modified: 21 Oct 2011 20:17
'Bye bye Gaddafi... It's your turn next', Syrian protesters in Lebanon tell Assad [Reuters]
Deaths have been reported during the latest protests in Syria, including up to 16 in the flashpoint central city of Homs, according to activist groups.
Two people were shot dead on Friday in Homs by security forces manning a checkpoint, while 14 more were killed as they participated in mass protests, the opposition Local Co-ordination Committees said.
Another civilian died when security forces opened fire on a funeral procession in the southern Deraa region, one of the focal points of opposition to Syrian President Bashar al Assad's government and two more people died in the central province of Hama, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
Some protesters drew inspiration on Friday from the death of Muammar Gaddafi, the toppled Libyan leader, as the country's opposition called for fresh protests in support of the Libyan people and against Assad's government.
"Gaddafi is gone, your turn is coming Bashar," protesters shouted on Friday in Hama. "Our souls, our blood, we sacrifice for you, Libya!" they chanted.
Syria's uprising has proved resilient over the past seven months in the face of a fierce crackdown estimated to have killed more than 3,000 people according to UN estimates, but it has shown some signs of stalling in recent weeks.
In Qusair, near the Lebanese border, Syrian forces closed all mosques to prevent people from gathering. The weekly protests usually begin as Syrians pour out of mosques following Friday afternoon prayers.
Although the mass demonstrations in Syria have shaken al Assad's government, the opposition has made no major gains in recent months, it holds no territory and has no clear leadership.
But Gaddafi's demise has raised hope among protesters that Assad could be driven out from power by an "Arab Spring"-uprising.
Some held signs linking Assad's fate to those of other deposed Arab leaders. Tunisia's Zine el Abidine Ben Ali has been driven to exile, and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak is in prison and facing charges of complicity in the deaths of more than 800 protesters in his country's uprising.
"Ben Ali fled, Mubarak is in jail, Gaddafi is killed, Assad...?" read one banner.
Syria's protesters have taken other cues from their Libyan counterparts.
Syria's opposition formed a national council, in imitation of Libya's National Transitional Council, hoping they could form a united front against Assad that Syrians and the international community could rally behind.
Some protesters also called on their compatriots to take up arms and invited foreign military action, hoisting signs that say "Where is NATO?" and urging the world to come to Syria's aid.
For the most part, Syrian opposition leaders have opposed foreign intervention
|
53 |
|
32 |
Politics Rest of the World- Greece - Bankrupt but armed to the teeth
Updated: 22 Oct 2011
Bankrupt but armed to the teeth
Steve McGiffen
Nothing exposes the hypocrisy of those currently running the EU more than the recent discovery by French journalist Jean-Louis Denier that the Greek government is being encouraged to spend vast sums of money on a range of hardware which no-one needs and no sane person wants.
Having spent the last couple of years arguing that austerity is not the "necessary" policy response demanded by the financial and economic crisis, behind the scenes it isn't in any real sense austerity which is happening at all.
It turns out that throughout this crisis of Greek public debt - and under the direction of the same international potentates who are imposing spending cuts on welfare, pensions, health care, the public sector and all of the other usual targets - Greece's "socialist" government has continued to spend vast sums on armaments.
The fact that the principal suppliers of these arms are two of the biggest proponents of austerity, the US and Germany, should not surprise us.
We have moved beyond a situation in which lying by leaders is not so much accepted as expected, to one in which reality plays no role whatsoever in their discourse.
Greece may, in the estimation of politicians and the mass media, be a badly governed, corrupt kleptocracy populated by robber barons and a lazy, feckless class of reluctant workers.
But it is at least armed to the teeth.
The immediate cause of Greece's financial crisis was the doubling from 2005 to 2008 of the value of loans from Western banks to the country's government.
By the end of that period, these loans amounted to $160 billion (£100bn).
At the same time the "defence" bill of this relatively small, relatively poor EU member grew by a third in the five years to 2009 as it became the world's fourth largest importer of armaments.
This is a country with fewer than 11 million people, one of the world's lowest birth-rates and a negative growth rate.
With a GDP higher than Spain's it isn't as poor as sometimes assumed.
But its wealth is unequally distributed and it spends only 4 per cent of its annual budget on education, putting it 105th in a global league table.
Within the EU, only Slovakia spends proportionally less on schooling its people.
The Greek "defence" budget is even higher than this, at 4.3 per cent of GDP.
Such figures can be hard to credit - it's more than two millennia since any part of Greece was a superpower, yet its leaders prefer bombs to books.
So it's clear clear that the ever-increasing bail-outs are, directly or indirectly, consecrated to the purchase of arms. Year on year, Greece has been spending money it does not have on weapons it does not need.
According to a joint investigation by Greek and German justices, bribery of top Greek politicians, public officials and military leaders has been used to secure contracts.
The money to purchase these weapons is supplied by bank loans which come from the same countries which are supplying the arms, including the US, Germany and France.
Greece has splashed out about $3bn on French combat helicopters, $2 billion on US fighter planes and roughly the same figure on French Mirage aircraft. German submarines come in at nearly $6bn and the outlay on French combat helicopters is a trifling half a million or so.
This presumably exempts Greece from recent criticism from outgoing US Defence Secretary Robert Gates that Europeans don't spend enough on arming themselves.
Yet just what Greece is expecting to defend itself from is unclear.
Its old enemy Turkey is in fact gradually reducing its arms purchases and last year proposed an accord to Greece under which each would cut its spending on weaponry by a fifth.
Despite its financial crisis, Greece refused to agree to this.
Only in 2009 did Athens start to experience difficulties in paying for imported arms and at that point the EU began to show concern.
When it could meet the bill for the astronomical sums spent on weaponry which, mercifully enough, is for the most part unlikely ever to be used, no-one had a problem.
This puts into a strange new context the recent spat between Germany and the European Central Bank as to how best to help Greece to pay its debts without destabilising markets.
Every single aspect of this row serves merely to cover up the reality of a situation in which a middle-income country can no longer afford to provide the means whereby its people can lead decent, productive, satisfying lives, yet can spend billions and billions on instruments designed to bring other lives to a premature end.
In Greece, protests continue as a new round of cuts, amounting to around £4bn billion before the end of the year, is debated in the Greek parliament.
Deputies from the ruling former social-democratic Pasok are beginning to defect.
I was recently asked an interesting question by a young woman from the US who had been watching events unfolding in Spain.
"An uprising in a dictatorship has an easy solution, in a sense." she said.
"You can introduce parliamentary democracy and hope that this provides a platform for resolving grievances which everyone can respect.
But what happens if you have an uprising in a parliamentary democracy?"
I couldn't answer. But I suspect we may soon find out
|
53 |
|
33 |
Politics Rest of the World- Greece the People's Protest at Loan Sharks and Speculators
Updated: 22 Oct 2011
Greek unions set for more strikes
Friday 21 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Greek trade unions warned today of further strikes next week after parliament approved new harsh cutbacks amid mass protests that left one man dead and about 200 injured.
Civil servants' union Adedy secretary-general Ilias Iliopoulos said that the new law "will not be implemented," and accused the governing Socialists of ignoring popular dissent.
Greece's main private-sector union GSEE was also planning new strikes.
"We plan long-running opposition to ensure that the crippling cutbacks imposed by our loan shark predators are not enforced," said GSEE board member Stathis Anestis.
In a disturbing development, three Communist Party offices were firebombed in Thessaloniki early this morning.
It is not yet clear who carried out the attacks.
More than 150,000 people took to the streets of Athens on Wednesday and Thursday during a two-day general strike against the cutbacks.
Police arrested about 20 people during both days.
The new measures include further pension and state salary reductions, civil service staff cuts and a reduction in the tax-free threshold.
Greek ferry seamen, municipal workers and nurses were on still on strike today.
Greek MPs passed the deeply resented new austerity Bill today, caving in to the demands of international creditors.
The austerity measures won 154-144 in the 300-member parliament despite dissent from a prominent Socialist MP who voted against a key article of the Bill.
A 53-year-old construction worker died of heart failure after attending the mass rally, while 74 protesters and 32 police officers were hospitalised with injuries.
Several dozen more injured protesters received first aid from volunteer medics who set up a makeshift treatment site on Athens' main Syntagma Square.
Police said that they had detained 79 people suspected of violent conduct.
Former labour minister Louka Katseli voted against one article that scaled back collective bargaining rights for workers.
Although she voted in favor of the overall Bill, Prime Minister George Papandreou expelled her from the party's parliamentary group, whittling down his parliamentary majority to a bare three seats - down from 10 seats two years ago.
Passing the entire Bill was "a matter of national responsibility for the critical negotiations that lay ahead in the next few days," claimed Mr Papandreou in a statement announcing Ms Katseli's expulsion.
"The government exhausted every possible effort to incorporate proposals made by members of parliament."
Greece now heads into a series of negotiations in Brussels, but fury at the government echoed across Athens.
"That it was voted on is one thing. Its implementation is another.
The people will tear it apart, they will dismiss it in practice," pensioner Kleanthis Kizilis said at the protest.
"Papandreou doesn't know what is going on.
For me, it's the worst government of all time," said protester Haralambos Tahoulas.
|
52 |
|
34 |
Politics Rest of the World- Greece -The Western Vultures hover
Updated: 22 Oct 2011
Greece handed €8bn aid package lifeline but euro concerns remain
Greece was handed a lifeline on Friday night after international lenders finally released an €8bn (£6.95bn) aid package for the beleaguered country, kicking off a crucial weekend for the future of the eurozone.
Although the agreement will allow Athens to avoid imminent default, a report leaked at the Brussels summit on Friday night suggested the terms of the second Greek bail-out would have to be ripped up in order to stabilise the country.
The report – prepared for the troika of the IMF, European Central Bank and European Commission – suggested Greece’s economy has deteriorated to such an extent that lenders would have to find €252bn in loans by the end of the decade.
The release of the bail-out funds came as Angela Merkel sought to play down fears of a deadlock between Germany and France, insisting that a debt crisis resolution has been delayed by “technical details”, not disagreement.
Those disagreements are thought to focus, in part, on the size of haircuts Greek bondholders will be forced to accept. The report said that in order to return Greece’s bail-out to the €109bn size agreed in July, bondholders would have to take a 60pc haircut.
The German Chancellor told the Bundestag on Friday that a “second meeting” on Wednesday had been called to nail down details because it was “better to be safe than sorry”.
Mrs Merkel earlier told MPs any private bondholders will be forced to take a bigger hit in any new Greek bail-out, of up to 50pc. France, though, is keen to limit the “haircut” to 40pc because it fears a technical default.
Global stock markets rose sharply as traders “bought hope” that European leaders would deliver their promise of a “comprehensive and ambitious global response”. Germany’s DAX soared 3.5pc, while France’s CAC 40 and Spain’s Ibex each rose 2.8pc. In London, the FTSE 100 closed up 1.9pc.
A meeting of the eurozone finance ministers – the so-called Eurogroup – kicked off the weekend of talks in Brussels.
On the Greek bail-out, which needs to be approved by the IMF, the group said: “We have endorsed the disbursement of the next tranche of financial assistance to Greece .
The disbursement is expected to take place in the first half of November.”
Confirmation that Greece will not run out of money next month came with a warning from the finance ministers.
“We note the macroeconomic situation has deteriorated since the fourth review and that economic challenges remain large,” they said, adding a second bail-out remains necessary “to ensure debt sustainability”.
This will involve “additional new official financing and private sector involvement”.
There were no further public statements as talks went on into the night, heightening fears the summit has lost its purpose since Germany and France’s shock announcement that any agreement would be delayed until Wednesday.
Mrs Merkel, who is struggling to keep her coalition together on domestic issues as well as Europe, is bound by law to seek the Bundestag’s approval before finalising a deal.
Leaders around the world urged Europe to grasp the chance to resolve the crisis.
President Barack Obama led a video conference call with David Cameron, Mrs Merkel and French president Nicolas Sarkozy late on Thursday night.
China’s prime minister, Wen Jiabao, spoke with Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council.
According to China’s foreign ministry he called for action to stop the crisis spreading. Mr Jiabao added: “I’ve seen that Europe’s leaders have an ardent political will and I hope they can turn their political will into concrete and effective action .”
On Saturday, the Eurogroup talks widen to include finance ministers from all 27 EU countries, including George Osborne.
On Sunday, David Cameron will join the EU leaders’ summit.
The talks focus on a three-pronged plan: expanding the European Financial Stability Facility bail-out fund; recapitalising the banks; and pushing for greater economic integration.
Italy will be the major focus. Silvio Berlusconi is expected to commit to an ambitious set of austerity measures.
|
53 |
|
35 |
Politics Rest of the World- Syria- Going Libya's Way ? Next for the West ?
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
Col Gaddafi kiled:
Bashar al-Assad will be next to fall, declare Syrians
Opposition leaders in Syria predicted that President Bashar al-Assad would follow Gaddafi to become the next Middle East strongman to be deposed in the Arab Spring. Khaled al-Hariri By Richard Spencer, Middle East Correspondent
8:03PM BST 20 Oct 2011
Even as Libya’s National Transitional Council prepared to declare victory in the civil war last night, celebrating crowds spilt into the streets of the Syrian city of Homs, an activist in the country said.
“They are chanting that this is a day of cheer and hope,” a spokesman for the Syrian Revolution General Commission said.
“We are all very happy and we hope that this will happen to Bashar al-Assad next.
We hope that the Arab League will help us after this great achievement.”
Amr al-Azm, a dissident in exile in the United States who helped form the opposition Syrian National Council earlier this year said that Mr Assad should learn the lesson of those who had already gone.
Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali of Tunisia ran away earlier this year, and is now alive and in Saudi Arabia.
Hosni Mubarak struggled on until removed by the army, peacefully in the end, and is in prison and on trial. Gaddafi, as Mr Assad seems willing to do, fought with all the force he thought necessary, and lies dead.
“If I were a member of the regime, Bashar or (his brother) Maher, I would start to feel rather concerned,” he said.
“These dictators who won’t hand over power, this is how they seem to end up.”
10 Ways to Keep Your Bladder Healthy31 Dec 1969(Health.com)Unthinkable Poised to Happen on Wall Street.
Every twist in the brief history of the Arab Spring has given rise to yet more twists, from the moment a vegetable seller set himself on fire in protest at Mr Ben Ali’s petty officialdom and inequalities in Tunisia last December.
The uprising against Gaddafi was an immediate response to the fall of Mr Mubarak, and now his death will ripple across the region.
Mr Assad will be uppermost in many people’s minds, but President Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen, recovering from an assassination attempt himself, is still refusing to keep promises to do a deal to transfer power.
On Thursday, he made a fresh demand for assurances of his safety if he stepped aside.
Niger to Libya’s south is facing demands from Libya to hand over leading Gaddafi officials, including Saadi Gaddafi, his third son. Seeing the fate of his father will make him even more determined to resist.
Algeria, which has an uneasy relationship with the new government, has refused to surrender Gaddafi’s wife, Safiya, and children, Mohammed, Hannibal and Aisha, who also fled across the border.
Its leader, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, will be experiencing his own nerves. He owes his position to his own success in putting down a long and bloody Islamist uprising and has faced renewed protests this year.
The strong al-Qaeda cell in the south, —the reason Mr Bouteflika has support from the West and received William Hague this week — demonstrates the implications of the Arab Spring for security across the world.
Mr al-Azm says that even the fate of Gaddafi will not sway Mr Assad.
“He will not change a thing,” he said. “He will keep killing and killing — he doesn’t know anything else.
We hope we will one day find him in a hole too.”
|
57 |
|
36 |
Politics Rest of the World-Who killed Gaddafi ?
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
Qaddafi is killed, with bullet wound to the head
(People's Daily Online)08:15, October 21, 2011
Still image from TV shows Libya's fallen leader Muammar Gaddafi in Sirte, Libya, Oct. 20, 2011.
Muammar Gaddafi died of his wounds on Thursday, a National Transitional Council (NTC) field commander told Xinhua.
The allegation on Gaddafi's death has not yet been officially confirmed by the NTC. (Xinhua)
Muammar Qaddafi, the ruler of Libya for more than 40 years, was killed yesterday after hiding in a filthy drainage in his hometown city of Sirte.
However, the disturbing images of a blood-stained and shaken leader draged around by angry fighters prior his death led the world to wonder who pulled the trigger.
The Mideast television Al Jazeera showed footage of Qaddafi, bloodied but alive, as he was dragged around by armed men on the streets in Sirte.
Later, the TV network broadcast a separate clip of his upper body, partly stripped, with eyes staring vacantly and an apparent gunshot wound to the head, as jubilant fighters fired automatic weapons in the air.
A third video, posted on Youtube, showed excited fighters hovering around his bloody but motionless body, posing for photographs, and some fighters yanked his limp head up and down by the hair.
The exact circumstances of his demise are still unclear with conflicting accounts of his death emerging.
But the footage, possibly of the last chaotic moments of Gaddafi's life, offered some clues into what happened.
Gaddafi was still alive when he was captured. In the video, filmed by a bystander in the crowd and later aired on television, Gaddafi is shown being dragged off a vehicle's bonnet and pulled to the ground by his hair.
"Keep him alive, keep him alive!" someone shouts.
Gunshots then ring out.
The camera veers off
Qaddafi’s body was ultimately seized by a brigade of Misurata-based fighters who had been fighting in Surt.
A reporter accompanying Ali Tarhouni, a deputy chairman of the Transitional National Council who went to view the body, saw Qaddafi splayed out on a mattress in a reception room, shirtless, with bullet wounds in the chest and temple and with blood on the arms and hair.
“We have been waiting for this moment for a long time. Muammar Qaddafi has been killed,” Mahmoud Jibril, prime minister of the Transitional National Council, the interim government, told a news conference in Tripoli.
Libyan television also reported that one of Colonel Qaddafi’s feared sons, Muatassim, was killed in Sirte on Thursday, and broadcast images of what it said was Muatassim’s bloodstained corpse.
Officials of the Transitional National Council told reporters late Thursday that Qaddafi had been killed in a crossfire, when a gunfight erupted between his captors and his supporters — making the argument that he was not killed intentionally.
Forensics experts outside Libya who viewed photographs of the body said the wounds appeared to have been caused by handgun fire at close range.
In Washington, US President Barack Obama said in a televised address that the death of Qaddafi signaled the start of a new chapter for Libya.
“We can definitely say that the Qaddafi regime has come to an end,” he said.
“The dark shadow of tyranny has been lifted and with this enormous promise the Libyan people now have a great responsibility to build an inclusive and tolerant and democratic Libya that stands as the ultimate rebuke to Qaddafi’s dictatorship.”
In a statement from NATO’s Libya operations headquarters in Naples, Italy, Roland Lavoie, a NATO spokesman, confirmed that the alliance’s aircraft struck two armed Libyan military vehicles near Sirte, but the he said that NATO officers did not know who was in them.
“It is not NATO policy to target specific individuals,” he said.
|
49 |
|
37 |
Politics Rest of the World- Libya-One battle ends -Another begins today
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
Keeping Libya's promise after Gaddafi's death Gaddafi is dead, but the revolution lives on.
