Home Reference
Reference - Contents
  Toggle all descriptions Collapse all descriptions
# Article Title Hits
1 Reference- The Great War on Bugs
Updated: 18 May 2013

World War 1

In a six month period ending October/November 1918

An estimated figure of 20,000,000 or more people world-wide died not from the rifle bullet, gas or bomb: they

were victims of an influenza pandemic which mainly attacked the younger age groups, from ages 21 to 29;

especially striking those in close proximity.

Many died while serving in the Army, waiting to be posted to the front.

 The irony of it all: a soldier trained for battle – to be killed by a bug!

14
2 Reference- Politics -The Wrecking Coalition- Minorities & Losers
Updated: 20 May 2013

Cameron 'losing control' as rift with party core widens 

 
 
 
 
 
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron listens to a question during a news conference at Number 10 Downing Street in London March 14, 2013. REUTERS/Nick Ansell/pool

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron listens to a question during a news conference at Number 10 Downing

Street in London March 14, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Nick Ansell/pool

 

By Mohammed Abbas

LONDON | Sun May 19, 2013 4:32pm BST

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron is "losing control of his party", Conservative Party grandee

Geoffrey Howe said on Sunday, as a row raged over whether a close aide to Cameron had labelled grassroots

activists "mad, swivel-eyed loons".

The furore threatens to further alienate Cameron and his inner circle from the core of his party, with whom ties

are already almost at breaking point.

 

Differences with the grassroots over Britain's membership of the European Union and Cameron's support for

legalising same-sex marriage have raised questions over his leadership and could hurt the party's chances in

the next election, due in 2015.

"Sadly, by making it clear in January that he opposes the current terms of UK membership of the EU, the prime

minister has opened a Pandora's box politically and seems to be losing control of his party in the process,"

Howe wrote in an article for the Observer newspaper.

Howe was former prime minister Margaret Thatcher's longest-serving cabinet minister, but fell out with her over

relations with Europe and is best remembered for a scathing resignation speech that helped topple her as

leader in 1990.

Cameron's Conservatives have been rattled by the surging popularity of the UK Independence Party (UKIP),

whose main aims are to pull Britain out of the EU and curb immigration.

Its rise has fuelled a heated national debate over whether Britain derives sufficient benefits from EU

membership to outweigh the financial cost and the ceding of some important powers to Brussels, like the

ability to limit immigrants from the other 26 countries in the union.

An opinion poll by pollster ComRes for the Sunday Mirror and Independent on Sunday newspapers put

support for UKIP at 19 percent, which ComRes said was the highest level the party had achieved in any survey

yet.

The opposition Labour party led with 35 percent, while the Conservatives were on 29 percent and their Liberal

Democrat coalition partners on 8.

"The ratchet-effect of Euroscepticism has now gone so far that the Conservative leadership is in effect running

scared of its own backbenchers, let alone UKIP," Howe said, referring to the hundreds of rank-and-file

Conservative members of parliament who occupy the rows of seats behind Cameron and his ministers.

REFERENDUM PROMISE

In January, Cameron promised that if the Conservatives won the 2015 election they would call a national

referendum in 2017 on whether Britain should stay in or leave the EU. But that did not go far enough for many

Conservatives, who last week forced him to back a new bill that would enshrine it in law.

The Conservatives' restive right wing also last week voted to criticise the government's legislative agenda for

not including such a bill in the first place, an unusual move in British politics that embarrassed Cameron.

Compounding Cameron's problems are media reports that an un-named close aide, at a private dinner last

week, described the Conservative grassroots as "swivel-eyed loons".

Cameron's office says the comment did not come from them, and insist the prime minister is still in charge of his party.

The row comes at an especially bad time for Cameron, whose flagship bill to legalise same-sex marriage will be

debated in parliament this week. Conservative activists wrote to Cameron on Sunday warning that the move

would boost UKIP's membership.

"The prime minister seems to have gathered around himself a metropolitan elite who seem to inhabit a different

planet to most of us ... Droves of previously loyal Conservative Party members are leaving," Bob Woollard,

chairman of the Conservative Grassroots umbrella group, told the BBC.

Cameron says he would like to do more to satisfy the Conservative core, but is held back by being in coalition

with the left-leaning Lib Dems.

Ties between the two parties have frequently come under strain since they teamed up in 2010, but they have

pledged to stay together to help revive Britain's weak economy.

However, in an article published on Sunday, Cameron hinted that he could end the partnership before the 2015

election.

"Can we improve the state of the country? Can we fulfil our manifesto? The best way to do that is to continue

with the coalition, but if that wasn't the case then we'd have to face the new circumstances in whatever way we

should," he told Britain's Total Politics magazine.

(Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

7
3 Reference- Have I the Right - to Die ?
Updated: 15 May 2013

Right-to-die debate:

Should the law allow assisted suicide?

 "When a Person is deemed to be of no further use to him or herself or society then he

should have the right to die". Radical

Call it Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide but the law and the medical profession should stop playing God.

Our laws – Medical and Legal are dictated by religion, few believe in and that religion should have no part in civil

law.

On the one hand the Government has little compunction to send our boys to their death.

Fails to give life support the most vulnerable in society and operates a life is cheap policy

Government commit murder by failure to protect people at work, allow overcrowding at home and by their incompetence commit carnage on our roads.