As one battle comes to an end, another begins today.
Larbi Sadiki Last Modified: 20 Oct 2011 23:29 Celebrations over Gaddafi's death mark the start of a new fight - to keep the spirit of the revolution alive
The Arab Spring, still unfolding, began with death.
But that is how life is laboured into this world.
And the significance and substance of new life can sometimes be commensurate with the "volume" of death, or the size and stature of the deceased.
Gaddafi was larger than life. He was a "prophet" of revolution, then pan-Arabism, and then pan-Africanism, gradually moving his amorphous programme of statehood from nationalism to transnationalism.
On the way, he littered his political history with unruliness, spreading his death squads far and wide, lending support in funding and arms to all and sundry, from Ireland to Chad.
The self-appointed "prophet", mentor, architect and non-president president of Libya, "king of kings" of all Africa, wanted a larger power ratio than that occupied by demographically sparse Libya.
He sought the mirage of power that would reflect the the country's huge surface area and the largesse beneath the Libyan Sahara, its reserves of black gold.
One thing stood in his way: his narcissism. It was bigger than even that of Narcissus himself.
That is why the death of Gaddafi unleashes huge potentialities and possibilities that will enliven the remarkable Libyan people.
Now it is their turn - after the thousands of deaths, injuries, the devastation, pain and suffering - to breathe life into the new Libya, the post-Gaddafi Libya.
But there are challenges.
Rationalising the revolution
There is no need for Libyans to reinvent the wheel.
The task now is to "quarantine" their passions.
Like their Egyptian or Tunisian neighbours, Libyans should not surrender their revolution. Indeed, the bathing water of this revolution has been bloody, and ought to be poured out, discarded.
The baby born from this process will need more than nursing: It will need many loving, but - above all else - "thinking", parents.
Today, they are tasked with laying down their weapons and their emotions to nurture their revolution, or risk the very life of the infant-revolution's condition.
New conditioning - post-conflict reconstruction - needs rational tutelage.
This needs to be rationality within Libyan specificity, and all of its complexities - tribal, regional, ideological, and even personal - must now measure to the challenge of life-giving in all its entirety.
Baby steps to democracy
This "rationality" must not guide the illusion of seeking absolute closure through unrealistic teleology. Democracy is always postponed.
It must be relativised. This would mean, in this instance, to search for a means to install a system of participatory governance through the following:
•To rationalise the revolution to ensure it turns to reconciliation at this moment.
Yes, there are other Gaddafis at large.
There are loyal clients, including tribes in the south.
Already there has been lots of blood spilled to enable the heroic Libyan people to snatch this victory.
Enough. There have been grave violations of human dignity, carried out by the rebels also.
Maybe that is the "collateral damage"' of all revolutions, which in their wake they victimise and kill before they can give life.
Libyans have even traditional instruments and forums for enacting reconciliation.
There are also existing experiences they can learn from (eg: from those in South Africa).
•To consider a form of deferential federalisation, which may be of use when seeking to empower tribes and regions. The moment calls for vertical and horizontal creativity in democratisation.
Gaddafi's death is a defining moment.
The definitional agendas must pay attention to participatory governance in ways that diffuses power, and to share it in order to build a reproducible centre.
•To frame a democratising road-map that integrates the revolutionary ethos with the pluralist ethos.
The Arab Spring geography will have to rationalise post-dictatorship democratic reconstruction by allowing parallelism. The revolution must be maintained as the realm of people's power: not a counter-power, rather a parallel power.
•The Euro-American model of apportioning and integrating power to enact legislative, executive and judiciary links in the chain of statism must be borrowed - with one addition: the link of peoplehood.
Legislators are implicated in the formal and top-down game of competitive party politics and power.
They rarely "represent" anymore.
They tend to obey the masters of finance, partisanship and ideology.
It will be one guarantor of wide and deep representation.
•Moreso than in Egypt and Tunisia, slicing the economic cake in Libya will have to be fairer than it has been in the past. Neither Egypt nor Tunisia has Libya's largesse.
Six million people sit on huge reserves of oil and vast tracts of land.
Theoretically, they have the potential to be amongst the richest people in this world.
Setting order to the Libyan house will require distributive justice, just as urgently as erecting durable, reproducible, legitimate, and popularly elected and contested civic bodies, watchdogs and institutions.
•To invest in human development so that the full potential of each Libyan can be released.
What we need are ways not only to regurgitate the lingo of "human development", the ubiquitous spouted cliché.
Rather, we need to encourage the Libyans to believe more in their capacity to measure up to this moment. Mubarak and Ben Ali bequeathed institutions of sorts, including parties and civil societies, even if fragile.
Gaddafi leaves nothing ... except a trail of mutinous tribes, progeny, and those tainted by his association.
This, unfortunately, includes even the likes of Mahmoud Jibril and other NTC members.
•To link this to the above, the work of the NTC must be limited to that of a caretaker administration and no more, rationally, soberly and collectively.
The NTC - and this is the political symbolism of Gaddafi's death - is now more than ever under the spotlight.
Who are its members?
What is the nature of any association they had with Gaddafi?
Are they apt to continue as they are without modestly and voluntarily explaining themselves to the Libyan people?
Accountability begins now - but through transparency, legality and honesty. The spectre of Gaddafi
Is Gaddafi dead?
He is physically.
The challenge now is to manage the legacy, to put to bed the question of what lives on and what dies with Gaddafi.
His progeny and his aides, including a certain Moussa Ibrahim, a former student of mine, are now either detained by the rebels or will soon be caught.
As one of Ibrahim's former mentors, all I can wish is to plead for a legal process of justice.
Kangaroo courts will complicate transition, not facilitate it.
Triumph through death is ephemeral, though justice and magnanimity it is lasting.
To an extent, there is partial closure in Gaddafi's death.
It spares Libya bloody showdowns and trials, which no matter how impartial are bound to be partial.
That is one advantage Libyans have over Tunisians, who must not digress in democratisation by seeking Ben Ali's extradition, and Egyptians whose own trials are imperfect - even if the cause of justice they seek is right.
There is probably a little of Gaddafi in every Libyan: anger, frustration, injustice, victimhood, and even hatred.
Now, as Gaddafi's body is laid to rest, so should all of these emotions. To let them take hold of "New Libya" would mean prolonging that residue of Gaddafi's rule.
To do so would be to give Gaddafi an undeserved lease of life.
The accounting [hisab] of Gaddafi's rule now begins by mortals, historians and rebels - and by his Creator. Gaddafi should have known better.
The Holy Quran (28:83) states: "That home of the Hereafter We assign to those who do not desire exaltedness upon the earth or corruption."
Gaddafi was guilty on both counts; of desiring exaltedness and of engaging in corruption.
He disobeyed not only God's will, but also the will of the Libyan people.
Libya lives on, deservedly free and proud - and forever sovereign through their glorious revolution.
But for them, too, the challenge is to institute a democracy that seeks neither self-glory nor returns to corruption and oppression.
Dr Larbi Sadiki is a Senior Lecturer in Middle East Politics at the University of Exeter, and author of Arab Democratization: Elections without Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2009) and The Search for Arab Democracy: Discourses and Counter-Discourses (Columbia University Press, 2004).
|
51 |
|
38 |
Politics Rest of the World- Libya- French Claim victory
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
French Air Power Begins, Ends NATO Campaign Over Libya With Sarkozy’s Help
By Gregory Viscusi and David Lerman - Oct 21, 2011 12:46 AM GMT+0100 . French Air Power Begins, Ends NATO Air Campaign Over Libya
Libyan rebels walk past wrecked military vehicles belonging to Muammar Qaddafi forces bombed by the French airforce in al-Wayfiyah 35 Km West of Benghazi on March 20, 2011.
Libyan rebels walk past wrecked military vehicles belonging to Muammar Qaddafi forces bombed by the French airforce in al-Wayfiyah 35 Km West of Benghazi on March 20, 2011.
.The NATO air campaign to oust Muammar Qaddafi began with French Mirage jets destroying a column of his tanks on the outskirts of Benghazi seven months ago.
Yesterday, it was a French Mirage jet that fired to block Qaddafi’s escape from Sirte in a four-wheel drive vehicle. Libyan fighters then moved in and killed the man who had ruled their country for 42 years.
The French involvement in the war’s denouement was symbolic of the leading role President Nicolas Sarkozy has played since Libyan rebels first sought outside help for their revolution.
While U.S. military involvement was “quite considerable,” said Andrew Pierre, a former senior fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington, “the intervention in Libya will be perceived by the French public as French-led.
That will be a strong card for a man who’s facing a very tough” re-election bid next year.
Sarkozy was the first Western leader to recognize the National Transitional Council as the representatives of the Libyan people, and French planes carried out the largest number of ground attacks.
Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron took the lead in a public campaign to impose a no-fly zone over Libya which led to NATO effectively providing air cover to otherwise out-gunned Libyan rebels.
“The end of Qaddafi was the work of Libyans in Libya,” French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet said at a press conference yesterday in Paris. “But French aviation was present from the start.”
Qaddafi Convoy Longuet said coalition planes yesterday noticed “a convoy of several dozen four-by-four vehicles trying to force their way out of Sirte.”
A Dassault Aviation SA (AM) Mirage 2000 jet fired its cannon ahead of the convoy “to block it, not to destroy it,” Longuet said. NTC forces then closed in on the blocked convoy and Qaddafi was killed in the fighting, Longuet said.
NATO now “will terminate our mission in coordination with the United Nations and the National Transitional Council,” NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in a statement.
On March 10, after a meeting at Sarkozy’s Elysee presidential palace with leaders of the TNC, organized by French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy, France became the first Western government to recognize the council as the representatives of the Libyan people.
On March 19, hours after the UN voted to impose an air-exclusion zone over Libya, French planes flew from mainland France with aerial refueling to destroy a tank column at the gates of Benghazi, the hometown of the NTC.
France First Sarkozy has repeatedly said that the attack, carried out before U.S. cruise missiles knocked out Libya’s air defenses, prevented a bloodbath in Benghazi.
In June, the French again went ahead of their NATO allies in air-dropping weapons to rebels in the Western mountains of Libya. Those rebels then went on the offensive, opening up a third front in the war after those of Benghazi and Misrata.
At a briefing in early September, French officials claimed their planes carried out 25 percent of all ground attacks, the most of any country, and 85 percent of helicopter attacks. French planes were based in Corsica, Crete, and on the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier and Mistral helicopter carrier.
The Libya campaign cost the French state 350 million euros ($480 million) beyond what was already budgeted for overseas military operations, the defense ministry said in presentation of its 2012 budget in late September.
Sarkozy presents a vision of France as “a great power that can take action and be effective because of his leadership,” said Pierre, a former director-general of the Atlantic Institute for International Affairs in Paris.
Military Engagements Sarkozy, who was elected in 2007 and faces re-election next year, boosted France’s military engagements in Afghanistan in 2008 and returned France to NATO’s unified military command in 2009.
At one point this year, French military forces were engaged on four fronts: Libya, Afghanistan, enforcing a UN demand that Ivory Coast strongman Laurent Gbagbo step down, and in a European anti-piracy fleet off the coast of Somalia.
For Sarkozy, success in Libya won’t necessarily help his re-election next year.
“Libya is popular on the whole with the French because it plays to their sense of France standing up for human rights,” said Laurent Dubois, a professor at the Paris Political Studies Institute.
“But that’s not what’s going to decide the election. It’s not as important as the economy.”
|
43 |
|
39 |
Politics Rest of the World- Libya- Beware US bearing gifts
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
THE ROVING EYE
The US power grab in Africa
By Pepe Escobar
Beware of strangers bearing gifts.
Post-modern Amazon and United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton finally landed in Tripoli - on a military jet - to lavish praise on the dodgy Transitional National Council (TNC), those pportunists/defectors/Islamists formerly known as "North Atlantic Treaty Organization rebels".
Clinton was greeted on Tuesday "on the soil of free Libya" (her words) by what the New York Times quaintly described as an "irregular militia" (translation: a heavily armed gang that is already raising hell against other heavily armed gangs), before meeting TNC chairman Mustafa Abdel-NATO (formerly known as Jalil).
The bulk of the US gifts - US$40 million - on top of the $135
million already disbursed since February (most of it military "aid") is for a missile scramble conducted by "contractors" (ie mercenaries) trying to track the tsunami of mobile anti-aircraft rockets that by now are already conveniently ensconced in secret Islamist warehouses.
Clinton told students at the University of Tripoli, "We are on your side."
She could not possibly connect the dots and note that the shabab (young people) who started demonstrating against Muammar Gaddafi in February have absolutely nothing to do with the TNC's opportunists/defectors/Islamists who hijacked the protests.
But she did have time to unveil another US foreign policy "secret" - that the US wants Gaddafi "dead or alive", George W Bush-style (or as the beneficiary of targeted assassination, Barack Obama-style).
The new Fallujah In her exhausting six-and-a-half hours on "free Libya" soil, Clinton couldn't possibly find the time to hitch a helicopter ride to Sirte and see for herself how NATO is exercising R2P ("responsibility to protect" civilians).
A few hundred soldiers and no less than 80,000 civilians have been bombed for weeks by NATO and the former "rebels". Only 20,000 civilians have managed to escape.
There's no food left. Water and electricity have been cut off. Hospitals are idle. The city - under siege - is in ruins. Sirte imams have issued a fatwa (decree) allowing survivors to eat cats and dogs.
What Gaddafi never did to Benghazi - and there's no evidence he might have - the TNC is doing to Sirte, Gaddafi's home town.
Just like the murderous US offensive in Fallujah in the Iraqi Sunni triangle in late 2004, Sirte is being destroyed in order to "save it".
Sirte, the new Fallujah, is brought to you by NATO rebels. R2P, RIP.
It gets much nastier. Libya is just one angle of a multi-vector US strategy in Africa. Wacko presidential candidate Michelle Bachmann, during Tuesday's Republican debate in Las Vegas, may have inadvertently nailed it.
Displaying her geographical acumen as she referred to Obama's new US intervention in Uganda, Bachmann said, "He put us in Libya. Now he's putting us in Africa."
True, Libya is not in Africa anymore; as the counter-revolutionary House of Saud would want it, Libya has been relocated to Arabia (ideally as a restored monarchy).
As for Obama "putting us in Africa" (see Obama, King of Africa Asia Times Online, October 18, 2011), those 100 special forces in Uganda billed as "advisers" should be seen as a liquid modernity remix of Vietnam in the early 1960s; that also started with a bunch of "advisers" - and the rest is history.
Murderous mystic crackpot Joseph Kony's Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) is now a rag-tag bunch of no more than 400 warriors (they used to be over 2,000).
They are on the run - and not even based in Uganda, but in South Sudan (now a Western protectorate), the Central African Republic and the long border with the Democratic Republic of Congo.
So why Uganda? Enter London-based Heritage Oil, and its chairman Tony Buckingham, a former - you guessed it - "contractor" (ie mercenary).
Here's Heritage's modus operandi, described by Buckingham himself; they deploy "a first mover strategy of entering regions with vast hydrocarbon wealth where we have a strategic advantage".
Translation: wherever there's foreign invasion, civil war, total breakdown of social order, there are big bucks to be made. Thus Heritage's presence in Iraq, Libya and Uganda.
Profiting from post-war fog, Heritage signed juicy deals in Iraqi Kurdistan behind the back of the central government in Baghdad. In Libya, Heritage bought a 51% stake in a local company called Sahara Oil Services; this means it's now directly involved in operating oil and gas licenses.
Pressed about it, TNC honchos have tried to change the conversation, alleging that nothing is approved yet.
What's certain is that Heritage barged into Libya via a former SAS commando, John Holmes, founder of Erinys, one of the top mercenary outfits in Iraq apart from Xe Services, former Blackwater.
Holmes cunningly shipped the right bottles of Johnnie Walker Blue Label to Benghazi for the right TNC crooks, seducing them with Heritage's mercenary know-how of enforcing "oil field security".
Got contractor, will travel Obama's Uganda surge is also a classic Pipelineistan gambit.
The possibly "billions of barrels" of oil reserves discovered recently in sub-Saharan Africa are located in the sensitive cross-border of Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Believe it or not, Heritage was the top oil company in Uganda up to 2009, drilling on Lake Albert - between Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo - and playing one country against another.
Then they sold their license to Tullow Oil, essentially a spin-off, also owned by Buckingham, bagging $1.5 billion in the process and crucially not paying 30% of profits to Washington's bastard, the government of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni.
Enter Libya's state oil company, Tamoil, which was part of a joint venture with the Ugandans to build a crucial oil pipeline to Kenya; Uganda is landlocked, and badly needs the pipeline when oil exports start next year. The NATO war on Libya paralyzed the Pipelineistan gambit.
Now everything is open for business again. Tamoil may be out of the picture - but so may be other players.
Trying to sort out the mess, the parliament in Uganda - slightly before Obama's announcement - decided to freeze all oil contracts, hitting France's Total and the China National Offshore Oil Corporation, but especially Tullow oil.
But now, with Obama's special forces "advising" not only Uganda but also the neighbors, and linking up with Heritage - which is essentially a huge oil/mercenary outfit - it's not hard to fathom where Uganda's oil contracts will eventually land.
The Amazon rules Unified Protector, Odyssey Dawn and all other metaphors Homeric or otherwise for the Africom/NATO 40,000-plus bombing of Libya have yielded the desired result; the destruction of the Libyan state (and much of the country's infrastructure, to the delight of disaster capitalism vultures).
It also delivered the lethal unintended consequence of those anti-aircraft missiles appropriated by Islamists - a supremely convincing reason for the "war on terror" in northern Africa to become eternal.
Washington couldn't care less about R2P; as the Libyan Clinton hop shows, the only thing that matters is the excuse to "securitize" Libya's arsenal - the perfect cover story for US contractors and Anglo-French intel ops to take over Libyan military bases.
The iron rule is that "free" Libya should be under the control of the "liberators".
Tell that to the "irregular militias", not to mention the Abdelhakim Belhaj gang and his al-Qaeda assets now in military control of Tripoli.
It's useful to remember that last Friday, the same day the US State Department announced it was sending "contractors" to Libya, was the day Obama announced his Uganda surge.
And only two days later, Kenya invaded Somalia - once again under the R2P excuse of protecting civilians from Somali jihadis and pirates.
The US adventure in Somalia looks increasingly like a mix of Sophocles and the Marx Brothers.
First there was the Ethiopian invasion (it failed miserably).
Then the thousands of Ugandan soldiers sent by Museveni to fight al-Shabaab (partially failed; after all the Washington-backed "government" barely controls a neighborhood in Mogadishu).
Now the Kenyan invasion. A measure of the Central Intelligence Agency's brilliance is that operatives have been on the ground for months alongside bundles of mercenaries.
Soon some counter-insurgency hotshot in Washington praying in the altar of new CIA head David Petraeus will conclude that the only solution is an army of MQ-9 Reapers to drone Somalia to death.
The big picture remains the Pentagon's Africom spreading its militarized tentacles against the lure of Chinese soft power in Africa, which goes something like this: in exchange for oil and minerals, we build anything you want, and we don't try to sell you "democracy for dummies".