Suicides among the young and not so young is increasing alarmingly due to the feeling of hopelessness of this rotten society

All this makes the debate about the Right to Die seems irrelevant to me !

But then the Law is an Ass

Decided by People in Parliament, most of whom, are selfish, self centred, egoistical

individuals whose self interest shows by the fact that they represent only themselves

not the weakest in society.

Radical

17
4 Reference- One Mother Tongue for a Cunning Linguist ?
Updated: 08 May 2013

European and Asian languages have one mother tongue

 

 

We are more connected than you think. Seven families of languages across the Eurasian continent, containing

tongues as diverse as modern Inuit, Tamil, Japanese, Greek and Hungarian, evolved from a single language that

existed around the time of the last ice age. That's the conclusion of research that has traced linguistics

thousands of years deeper into the past than was previously thought possible.

The evolution of language is thought to have much in common with biological evolution. Scientists look for

similarities between languages that hint at a common ancestor. Just as a fused bone or an extra finger in two

species could suggest they shared a common ancestor, two words that have the same meaning and a similar

sound in different languages – known as cognates – may indicate the same thing. For example, "brother" in

English, "bhratar" in Sanskrit, "frater" in Latin and "frère" in French are all cognates.

Identifying cognates has helped linguists categorise modern languages into families that evolved from the same

protolanguage. English, Swedish and Farsi are all part of the Indo-European language family that is thought to

descend from proto-Indo-European, whereas Finnish and Hungarian are thought to descend from proto-Uralic.

But could most of the protolanguages on the Eurasian continent and even across the Bering Strait into Alaska

be part of a superfamily that descended from a more ancient mother tongue – proto-Eurasian (see map)?

This idea has been knocking around for almost a century, says Mark Pagel at the University of Reading in the

UK. "It's kind of an obvious idea – Eurasia is this contiguous landmass, and similar proposals have been made

about the protolanguages of Australia and North America."

However, the existence of superfamilies has, until now, been extremely hard to prove. Changes in languages pile

up over time, so the further back you go, the fewer cognates there are to compare. What's more, similarities can

arise purely by chance. Many researchers do not believe languages can be traced back further than about 8000

years.

"That's the argument that there's a limit on the time for which we can go back in historical linguistics," says  

Quentin Atkinson from the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

But now Pagel, Atkinson and colleagues have smashed through that limit, travelling further back in time than

linguists have ever done before. They say that not only do their results suggest that the Eurasian superfamily

exists, but that they have also been able to mathematically deduce its evolution.

The key to the breakthrough was the team's discovery in 2007 that the form of frequently used words evolves at

a much slower pace than less common words. These conserved words, the team reasoned, were more likely to

retain traces of their ancestry than words that evolved rapidly.

They then used this idea to predict which words in a database of Eurasian protolanguages were cognates,

removing words that looked and sounded similar but were not high-frequency words. This eliminated fluke

similarities.

The team then ran a list of these cognates – such as those meaning "I", "mother", "hand" and "fire" – through a

statistical model that deduced the relationship between the words based on how quickly they changed with time.

This gave a tree of the Eurasian superfamily whose common ancestor can be traced back 15,000 years.

"We found it remarkable that we got this 15,000-year result because it coincides beautifully with the retreat of the

ice sheets after the last glacial maximum," says Pagel. "One realistic scenario is that the tree represents the

expansion of human populations as the climate improved and more people could be supported."

Luisa Miceli, a historical linguist at the University of Western Australia in Perth, agrees that the result proves that

the languages are closely connected, but she suggests they might be neighbours rather than siblings – with the

words borrowed from one another rather than being true cognates.

However, she says the interesting questions about what factors were associated with the spread of these

languages do not depend on whether they were part of a true superfamily or simply sets of languages that were

in contact.

Journal reference: PNAS, doi.org/mf4

This article will appear in print under the headline "The mother tongue of Eurasia"

21
5 Reference- Freecycle.uk.org - Unwanted goods given & received freely
Updated: 07 May 2013

Changing the world one gift at a time


Welcome to the UK Freecycle.org® Groups' Homepage

The worldwide Freecycle Network is made up of many individual groups across the globe.

It's a grassroots movement of people who are giving (and getting) stuff for free in their own towns.

Freecycle groups match people who have things they want to get rid of with people who can use them.

Our goal is to keep usable items out of landfills.

By using what we already have on this earth, we reduce consumerism, manufacture fewer goods, and lessen the

impact on the earth.

Another benefit of using Freecycle is that it encourages us to get rid of junk that we no longer need and promote

community involvement in the process.

There are now 493 Groups spread across the country, with 1,650,803 members!

How does Freecycle work?

Everything posted must be free, legal and appropriate for all ages. When you want to OFFER something -

whether it's a chair, fax machine, piano or an old door, simply send an email to your group.

After that it is up to the giver to decide who receives the gift from the responses only they receive and to set up a

collection time, and finally post an item TAKEN message.

Maybe you're looking to acquire something yourself?

Post a WANTED message and a group member may just have what you're looking for.

Alert the group with a follow-up RECEIVED message.

Get started!

Find your most local Group, either by searching for your town or city, or browsing the lists of Freecycle.org

Groups, and join it.

Please check the existing Posts before making a new one, and make sure you've read any and all ADMIN

messages before posting!

Don't forget to read the disclaimer as well!

21
6 Reference- Cuba- President Heads May Day Parade
Updated: 02 May 2013

C U B A

  1. May 1, 2013
  2. http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html
 

Cuban President heads May Day central event

PRESIDENT Raúl Castro today headed the central event for International Workers’ Day, while

Cuban workers and people filled the country’s plazas and avenues in honor of Venezuelan  

Comandante Hugo Chávez.

Cuban President heads May Day central eventIn Havana’s Plaza de la Revolución, President Raúl Castro is present at the

celebration in which hundreds of thousands of workers, professionals, youth,

students, children and the population in general are participating under the

maxim of marching united for a prosperous and sustainable socialism,

according to the Federation of Cuban Workers (CTC), which convened the May Day event.

The CTC call made public at the beginning of this week emphasized the tribute to Chávez and

support for the Bolivarian Revolution.

“To the sister people of Venezuela and their President Nicolás Maduro, our active solidarity and

commitment to continue together in this struggle for the America envisioned by Simón Bolívar

and José Martí, the communiqué reads.

The call states that this is another opportunity to demand the end of the economic, commercial

and financial blockade of Cuba maintained by the United States for more than 50 years.

The marchers are also demanding the liberation of the five Cuban anti-terrorists incarcerated in

the United States after their arrest in 1998 for monitoring Miami groups plotting acts of

terrorism against Cuba, and who were sentenced without any evidence relating to the charges

brought against them being presented at their trial.

The national press today published a message from Gerardo Hernández, Fernando González,

Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero and René González, in which the Five – as they are known

in campaigns for their release – greet workers in Cuba and throughout the world. (PL)

 

37
7 Reference-Weather Permitting- A day of celebration across the globe
Updated: 01 May 2013

A day of celebration across the globe

 Tuesday 30 April 2013
 
 Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm declared May Day "the only unquestionable dent made by the secular
  
movement in the Christian or any other official calendar."

In fact the day has two parallel histories - one as the workers' celebration when red banners fly in the spring

sunshine all across the globe and another more traditional celebration of the end of winter and the approach of the

better weather of summer.

Both of these themes are related of course.

It is no coincidence that they both look forward to the celebrations of better times to come.

There are a whole number of reasons that May 1 has become the special day for the workers of the world.

One key anniversary was the commemoration of the 1886 Haymarket affair in Chicago.

Police gunfire killed at least four demonstrators and injured many more who had been taking part in a labour

march.

On Tuesday May 4 1886 at Haymarket Square in Chicago, workers organised a peaceful rally in support of those

striking for an eight-hour day.

A dynamite bomb was thrown at the police as they tried to disperse the meeting.

The bomb blast and ensuing gunfire resulted in the deaths of seven police officers.

At least four civilians were killed and scores of others were wounded.

In 1889 the first congress of the Second International, meeting in Paris, called for international demonstrations on

the 1890 anniversary of the Chicago killings.

May Day was formally recognised as an annual event at the Communist International's second congress in 1891.

In 1904 the International Socialist Conference meeting in Amsterdam called on for demonstrations on May 1 for the

legal establishment of the eight-hour day.

In many countries, including Britain, working-class organisations fought to make May Day an official holiday, and

their efforts largely succeeded.

May Day has traditionally been an important official holiday in countries such as the People's Republic of China, North Korea and Cuba.

For many years, in the former Soviet Union the day was celebrated by huge demonstrations including military parades.

May Day celebrations typically featured elaborate popular pageants and parades with major communist leaders using the day to make keynote speeches.

The biggest celebration was traditionally organised on Red Square, where the general secretary of the CPSU and

other party and government leaders stood on Lenin's Mausoleum acknowledging the crowds.

Just who was or wasn't on parade on May Day was often an indications of changes in the party hierarchy.

Kremlin watchers studied the TV pictures searching for clues of real or imagined inner party rivalries.

Cold war military experts did the same thing with the military hardware on parade looking for scraps of evidence of

new weapon systems.

They will be doing exactly the same today with the film from North Korea's May Day celebrations.

Meanwhile far-right governments have traditionally sought to repress the message behind International Workers

Day, with fascist governments in Portugal, Italy, Germany and Spain abolishing the workers' holiday over the

years.

The US and Canada do not officially recognise May Day - too much like socialism for them - and have tried to

hijack Workers Day.

The US government attempted to erase history by declaring that May 1 was Law Day instead.

They pronounced that Labour Day was to be on the first Monday of September.

However red flags still fly and workers still march in every major US and Canadian city on May Day.

Meanwhile in Cuba thousands will be marching in the streets tomorrow showing their support for the popular

revolution.

In Greece May 1 is a public holiday marked by demonstrations to which left-wing political parties and unions

participate.

The first May Day celebration in Italy took place in 1890. It started initially as an attempt to celebrate workers'

achievements.

It was abolished under the fascist regime and immediately restored after the second world war.

Today May Day is an important celebration in Italy.

More than half a million people will attend the famous left-wing-organised May 1 concert.

May Day was celebrated illegally in Russia until the February revolution enabled the first legal celebration in 1917.