The Bush administration woke up to this "threat" a bit too late - at Africom's birth in 2008. Under the Obama administration, the mood is total panic.
For Petraeus, the only thing that matters is "the long war" on steroids - from boots on the ground to armies of drones; and who are the Pentagon, the White House and the State Department to disagree?
Italian geographer and political scientist Manlio Dinucci is one of the few to point out how neo-colonialism 2.0 works; one just needs to look at the map.
In Central Africa, the objective is US military supremacy - on air and in intel - over Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
In Libya, the objective is to occupy an absolutely strategic crossroads between the Mediterranean, northern Africa and the Middle East, with the added (nostalgic?) benefit of the West - as in Paris, London and Washington - finally getting to hold military bases as when King Idris was in power (1951 to 1969).
As a whole, control must be established over northern Africa, central Africa, eastern Africa and - more problematically - the Horn of Africa.
The trillion-dollar question ahead is how China - which plots strategic moves years in advance - is going to react. As for Amazon Clinton, she must be beaming. In Iraq, Washington meticulously destroyed a whole country over two long decades just to end up with nothing - not even a substantial oil contract.
Clinton at least got a private army - the "advisers" who will be stationed in the bigger-than-the-Vatican US Embassy in Baghdad.
And considering that Obama's new African "advisers" will be paid by the State Department, now Clinton's also got her own African private army. After November 2012, Clinton might well consider a move into the contractor business. In the sacred name of R2P, naturally.
Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge.
His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).
He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com
|
47 |
|
40 |
Politics Rest of the World- Libya - The West will still want more than its Oil
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
Western intervention, is it ever helpful? According to Greg Muttitt, a London-based writer, the best thing the West can do for Libya is to leave it alone.
Last week I wrote about Libya and expressed the hope that the country would be able to find its own path in a future without Gaddafi.
The rebels have received important help from France and Britain among other foreign powers.
Those foreign powers will be eager to establish a regime in Libya that suits them.
Only the Libyan people can create a country whose natural resources support the freedom and prosperity of the many.
Plenty of people will be on hand with advice for the Libyans in the months ahead.
I thought it might be useful to think a little more about how best people outside the country might be able to contribute.
I turned to Greg Muttitt, a London-based writer who has made an intense study of the politics of Western
intervention and Iraqi resistance in the years since the invasion of 2003.
In the interests of transparency I should add that I commissioned Greg's book, Fuel on the Fire: Oil and Politics in
Occupied Iraq when I was an editor at Random House.
I began by asking Greg about what he made of the reporting about Libya he'd seen in the Western media in recent weeks.
"Reporters and commentators have been assuming that Britain, France, and the US should somehow take the
lead in helping Libya's transition, as though the occupation of Iraq has taught valuable lessons and that the West
should somehow take responsibility of nation-building.
The clear lesson from Iraq should instead be that the West should stay out of Libyan affairs.
At every stage US-UK involvement in Iraqi politics played a negative role."
"We should watch out for Western interpretations about what Libyan society is like."
Greg Muttitt, author
Another thing that's striking in Western coverage, according to Greg, is the low level of knowledge about Libyan culture, society and politics.
There's a lesson to be learned from Iraq. Starting with a very vague understanding of the country and its politics
the Western powers created a system that emphasised sectarian identities, even though Iraqis themselves didn't think that way.
"We should watch out for Western interpretations about what Libyan society is like.
It is in the West's interests for the Libyan political class to be weak and isolated, so it can be easily influenced from outside.
That doesn't mean that officials and generals have to sit down and work out a 'divide and rule' strategy.
But everyone is tempted to see things in terms that suit their interests.
Western policy-makers are no exception. There's ample evidence of that in recent history."
The Western powers, in other words, will find the Libya that suits them in the months ahead.
They might find that it is divided tribally, or between 'moderates' and 'Islamists'.
Those of us who wish Libya well should resist the temptation to believe what plausible voices in the mainstream
media tell us about the country.
Advice and interests
I wanted to ask Greg a bit more about the way that Western governments tried to influence events in Iraq after the
invasion in 2003.
"The word most commonly used in Iraq in this context was 'advice'".
Governments have interests and the 'advice' they offer is inevitably shaped by those interests.
Greg explains: "I put this point to a British civil servant working on the Iraqi economy.
He accepted the argument and said, 'well we don't go around advising countries to set up cooperatives and hold
big consultations' ... I looked at this in relation to former senior executives of major oil companies 'advising' Iraq on its oil policy.
It wasn't that they were corrupt or doing favours to their old employers or anything like that.
From the way they saw the world, foreign multinationals were obviously the best placed to run the Iraqi oil industry."
Any 'advice' offered to the Libyan people from foreign governments is most likely tainted by consideration of their own interests [GALLO/GETTY]
The Americans and the British will aim to support Libyan politicians that they feel they can do business with.
They will tend, quite naturally, to think that they helping moderates, but these moderates will also be willing to work in ways that suit the Western powers.
"In Iraq Bremer said he promoted exiles because they understood democracy better.
What that meant in effect was that they were also more likely to be pro-American.
Everyone likes to think they are promoting democracy and human rights."
So the most useful thing the European powers can do is to leave Libya well alone.
I wanted to ask what foreign citizens can practically do to support Libyan self-determination and to frustrate their own countries' attempts to meddle.
"We should reject the agenda of the military and of civil servants in our own countries, but strengthen our cultural
links and our solidarity with grassroots Libyan civil society."
Greg Muttitt, London-based author
"The key thing here is to connect, to listen to Libyans and to learn about the country.
If all we have is government relaying its perspective, or mainstream media reporting with all its shorthand and
sensationalism, a Libyan voice, apart from the elites chosen by the West, will be absent from the debate about the country's future."
Grassroots approach
A handful of independent and mainstream journalists did crucial work in Iraq, helping people outside the country
to know what was going on. Greg singles out Ahmed Mansour at Al Jazeera, Jonathan Steele at the Guardian and
Anthony Shadid at the Washington Post in the established media: "The independent ones were especially important; Dahr Jamail, Rahul Mahajan.
There were activists, too, people like Ewa Jasiewicz, Jo Wilding."
These people did the crucial work of finding out what Iraqi society was actually like.
They found people who were struggling to make the best of things in the chaos after the invasion. People on the ground were able to find grassroots activists.
And the relationships built then had a huge significance later.
"I did most of my work with the oil workers' trade union, which has been the target of much government repression.
A lot of this is because the union has played a central role in the (so far successful) campaign against a new oil law. At various times the Iraqi government tried to arrest the union's leaders, seize their equipment, transfer them, and so on.
The union has been very effective at building the right connections within Iraq, but at those times of crisis, international solidarity made a real difference.
The AFL-CIO and the TUC wrote to the Iraqi government in their defence, for example, when the Iraqi government was threatening to attack them."
Those who want to help Libya, Greg is clear, will be most effective if they learn as much as they can about the country and take their lead from the Libyans themselves.
The edge Libya has over Iraq is that there are no foreign troops on the ground
"We should reject the agenda of the military and of civil servants in our own countries, but strengthen our cultural links and our solidarity with grassroots Libyan civil society.
Those independent journalists and activists who bravely travelled to Baghdad in 2003 to meet Iraqis and make sense of the culture and politics -
they were heroes, in fact the only non-Iraqi heroes of the whole episode. Meanwhile, parts of the anti-war
movement worked very closely with members of the Iraqi diaspora in Britain who could help interpret events and guide campaigning.
If we are serious about helping the Libyans, that's the lesson to learn - that we should show humility in learning
from Libyans about their country rather than bombarding them with lectures about democracy and how to run an economy."
There's a chance for Libya now that Iraq didn't have. There is no foreign army of occupation in the country.
Those of us who want to see an end to Western meddling in the region have a responsibility to pay attention to
what our own governments are doing and to do what we can to learn about a country that is emerging from decades of dictatorship.
Real Libyan democracy will be the achievement of the Libyan people, not a gift from outside. And it will be a
reversal for the foreign powers, who have so little time for 'cooperatives and big consultations'.
Make no mistake, whatever happens in Libya will reverberate around the Middle East and the wider world.
Dan Hind has worked in publishing since 1998 and is the author of two acclaimed books:
The Return of the Public and The Threat to Reason. He is this year's winner of the Bristol Festival of Ideas Prize
|
49 |
|
41 |
Politics Rest Of the World- NTC Forces Celebrate Gadaffi's death
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
NTC forces celebrate Gadaffi's death
Thursday 20 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Libyan Transitional government forces were celebrating the death of Muammar Gadaffi today during the capture of Sirte - the last significant bastion of forces loyal to him.
While reports of Gadaffi's death were confused there seemed little doubt over the claims' authenticity as the Morning Star went to press.
Although Libyan NTC forces claimed the colonel had been killed in ground fighting Nato counter-claimed that its planes had blasted a fleeing convoy that was carrying into refuge.
NTC Information Minister Mahmoud Shammam said that he had been told that Gadaffi was dead by fighters who claimed to have seen the body.
Celebratory gunfire and cries of Allahu Akbar rang out across Tripoli as reports of his death spread,
In Sirte, NTC fighters celebrated the city's fall after weeks of bloody siege by firing endless rounds into the air, pumping their guns, waving knifes and even a meat cleaver in the air.
The final assault on Sirte began at 8am and ended about 90 minutes later.
Just before the battle about five carloads of Gadaffi loyalists reportedly tried to flee the enclave, but they were met by gunfire by NTC forces which killed at least 20 of them.
Nato spokesman Roland Lavoie said the alliance's aircraft had hit two vehicles of pro-Gadaffi forces.
The Misrata military council said that its fighters had captured Gadaffi but another commander Abdel-Basit Harun said Gadaffi had been killed when the air strike hit the convoy.
In fact the only thing on which the disparate elements of the anti-Gadaffi forces agreed on was the death of the country's leader of 42 years.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
52 |
|
42 |
Politics Rest of World- Total Media Distortion Over Israeli Prisoner Exchange
Updated: 21 Oct 2011
The media blitz that fools no-one
Thursday 20 October 2011
by Hugh Lanning
Gilad Shalit is a member of the Israeli Defence Force which is illegally enforcing an occupation and a siege on Gaza.
In Israel's prisons the thousands of Palestinian prisoners who remain include 164 child prisoners - most often charged with throwing stones.
At least 750 Palestinians are being held without charge or trial for an indeterminate length of time.
It is heartening that Shalit has called for the release of all prisoners and peace.
But in the British media he is presented as an innocent abroad - like some wayward sailor captured by Somalian pirates.
The Palestinians being released are all presented as guilty, blood-thirsty terrorists.
The pictures portray the undoubted joy of the reunion of the Shalit family.
In contrast it is as if the Palestinians do not have family or friends.
For David Cameron the Palestinian prisoners do not exist - not even mentioned in his statement on Shalit's release.
This balance is typical of media coverage.
Earlier this year, the Today programme reported two Palestinian rockets which damaged a house in Israel, yet failed to report Israeli attacks on Gaza which killed nine Palestinians on the same day.
The BBC accepted that it made a "lapse." But if you Google the name of the Israeli ambassador and the BBC and do the same with the Palestinian ambassador, the ratio is unsurprisingly 10-to-one in favour of the former.
If you delve into the web hits, the Israeli ambassador tends to be lead stories on prime-time TV news, the Palestinian obscure hours on World Service.
The BBC initially bleeped out the words "free Palestine" from a Mic Righteous song - because suggesting Palestine was not free was deemed "contentious." It is censorship by omission to highlight the rocket that comes out of Gaza, not the disproportionate number of high-technology rockets targeted with deadly effect at Gaza.
To erroneously talk of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, while omitting to mention the occupation of east Jerusalem. Brave settlers as opposed to well-armed, militarily protected shock troops illegally colonising huge tracts of Palestinian territory. You only have to see the swaggering arrogance of those moving in and occupying the homes of Palestinian families in east Jerusalem to understand that this is a conscious strategy - to use tactics designed to intimidate and threaten.
Supporters of the Palestinian cause who talk of apartheid and ethnic cleansing get vilified. But how else can you describe the plan to evict 30,000 Bedouin from their traditional homes in the Negev?
The Bedouin had lived in these areas for hundreds of years when there was no friendly Israeli official to hand them a certificate. Dale Farm does not bear comparison - although the similarities are a bit too close for comfort.
The Palestinian UN bid for independence showed - if nothing else - how comprehensively Israel has lost the moral argument on a global scale relying on the threat of the US veto so shamefully deployed by Obama.
Intriguingly the siege of Gaza and the absence of a peace process was justified because of Hamas - despite them winning Palestinian elections.
Yet it is with Hamas that the Israeli Government has just done a deal - clandestinely brokered for years, while publicly stating that there was no-one with whom Israel could negotiate.
Just as for years the US was happy to support the Taliban to fight the Russians, the Israelis welcomed the rise of Hamas to undermine the PLO, Fatah and Arafat.
The hypocrisy is prevalent all the time.
When the Israeli embassy was attacked in Cairo, at the beckoning of Netanyahu, Obama and Cameron were on the phone overnight demanding Egypt honour its international obligations and the Geneva Convention. It is difficult to count the number of unchallenged Israeli breaches of international law, where we now welcome into the country suspected war criminals with impunity.
At the UN, Obama made much of the fact that it was for the two sides to negotiate a settlement, that it would be wrong for them to intervene and prematurely recognise Palestine.
Presumably Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq are all examples of this non-interventionist strategy?
The Israeli response to this global shift in opinion, has been set out by the Reut Institute - an Israeli think tank - tank being the operative word. It is to attack and smear its opponents.
Dismayed by the growth of the solidarity movement and, in Britain in particular, the growing trade union support for Palestine and for a boycott of firms complicit with the occupation.
It is to equate criticism of Israel with anti-semitism.
This is to misunderstand the nature of the opposition to its actions.
Solidarity with Palestine is born and bred on anti-racist principles, of distaste for a people being oppressed by virtue of their race, of the dishonour that is done to those who hold dear the values of their religions.
The strength of the solidarity movement is its diversity.
Once again Israel underestimates, to its own detriment, the scale and nature of the distaste and revulsion to its behaviour.
Hugh Lanning is chairman of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign www.palestinecampaign.org
|
45 |
|
43 |
Politics Rest of the World- US Occupy Wall St. Movement expands in all directions
Updated: 20 Oct 2011
Funds pour in to keep Wall St occupied
Wednesday 19 October 2011
Support for the Occupy Wall Street movement is growing far beyond expectations, organisers said today.
It has received $435,000 (£275,000) in donations, mostly online but $85,000 (£53,000) has been donated in person at the Manhattan park that's become the epicentre of the global "anti-greed" protests.
Roughly $8,000 (£5,000) is now coming in every day just from the lock boxes set up to take donations at Zuccotti Park.
They've also been getting help from a nonprofit group.
Occupy Wall Street officially became a project of the Washington-based Alliance for Global Justice on September 28 - 11 days after protesters began camping out at the park.
The status allows the alliance to process donations on the movement's behalf, and makes it responsible for tax reporting.
Volunteers tally the donations and each day's total is deposited at the Broadway branch of the Amalgamated Bank, the only US bank that is 100 per cent union-owned.
|
53 |
|
44 |
Politics Rest of the World- Western Arms Dealers supplied Arab States Suppression of Democracy
Updated: 20 Oct 2011
Arms dealers fuelled protest crackdowns
Wednesday 19 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Amnesty International revealed today that the US, Russia, Britain and many other European countries have sold much of the weaponary used against recent pro-democracy demonstrators across the Middle East.
The human rights group is urging the US Congress to block a $53 million (£34m) proposed arms sale to Bahrain, where more than 30 people have been killed in the monarchy's crackdown on protesters.
"To the extent that arms transfers are knowingly engaged in and result in the perpetration of crimes against humanity, the transferring state also becomes responsible under international law," said Amnesty advocacy director for the Middle East and North Africa Sanjeev Bery.
Amnesty has looked at arms transfers since 2005 to Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain.
It found that the main suppliers were the US, Britain, Russia, Germany, Italy, France, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic.
The group said that countries must tighten and increase transparency in arms export controls to avoid the risk that weapons will be used to violate human rights.
"It's precisely the wrong signal to send for the Obama administration to be on the verge of sending $53m in weapons to a Bahraini king whose security forces have already been opening fire on peaceful protesters this year," Mr Bery said.
US State Department spokesman Mark Toner insisted, however, that several steps still remained before the US could deliver the weapons to Bahrain.
"We're going to continue to look at all the elements on the ground, including the human rights situation," Mr Toner said, although he didn't address the issue of past sales.
And he declined to say if the deal could be ended by the Bahraini government's failure to implement reforms.
The so-called Arab Spring protests across the region came largely as a surprise to the arms-dealing countries after decades of stagnant and repressive rule.
Amnesty argues that the US and others supplying weapons have long ignored human rights violations under many of the regimes and shouldn't have sold them in the first place.
"The international community needs to know exactly what's being given to whom and exactly how it's being used," Mr Bery said. "If not, the US government should not be in the business of providing the weapons to begin with."
|
42 |
|
45 |
Politics Rest of the World- Justice for Palestinian Prisoners
Updated: 20 Oct 2011
Palestine Solidarity Campaign Justice for Palestinian prisoners: -take action!
PSC welcomes the prisoner exchange with several hundred Palestinian prisoners released in exchange for the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.
The Palestinian prisoners will be released in a deal that benefits the entire Palestinian community.
However, some Palestinians have been exiled from their homes in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. Even when the total number of 1,027 Palestinians have been released, it is important to remember that more than 6,000 remain in Israeli jails, including 164 child detainees who are not on the initial list of those to be released.
There are at least 750 Palestinians being held without charge or trial for an indeterminate length of time. Israeli organisations such as B’Tselem and the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel have documented the abuse and torture of detainees, many of whom are held for decades.
When prisoners die in jail (over 200 to date) the bodies are rarely returned to their families, who are not told where they are buried. What you can do: Contact your MP: •Call on your MP to raise this issue with ministers, in parliamentary questions and to sign Richard Burden's EDM 2274 on child prisoners and Michael Connarty's EDM 2225 on prison conditions •Ask to meet your MP at the National Palestine in Parliament Lobby on Wednesday 23rd November •Use our email tool here>> Contact the media:
•Write letters for publication to national and local newspapers, putting the Palestinian perspective. This is a way of getting the Palestinian voice heard in the media •Call radio talk shows and contribute to the debate from the Palestinian point of view •Complain about coverage that focuses on Shalit without placing the same sort of human emphasis on the Palestinian prisoners For information on how to do all the above, points to raise in your letters, and contact details for newspapers, radio stations and the BBC click here>> With Shalit's release: time to press again to end the siege on Gaza As Shalit's capture was the initial pretext for Israel’s blockade of Gaza - and the collective punishment against all Gazans - that blockade must now be lifted, with immediate effect. And the international community should be working tirelessly to implement international law in respect of all Palestinian human and national rights. Sign our petition calling for an end to the siege of Gaza >>
|
45 |
|
46 |
Politics Rest of the World-Greece-Protests continue as the bail out is oversubscribed by speculators
Updated: 19 Oct 2011
No pause for Greek workers in cuts fight
Tuesday 18 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Greek railway workers and journalists joined ferry crews, rubbish collectors, tax officials and lawyers today in a strike blitz against yet more austerity measures.