It was a huge celebration in the Soviet years and since 1992 May Day has been officially called the Day of Spring

and Labour, and remains a major holiday in present-day Russia.

In South Africa Workers Day has been celebrated as a national public holiday on May 1 each year since 1994.

34
8 Reference -The Tradition of the People's Holiday
Updated: 01 May 2013

The long tradition of the people's holiday

 
Tuesday 30 April 2013
by Peter Frost
 
 May Day, of course, is a very old celebration, much older than its history as a workers' holiday.
  
The Celtic pagan festival of Beltane and the Germanic festival of Walpurgis Night are both part of its rich
  
parentage.

Traditionally this day has been an occasion for popular and often raucous celebrations.

Early accounts tell us of young people taking to the woods on the eve of May 1 with predictable results.

As you would expect the Christian church tried to hijack and clean up the whole celebration. Many Christmas

carols started life as pagan Maying songs.

God Rest You Merry gentlemen was originally sung as "Here's to you merry Mayers all."

So much so that in 1955 the Pope named May Day as the feast of St Joseph the worker, the patron saint of

workers.

As so often, the Christian tactic was if you can't beat 'em just nick their happiest celebrations.

The church did it with Christmas and Easter but has had a lot less success with May Day.

In Britain it wasn't until 1978 that the Labour government created the May Day bank holiday officially.

The Tories have always hated it and today's Con-Dem crew have plans to get rid of it.

Many traditional celebrations still continue.

In Oxford May Morning revellers gather below the great tower of Magdalen College to listen to the college choir

sing traditional madrigals.

Usually some people risk life and limb jumping off Magdalen bridge into the all-too-shallow river Cherwell.

Whitstable, Kent, hosts a good example of more traditional May Day festivities, where a character called Jack in the

Green leads an annual procession of morris dancers through the town on the holiday.

Padstow in Cornwall holds its annual 'Obby 'Oss (hobby horse) day of festivities.

This is believed to be one of the oldest fertility rites in Britain - revellers dance with the Oss through the streets of the town.

Prior to the slaughter of the first world war most English villages had a maypole.

Sadly after the war most were replaced by war memorials.

Today there are new maypoles on many a village green.

Scotland celebrates May Day too. In St Andrews, some students gather on the beach late on April 30 and run

naked into the North Sea at sunrise.

Both Edinburgh and Glasgow hold big May Day festivals as well as labour movement rallies.

In Edinburgh the Beltane Fire Festival is held on the evening of May Day eve and into the early hours on the city's

Calton Hill.

An older Edinburgh tradition has it that young women who climb Arthur's Seat and wash their faces in the

morning dew will have lifelong beauty.

The official Irish May Day holiday is the first Monday in May.

On May 1 1561 King Charles IX of France received a lily of the valley as a lucky charm.

He decided to offer this fragrant flower each year to the women of the court.

Since the beginning of the 20th century a sprig of lily of the valley became a symbol of springtime and May Day.

When I have been in France for May Day I have found French Communist Party stalls selling these fragrant left-

wing favours.

You can smell the lovely perfume on political demonstrations and marches.

It could only happen in France.

In rural regions of Germany, especially the Harz mountains, Walpurgis­nacht celebrations of pagan origin are

traditionally held on the night before May Day, including bonfires and the decorating of a Maibaum or maypole.

Many German left political parties and trade unions organise marches or demonstrations.

Wherever you are celebrating the workers' holiday, in Britain, on one of our many national or regional celebrations,

or perhaps in more exotic places around the world, remember those red banners will be flying in every corner of

the globe.

The Internationale will be sung in 100 different tongues.

For tomorrow is the International Workers Day.

Happy May Day!

----

Top May Day facts

  • May Day is Beltane, which means "day of fire."
  • It is an ancient pagan festival.
  • Bel was the Celtic god of the sun.
  • The first maypoles would have been a growing tree brought from the woods.
  • Single men and women would dance around the maypole holding on to ribbons until they became entwined with their new loves.
  • Class and social position was set aside on May Day.
  • Everyone from the highest to the lowest joined in as equals.
  • May Day is a celebration of fertility.
  • Whole villages would go to the woods and all sorts of sexual adventures would take place.
  • The Green Man, sometimes known as Robin Goodfellow, was the Lord of Misrule on May Day.
  • He and his merry men would make jokes and poke fun at the local authorities.
  • A Puritan Parliament banned May Day festivities in 1644.
  • May Day is the only major festival of the year with no significant church celebrations or services.
  • Working people would often take May Day off to celebrate even if their employers disapproved.
33
9 Reference- Remembering Stephen Lawrence, Murdered by Racists
Updated: 21 Apr 2013

Doreen Lawrence: 'I could have shut myself away, but that is not me'

It's 20 years since Stephen Lawrence was murdered by racists in London. Since that night his mother, Doreen, has

campaigned tirelessly for justice, and set up a charity in his name.

Here, she talks to Tim Adams and responds to questions from Observer readers, who ask about her memories of

her son, whether Britain today is a better place to be black and what it was like to carry the flag at the Olympics

doreen lawrence
Doreen Lawrence: 'You can only forgive those who seek forgiveness. They [Stephen's killers] still don't admit
  
anything.' Photograph: Suki Dhanda for the Observer

It doesn't seem like 20 years, not to Doreen Lawrence. "The thing is," she says, "I could tell you what happened

each and every year since Stephen died, but in a way it is like it was yesterday, it is all still very raw. And the battle

itself is constant."

Lawrence talks to me in an office at the headquarters of that ongoing battle – the Stephen Lawrence Centre in

Deptford, south-east London – where she works tirelessly on the isues of social justice that prove her son's death

at least made a difference. On Monday, the anniversary of his murder, she will be attending a service in his memory

at St Martin-in-the-Fields in central London. When she talks about him, though, it still tends to be in the present

tense. "Stephen is always smiling like that," she will say to me, or "That is how Stephen is". She does it because

he still feels very much part of life, she says. "There isn't a day when I don't talk about him in one way or the other.

And now I have my three grandchildren to remind me. Ethan, my daughter's son, is only two, but he is so similar to

Stephen – he has exactly the same look in his eye."

Stephen LawrenceStephen Lawrence, stabbed to death in a race murder in Eltham in 1993. Photograph: Rex Features

Sometimes she imagines how Stephen would have been now, at 38, had he lived. "I think he would have had a

family, I think he would have travelled widely," she says. "I know he would have qualified as an architect. As I often

say to people: you don't know what the future holds. Up until Stephen died, I think I took my kids, my family, for

granted, like we all do. I don't do that now."

Lawrence lives on her own now, having separated from husband Neville in 1999. She spends most days here in

the office. Part of the work of her foundation is to give young people the opportunities that Stephen was so brutally

denied. She has raised the money for aspiring architects who would otherwise struggle to afford the fees to help

them pursue their ambition as Stephen hoped to. It's a big commitment – seven years of training. Four of the

students the foundation has helped have now qualified, and there are 90 other alumni.

In recent years, as the foundation's most reliable funding has been withdrawn by the closing of the London

Development Agency, it has become much harder to guarantee this work. Lawrence used to be able to employ 15

people here, with an ambitious programme to help educate and implement the findings of the 1999 Macpherson

report into Stephen's death. She is now down to three full-time, and a few volunteers: the big society in action. She

recently had the home secretary here and told her what she thought.

"All politicians make positive noises to us," she says, "and this coalition government is no different, but in my last

meeting with Theresa May I did have to say, you know, I felt I had been really let down. She met some of our

students and was saying how wonderful the work was, and so on. I didn't feel I could let that pass. After losing

Stephen, I don't feel I have much else to lose in life, so I try to speak my mind. I don't remember her saying very

much in response. Though to give her her due, later on they did contact the trust and we were given some

emergency financial support to keep us going until March. It is very tough, though."

I have come here armed with a long list of questions from Observer readers, most of which are prefaced by tribute

to Doreen Lawrence's spirit and dignity. In person, you have a clear sense of that determination, her ongoing

mission, her refusal to despair. It is that determination that has now seen two of the perpetrators of her son's

murder behind bars; it is a relief to her that one of them, Gary Dobson, has dropped his appeal against last year's

conviction, though the other, David Norris, is pursuing his case. She has learned by long practice not to dwell too

much on any of that, she says.

We talk a little about her Olympic experience last year, when she was invited by Danny Boyle to help carry the flag

in the opening ceremony alongside Ban Ki-moon, secretary general of the UN. "When they asked me I was really

excited," she says, "because though I had applied for tickets in the ballot, I didn't get any. And on the night itself I

got very emotional just standing there and thinking of all the millions of people watching and the world coming

together." The inclusivity of that ceremony and the Games were an expression of London at its tolerant best, she

suggests, a statement of how far we had come in the past two decades, though she is obviously close enough to

the reality to realise her home city doesn't always live up to that ideal.

Her role in effecting those changes, the role that she was forced into by her son's death, still seems often surreal to

her, though she does not step back from its responsibility. "It's funny," she says, "I was in a school in Sydenham

recently and they told me I was their 'live history' lesson." She smiles. "They were doing their GCSEs and I was

part of their coursework apparently. How strange is that?"

The oddness clearly feels a bit like her fate, these days, but she is not without hope or purpose. She answers the

questions our readers have asked in that spirit.

Is London/the UK in 2013 a better place to be a young black man now than in 1993? Youcantalan, via email

That depends on which young black man you speak to. When Stephen was killed my whole idea of London

changed. I used to see it through rose-tinted glasses. I had never imagined racism would take anyone's life. I used

to talk to Stephen about not getting involved in certain things, but he was always, "Mum, I'm not doing anything!" I

think that is how a lot of young black men feel still today. But that doesn't stop them being harassed in stop and

search, or if they drive a nice car it is always assumed they are drug dealers. That is as true now as it was then. If I

ever see anyone stopped on the street, it is invariably still a crowd of white policemen around a young black guy.

Did you experience racism when you came here to live with your mother, from Jamaica, as a nine-year-old?

Name and address supplied

Not really. I went to primary school here. I wouldn't say there was a problem, though if they showed a documentary

at school about Africa or something kids would ask me: is that what it is like where you come from? The teachers

weren't overtly racist but it was clear, too, looking back that we weren't always given the same opportunity. We

would be put in for CSEs rather than O-levels. Or when we had careers advice it was always, "Are you good with

your hands?" Most of my friends just ignored all that, though, and found our own jobs. I worked in a bank for

seven years before I had Stephen. A lot of it was just kind of what you got used to. My younger brother told me he

would make sure he stood apart from people at a bus stop or whatever, because he thought they might accuse

him of being a pickpocket, or of trying to steal something. But overt racism: no.