The protests will lead into a general strike on Wednesday and Thursday, when Parliament holds a crucial vote on new cutbacks following nearly two years of austerity.
The strikes kept island ferries in port for a second day, while stinking mounds of rotting rubbish remained uncollected for the 17th day on the streets of Greece's cities.
Tax collectors and lawyers joined the strikes, while civil servants occupied the finance and labour ministry buildings.
Unemployment rose to 16.5 per cent in July, up from 16 per cent in June and 12 per cent a year earlier.
Teachers, doctors, taxi drivers and bank employees will be on strike tomorrow and Thursday, alongside air traffic controllers - whose walkout will ground all flights for two days.
The country's two largest trade unions have also called rallies and protest marches to Syntagma Square outside Parliament in central Athens during the general strike, while a Communist-backed trade union has urged members to block off the assembly building on the day of the vote.
Vans mounted with loudspeakers were doing the rounds of central Athens today, urging workers to "flood Syntagma Square and surround Parliament."
The highly unpopular new measures include further pension and salary cuts, the suspension of 30,000 public servants on reduced pay and the suspension of collective labour contracts.
Greece's nominally Socialist government needs to pass the cutbacks - which some of its own backbenchers have threatened to block - to meet IMF and eurozone conditions for the next €8 billion (£7bn) chunk of the international loans that have been keeping it afloat since May 2010.
The country has been regularly flogging off short-term debt - up to six months - and on Tuesday successfully auctioned €1.62bn (£1.4bn) worth of 13-week treasury bills.
The country had to offer buyers a slightly higher yield, 4.61 per cent compared with 4.56 per cent at the previous sale last month.
The auction was 2.86 times oversubscribed.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
45 |
|
47 |
Politics Rest of the World- Fascist Zionist "Lebensraum" in Jerusalem
Updated: 19 Oct 2011
Illegal flats plan to cut off Arab east Jerusalem
Tuesday 18 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
A plan to settle thousands more Jews in a strategic part of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem quietly cleared a bureaucratic hurdle last week, threatening to cut a link between Arab east Jerusalem and the West Bank.
The proposed Givat Hamatos development would complete an Israeli encirclement of part of east Jerusalem, the Palestinians' planned capital.
The scheme calls for about 2,600 apartments, including 1,800 for Givat Hamatos and 800 for an expansion of Beit Safafa, an adjacent Palestinian neighbourhood.
Construction could begin by the second half of 2012.
Because of Israel's construction of a semicircle of Jewish enclaves in east Jerusalem, only a few land corridors are left between its core Arab neighbourhoods and the West Bank.
Givat Hamatos would cut off one of the key remaining ones, isolating the area of Beit Safafa from Bethlehem.
The new building plan drew condemnation over the weekend from UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.
Ms Ashton said she "deplored" the latest Israeli decision and urged the government to halt the project.
Both Ms Ashton and Mr Ban reiterated that Israeli settlement activity in east Jerusalem violates international law.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has said he will not return to talks as long as Israel keeps building on territory it captured in the 1967 war, and Palestinian officials said the plans for Givat Hamatos reinforced that decision.
"It's another slap in the face of all those international efforts being made toward the resumption of a meaningful political process," said Salam Fayyad, one of Palestine's two disputed prime ministers
"It's not only damaging to our own interests, it's damaging to all those who have an interest in a two-state solution."
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com" target=_self>foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
45 |
|
48 |
Politics Rest of the World- Palestinians welcome prisoners home
Updated: 19 Oct 2011
Palestinians welcome home imprisoned loved ones
Tuesday 18 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Tens of thousands of flag-waving Palestinians celebrated the release of hundreds of prisoners swapped for captured Israeli soldier Sergeant Gilad Shalit today.
In Gaza people into a sandy square where a huge stage had been set up, decorated with a mural depicting Sgt Shalit's capture in June 2006 at an army base near the Gaza border, following the Israeli kidnapping of two Palestinian brothers from the territory.
Thousands of revellers hoisted green Hamas flags.
The agreement betwen the Palestinians and Israelis specifies the release of 1,000 Palestinians.
Most of the first batch of 477 prisoners who were freed today had been serving life sentences for killing Israelis, and their release broke a long-standing Israeli determination not to free those with "blood on their hands."
More than 300 of the prisoners arrived in Gaza, the rest in the West Bank. Mass celebration rallies were under way in both of the Palestinian territories.
Earlier in the day, hundreds of relatives of prisoners had waited at a West Bank checkpoint for a first glimpse of their loved ones.
However, the buses carrying the prisoners were instead driven directly to Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas's headquarters in the West Bank.
Clashes erupted between about 200 young Palestinians at the checkpoint and Israeli soldiers, after the families were told they had waited in the wrong place.
Israeli troops fired tear gas and Palestinians threw stones for about half an hour.
Some of the young men climbed atop a fence near the checkpoint and draped it with the flags of Hamas and Mr Abbas's Fatah movement.
In Ramallah, Mr Abbas addressed a crowd of thousands, included released prisoners and their relatives.
In a display of unity, he shared a stage with three Hamas leaders and at one point the four men raised clasped hands together.
In his speech, Mr Abbas praised the released prisoners as "freedom fighters" and said that negotiations will bear more fruit.
"I am revealing to you ... that there is an agreement between us and the Israeli government on another batch similar to this," Mr Abbas said.
But elsewhere Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu sent a message to the freed prisoners that they will be punished if they return to violence.
He said: "We will continue to fight terror and every released terrorist who returns to terror will be held accountable."
Israel still holds about 5,000 Palestinian prisoners.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
46 |
|
49 |
Politics Rest of the World- Chile- Student Education protests fuels draft demand on 18 yr olds
Updated: 19 Oct 2011
Chilean military in mass call-up
More than 50,000 18-year-olds have one month to report for service
as student protests are blamed for disrupting recruitment
guardian.co.uk,
The student movement has been blamed for encouraging young people to boycott schools, thus closing their doors to military recruiters.
Chile has given nearly 57,000 18-year-olds one month to report for potential military duty, saying the government needs to fill gaps in its armed forces because a nationwide student protest movement has reduced the number of volunteers it usually gets.
Military service is obligatory in Chile, but there are usually enough volunteers to fill the ranks so that no one has to serve against their will.
So far this year, 14,127 men and women born in 1993 have signed up, and the armed forces deputy secretary, Alfonso Vargas, has said they need a bigger pool to choose from to fill 11,340 spots.
That's why 56,793 more teenagers will need to report in a month for potential duty in 2012, he explained on the draft office's website.
Vargas blamed the student movement that has been campaigning for education reform since April for leading thousands of young people to boycott schools, and thus closing their doors to military recruiters.
General Gunther Siebert, who directs Chile's military draft, also blamed the student movement in an interview published in the El Mercurio newspaper, and said that 2.5 candidates are needed for every spot because many can't serve for physical or other reasons.
But Chile's military also had a shortage last year, before the movement began, and at that time it called up fewer than 39,000 for the draft.
To have 2.5 candidates for each spot, the military would need to call up only 14,223 more youngsters. Instead, so many more have been told to report that Chile could have more than six candidates for each position.
The Associated Press asked Chile's national draft office in writing for an explanation, as requested by its spokesman, and did not immediately receive a response.
To find out whether they've been drafted, Chilean 18-year-olds must go to a military website and enter their national identification number.
Many have been doing so and then commenting about it on social networks, where a popular tweet asks why Chile seems to value military service more than education by making it obligatory.
Unlike in some other countries, attending a university does not enable young Chileans to avoid the draft.
The only exceptions are physical limitations, providing the primary income for a family, being married or expecting a child, being convicted of an "immoral" crime, or being the child of someone imprisoned or tortured by Chile's 1973-1990 dictatorship
|
47 |
|
50 |
Politics Rest of the World- More on Hamas deal on Shalit swap
Updated: 18 Oct 2011
Hamas: Israel pledged to lift Gaza blockade as part of Shalit swap deal
Mahmoud Zahar, member of Hamas' negotiating team in Shalit deal tells Haaretz Israel had agreed to lift blockade as part of deal in talks with a German mediator long ago.
By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff
Ending the blockade of the Gaza Strip is part of the agreement between Hamas, Egypt and Israel for the return of Gilad Shalit, according to Mahmoud Zahar, one of the leaders of Hamas in Gaza and a member of Hamas' negotiating team in the Shalit deal.
Israel agreed to this long ago, in talks with a German mediator, and it is still part of the agreement, Zahar told Haaretz on Monday.
Zahar, who will be one of the Hamas officials greeting the released prisoners on Tuesday, said there are several other issues the sides also agreed to as part of the deal.
For one, families from Gaza will now be allowed to visit their relatives in Israeli prisons.
Since Shalit's abduction, such family visits have been banned.
Additionally, in an attempt to increase pressure on Hamas to reach an agreement on freeing Shalit, Israel had stripped Palestinian prisoners of certain privileges and put many of their leaders into solitary confinement.
These measures will now be reversed, Zahar said.
Finally, Israel agreed to ease the blockade on Gaza, Zahar said.
Israeli defense officials confirmed that the Shalit agreement marks a turning point in relations between Israel and Hamas.
They said that various steps have already been taken to ease the blockade on Gaza in recent months, as part of the unofficial cease-fire between Hamas and Israel.
Now, Israel is evaluating the implications of the Shalit deal for its blockade policy.
There are two main possibilities that any future decision to ease the blockade might include.
One is to ease restrictions on the movement of people through the Gaza border crossings, and particularly travel from Gaza to the West Bank via Israel.
The second is to increase exports of goods from Gaza to Israel and abroad.
There are already very few restrictions on the entry of goods into Gaza from Israel, except for those that can be used to manufacture weapons.
After Shalit's release, Israel will no longer have any excuse to continue the blockade, Zahar said.
"This is what representatives of European countries told us when they approached us about releasing Shalit, and the Israelis made this commitment as well," he said.
The deal should send Israel a message that power cannot overcome the drive to free prisoners, Zahar added.
The only way to solve the problem of the prisoners is by freeing them, he said, and the Israeli media needs to tell the Israeli public so.
Preparations for receiving the prisoners in Gaza have already been completed, including construction of a big stage for the main ceremony in the center of Gaza City.
Hundreds of members of Hamas' military wing have deployed along the entire length of the road that runs from the Rafah crossing, on the Gaza-Egypt border, to Gaza City, since the prisoners will arrive at Rafah via Egypt.
The Rafah crossing area has been declared a closed military zone and only 100 VIPs will be allowed entry
|
46 |
|
51 |
Politics Rest of the World- The Butcher Assad and Syria's Bloody Revolution
Updated: 18 Oct 2011
I saw 100 taken to be killed, says defector from Assad’s forces
In a safe house reached with the help of guides signalling a route through the warren of
darkened streets, a clutch of Syrian army defectors plots the downfall of a feared regime. 9:30PM BST 16 Oct 2011
The city of Homs is a virtual ghost town.
Its medieval fort has been transformed into a garrison and checkpoints have been established around the city.
But in its back alleys groups of armed men have formed units to defend the population from the military onslaught.
Some are local revolutionaries, known as thwarr, who have joined the protests against President Bashar al-Assad that have convulsed the country for six months.
Others are defectors from the armed forces who have now turned their guns on their former comrades.
The seven deserters at the safe house proudly display stolen weapons, including rocket launchers, anti-aircraft guns and grenades.
One, a 19-year old conscript, had been shooting at protesters a week beforehand. "The [secret] security would stand behind us and make us shoot," he says.
"Anyone who refused would be shot right there, as a lesson to everyone else.
The snipers were there to shoot at us as well as protesters."
Another was in air force intelligence – a feared branch of the security apparatus – but left in disgust.
"I was a prison guard in Damascus," he says.
"I watched as men had their fingers cut off with pliers, and as cattle prods were pushed down people's throats.
"Women were raped and murdered in front of me.
I saw one young man – he was 18 – as his stomach was cut open and his intestines ripped out whilst he was still alive."
Another incident could amount to an account of a war crime by the Syrian government.
"I saw 100 people being loaded onto a bus to be taken away.
We all knew what would happen to them.
I never saw them again – they were killed and buried in the hills.
After this I knew I had to join the opposition.
Many of us guards knew the truth, and I think many are willing to leave the regime.
It is just so hard to do.'
Another is an Alawi – the sect long assumed to be totally loyal to the regime.
He says: "Not many of us have left, but they will. It is just so obvious that they are lying to us.
We are offered privileges the others don't get, like better barracks and equipment.
But it's not worth it."
The Daily Telegraph toured Homs and saw the bullet holes, smoking rubble and graffiti that the conflict had left behind.
One message scrawled by regime forces reads "This is Assad's Syria".
Citizens reply with the simple statement: "Islam. Syria. Freedom."
Abu Ali, a demonstrator who volunteered to act as a guide, says most people have fled or are confined to their homes.
"People are afraid to leave their homes and they are not even safe there," he says.
"The army enters into these small streets and just opens fire randomly.
One 65-year-old woman was killed when a shell hit her house – she had been mourning her dead husband who was killed the previous week."
Scenes in Homs's Charity Hospital show the brutality of the crackdown.
A man of 26 lies semi conscious in his bed, barely breathing.
His father produces an X-ray showing a bullet still lodged in the man's chest.
"I lost my 12-year-old son two weeks ago. Now my other son could die.
I have nothing left," he says.
Another 28 year-old lies in the next bed, a mass of tubes and cords attached to machines keeping him alive.
"These men can only stay here for two or three days," Abu Ali continues.
"Their families are worried about security coming and taking them away.
|
57 |
|
52 |
Politics Rest of the World- Israel -6,000 Palestinian Political Prisoners - less 1,000 = 5,000
Updated: 18 Oct 2011
Israel's asymmetrical prisoner swap The Israeli-Hamas prisoner swap is not a measure of life value,
but rather an illustration of the asymmetrical conflict.
Rachel Shabi Last Modified: 15 Oct 2011 19:02
Holding political prisoners is a means of avoiding political solutions to conflict [EPA]
It doesn't take long to meet a prisoner family in Palestine.
With more than 6,000 Palestinians incarcerated by Israel right now and more than 700,000 in jails since Israel's 1967 occupation of the Palestinian territories, those stories soon come into the frame - mention of a father, a brother taken away; a swallowing of pain; a distant gaze determined to bring a beloved, absent face into focus.
Now Israel has cut a deal with Hamas to release the soldier Gilad Shalit, five years after his capture, in exchange for more than a thousand Palestinian prisoners, these figures allude to the reality of mass Palestinian imprisonment.
With 20 per cent of the population jailed at some point, prison is a feature of Palestinian life under occupation.
From the routine night raids that drag family members away, to the opaque military trials, the detention of children (7,000 since the year 2000) and the torture reported by Amnesty to take place in Israeli prisons, it all adds up to a system of control and debilitation.
Israel adheres to the script of countries that try to crush national struggle: criminalise protest; use widespread arrests to show who's in charge and categorically refuse to count any prisoners as political.
Those Palestinian detention figures are shockingly high - but then, the Israeli occupation has been shockingly long, and its permeation into Palestinian life just as deep.
Despite the duration, Hadas Ziv, of Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, says the fact Israel blanket-labels all Palestinian prisoners as cold-blooded murderers shows that the country is in a phase which characterises the earliest stages of conflict.
"Once you give people the attributes of an ideology or a political struggle, there is something to talk about," she says.
"When a conflict is approaching resolution, you see a move from propaganda to seeing people as human beings with political standing."
Political power is one reason why prisoners are so important: because they generate trust and credibility not attributed to politicians, former prisoners can be key to resolution talks.
Holding political prisoners is another means of avoiding a political solution to conflict - the continued detention of key Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti testifies to that.
Similarly, leaders of the current non-violent popular campaign against Israel’s separation wall - Abdullah Abu Rahmeh and Bassem Tamimi, for instance - know why they are repeatedly arrested and put behind bars.
This component - that arrests devastate individual families but also decimate collective struggle - underpins regular Palestinian campaigns over prisoners; current escalating hunger strikes and solidarity actions are protesting prisoner conditions, in particular the practice of solitary confinement.
But meanwhile, the terms of the Israel-Hamas brokered prisoner swap - one Israeli, whose name the world knows, for 1027 faceless Palestinians - has generated some absurd comments on the value each side places on human life.
In reports of how much Israelis care about the soldier Shalit - all true - there is somehow the inference that Palestinians don’t cherish their loved ones in the same way.
But it is clearly more approachable a task to keep one soldier's name in people's hearts and in the headlines, than it is with countless thousands of Palestinian men.
And the undertaking is smoothed by a media skew on the subject: taking part in a panel discussion on reporting the conflict last year, I heard a European journalist explain that Shalit was an easier pitch because he seemed innocent and blameless, while Palestinian prisoners didn’t generate the same assumptions.
Meanwhile, the cold exchange rate of a thousand prisoners to one Israeli obviously doesn't mean that Palestinians morally agree with this equation; it just points to the brutal asymmetry of forces and capacity in this struggle.
There is, however, one setting in which the two sides stand on level ground.
When the prisoner deal was announced this week, there were jarringly rare images of both Israelis and Gaza strip Palestinians joyously celebrating the same news story.
There it was, in that moment: an equality borne of shared humanity.
Rachel Shabi is a journalist and author of Not the Enemy: Israel's Jews from Arab lands.
You can follow Rachel Shabi on Twitter @rachshabi
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
|
45 |
|
53 |
Politics Rest of the World-Occupy-A Catalyst for Change
Updated: 17 Oct 2011
'Occupy': A catalyst for change? As anti-greed protests spread to cities across the world,
Inside Story examines the movement's goals and its impact.
16 Oct 2011 10:05 The 'Occupy' movement is holding gatherings around the world as protesters meet in the financial centres of several cities.
The movement's central site, United for Global Change, says 951 cities in 82 countries will participate in rallies.
Dozens of protesters were arrested in New York as thousands marched through the city's financial district before moving on to Times Square. Protests were also held elsewhere in the US and Canada, notably in Washington DC, the US capital.
And several cities across the world - from Tokyo to Alaska via London, Frankfurt and Washington - held demonstrations in a show of solidarity with the rallies that began last month in New York. But does the movement have a defined agenda?
Could it be a catalyst for change?
And at what price? Inside Story, with presenter Mike Hanna, discusses with Mark Bray, an organiser and media team member of 'Occupy Wall Street'; Alessio Rastani, an independent stock broker; and Dean Baker, the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy research.
|
62 |
|
54 |
Politics Rest of the World- US Food Chain Slaves
Updated: 13 Oct 2011
|
Food chain slaves
|
|
|
It is a nation built on the abolition of slavery, but there are at least 40,000 slaves in the US today.