You are such an inspiration and a fine example that persistence pays, particularly if accompanied by dignity and

honesty. How do you keep going when there is so much venom aimed at you? How do you get past the negativity

and always have something positive to say? Barbara Moss, via email

I do get some venom. We get hate mail here, and stuff posted on the websites. My real fear is more when I am on

the street. I get recognised and sometimes people will catch me unawares and put their arms around me, or say

they need to give me a hug. I find that quite alarming. I'm quite small and suddenly I am being crushed. It's mostly

positive, but there are a few who just stare at me. I do try not to be negative, though. I could have closed my door

and shut myself away, but that is not me, and my children were not brought up that way.

In your fight for social justice and justice for your son, you and your family must have suffered. Isn't it time for you

to take some time out for yourself? No criticism intended – I think you are amazing – but you need a break. Gail

Kirkland, Edinburgh, via email

I definitely agree with that! When I started working at the centre, I thought I'd do it for about three years and then

hopefully hand it on to others. I thought I might retire to America or somewhere and live out the rest of my days

quietly. But my life has not been like that. I realised that if I wasn't here the work wouldn't exist. I still want it to

survive on its own, so I carry on. I travel up and down the country for the trust. I don't do holidays much. As time

goes on, the work of the trust just gets more intense. It is harder and harder to get away.

What do you think are the main reasons for the lack of success of black boys in education – and the high rates of

unemployment, prison sentences, and rates of serious mental illness among the black community? RabBurnout,

via website

That's really a question about social justice. There isn't just one thing you can point to. Yes, boys need strong role

models to give them a sense of what they can achieve. I read something the other day about a teacher saying of

black boys that "they have the bodies of men and the brains of children". You wonder: how is this person fit to

teach kids? Parents have a big responsibility too. When I had children, I thought it was important for them to be

children, not to grow up too fast. Still, when my kids came home from school in the evenings we would always

have the dictionaries out while I was cooking; I would be giving them spelling tests and word tests. My kids all got

fed up with me not letting them hang out with their friends on the street. I would say: "They are out there today,

they will be out there for ever. This is what you have to do to make sure you don't end up like that." I don't think it

matters who says that to kids as long as someone does. To say that single parents can't do that is so wrong, as

the likes of David Lammy will tell you. He was brought up by his mother on an estate in Tottenham and he went off

to Harvard and became an MP.

The Macpherson report recommended "that consideration be given to amendment of the national curriculum

aimed at valuing cultural diversity and preventing racism, in order better to reflect the needs of a diverse society".

In light of Michael Gove's new history curriculum, how successfully is our education system meeting

Macpherson's recommendations? Martin Spafford, via email

I hated history at school, because it had nothing to do with me. We were taught about empire but not about slavery,

what our grandparents and great grandparents went through. I wanted the Macpherson report to ensure that we

opened up history lessons so all the kids in the class knew where they were from. If kids just hear that these

people are over here taking our jobs, they will believe it. If they hear that in the past Britain has exploited every

single aspect of the places where these children come from, then perhaps they will see things differently. Black

boys in particular have a sense that their self-worth is not much; we need to change that. All children should have

an understanding of the forces that created the country we all live in today.

What was your idea of Britain before you came here – a promised land? Richard Adams via email

No, it was more how cold it was, and how cramped. In Jamaica we had a yard and fruit trees. I used to think of

Britain as a place of red brick huts with fires in the middle and all the people huddled round, and when I came here

that is quite a lot how it felt. It was the summer but it was freezing. I had no cardigan, just a summer dress. And all

the houses joined together, and people letting dogs inside the house, living with dogs; I couldn't understand that.

What is your favourite memory of Stephen? It's the question I love answering about my brother Ben [Kinsella, who

was murdered]. Brooke Kinsella, via email

There are many, of course. Stephen has a particular look. My daughter Georgina made me a calendar once. And

each month had different pictures. For December there is a picture of Stephen the Christmas before he was killed.

We had a washing-up rota at the time and it so happened that Christmas Day was Stephen's turn. The picture is of

him surrounded by all these pots and pans saying: "I can't believe this is happening!" It was very funny. He has a

way of being mischievous. He looks down then he looks up in an amused way. That is just Stephen for me.

Did you ever feel paralysed by anger at the injustice? If so, how did you overcome this? Susan Shaw, via website

I always tried to busy myself with something. In the early days I did focus on the anger – it was like I was locked in

a room with it for 24 hours a day. I didn't want to be in that place so I don't go there.

Some years ago, you undertook a counselling degree at the University of Greenwich. What motivated you to do

this, and how has it helped you personally and professionally? Christine Murray, via website

I did it because I wanted to understand more about the grieving process. For a couple of years after Stephen died, I

had no counselling myself. I thought it would take me to too many dark places. But then I had therapy for probably

a decade. I took the opportunity to study that process because I thought it would help me, and it did.