Slavery: A 21st Century Evil Last Modified: 10 Oct 2011 14:09
|
In the opening episode of Slavery: A 21st Century Evil, Al Jazeera's Rageh Omaar investigates food chain slavery, considered the easiest form of slavery to stamp out, in the US
The US has been leading the global fight against modern slavery.
But, according to conservative estimates, there are between 40,000 and 50,000 slaves in the US today.
So in this episode, Rageh questions why a nation built on the abolition of slavery - a country that had to go through a painful civil war to formally bring an end to slavery - is failing to address the problem inside its own borders.
The investigation begins in the poor villages of Thailand, where agents for the US slave masters trick desperate peasants with promises of well-paid jobs abroad.
But far from fulfilling their American dream, many end up in slave labour farms in Hawaii, California and Florida - unable to return home and working to pay off the debts they incurred in the pursuit of a better life for themselves and their families
|
57 |
|
55 |
Politics Rest of the World-Greece to get £7bn bailout but Italy fragility exposed
Updated: 13 Oct 2011
Inspectors approve €8bn lifeline for Greece
Athens bailout backed at last, but Slovakian vote on extending fund's powers in doubt
By Ben Chu, Economics Editor
Independent
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
The "troika" of inspectors who are administering the Greek bailout yesterday said they had agreed to release the funds that Athens needs to avoid defaulting on its debts.
The representatives of the European Union, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund said the Greek government had done enough to justify the release of the latest €8bn (£7bn) payment.
The officials said in a statement: "The next tranche of €8bn will become available, most likely, in early November."
They warned, however, that the Greek government's efforts to sort out the country's public finances had been patchy and that the administration of George Papandreou, the Prime Minister, still needed to step up its efforts.
They said: "As overall progress has been uneven, a reinvigoration of reforms remains the overarching challenge facing the authorities."
The officials also urged the Greek government to "put more emphasis on structural reforms in the public sector and the economy more broadly".
Despite the troika's broadly positive verdict, the German government said it had yet to make up its mind over whether to approve the payment of the funds to Athens.
A German Finance Ministry spokesman said: "We'll wait and look at the report, analyse it and then decide what will happen." The statement on Greece coincided with a political crisis in Slovakia, the only one of 17 eurozone nations that has yet to ratify the extension of the powers of the €440bn European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF).
Slovakia's parliament brought down the government on last night by rejecting a plan to expand the eurozone's rescue fund, but the outgoing government said it hoped to pass the measure by the end of the week with opposition support.
Prime Minister Iveta Radicova had made the issue into a vote of confidence to try to prevent one of her coalition partners, the liberal Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) party, from opposing the European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF), but in vain.
Without ratification from all 17 eurozone parliaments, the European bailout fund cannot start to exercise its new powers, which include buying up the sovereign bonds of stressed member states and recapitalising eurozone banks.
Radicova, who held back tears during a news conference after the vote, called on the three like-minded parties in her coalition to approach the leftist main opposition party, Smer, for a way to pass the deal in a new vote. Smer had demanded a reshuffle or resignation in exchange for its support.
Radicova's finance minister, Ivan Miklos, said Slovakia was still likely to find a way to ratify the agreement soon.
Meanwhile, the fragility of Silvio Berlusconi's government in Italy, which is struggling to convince investors of its creditworthiness, was illustrated last night when the tycoon premier failed to have the first article of the budget passed by the lower house.
Mr Berlusconi appeared surprised when the straightforward house-keeping motion to sign-off the books for the 2010 budget failed to obtain a majority, with 290 votes in favour and 290 votes against.
Pier Luigi Bersani, leader of the opposition Democratic Party, called for Mr Berlusconi's resignation.
"A government defeated on the budget cannot balance the budget and... cannot continue," Bersani said.
|
47 |
|
56 |
Politics Rest of the World-Afganistan- Poppy Day
Updated: 12 Oct 2011
Afghan opium output soars by 61%
Tuesday 11 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Afghan farmers are cranking up opium production driven by continued poverty and rising prices of the drug, UN experts revealed today.
A report by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) said Afghan opium production soared by 61 per cent this year, to 5,800 metric tons from 3,600 in 2010.
Cultivation of poppies has risen 7 per cent to 131,000 hectares as struggling farmers increase production of the raw material for heroin and morphine.
Occupied Afghanistan is already the world's largest opium producer, providing about 80 per cent of the global crop.
Farmers told UN researchers that they turned to the illegal poppy because it produced more profit from relatively small plots of land, helping them provide basic food and shelter for their families and improve their living conditions.
Seventeen Afghan provinces are affected by poppy cultivation, up from 14 a year ago.
And three provinces that had been declared "poppy free" - a label that brings extra development funding - have backslid and are now opium producers again, the report said.
Much of this happened because farm-gate prices have soared.
UNODC said the high price of opium plus lower wheat prices "may have encouraged farmers to resume opium cultivation."
Dry opium costs about 43 per cent more than it did a year ago.
Farmers who chose to grow opium in spite of the Karzai regime's Nato-backed anti-drugs push received a windfall.
The per-hectare price of opium more than doubled to $10,700 (£6,800) from $4,900 (£3,100), according to the report.
Afghanistan UNODC chief Jean-Luc Lemahieu said the extra revenue is helping to fund crime and "instability."
Mr Lemahieu said: "We cannot afford to ignore the record profits for non-farmers, such as traders and insurgents, which in turn fuel corruption, criminality and instability.
"This is a wake-up call - counternarcotics strategies are central to achieving a secure and prosperous Afghanistan."
Russia and Iran have long complained that the dramatic increase in opium exports from Afghanistan since the US-led invasion of 2001 has fuelled drug addiction and associated social problems in neighbouring states and around the world.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
52 |
|
57 |
Politics Rest of the World- Afganistan - Our Taxes are supporting their Corruption
Updated: 12 Oct 2011
Yet another Afghan bribery probe shut down
Tuesday 11 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
A major investigation into an influential Afghan governor accused of taking bribes has been shut down and its top prosecutor transferred to a unit that doesn't handle corruption cases, Afghan and US officials have admitted.
The closing of the probe into Ghulam Qawis Abu Bakr, the former governor of Kapisa province, comes on the heels of an unpublicised assessment by US officials that no substantive corruption prosecutions were taking place in Afghanistan despite President Hamid Karzai's pledge to root out rampant graft.
The investigation raises troubling questions yet again about how much Western taxpayer money is lining the pockets of powerful Afghan officials.
It also suggests that the lax prosecution of corruption has pervaded all levels of the regime.
Mr Abu Bakr was suspended as governor after CIA director David Petraeus presented Mr Karzai with documentation showing that he was colluding with militants, an Afghan official in Kabul with direct knowledge of the incident said.
In the two years since Mr Karzai unveiled a new anti-corruption task force powerful government figures have been accused of corruption and even investigated, but seldom brought to court.
It appears that Mr Abu Bakr will be no exception.
Most of the approximately 2,000 cases investigated by the anti-corruption unit since its birth in 2009 have stalled, according to a Nato official.
The 28 convictions so far have all been of minor players.
The attorney-general's office has been infiltrated by power brokers ranging from MPs to warlords who are systematically blocking cases, the Nato official said.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
60 |
|
58 |
Politics Rest of the World- The Wretched Scandal of Gaza - Mary Riddell of the Telegraph
Updated: 10 Oct 2011
The wretched scandal of Gaza
Despite the Palestinians' appeal to the UN for statehood,
Gaza remains in a state of siege, lacking basic food and sanitation.
Mary Riddell reports from 'a stricken land'
Telegraph article A girl sleeps in front of her house, destroyed by an earlier Israeli offensive: 'Gaza is one of the hardest places on earth to be a child’ Photo: Mohammed Salem / Reuters By Mary Riddell 6:42AM BST 10 Oct 2011 Past bombed suburbs and scrubland stands the house on the frontier of hell.
Once, Abdullah Wahdem's home was a pleasant villa set in the citrus groves of northern Gaza.
Now its cream stucco frontage is pitted by the bullets and artillery salvos that slammed into the last outpost of a stricken land.
Three miles away, across the wasteland, is Sderot, the Israeli town regularly hit by Hamas rockets fired from Gaza.
While those attacks have provoked international outrage, few outsiders ever see the return violence visited on innocent inhabitants of a territory under blockade.
The occupants of Abdullah's house are as gravely scarred as its facade.
Behind the shutters stands his sister-in-law, a pretty young woman with a closed slit where her left eye was shot away.
Her small daughter and the family's other children still wake screaming after artillery rounds fell on their bedroom. Abdullah's 10-year-old son, Mohammed, extends a hand with fingers missing.
"We are still suffering so much," Abdullah says. "Everything has been demolished by the Israelis."
The fruit farm that was once his livelihood has been flattened by "sweepers" that have destroyed trees and bushes to allow maximum visibility in a buffer zone where, according to a local lawyer, a shoot-to-kill policy still operates.
Farmers have been struck down as they tend their land, and a teenager collecting scrap metal from the rubble was shot the day before we drove in.
Almost three years have passed since the start of Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli Air Force campaign that killed 1,300 Palestinians, many of them women and children, and injured 7,000 more.
Although the hostilities that crushed 4,000 homes and bombed Gaza back into medievalism are over, the current ceasefire does not betoken peace, or even an absence of war.
The road back from Abdullah's house leads through Beit Hanoun, where an Israeli air raid was reported to have injured three Gazans shortly before our arrival.
I am travelling with Justin Forsyth, chief executive of Save the Children, and David Miliband, debarred from visiting Gaza for security reasons while he was Foreign Secretary and paying his first visit to support the charity's work.
The Arab Spring has not percolated the permafrost of Gaza's political winter.
In the highest global forums, the Middle East peace process is back on the agenda after the Palestinian appeal to the UN for statehood.
Gaza, barely mentioned in such discussions, is the scandal that the world forgot.
With justifiable cause, Israel fears and detests the Islamic fundamentalist group Hamas, elected to govern the Gaza Strip.
Talks between Hamas and Fatah, the Palestinian party that administers the West Bank, are far from reaching accord over the occupied territories.
In an urban sprawl of buildings bombed to rubble, the odd fruit stall, even a barber and a wedding dress shop, reflect the determination of Gaza's 1.5 million citizens to survive a siege under which necessities, such as fuel and building materials, are either unobtainable or have to be smuggled through tunnels from Egypt.
Children with pressed uniforms and schoolbags walk home from classrooms too overcrowded to cope, and the blue sea lapping northern beaches is poisoned by raw sewage.
Electricity and the undrinkable tap water are intermittent, and – in a country that should be prosperous – children are routinely starving.
In a nutrition centre to which Save The Children has given $250,000 since the war ended, a grey-faced mother of nine sits with her tiny, 10-day-old triplets.
Her name, Tahani, which means Blessings, is unlikely to reflect their futures or that of the 10 per cent of Gazan children so malnourished that their development is permanently stunted.
Many of the mothers sitting in this clinic are university graduates, and the director, Dr Adnan Al-Wahaidi, trained at Great Ormond Street.
But neither education nor skill can counter the curse of being born in Gaza, whose situation Dr Adnan describes as "being like a car stuck in sand and getting sucked in deeper".
As Justin Forsyth says: "Gaza is one of the hardest places on earth to be a child.
The sadness is that the ruin of these children's lives is so unnecessary."
While Forsyth's staff and medical teams do what they can, the Gazan crisis is also a failure of politics.
On the humanitarian front, Forsyth has only praise for the Government, and in particular the International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, and the "extraordinarily brave" Chancellor, George Osborne – who, in the face of austerity cuts, has ensured that British aid spending is maintained.
In the political sphere, however, courage is less evident.
Despite pledges to the contrary, the Gazan border remains virtually impenetrable, stifling the economy and starving the population of life's staples.
As David Miliband says: "Gaza has gone off the political agenda, and that is dangerous."
Despite his lack of any formal role, Miliband, who left Gaza to meet young activists in Egypt, remains an influential figure, able to command the attention of foreign leaders at a time when the US Congress is threatening to cut $200 million in aid to the Palestinians as a rebuke for President Mahmoud Abbas's call for statehood.
A central player in the mounting diplomatic crisis facing the occupied territories is Miliband's old friend and mentor, Tony Blair.
As the special envoy for the Middle East Quartet, made up of the US, Russia, the EU and the UN, he has attracted the wrath of Palestinians, one of whom described him as more like an "Israeli diplomat" than a neutral interlocutor.
While no politician (least of all Miliband) backs accusations that Blair has been freeloading, there is a genuine anxiety over the worth and impartiality of the Quartet.
In the marbled offices of the West Bank, some senior Palestinian figures make little secret of their scorn for Blair and the "useless" alliance he represents. As Quartet efforts to revive the peace process continue, there is scant mention of Gaza, the dirty secret of the region and the world.
Countless lives depend on whether Israel can finally be persuaded or shamed into seeing that a prosperous neighbour would be less of a threat than a pariah land in which the Hamas government becomes more entrenched and misery engulfs the peaceful majority.
Here in Gaza everything is rationed, except hope. In a children's centre whose libraries and rose-scented rooms offer a rare oasis of calm, two 10-year-old boys write out neat homework.
Abdullah wants to be a doctor, and his friend, Yusuf, says he hopes to become a pilot and fly out of Gaza airport.
But Gaza has no airport.
To fly away seems an impossible ambition when Yusuf may never even be permitted to trudge the dusty kilometre through no man's land and across the barricaded border.
The question is whether a region and a world intoxicated by the Arab Spring have the will to nurture one child's small dream of freedom.
|
55 |
|
59 |
Politics Rest of the World- Occupy America-A failed Capitalist alternative demanded
Updated: 10 Oct 2011
Occupations spread across US
Tuesday 04 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Protesters continued to occupy Manhattan's financial district yesterday in defiance of Saturday's mass arrests and expanded their protest against corporate greed to cities around the country.
As the Occupy Wall St protest entered its third week, activists in New York held meetings and forums in nearby Zuccoti Park - even after police rounded up nearly 800 people on Saturday afternoon for blocking the Brooklyn Bridge.
Most of those detained were released the following day.
Teenage activist Kira Moyer-Sims from Portland, Oregon, said that protesters are undaunted and are settling in for the long haul.
New York City officials "thought we were going to leave and we haven't - and we're going to stay as long as we can," she said.
Campers are taking turns organising a "general assembly" where they divide tasks among themselves and have established a makeshift hospital and legal aid facilities to help people who are arrested.
Protesters have even started printing a newspaper - the Occupied Wall Street Journal.
On Sunday a delegation of New York state school teachers joined the occupation in Manhattan to express their solidarity.
Denise Martinez, a Brooklyn resident who works at a school where most students are from families on or below the poverty line, said: "The financial institutions here on Wall Street have caused the economic problems and they're not contributing their fair share to solving them."
Ms Martinez said that government investment in education had shrunk to the point where she was routinely teaching classes of about 50 pupils.
"These are America's future workers and what's trickling down to them are the problems - the unemployment, the crime.''
The Wall Street protest has inspired citizens in other cities around the US to stage similar actions. A map of the country displayed on Zuccoti Park's plaza showed 21 occupations taking place across the country.
The biggest protests outside New York are being staged outside Federal Reserve buildings in Los Angeles, Chicago and Boston, while a group in Columbus, Ohio, took to the city's streets on Sunday.
And in a sign that the protest is spreading further afield, people across the border in Canada are planning an Occupy Wall Street solidarity rally in Toronto later this month.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com"
|
55 |
|
60 |
Politics Rest of the World- Greece Lightning Strikes As IMF demand more cuts
Updated: 07 Oct 2011
Greeks keep up fight against austerity
Wednesday 05 October 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Greek public-sector staff walked off the job today to protest against the government's push for harsher austerity measures in a bid to win more loans from its EU and IMF creditors.
At least 20,000 protesters converged in central Athens and another 15,000 gathered in Thessaloniki.
Nearly all the demonstrations were peaceful, but a few dozen protesters near parliament threw stones at riot police, who shot back tear gas.
The 24-hour strike was called by the country's two main union confederations the Civil Servants' Confederation (ADEDY) and the Greek General Confederation of Labour (GSEE).
Air-traffic controllers honoured the action, grounding all flights in and out of Greek airports.
State hospitals were running on emergency staff, while lawyers, teachers and tax officers also walked out for the day.
Public transport employees held work stoppages in the morning and evening and state television and radio pulled news programmes off the air.
Greek citizens have already been robbed of their collective bargaining rights and hit with successive pay and pension cuts in the name of deficit reduction.
They are currently enduring a deep recession, with the economy expected to contract 5.5 per cent this year.
Unemployment has spiralled to above 16 per cent as small businesses have closed down.
Now the nominally Socialist government is proposing to suspend about 30,000 public-sector staff on partial pay for six months before sacking them.
Protesting Finance Ministry employee Irini Sypsomou-Arapogianni called for a crackdown on wealthy tax dodgers instead of austerity for working people.
Fllow protester Zacharis Zacharia said: "Everybody's paying except those few who drove us to this point."
But in Brussels IMF Europe programme chief Antonio Borges put pressure on Athens to carry on with privatisations and other "structural adjustment" measures.
GSEE and ADEDY have called a general strike for October 19.
|
63 |
|
61 |
Politics Rest of the World- Support Palestinian Prisoners Hunger Strike
Updated: 06 Oct 2011
Support Palestinian prisoners’
hunger strike since 27 Sept. 2011
Sign
Blog
Signatures
Email friends
We, the undersigned, stand in solidarity with Palestinian prisoners, currently on hunger strike, in protest against the humiliating and cruel treatment they are subjected to at the hands of the Israeli Prison Services.
The world must no longer ignore the plight of approximately 7,000 Palestinian prisoners who are denied their most basic human rights enshrined in International humanitarian law.
These includes: Long term isolation, the denial of medical attention for serious chronic diseases, lack of access to education and basic reading material; shackling of hands and legs when meeting visitors; refusal of family visits and excessive use of fines as a form of punishment.
Many prisoners are held without charge for unspecified period of time and some are held under administrative laws which are being only used in Israel.
We call on the Israeli authorities to meet the demands of the hunger strikers immediately and release all political prisoners.
|
61 |
|
62 |
Politics Rest of the World- Syria will strike if attacked- Assad
Updated: 06 Oct 2011
Latest update 18:07 04.10.11
Assad: Syria will shower Tel Aviv with rockets
if attacked by foreign powers
Iranian news agency quotes remarks made by Syrian president during August meeting with Turkish FM; Assad: It will take Damascus 6 hours to mobilize against Israel.
By Haaretz
Syria will strike Israel and "set fire" to the Middle East if foreign forces choose to launch a military strike on the protest-ridden country, the Iranian news agency Fars quoted Syrian President Bashar Assad as saying on Tuesday, referring to remarks made by the Syrian leader during a meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu last August.
During a meeting with the Turkish FM, the Fars report claimed, Assad indicated that Syria would not hesitate to strike major Israeli cities if it was attacked.
"If a crazy measure is taken against Damascus, I will need not more than 6 hours to transfer hundreds of rockets and missiles to the Golan Heights to fire them at Tel Aviv," Assad said.