I am a serving police officer and qualified police trainer. In my view many officers are unconsciously incompetent

because their training is often inadequate. Will you be working will the College of Policing to ensure officers are

better equipped to understand the cultural issues that lead to mistrust of the police? Peter Clarke, via email

I certainly will do if I am ever invited to. I have never really been asked to be involved with the police. Just once,

when I went to a senior police training role play thing. When I was there it seemed that their behaviour was very

defensive, very quiet.

How did it feel to stand in front of Chris Ofili's painting No Woman, No Cry? Nicola Churchward, via email

I didn't stand in front of it for years after it was made. I read that Chris Ofili had won the Turner prize, and I knew

about it. I eventually saw it at Tate Modern and it is an amazing painting. Each tear drop has Stephen's face in it. I

suppose at the time I was proud, or rather honoured, that somebody had been moved to do that. Chris Ofili I have

got to know a little; he is a great source of energy.

My friends' teenage son was killed six months ago. It was as a result of an accident, rather than an act of violence,

but from your own experience, do you have any words of advice about how his parents might make their peace

with such a terrible loss? Name and address supplied

Time hasn't been that much of a healer. And for me, the violent way in which Stephen was killed made it very hard

to come to terms with. The pointlessness of it. But you do have to find ways to remember who your child was as a

person. I always have pictures of Stephen around, and I always talk about him; I never want to think that he never

existed. At first, I just kept asking why did God let this happen, why did he not protect Stephen? For a long time I

used to go to the church where I had always gone, but I would sit at the back and just slip in the moment the

service started and as soon as it finished I would leave. I didn't really want to speak to anybody and people found it

hard to speak to me, I think. As time has gone on, I've begun to have a bit more understanding that through his

sacrifice a lot of positive things have happened. People say to me sometimes if it wasn't for the work we had done

their lives would be harder. I take some comfort from that. The fact is a death is a death, however it happens. You

have to find some way of looking back on the positive things in the person's life before that happened.

Would you ever consider being a member of the House of Lords or even standing as mayor of London?

Name and address supplied

I question what some people in the House of Lords are really there for. But of course I would like to be able to

challenge some things that go on in government, to speak up on some issues. I think a lot of people do it for the

glorification or whatever, but that would not interest me. Mayor of London: I don't think so.

After two decades of amazing work, are we getting to the point where anti-racism campaigning is perhaps too

focused on Stephen, such that our point of reference is 20 years out of date? Patrick Neylan, via website

I don't think anti-racism is too focused on Stephen. When I speak I make a point of trying to speak about all young

people. His name has become a useful reference point for people to talk about these things. The Macpherson

report is a major inquiry, and I don't think it is in danger of overshadowing the other issues.

How do you feel knowing that another 106 people have died in attacks with a possible racial motivation since the

murder of Stephen and the inquiry into his death? Harmit Athwal, Institute of Race Relations, via email

Obviously every death is terrible. Many times mothers have written to me and contacted me. The mother of Andre

Smartt-Ford, who died at Streatham Ice Rink in 2007, for example. I try to give as much support as I can. I can't

promise to get involved in everything because there is only one of me, but I have tried to speak out on behalf of

other mothers and other victims.

I sometimes think, talking to my own teenagers' friends, that race is not discussed enough among white families. If

there was one thing you would say to other mothers about the way we discuss race-related issues, what would it

be? Subistar, via email

It is every parent's responsibility to discuss these issues and to ensure that their children are tolerant of those

around them. This country was never a country for some mythical English white people; it has always been a mix. I

would just say that people need to know their history.

How do I handle less open-minded attitudes when someone makes a comment that could be deemed racist?

James Aldworth, New York, via email

Always challenge it. If you hear a child in a playground making a racist comment, you speak out, you never let it go.

What are your feelings towards your son's killers? I doubt I ever could, but do you think you could forgive them for

what they did? Perrylee, via email

You can only forgive those who seek forgiveness. They still don't admit they have done anything wrong, so I don't

see how I can forgive them. They have to say sorry before you can think about forgiveness. They have never said

that and I don't imagine they ever will.

Do you think institutional racism against British Muslims exists in this country? begmohsin2, via email

It is a problem. As soon as you start talking about people in groups, then that kind of behaviour starts. Some

young black men may be into drugs, but the majority are not. Some young Muslims may be sympathetic to

terrorism, but clearly most are not. The racism arises out of that.

Like you, I am a strong supporter of the public sector equality duty. Its predecessor, the race equality duty, was

motivated in large part by Stephen's murder and is widely thought of as the most innovative development in

equality legislation since the 1970s. So why do you think the government considers the duty to be "red tape", and

what do you think of the current review that has raised the suggestion that the duty might be scrapped or further

watered down? Dr Hazel Conley, Centre for Research in Equality and Diversity

The public sector equality duty is the only measure we have to hold institutions to account over issues of race, but

the review wants to make it seem as though it is about the bureaucracy of form filling. It is a bit like the

recommendations from Macpherson about stop and search, the necessity of providing a paper basis for the

reason why you had been stopped, so you could hold an officer to account. They have done away with that and

they seem to be trying to do the same here. We are moving backwards rather than forwards.