In addition, Fars reported that the Syrian president told the Turkish FM that he would also call on Hezbollah in Lebanon to launch a rocket attack on Israel, adding: "All these events will happen in three hours, but in the second three hours, Iran will attack the U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf and the U.S. and European interests will be targeted simultaneously."
Assad's comments to the Turkish FM came after Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said earlier Tuesday he would set out his country's plans for sanctions against Syria after he visits a Syrian refugee camp near the border in the coming days.
The move heralds a further deterioration in previously friendly relations between Ankara and Damascus since the start of Assad's crackdown on protesters.
"Regarding sanctions, we will make an assessment and announce our road map after the visit to Hatay in southern Turkey, setting out the steps," Erdogan told reporters, adding he expected to visit the region at the weekend or the start of next week.
Some 7,000 Syrians have taken refuge in camps established in Hatay, in flight from President Assad's security forces.
__._,_.___
|
52 |
|
63 |
Politics - Bahrain locks up its best Medics
Updated: 03 Oct 2011
Bahrain
The dictatorship is locking up its doctors and nurses
who assisted demonstrators of the Arab Spring.
And I thought we needed more not less?
I must write, and ask you too.
Would Caring Cameron give asylum to those incarcerated, and stop getting so cosy to these despots who banged up the Medics
We need more carers like that, those who devout themselves for people based on their need not ability to contribute
|
146 |
|
64 |
Politics- As the US reduces its aid to Palestine-See its contribution to Israel
Updated: 03 Oct 2011
ISRAEL
The US is reducing its contribution to aid Palestine because its upset with them.
But its ISRAEL that is consuming billions of US dollars. It is ISRAEL who wouldn’t survive 10 mins if the US cut of aid to them.
Check it out yourself-the in-balance of contributions ,I mean. Guess how much the US gives Israel EVERYDAY ?
The Cost of ISRAEL to US Taxpayers
By Richard H. Curtiss Former U.S. Foreign Service Officer The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs
For many years the American media said that “ISRAEL receives $1.8 billion in military aid” or that “Israel receives $1.2 billion in economic aid.”
Both statements were true, but since they were never combined to give us the complete total of annual US. aid to ISRAEL, they also were lies—true lies.
Recently Americans have begun to read and hear that “Israel receives $3 billion in annual US foreign aid.”
That's true.
But it's still a lie.
The problem is that in fiscal 1997 alone, Israel received from a variety of other US. federal budgets at least $525.8 million above and beyond its $3 billion from the foreign aid budget, and yet another $2 billion in federal loan guarantees.
So the complete total of US grants and loan guarantees to ISRAEL for fiscal 1997 was $5,525,800,000
How much is that per day ?
$15 million a day in 1997
|
77 |
|
65 |
Politics-Israeli West Bank Settlers Steal Palestinian Sheep and Chop down Olive Trees
Updated: 03 Oct 2011
Settlers 'steal 150 sheep' near Hebron
Published Saturday 01/10/2011 (updated) 02/10/2011 19:46
HEBRON (Ma'an) -- Armed Israeli settlers seized 150 sheep from shepherds south of Hebron in the southern West Bank, a popular committee leader said.
Popular committee secretary-general Azmi Shoyoukhi told Ma'an that residents of Shima, a settlement east of al-Dhahiriya, stole sheep belonging to Faris Samamrah.
They took the sheep to Shima settlement after assaulting several shepherds and threatening to shoot them if they returned to the area, the local official said.
Meanwhile, other residents of the same settlement chopped down 10 olive trees belonging to Mousa Samamrah, Shouyoukhi said, adding that settlers destroyed 45 trees in the same field on Thursday.
Shouyoukhi said locals held a rally to protest the theft of the sheep, joined by Majdi Amr, director of the south Hebron office of the Palestinian Authority Ministry of Agriculture.
International and Israeli activists participated in the rally, and held a sit-in in the area where the sheep were stolen, waving Palestinian flags and chanting anti-settlement slogans.
Protesters damaged water pipelines laid down by settlers in the area. Israeli police and civil administration officers arrived and the sheep were released after representatives of the Red Cross intervened, Shouyoukhi said.
Earlier Saturday, Israeli settlers burned farmland south of Nablus in the northern West Bank, a Palestinian Authority official said.
Ghassan Doughlas, who monitors settler violence and vandalism, said land in the Einabus and Huwwara villages burned as the result of a fire set by residents of the illegal Yitzhar settlement.
The settlers had started a fire on the Einabus mountain but it spread to Huwwara, he said.
Residents of Yitzhar settlement also chopped down 45 olive trees belonging to Zakariyya Nassar and Muhammad al-Qitin in Madma village on Saturday, Doughlas said.
|
64 |
|
66 |
Chinese CP embraces capitalist- Politics Rest of The World
Updated: 27 Sep 2011
Top capitalist set to join CPC ranks
CHINA: The richest man in the country is poised to become the first capitalist to join the central committee of the governing Communist Party, according to media reports at the weekend.
The Guangzhou-based Time Weekly newspaper reported that the organisation department of the party’s leading body had completed its evaluation of Sany group chairman Liang Wengen, who has an estimated fortune of £6.4 billion.
Fan Jinggang, founder of the popular left-wing Utopia website, claimed the reports showed that “private capitalism is penetrating the power base of our socialist country.”
|
66 |
|
67 |
French Left Win Senate-Politics Rest of the World
Updated: 27 Sep 2011
Left sweeps to victory in French Senate elections
Monday 26 September 2011
by Tom Mellen
Progressive parties wrested the French Senate from President Nicolas Sarkozy's Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) and its neoliberal allies in indirect elections on Sunday.
The opposition Socialist Party and a left-wing electoral alliance took the majority of seats in the upper house of parliament for the first time since the foundation of the Fifth Republic in 1958.
The Socialists and the Left Front, which unites the French Communist Party, the anti-capitalist Left Party and two smaller left-wing factions, together won at least 26 seats from the UMP and centre-right parties - giving progressive forces a historic majority in the 348-member Senate seven months before presidential elections.
Senate Socialist group leader Jean-Pierre Bel said: "This is a day that will mark history. For the first time, change is in motion.
"This is a real affront to the right."
Final results won't be known until tomorrow because election officials in France's Caribbean territories have yet to report.
The Senate, which can initiate Bills and slow down their passage, is elected by regionally and locally elected officials under a system that favours rural districts over urban ones.
Communist Party senators were re-elected to 14 seats and gained a new one.
"The citadel of the right has fallen," PCF national secretary Pierre Laurent declared.
Mr Laurent said the result amounted to "a final sanction of government policy" which reflected "the anger of local and regional politicians facing repeated attacks by the Sarkozy administration against local democracy."
He insisted that the Senate must now become a bulwark "against Sarkozy's policy of austerity and democratic regression.
"A page is turning - the days of the right in power are numbered. It's a great sign of confidence and hope for the future of elections in 2012."
UMP MP Patrick Ollier insisted that the results had "no national political significance."
But Agriculture Minister Bruno Le Maire, who has been tasked with drafting the UMP's political programme for 2012, conceded that the election was a "serious warning."
Sunday's elections were to renew 170 seats.
French senators serve six-year terms.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
65 |
|
68 |
PETRIFIED (Pun) GADDAFI LIVES ON IN THE DESERT SAND ? POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 24 Sep 2011
Gaddafi daughter: my father is alive and fighting
The daughter of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi claimed on Friday that her father is alive and fighting on the ground in Libya.
Aisha Gaddafi also attacked the country's new rulers and called them "traitors" in a telephone message aired by Syria-based Arrai television.
"Remain reassured, your great leader is doing well. He carries weapons and is fighting on the fronts," she said in the message.
"You can be proud of your leader," she said, addressing the "resistant people" of Libya.
Aisha, who fled to Algeria with her mother and two brothers late last month, called on the people to "rise" against the new rulers, saying members of the National Transitional Council were "traitors who have broken their oath of allegiance" toward Gaddafi.
She warned Libyans that "those who have betrayed their allegiance could do the same with you".
When rebel fighters stormed and captured Gaddafi's Bab al-Aziziya headquarters on August 23, they found no trace of the strongman, who has since made several broadcasts claiming he is still in Libya.
Reports also emerged that he may be in the south.
"General Belgasem al-Abaaj, who we captured on Monday, said that Gaddafi had contacted him by phone about 10 days ago, and that he was moving secretly between (the oases towns of) Sabha and Ghat," an NTC commander, Mohammed Barka Wardugu, told AFP.
Abaaj had said that Gaddafi "is helped by Nigerian and Chadian mercenaries who know the desert routes", added Wardugu, spokesman for the Desert Shield Brigade.
|
111 |
|
69 |
BAHRAIN-REPRESSION BY THE DICTATORSHIP CHALLENGED- POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 24 Sep 2011
| Bahrain 'fires tear gas' at protesters |
| |
Rubber bullets and tear gas reportedly fired on protesters calling for a boycott of Saturday's parliamentary vote.
Last Modified: 23 Sep 2011 14:19
|
|
Demonstrators in Bahrain have been blocked by security forces in a march toward Pearl roundabout as protests continued ahead of Saturday's planned elections.
Reports from Bahrain claim protesters were proceeding to the central area from villages outside the capital city when they were pushed back by tear gas and rubber bullets.
"The protesters have tried to take to the streets in a number of villages around the country and they have been immediately met with brutal police repression," a source in Bahrain told Al Jazeera on Friday.
"Police have been firing tear gas, rubber bullets, shotgun pellets and other types of objects at protesters who are largely unarmed in these villages.
"Those who are carrying anything are [carrying] stones and maybe paint to throw at police vehicles."
Demonstrators involved in the march toward Pearl roundabout, the centre of the protest movement until government forces tore down the center statue and renamed the intersection, have called for a boycott of parliamentary elections planned for Saturday.
The election will fill 18 parliamentary seats emptied when the country's main Shia opposition party stepped down six months ago to protest an earlier violent government crackdown on demonstrations.
Earlier this year, Shia-led groups had earlier called for demonstrations to press the government for more freedoms from the Sunni monarchy which has ruled the strategically important Gulf island for more than 200 years.
'Under repression'
Protesters on Friday marched to Manama's Pearl Square, the former epicenter of Bahrain's uprising that broke out in February.
|
A freelance journalist reports from outside Manama
|
"There are some posters of politicians hanging around places in Manama, the capital, that I've been seeing," the source said.
"But once you get into the villages, which are predominantly the Shia villages in and around the capital, you don't see any support for these politicians, who many are calling 'opportunists'."
Bahraini authorities have stepped up pressure on anti-government activists ahead of the elections, threatening those who use social media and websites to urge acts of dissent with jail.
"There is a class of society under repression and there are obstacles at every turn, blocking their voice," said Sheik Isa Qassim during Friday's sermon.
The cleric told followers in a mosque in Diraz, an opposition stronghold northwest of the capital Manama, that the vote on Saturday is meaningless.
"This is fake democracy," Sheik Isa said.
Nightly clashes
Shia muslims make up a majority of Bahrain's population, but they have long been ruled by a Sunni dynasty which they claim has not provided economic opportunities.
According to human rights groups, more than 30 people have died as a result of the protests in Bahrain.
Hundreds of activists have been detained and brought to trial on anti-state charges in a special security court since March, when Bahrain's rulers imposed martial law and invited a Saudi-led Gulf military force to help put down dissent.
Since Bahrain lifted emergency rule in June, rights groups claim government opponents have clashed with police almost every night.
Manama's Pearl Square has been heavily guarded since Bahrain's security forces stormed the protesters' encampment camp there six months ago.
On Friday, police checkpoints were erected on the streets leading up to the square. Armored police vehicles were seen parked near the former hub of anti-government protests and riot police were lined up behind the vehicles.
The opposition's boycott of Saturday's vote will likely tighten the grip of the kingdom's Sunni rulers, who have so far managed to ride out six months of protests inspired by the Arab Spring
|
|
66 |
|
70 |
SYRIA-THE REVOLUTION CONTINUES-POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 24 Sep 2011
|
Syria: The revolution will be weaponised
|
|
|
|
Journalist Nir Rosen discusses armed struggle with army officers who have defected to join the opposition.
Nir Rosen Last Modified: 23 Sep 2011 14:36
|
|
Editor's note: Al Jazeera special correspondent Nir Rosen spent seven weeks travelling throughout Syria with unique access to all sides. He visited Daraa, Damascus, Homs, Hama, Latakia and Aleppo to explore the uprising and growing internal conflict. In the first article of his series he meets with leaders of the armed opposition in Homs. Names of some of the indivduals quoted have been changed to protect their identities.
Homs - On August 31, I met up with a trusted acquaintance called Abu Omar (not his real name). I had been waiting for this meeting with anticipation, as the people involved were extremely hard to reach. They were constantly evading the regime.
Abu Omar called the night before to let me know it was going to happen. The next morning I awoke excited. Adding to my nervous energy, the mobile network in town was shut off. Unable to call Abu Omar, I decided to go to the café near where we had last met, hoping he would find me.
Concurrently, he was sitting in the car near where he had last dropped me off, hoping I would find him. Two hours after the pre-arranged time, he pulled up to the café. He asked me what devices I had and instructed me to remove the batteries from my mobile phone.
We drove north to Rastan, a city with a strong opposition presence. The last time I was there, several weeks earlier, I had counted 50 tanks along the perimeter of the town. As we drove toward the town, the scene was wholly different, not a single tank in sight. Rastan felt liberated.
Abu Omar was a senior coordinator in the country's six-month-old uprising and was involved in opposition activities since 2007. He lamented that to date, the revolution had only succeeded in costing the lives of three thousand people.
"After Libya, many people said it was a mistake to have a peaceful revolution and if they had done it like the Libyans they would be free by now," he said.
As I spent more time in Syria, I could see a clear theme developing in the discourse of the opposition: A call for an organised armed response to the government crackdown, mainly from the opposition within Syria. Demonstrators had hoped the holy month of Ramadan would be the turning point in their revolution, but as it came to an end - six months into the Syrian uprising - many realised the regime was too powerful to be overthrown peacefully.
Previously, on August 25, I met with a senior opposition leader in Damascus' large suburb of Harasta, an anti-regime stronghold. The government had cracked down harshly on demonstrations there, though the armed opposition had been able to kill many members of the security forces.
"In the end we cannot be free without weapons," the leader said. "It's necessary, but not by the people, by the army; we need defections."
A few days later, on August 28, I attended an anti-regime demonstration in the Bab Assiba neighbourhood of Homs. Demonstrators there were calling for a no-fly zone, much like the one imposed over Libya. Many of them hoped for international intervention.
In Rastan, Abu Omar introduced me to Firas - an organiser of the nightly anti-regime demonstrations. Firas (not his real name) asked me how much justification NATO needed before it intervened. It would be better if NATO helped without the destruction of infrastructure that had taken place in Libya, he said.
Anatomy of the opposition
|
"[The opposition is] mostly young. They are free thinking. They don't believe Dunya TV (a pro-regime channel)."
- Abu Omar, senior opposition leader
|
Along with the army, the country has several intelligence and security services tasked with preserving order. Protesters correctly surmise that any defections will come from the heavily Sunni army and not various security forces, which are primarily staffed by Alawites, the heterodox sect of President Bashar al-Assad.
The opposition is loath to admit it but they are effectively all Sunni. The diverse ethnic makeup of Syria makes for a complicated map of allegiances within the country. Christians, by and large, support the regime out of fear of the unknown realities of a post-Assad Syria, while the Druze are sitting in the wings, waiting to see which side will emerge victorious. The Kurds, however, secretly hope for the regime to collapse.
Such is the segregation, that those who support the opposition know little about those who support the regime, and vice versa. They watch and believe different news media, they attend funerals for different "martyrs", (dead security forces or dead opposition supporters), and they believe the worst rumours about each other and are increasingly divided by an unbridgeable gap.
In the propaganda war being waged between opponents and supporters of the Syrian regime, the nature and make up of the opposition has been a key point. Opponents of the regime insist that the opposition is entirely peaceful and if any security forces have been killed it is only at the hands of other security forces in order to blame the opposition. Defenders of the regime describe the opposition as Salafi terrorists, arms dealers, drug smugglers, mercenaries or criminals.
The overwhelming majority of the opposition is peaceful and unarmed.
For some it is a question of principal or strategy; for many it is simply because they do not have access to weapons that would be useful against the powerful Syrian security forces. There are various different armed opposition actors in Syria. Together they have killed around 700 hundred members of the Syrian security forces in various clashes and ambushes.
The most organised and professional armed opposition members are those who are deserters from the army. However, it is important to point out they have not deserted with their weapons and it is not entire units that are deserting, currently just individuals. In much of the country young men arm themselves or are provided weapons by wealthier people to protect themselves from the onslaught of security forces.
|
"[The defectors] saw there is no justice in the army, that they cannot advance in the army, and what was happening to the people, who are their family."
- Abu Omar, senior opposition leader
|
There are also local self-defence militias and armed civilians throughout various villages and slums. Though many are socially and religiously conservative, they do not appear to consider themselves mujahedin or otherwise fit the stereotype of Islamic extremists. Accordingly, individuals have told me that Islam does provide them with inspiration and strength but they do not fight for Islam and their goals are generally secular.
Abu Omar is a senior opposition leader in Homs who coordinates with the defecting military personnel. These defectors are not very religious, Abu Omar told me. "They drink, they have girlfriends," he said. "They are mostly young. They are free thinking. They don't believe Dunya TV (a pro-regime channel). They saw there is no justice in the army, that they cannot advance in the army, and what was happening to the people, who are their family."
Back in Rastan
We were told to drive to a certain corner at a certain time. We arrived and saw a car on the opposite corner. Inside were three men each with an equally stern gaze.
I was worried that they were with the regime and we had been set up. Another car was parked on the corner diagonal to us. Abu Omar got out, walked to it and spoke to the men inside. We followed a lead car while being tailgated by another.
Abu Omar told me that several other cars were watching us. We drove towards the outskirts of town past some orchards and stopped by a house under construction.
A man got out of the car in front, and headed towards the car I was sitting in. He was tall and wore the uniform of a first lieutenant in the Syrian army with a patch from the 5th Special Forces unit, a pistol in his belt and his pants tucked into black military boots. As he came over he gestured that I follow him, without much recourse I hesitantly complied.
He took me to a stairwell and handed me a tracksuit and a pair of sneakers and told me to change. I undressed down to my underwear. We were clearly both a bit uncomfortable.
They did not give me a shirt, so I put on the track jacket that was a couple of sizes too small for me. It was also inappropriately warm for the summer. The training pants weren't much better either - I felt nervous, uncomfortable and to top it off very sweaty. He asked me to open my mouth and looked up and down it and then in my ears and felt my scalp.
We left my clothes in Abu Omar's car and entered the leas car. Inside was a Kalashnikov. Adding to my physical discomfort, they gave me a thin ski mask and asked me to put it on in reverse so it covered my eyes. However, once it was stretched out on my face I could just about see through it. It was hot and uncomfortable.
|
"They gave me a thin ski mask and asked me to put it on in reverse so it covered my eyes ... I felt claustrophobic and trapped."
- Nir Rosen, journalist
|
I felt claustrophobic and trapped. I could hear my own breathing louder than usual as we bounced around on a rough road.
In eight years of working in conflict zones with armed groups I had never been told to put a mask on. Abu Omar told me it was also for my protection so people outside would not recognise me. "Do you trust these people?" I whispered to Abu Omar.
"Its too late now," he laughed at me.
The driver communicated with some people on his walkie talkie, informing them of his whereabouts and asking them what was happening where they were. We drove around for a few minutes and pulled up to another orchard.
I took off the mask. We continued to walk behind a house, and proceeded to sit on some plastic chairs that sunk into the soft dirt, under the shade of some fruit trees. Someone brought us coffee and water; my hands trembled as I drank. Suddenly the silence was broken by a couple of gunshots. Immediately my mind flashed images of being ambushed by security forces. The man got on his radio to inquire about the shots but he didn't seem too phased.
"We are free officers rejecting the oppression of people and we are protecting the innocent people," first lieutenant Muhamad Abdelaziz Tlass of the 5th special forces told me. I was with a leader of the Khalid bin al Walid brigade of the Free Officers' Battalion. The other unit of deserters in Homs was called the Salahedin Victory brigade.
Homs was the centre of armed opposition in Syria. Rastan was the centre for the armed opposition in Homs. There were also deserters operating in Jabal Azzawiya in the north and Daraa in the south. Most of them had deserted from different units on May 30.
Tlass estimated the number of deserters in and around Homs at 500, however many defectors did not have rifles and only stocked with a few rocket propelled grenades (RPGs). Most of the men were originally from Homs, he said. They were mostly from the army because the regime controlled the security units.
"After the year 2000 they recruited Alawites to the security services," he said. "The regime is Alawite and security forces are the ones doing the killing. The government has convinced Alawites that this is an existential battle for them but this is not true."
The resistance strikes back
|
"One of my soldiers saw a big demonstration on Al Jazeera and asked me 'Sir, is it possible this is in Syria and they are really asking for the fall of the regime?'"
- 1st Lieutenant Muhamad Abdelaziz Tlass, Free Officer
|
Tlass claimed their first operation occurred on June 20 when they defended a demonstration. Military security ordered an armoured personnel vehicle belonging to the army to shoot at a demonstration. Four children were killed and he claimed security forces killed an army general for refusing to shoot. But it was more likely that the deserting soldiers had killed the general.
"Our people tried to defend the demonstration," he said. "We stopped the security forces from killing more and battled with them." He claimed they killed six security force members. "It hurts us when they get killed," Abu Omar said, "they don't know why they are fighting."
In Homs, the resistance was commanded by a major but the highest ranking deserting officer was a colonel, they told me. They were mostly young because young officers were less restricted in their thought. The older officers have a strong historical memory of the harsh suppression of the Hama armed uprising in 1982.
"The army is not loyal to the government," he told me, "but they control media so they don't know the real situation on the ground. One of my soldiers saw a big demonstration on Al Jazeera and asked me 'sir is it possible this is in Syria and they are really asking for the fall of the regime?'"
He told me that the personal mobile phones of soldiers were taken away and even officers were denied access to satellite television so they would only be able to watch state controlled television. The daily reports the government gave the army were written by security forces, he said, and helped motivate soldiers to kill civilians and convince them that civilian demonstrators were terrorists, provocateurs, traitors, foreign agents and Salafi extremists.
According to Tlass, in 2004 the defense ministry became overwhelmed by Alawites and fell under their control, with all senior positions allocated for the minority sect. He explained that this was the reason the army remained strong behind the regime. Though these officers controlled the army, "the army is with the people", he said.
|
|
|
The opposition is still debating on whether to announce an armed revolution [GALLO/GETTY]
|
The issue of scaling up
The officer in civilian clothes told me they lacked the ability to initiate large operations.
"Our revolution is peaceful still and we don't have weapons," he said, "but it is time to arm the revolution, especially after Libya. Six months without results, and the number of dead ..." He trailed off, but estimated the dead were five thousand, double the official number.
They were hoping for a no-fly zone because they believed this would encourage entire units to desert along with their vehicles without having to worry about being attacked by the regime's helicopters or fighter planes.
It was a flawed logic though because the international community had little pretext for a no-fly zone when the Syrian regime had not yet used its aircraft to attack people and there was no concern for an imminent massacre as had been claimed would happen in Libya.
|
"Our revolution is peaceful still and we don't have weapons ... but it is time to arm the revolution."
- 1st Lieutenant Muhamad Abdelaziz Tlass, Free Officer
|
In addition, Libyan rebels liberated Benghazi from the Gaddafi regime and used it as a base to launch their military and political operations with international assistance. Benghazi was over 1,000km away from Tripoli and the desert terrain made it easy for NATO forces to destroy any regime vehicles on the road. In Syria, there is no equivalent of Benghazi.
In fact there is no remote region that can successfully be severed. Daraa, by the southern border, is 45 minutes away from Damascus, the capital. Idlib by the northern border is 45 minutes away from Aleppo, the country's commercial hub. Syrian towns are too close to each other and the terrain is more mountainous and full of trees. There is no indigenous Syrian force that can seize control of a city, yet. The armed opposition fighters had not even succeeded in holding on to rebellious Hama. They could not properly defend slums like Ramel in Latakia and Bab Assiba in Homs even though the urban terrain favored defenders.
The men I was meeting claimed to operate in all of Syria and indeed up to 700 members of the Syrian security forces had been killed since the start of the uprising, though most had been killed in clashes with unorganised but armed locals of villages and poor neighbourhoods. They had recently ambushed and killed an Alawite battalion commander on the road from Hama to Homs.
"He had given orders to kill many civilians," Tlass said. I interjected that they [opposition] must have had good intelligence. "We have many eyes," the officer in civilian clothes said.
In the middle of our conversation he got a call on his radio. "We have to go," he stood up.
Everybody unceremoniously and quickly got in their vehicles and drove away. I started to panic that we were going to be attacked and again I imagined being gunned down in a hail of bullets. Fortunately for all concerned, this was not the case and I got up and returned to the same stairwell where I changed clothes. The two cars led us out a bit and then turned away.
Two days later I was watching Al Jazeera in Damascus when I saw the same first lieutenant Tlass with several soldiers standing behind him formally declaring that he was deserting and joining the Khalid bin al Walid brigade.
Postscript
|
"We did not decide to declare this revolution armed yet."
- 1st Lieutenant Muhamad Abdelaziz Tlass, Free Officer
|
Within the ranks of the opposition's civilian leadership there is a debate over which course to take. A repeat of the Libya scenario and international military intervention is unlikely. Mostly peaceful demonstrations have failed to shake the foundations of the regime. But an openly armed rebellion would support the regime's narrative and might also lead to a harsher crackdown.
Until now the regime's response has actually been relatively restrained compared to the violence it is capable of unleashing.
"We did not decide to declare this revolution armed yet," Abu Omar told me.
The civilian opposition within Syria was debating whether it was appropriate to declare an armed revolution, he said, explaining why they had not yet broadcast videos of their operations even though on the street in Homs everybody knew about them.
"They say they resigned from the military to defend the civilians but most of their operations involve attacking checkpoints," he said. "They say 'we attack the ones who attack us; this is our way of defending civilians.'"
|
|
|
|
Source:
Al Jazeera
|
|
58 |
|
71 |
STATEHOOD FOR PALESTINE REQUEST TO UN- POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 24 Sep 2011
|
Middle East
|
|
|
|
Palestinians submit statehood request to UN
|
|
|
|
President Mahmoud Abbas says time has come to end the suffering and the plight of millions of Palestinians.
Last Modified: 23 Sep 2011 18:38
|
|
Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas has handed over a historic request to UN chief Ban Ki-moon, asking the United Nations to admit the state of Palestine as a full member.
The Palestinian leader won huge applause and a standing ovation on Friday as he entered the hall just after submitting the membership request.
"I call upon the distinguished members of the Security Council to vote in favour of our full membership," Abbas told the UN General Assembly.
"I do not believe that anyone with a shred of conscience can reject our application for a full membership in the United Nations and our admission as an independent state," Abbas said.
In his address, Abbas said he was ready to return to negotiations based on the 1967 borders, saying he did not want to isolate or delegitimise Israel.
"Here I declare that the Palestine Liberation Organisation is ready to return immediately to the negotiating table on the basis of the adopted terms of reference ... and a complete cessation of settlement activities," he told the UN General Assembly.
But he maintained previous peace talks were "smashed against the rocks of the positions of the Israeli government, which quickly dashed the hopes raised by the launch of negotiations last September".
Palestinians celebrate
Palestinians across the West Bank celebrated the formal submission of their bid to become a United Nations member state, despite opposition from the United States and Israel.
In city centres, giant television screens were set up so residents could watch Abbas deliver a historic address to the 193 member states of the UN General Assembly.
In Ramallah, the political capital of the West Bank, many cars were flying the Palestinian flag. Posters of Abbas and his predecessor, the late Yasser Arafat, festooned in the streets, as the crowd swelled to the largest seen in Ramallah since Arafat's funeral in 2004.
"I've heard a chant tonight that I've never heard before," Al Jazeera's Cal Perry, reporting from Ramallah, said. "People are chanting for Mahmoud Abbas. His speech was really playing to the next generation."
"Tonight we have seen spontaneous shows of support for Abbas, who has sometimes seen cascading public support."
Near the Muqataa, Abbas's presidential headquarters, flags of the more than 125 nations that have recognised a Palestinian state flew in a circle around a Palestinian flag.
Friday gatherings
In a sign of mounting tension earlier on Friday, one Palestinian man died after being shot by Israeli troops who intervened in a clash between villagers and Jewish settlers south of the West Bank city of Nablus.
In the southern city of Hebron, the municipality building was draped with a three-metre poster of Abbas and "Palestine 194", and similar decorations were hung in the northern cities of Nablus and Jenin.
At the Qalandia checkpoint between Ramallah and Jerusalem, the Israeli army fired tear gas into the crowds, with a military spokeswoman saying "around 100 rioters" were throwing stones at the troops.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that clashes also broke out in the East Jerusalem neighbourhood of Ras Al-Amud.
In Nabi Saleh village, protesters chanted support for the UN bid, but activists also burnt a picture of Barack Obama, the US president, who has vowed to veto the membership bid at the UN Security Council.
Full membership bid
Full UN membership can only be bestowed by the Security Council where Abbas' request will almost certainly be derailed, either by a failure to win the needed nine votes in the 15-member body or, if the necessary majority is obtained, by a veto.
The Palestinians say they are seeking full UN membership to underscore their right to statehood, but have left open the option of a lesser alternative - a non-member observer state.
Such status would be granted by the General Assembly, where the Palestinians maintain broad support.
Siding with Israel, Obama has said a Palestinian state can only be established as a result of negotiations, and that there is no short-cut to Palestinian independence.
"I extend my hand to the Palestinian people," Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said during his own address to the General Assembly, shortly after Abbas' speech.
"The truth is that Israel wants peace. The truth is that I want peace," he said.
Abbas has said negotiations remain his preference, but that he will not resume talks - frozen since 2008 - unless Israel agrees to the pre-1967 frontier as a baseline and freezes all settlement construction on occupied land.
"The American administration did everything in its power to disrupt our project, but we are going through with it despite the obstacles and the pressure because we are asking for our rights," Abbas said late on Thursday.
"There are small countries in the world that have gained their freedom and independence, but we still haven't got ours," he told the Palestinian community in New York.
Palestinian state television has carried wall-to-wall coverage of the diplomatic drama playing out in New York, interviewing local officials and politicians and running a series of advertisements backing the UN membership push.
One featured a jigsaw puzzle of the globe as depicted in the UN logo, but with with a missing piece.
From the side of the screen, a piece in the colours of the Palestinian flag flies across and slots into place, completing the puzzle.
'Palestine freedom'
The three main Palestinian newspapers also dedicated their front pages to the bid, and the inside pages were dotted with paid advertisements from individuals and businesses expressing their support for Abbas and the UN move.
"The president delivers his speech to the General Assembly and presents a request for recognition of the state of Palestine," read the headline in Al-Quds newspaper, emblazoned over pictures of pro-bid demonstrations.
Another cartoon in the paper used the famous image of US soldiers raising their flag during the battle of Iwo Jima, replacing the US flag with the Palestinian one and the soldiers with Palestinians, some in traditional garb.
Al-Ayyam's headline read: "The president presents a request for full membership for Palestine in front of the world", while on the back, a cartoon showed Abbas at the UN podium shouting into a loudspeaker: "Freedom for Palestine".
In the Gaza Strip, however, life was continuing as normal with no sign of any activity to mark the UN bid, which has not been backed by the territory's Hamas rulers.
Al Jazeera's Nicole Johnston said Hamas security officials cracked down on people watching the Abbas address in Gaza City cafes.
Our correspondent also said police confiscated Palestinian flags that crowds were waving in the streets.
Speaking hours before the Abbas address, senior Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said the UN bid would not bring independence.
"Our Palestinian people do not beg for a state ... States are not built upon UN resolutions. States liberate their land and establish their entities," he said.
|
|
|
|
Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
|
|
63 |
|
72 |
PALESTINE-CAMERON WALKS BY ON THE OTHER SIDE-POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 22 Sep 2011
Mass show of support for UN bid
Wednesday 21 September 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Tens of thousands of flag-waving Palestinians rallied in towns across the occupied West Bank today in a show of support for President Mahmoud Abbas's bid to win UN recognition of a Palestinian state.
Participants called for the establishment of an independent Palestine and slammed the US for pledging to block the bid if necessary, by using its veto in the security council.
Ramallah's main square was bedecked with images of Mr Abbas and late Palestinian president Yasser Arafat, along with Palestine Liberation Organisation and Palestinian Authority flags.
The crowd cheered when a masked youth on a stage burned a US flag before being led away by Palestinian security forces.
The rallies were staged far from possible friction points with Israeli occupation forces, though in two locations small groups of boys broke away and threw stones at Israeli troops who responded with tear gas.
In Hebron, where several hundred Israeli colonists live in a heavily fortified city-centre enclave, dozens of Palestinian riot police eventually dispersed stone throwers.
No casualties were reported in either incident.
Mr Abbas is to address the UN general assembly on Friday and request full UN membership.
"We are going to the UN because we are tired of negotiations for the sake of negotiations," Mr Abbas's aide Tayeb Abdel Rahim told supporters in Ramallah.
A new poll has found that 83 per cent of Palestinian people believe that the president's quest for UN recognition is a good idea.
The survey, conducted in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem last week by the independent Palestinian centre for policy and survey research, included 1,200 respondents and had an error margin of 3 percentage points.
But Birzeit University professor Asem Khalil struck a note of caution.
He warned that even if the UN recognises Palestine it will not automatically turn Gaza and the occupied territories into a sovereign state, because Tel Aviv has no intention of dismantling the occupation.
"Just this morning someone was saying to me that after the vote there will be no checkpoints," Professor Khalil said.
"The Palestinian Authority has contributed to this popular illusion and this will soon have a very negative impact against the Palestinian people."
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
63 |
|
73 |
PALESTINE-IS A US, BRITISH AND FRENCH RESPONSIBILITY- POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 21 Sep 2011
|
Obama's perfect storm
|
|
|
|
By opposing a Palestinian statehood vote at the UN, Obama will continue to alienate Arabs and the wider Muslim world.
Mark LeVine Last Modified: 20 Sep 2011 15:41
|
|
|
|
Susan Rice has said, 'there's no magic wand that can be waved in New York and make everything right' [GALLO/GETTY]
|
Perhaps the title isn't fair. The storm that awaits Barack Obama at the UN is not entirely of his own creation.
He did not create half a century of US foreign policy based on support for authoritarianism and occupation in the Arab and larger Muslim worlds. It was not Obama, but his predecessors - going back to Franklin Delano Roosevelt - who cosied up to the Saudis and promised them unlimited protection in return for unlimited access to all that oil.
It was not Obama but Richard Nixon who put geostrategic considerations ahead of pushing for a robust and fair negotiating process to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian issue, when there were only a few settlements and Israelis and Palestinians had not yet moved towards ideological extremism and terrorism as their chosen means of communication.
It was not Obama but Jimmy Carter who toasted the Shah's health in 1977, as Iran was primed to explode in revolutionary fervour (Mr Carter's introductory joke - "There's one thing I can say about the Shah: He knows how to draw a crowd", - did turn out to be prescient, but not in ways he imagined). Carter did set a very high bar with the Camp David Accords - more than half of which were devoted to the Palestinian issue - but he never pressed Israel to honour the spirit of the Accords once it became clear that Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin had no intention of doing so. This was a mistake that quite possibly cost Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat his life.
And it certainly wasn't Obama who gave Taliban "freedom fighters" their first billions in cash and US weapons, or who smiled while Saddam Hussein launched a ruinous war on Iran and Israel entrenched its settlement enterprise. Ronald Reagan will have to take the blame for those, if anyone's bothering to keep score anymore.
Obama didn't launch the first Gulf War, or even the second.
He didn't waste the 1990s shepherding a peace process that only the most incompetent of shepherds would have imagined would lead to the oasis of peace. He can't be blamed for doing nothing to press US allies from Morocco to Pakistan to clean up their acts and move towards democracy as the post-Cold War era of globalisation, with all its promise, began to take shape. That was, of course, Bill Clinton's affair.
The current president didn't ask to inherit two wars and the world's most powerful and profitable military-industrial complex that feeds off - and directs - these wars. How precisely do you take on a trillion-plus-dollar-a-year monster that has spent the better part of a century not just protecting but constantly expanding its turf, turning back any attempts by politicians to rein it in, regardless of their party or the rationality of their arguments?
The game is rigged, but so what?
In fact, perhaps Obama never had a chance. He might have dined with Palestinian professors back in Chicago, but there was no way he would have been allowed near the presidency if he actually internalised the historical narrative represented by Palestinian history and that of the Arab and larger developing worlds. Yes, he's half African and grew up partly in Indonesia, and can give really nice speeches about the need for the peoples of the world to build a common future.
But more than anything, Obama is a product of the US political machine - from Harvard to Chicago to the White House. And you don't go through that meat grinder and come out at the other end with many principles left intact.
Even if Obama can't be blamed for the system - an-nitham, to use the entirely appropriate Arab connotation of the term - he must take responsibility for how many opportunities he has squandered and just how far US strategic designs have moved from the emerging realities in the Middle East and North Africa.
There are many arguments to be made for and against PA president Mahmoud Abbas bringing a statehood bid before the UN. Indeed, in a seemingly strange irony, one of the most eloquent arguments against the bid comes from Susan Rice, the US Ambassador to the UN, who explained that "there's no shortcut, there's no magic wand that can be waved in New York and make everything right ... The reality is that nothing is going to change. There won't be any more sovereignty, there won't be any more food on the table."
|
"The reality is that nothing is going to change. There won't be any more sovereignty, there won't be any more food on the table."
- Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the UN
|
But of course, the reason for US opposition to the statehood bid - namely, US policy that supports Israel's ongoing entrenchment of its occupation in the West Bank against the wishes of the entire world - is left unstated. Indeed, Rice and the Obama Administration are being patronising in the extreme by arguing that the push for a vote represents a "miscalculation" and a "gap between expectation and reality [that] is in itself quite dangerous".
Instead, the reality is that the Obama administration, and the US foreign policy system it represents, are the ones who have badly miscalculated.
Palestinians understand quite well that this vote is largely symbolic. But with nothing to lose and the US hopelessly titled towards Israel, if the Palestinians can extract a political price by increasing the amplitude of the wave of anger of the newly empowered "Arab street" (a term that after decades of mis-use finally has some analytical bona fides) in response to the planned US veto in the Security Council, Palestinians will for once have played their historically bad hand well.
Letting both the US and Israel know that the continuation of the status quo will no longer be painless is better than most other alternatives. It also begins to create a narrative of fairness and equality for Palestinians vis-a-vis Israel, since according to Obama's own words, Palestinians deserve no less than Israelis a sovereign state of their own.
If the coming intifada can follow the best practices of the Arab democracy revolts and remain largely non-violent in the face of the various forms of violence Israel will likely deploy against Palestinians, this new narrative will play an important role in beginning to level the diplomatic playing field between the two sides, weakening the US position in the process.
Even the weak smell blood
Of course, a change in narrative is unlikely to threaten decades-long US policy imperatives on its own, but it can make them much more difficult to protect. In the process it would weaken Obama's standing at home and abroad, something people around the region, and in the US, are beginning to sense more clearly as summer turns to autumn.
Aside from the Palestinian issue, the other major element of the perfect storm Obama is facing at the UN concerns US opposition to the pro-democracy movements across the region. Most Arabs remember quite well how Obama refused to the use the "D-word" - democracy - during the heat of the uprisings in Tunisia and especially Egypt. Particularly in Egypt, the utter silence of the US administration while the military junta continues with serious violations of the rights of Egyptian democracy advocates has further tarnished Obama's image in the bellwether country of the Arab Spring.
US unwillingness to press fully for the removal of Syrian President Assad or Yemeni President Saleh, and its even starker silence in Bahrain - never mind Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco and other monarchies that have managed to repress their fledgling democracy movements - only further alienates the US (and Europe as well) from the historic momentum of the region-wide protest movement.
These policies ensure that the US will be in a far weaker position when this struggle plays itself out than it was at the start, when the US could have stood firmly on the side of the young protesters. Supporting the overthrow of Gaddafi won't score Obama or the US more broadly many points, because everyone understand that Gaddafi was never a friend, but merely a useful client who, like Saddam Hussein before him, could easily be sacrificed if doing so served broader interests.
Indeed, the protesters know how deeply implicated the US has been in the existing authoritarian order in the Arab world. If a few hundred Egyptians almost tore apart the Israeli embassy, think what thousands might do next time, especially if there is something resembling a real transition to democracy after the upcoming elections and the government has to respect their sentiments.
The protesters understand full well that the three core US goals in the Middle East - protecting key oil-producing allies and their clients, ensuring the stability of the Israeli and Egyptian military complexes, and maintaining the power of the larger US "weapondollar-petrodollar" complex - are inimical to the interests of real democracy. As these protesters become empowered, Obama, who began his presidency with such eloquent words about a new age of cooperation and common purpose, will be left even more isolated in the region.
A system in retreat?
And as Obama looks weaker, the system will search for alternatives that can shore itself up, even if it means further militarising the country, against the needs of the vast majority of Americans. And with a weakened and even more dangerous United States careening towards its own slow Armageddon, we might well witness the "clash of civilisations" that neocons have long prayed for.
|
It might not be fair for history to let Barack Obama take the fall. But history doesn't care who's right or wrong.
|
Only the civilisations in question won't be drawn from religion, tribe, or nation. They'll be separated by money, power and utterly opposed visions of the future: a global Arab Spring led by third world youth and their Western peers (including, one might dare to hope, millions of unemployed working-class Americans who will no longer sit and support their own impoverishment), versus the dynamic of repression, expropriation, intolerance, and violence of a "nitham" that has linked the world's elite - from Washington to Tehran to Beijing - in a bloody embrace for decades.
It might not be fair for history to let Barack Obama take the fall for such an outcome. But history doesn't care who's right or wrong. It only cares who's smart or strong. And on both counts, it looks today like the US under Obama's leadership is getting weaker and dumber, while its adversaries - from the Arab street to the Chinese State Council - grow more adept at frustrating its wishes with each passing year.
Barack Obama has very little time or manouevering room to change this dynamic, but a bit of honesty at the UN would be a good place to start.
Mark LeVine is a professor of history at UC Irvine and senior visiting researcher at the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies at Lund University in Sweden. He also is the author of Heavy Metal Islam: Rock, Resistance, and the Struggle for the Soul of Islam and the soon-to-be-published An Impossible Peace: Israel/Palestine Since 1989.
Follow Mark LeVine on Twitter: @culturejamming
The views expressed in this article are those to whom they are attributed and do not necessarily represent al Jazeera's editorial policy.
|
|
50 |
|
74 |
POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD- BERLUSCONI IMPLICATED IN MILLS BRIBE
Updated: 20 Sep 2011
Berlusconi hit by fresh court case
ITALY: Premier Silvio Berlusconi was back in court today over claims that he bribed British lawyer David Mills to lie in court in the 1990s to protect his extensive business interests.
Mr Mills was convicted in 2009 of having taken a £380,000 bribe, but the verdict was overturned when Italy’s highest criminal court ruled the statute of limitations had expired.
Mr Berlusconi has denied wrongdoing and accused vMilan magistrates of launching politically motivated prosecutions against him.
|
73 |
|
75 |
POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD- YEMENI PEOPLES BLOODY STRUGGLE FOR DEMOCRACY
Updated: 20 Sep 2011
Sanaa slaughter kills another 20
Monday 19 September 2011
by Our Foreign Desk
Yemeni soldiers killed 20 protesters in the capital Sanaa today, a day after 20 others were mown down by government forces who opened fire on thousands of demonstrators with anti-aircraft guns and automatic weapons.
The increasingly bloody crackdown prompted the United States, EU and other members of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to demand that President Ali Abdullah Saleh's administration seek a peaceful resolution to the months-long unrest.
US UNHRC envoy Eileen Donahoe said that Washington was concerned at "increasingly disturbing reports about violence."
She urged Yemen to rein in the security forces.
"Now is the time for an immediate, peaceful and orderly transition," Ms Donahoe said.
But a senior opposition activist in Yemen accused Saudi Arabia and the US of standing in the way of the "Yemeni revolution."
Ali al-Saqqaf said: "Saudi Arabia is totally against the victory and triumph of the Arab revolutions unless these revolutions serve the interests of Riyadh and its American and Western masters.
"That is why they are providing a safe haven for ousted dictators and leaders."
Mr Saleh remains in Saudi Arabia, where he fled for medical treatment following a rocket attack on the Yemeni presidential palace in Sanaa on June 3.
Yemeni Foreign Minister Abubakr al-Qirbi told the UNHRC today that the government was committed to political reforms.
He rejected claims of excessive force by police and pro-government militia, accusing some opposition groups of terrorist activity.
"We have presented evidence proving that many accusation made against security organizations are baseless," Mr al-Qirbi said.
But he said calls for an independent international investigation into the crackdown were "inconsistent with the recommendations calling for dialogue between Yemeni political parties to solve the crisis."
The Gulf Co-operation Council, which comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, has proposed an initiative for Mr Saleh to transfer power, but he has so far refused to sign it.
foreigneditor@peoples-press.com
|
66 |
|
76 |
POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD-RECOGNISING PALESTINE- YANKS AND ZIONISTS THROW SPANNERS IN THE WORKS
Updated: 20 Sep 2011
Abbas holds firm in face of Washington pressure
Monday 19 September 2011
Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas said today that he will defy US and Israeli arm-twisting to apply for full Palestinian membership of the United Nations on Friday.
Mr Abbas told reporters en route to the UN headquarters in New York: "From now until delivering the speech at the general assembly on Friday we have no thought except going to the security council.
"Then, whatever the decision is, we will sit with the leadership and decide."
Mr Abbas is seeking UN security council backing for a state of Palestine on 1967 borders to be accorded full UN membership.
But Washington and Tel Aviv have threatened to cut off over £300 million in economic and security assistance if the PA goes ahead with the effort.
A poll by the independent Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah which found that 83 per cent of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip support Mr Abbas's bid for full membership.
|
65 |
|
77 |
THE ITALIAN AND SPANISH WORKERS STRIKE BACK - POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD
Updated: 19 Sep 2011
In Italy and Spain:
Workers strike back against attacks
By Gene Clancy
Published Sep 18, 2011 10:17 PM
Unions mounted a general strike in Italy in 100 cities and organized mass protests in Spain on Sept. 6 as they battled government efforts to solve Europe’s debt crisis on the backs of the workers.
Parts of Italy’s public transport network ground to a halt, and the strike closed major attractions such as the Colosseum in Rome as tens of thousands of workers took to the streets across the country.
“We are on the edge of the abyss, we need responsible government,” said CGIL union leader Susanna Camusso.
“We are striking against measures that are irresponsible and which put all of the burden on public sector workers,” she told strikers in Rome. (BBC, Sept. 6)
And in Spain, whose jobless rate is the highest in the industrialised world at nearly 21 percent, unions were also taking to the streets in a show of force against a constitutional amendment which would require that the government balance its budget.
So intent is Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero on placating the international financial markets, that he is planning to ram through the measure without even giving the Spanish people a chance to vote on it.
“We [have planned] a demonstration joined by thousands of people,” Labour Union spokesman Luis María González said of the Spanish protests. “More than anything it is to demand a referendum.”
In a speech on the same day as the demonstrations, the head of the World Bank kept up the pressure on European governments to get their economies back on track, saying their patience was running out. “We’re reaching a key decision point for European leaders,” Robert Zoellick said. (AFP Journal, Sept. 6)
And Italy received a stern warning from the head of the European Central Bank to stick to its austerity plan after Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, suffering from an all-time low approval rating, showed signs of compromising.
Jean-Claude Trichet told a forum in northern Italy that sticking to the plan was “absolutely decisive” to Italy’s credit worthiness. Italy’s austerity plan also calls for a balanced budget.
Apart from the protest in Rome, more than 10,000 were taking part in an anti-austerity demonstration in Florence, and marches were underway in Genoa and other towns and cities across Italy.
The eight-hour strike caused major disruptions to public transport, with airlines, trains, buses and ferries announcing cancellations and delays.
The strike was also affecting hospitals and postal services. Schools were unaffected, with classes yet to begin for the year.
Red balloons bearing the union logo floated above the march, which was awash with banners calling for rejection of the draft plan. “Change the austerity plan to give the country a future,” read one. (New York Times, Sept. 7)
Berlusconi’s government adopted the draft austerity plan on Aug. 12 in a bid to bring Italy’s budget into balance in 2013 instead of 2014, as had been planned earlier.
As in Spain, these “balanced budget” measures are galling to workers, who have witnessed massive government bailouts for giant banks and massive unemployment. They are clearly an attempt to force poor and working people to pay for the current world economic crisis.
The governments of Spain and Italy showed which side they were on the day after the demonstrations.
They both passed the repressive, undemocratic and economically crushing austerity measures.
These steps have left the financial crisis unresolved while undercutting the workers, drawing larger sections of the working class into struggle.
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011 Email: ww@workers.orgSubscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.netSupport independent news DONATE
|
69 |
|
78 |
POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD- MERKEL ON THE WAY OUT ?
Updated: 19 Sep 2011
| Merkel's party 'loses Berlin state election' |
|
Exit polls show German chancellor's governing coalition has suffered sixth defeat in state polls this year.
Last Modified: 18 Sep 2011 17:45
|
 |
| Exit polls reveal Merkel's Christian Democrats came in second to the Social Democrats [Reuters] |
Angela Merkel's conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) have been beaten by the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) in a regional election in the city-state of Berlin, according to exit polls aired on German television.
The figures aired on ARD television showed the German chancellor's party had polled 23.5 per cent of the vote, with the SPD on 29.5 per cent and the Greens on 18 per cent.
The defeat would mark the CDU's sixth defeat in seven state elections held this year.
Although the CDU was up from 21.3 per cent compared to the last poll in 2006, it is well below the 40 per cent vote the party used to secure in the capital through the 1980s and 1990s.
Although Mayor Klaus Wowereit is returning to his seat, he will have to build a new coalition in Berlin, after a weak showing by his previous partner, the Left party, who polled 11.5 per cent.
'Devastating blow'
In more bad news for Merkel, her coalition partner, the Free Democrats (FDP), failed to poll the five per cent threshold needed to win a single seat accroding to the exit poll.
"Everyody was expecting a devastating blow, but it was not against the CDU, it came against the junior partner of her coalition, who polled just 1.5 per cent," said Al Jazeera's Nick Spicer in Berlin.
"People here are calling it a debacle, they are being wiped off the political landscape, and people are asking if they [the FDP] deserve their position in the governing coalition."
The technology-friendly Pirate Party made its debut in a German legislature, capturing 8.9 per cent of the vote. Formed in 2006, the party was able to win widespread support from young Berliners.
It has expanded its platform from its original push from file sharing and data protection on the internet to include education and citizens rights.
"They [the Pirate party] even went to the regional airport in their underwear and bikinis to protest because they were unhappy with the security procedures there," said our correspondent.
"They are now represented in the state legislature."
Spicer said the election's main issues have been Berlin's unemployment - which, at 13 per cent, is double the national average - and the rising cost of rental accommodation.
Rising pressure
The FDP defeat could build pressure on the party - which has plunged from record popularity of 14.6 per cent in the 2009 federal election - to remove Guido Westerwelle, the unpopular foreign minister.
Meanwhile, Merkel, who has been criticised for her leadership during the eurozone crisis, is halfway through a four-year term as the country's head of government.
The defeats for her CDU have battered her popularity ahead of a critical vote in the Bundestag at the end of September to give the European Financial Stability Fund, the eurozone bailout fund, more powers. The SPD, in opposition at the national level since 2009, want to use the result in Berlin - Germany's largest city with 3.4 million people - to build momentum to oust Merkel in the next federal election in 2013. The SPD has ousted or helped defeat the CDU in Hamburg and Baden-Wuerttemberg this year and remained in power elsewhere
|
|
67 |
|
79 |
POLITICS REST OF THE WORLD- OBAMA'S "BUFFETT TAX" MAKES THE RICH PAY MORE
Updated: 19 Sep 2011
Obama's millionaire tax is class war, say Republicans
Forthcoming 'Buffett tax' provokes fresh conflict between US president and rightwingers
- Dominic Rushe in New York
- guardian.co.uk, Sunday 18 September 2011 18.29 BST
Barack Obama faces a rough ride over the 'Buffett tax'. Photograph: Jacquelyn Martin/AP
US Republican leaders have accused president Barack Obama of "class warfare" as he prepares to unveil plans to increase taxes for millionaires.
Obama is set to reveal details of the so-called "Buffett tax" – named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett, who has repeatedly called for the rich to pay higher taxes – on Monday. Obama looks set to propose a tax hike for those earning more than $1m a year as part of a wider plan to tackle the US's massive deficit.
The proposals, which have little chance of becoming law without Republican support, look set to become the latest battle ground for Republicans and Democrats gearing up for next year's election and an increasingly contentious fight over how to support the US's struggling economic recovery.
Paul Ryan, chairman of the House of Representatives budget committee, said: "Class warfare may make for good politics, but it makes for rotten economics." Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Ryan said the plan "adds further instability to our system, more uncertainty, and it punishes job creation and those people who create jobs." Ryan said higher taxes would hurt job creation. "If you tax something more, you get less of it," said Ryan.
Mitch McConnell, the Senate Republican leader, said the proposal would further damage the US's fragile economy. "We have thrown a big wet blanket over the private sector economy. We've borrowed too much, we've spent too much and we've dramatically over-regulated every aspect of the private sector in our country and now we are threatening to raise taxes on top of it. That's not going to get the economy moving," McConnell said on NBC's Meet the Press.
The fight comes as clashes between Republicans and Democrats over the economy intensify in the runup to next year's election. The would-be Republican presidential candidates will hold their next debate on Thursday and Obama's proposals are bound to be a central issue.
Former president Bill Clinton defended the plan. "The least harmful tax increases are the ones that senator McConnell and the people who agree with him hate the most, and that is restoring the tax levels that existed when I was president for those of us in high-income groups. That's the one that does the least harm."
Obama's proposal comes a month after Buffett began reviving his longstanding objection that he and his "megarich friends" pay significantly less tax than most people thanks to tax breaks that favour investors. "My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress," he wrote in the New York Times. "It's time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice."
Obama's poll ratings hit a new low last week, thanks to the continuing economic malaise in the US. According to the latest CBS/New York Times poll, Obama's approval rating is now 43%, down from 57% in May.
Those surveyed said the economy and jobs were the two biggest issues the US faces. Some 86% said the state of the US economy is either very bad or fairly bad. Nearly half – 48% – believe the nation is moving toward another recession.
Obama's millionaire tax hike will be a central component of the president's proposals to a special joint Congressional "super committee" that is working to reach a bipartisan budget deal by late November.
With unemployment now at 9.1% and income inequality at record levels, the president is hoping to put pressure on Republicans who have staunchly rejected any tax increases and have called for deep cuts in government spending on the US's Medicare, Medicaid and social security programmes.
Last week Republican speaker John Boehner said Obama should tackle tax reform to get rid of many tax breaks. "Tax increases, however, are not a viable option for the joint committee," Boehner said.
The tax fight comes in another tough week for Obama. The United Nations is set to vote on recognising Palestinian statehood this week after the US fought unsuccessfully to stop the vote taking place. Last week the Democrats lost a key congressional district in New York where some of the area's heavily Jewish voters said they were protesting against the administration's record on Israel.
He is also expected to meet European leaders amid fears that Europe's economic crisis will prove a further drag on the US's fragile recovery. US Treasury secretary Tim Geithner travelled to Poland last week to meet Europe's finance ministers and asked them to step up efforts to tackle the crisis. Geithner was rebuffed by Austria's finance minister, Maria Fekter. "I found it peculiar that even though the Americans have significantly worse fundamental data than the eurozone, they tell us what we should do and when we make a suggestion ... that they say no straight away," said Fekter.
Taxing America
• Last week the US census revealed that 46 million Americans – one in six – now live in poverty, the highest number ever.
• In 2010, the top 20% of Americans earned 49.4% of the nation's income. The top 1% account for 24% of all income.
• About 47% of US people pay no federal income taxes, either because their incomes are too low, or because they qualify for enough tax breaks to eliminate their liability.
• People who make money from investments pay far lower taxes than those who earn it from their wages.
• Last year Warren Buffett, who has a $50bn personal fortune, paid $6.9m in federal taxes – 17.4% of his taxable income. The other 20 people in his office paid between 33% and 41%.
• "While the poor and middle-class fight for us in Afghanistan and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks," Buffett wrote in the New York Times last month
| |