How do you feel about the "reclaiming" of the "N" word and, particularly, the frequency with which it is used in

rap? Jo-Anne Welsh, via email

I think it is more of an American thing than a British one. I don't listen to rap music, so I don't really have a view. I

guess kids can be influenced, but not always. Stephen was a music fan; he liked Mariah Carey and some urban

music such as Public Enemy. But I don't think it had much of a bearing on how he behaved.

How do you see the current state of race equality in Britain, especially considering the negative rhetoric

surrounding human rights, immigration and asylum policy? Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty

This government could have built on Macpherson, and they haven't. When my son was murdered the

Conservatives were in power and they did nothing. And it seems in coalition, now, they still don't do anything. I

have not met David Cameron in the way that I met Blair and Brown. Politicians always seem to want to blame

immigration for the problems of the country. Immigration policy has to be fair, but you have to keep making the

arguments against that blame culture. We need younger people to be taking up the battle for these issues. I went

over to Washington for President Obama's first inauguration. It was something I never expected to see in my

lifetime, a black man running a country like the US. I needed to be there to witness it, one of the 2 million. I don't

think I will ever see it happening here, though. There are plenty who could do it, but I don't think we would give

them the opportunity. They would never think you are good enough, not really.

The Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust is dedicated to providing opportunities for disadvantaged young people and

maintaining Stephen's legacy. To give money, go to justgiving.com/slct/Donate. stephenlawrence.org.uk

46
10 Reference- Celebrate May Day in Glasgow
Updated: 19 Apr 2013

May Day marvels in Glasgow

Thursday 18 April 2013

by Chris Bartter

Comedian and activist Mark Thomas. Marxist magician Ian Saville.

The Co-op brass band. Folk musicians Siobhan Miller and Jeana Leslie.

Political song master Arthur Johnstone.

Singer/writer Dave Anderson.

Harmonica virtuoso Fraser Speirs.

Each is a star in their own right but put them all together and you've got a phenomenal line-up and they'll be

appearing at The Great MayDay Cabaret in Glasgow's Oran Mor on May 6 to crown this year's Glasgow Friends

Of MayDay activities.

It's the culmination of a whole range of events which have been organised by the friends with support from the

STUC, Co-operative Membership and Thompsons Solicitors.

Tonight and tomorrow in Glasgow legendary Chilean folk group Quilapayun, backed by Scottish-Chilean band

Voces Del Sur, play their only British dates in a tour which takes place 40 years after the vicious coup that

forced them into exile in France.

But the full Friends Of MayDay programme starts with two walks visiting sites of significant socialist interest in

Glasgow on April 27 and May 4.

One of them, organised by the Glasgow Women's Library, takes in women's heritage in the west end of the city.

The hugely successful film The Happy Lands about the General Strike and the subsequent lockout in a pit

village in Fife returns for a showing on May 5 and there'll be screenings of films by Glasgow's anti-racism

campaigners Hope Not Hate and the Scottish Cuba Solidarity Campaign.

A group of Matt McGinn aficionados stage a tribute to the great folksinger in St Andrew's In The Square on May

3 and the highly praised talk by prominent Scottish composer Bill Sweeney on music and the working-class

movement has been revived by the Morning Star campaigns committee as part of their Our Class, Our Culture

series.

It's a fantastic line-up of events and the full programme and booking arrangements are at www.may1st.org.uk.

45
11 Reference- BBC the Political Propaganda Machine dancing to the same old Tory tune
Updated: 02 Apr 2013

New BBC director general begins

task of mending corporation's reputation

Tony Hall will spend first day speaking to staff as he embarks on restoring public confidence in corporation after

Savile scandal

  • Press Association
  • The Guardian, Monday 1 April 2013 18.19 BST
Tony Hall
Tony Hall takes up the role of director general of the BBC on Tuesday. Photograph: Graeme Robertson

Tony Hall will begin the job of repairing the BBC's battered reputation when he takes up the role of director

general on Tuesday. Lord Hall, who started out as a BBC trainee 40 years ago, will spend part of his first day

speaking to staff at the corporation, which has been beset with problems since the Jimmy Savile sex abuse

scandal came to light last September.

The former BBC news executive also has to contend with low staff morale – highlighted by last week's strike in a

row over jobs, workload and claims of bullying.

When the previous director general George Entwistle stepped down in November after a Tory peer was

mistakenly implicated in child abuse claims in a BBC2 Newsnight report, Hall was the only candidate contacted

by the BBC Trust. Before being offered the £450,000-a-year post, he had been chief executive of the Royal Opera

House, a job he took up in 2001.

Birkenhead-born Hall, who was made a crossbench peer in 2010, admitted there was "a lot of hard work ahead"

when announcing his first appointments earlier this year, but said he was creating a team that would "define the

BBC and public service broadcasting for the next decade". He had previously spoken of building a "world-class

team for this world-class organisation", saying he cared about it passionately.

The new director general, who was head of BBC news and current affairs from 1996 to 2001, "has a honeymoon

period - but it could be a short one", according to media commentator Raymond Snoddy. The former presenter

of the BBC News channel's NewsWatch said on Sunday: "Tony Hall arrives with a ocean of good will behind him

as the 'right person' to sort out the mess the BBC is in following the Savile and Newsnight scandals.

"Reality starts tomorrow. He will soon be judged on how well he succeeds – or not – in improving trust in the

BBC and restoring morale while coping with real falls in income. Just round the corner there will also be the start

of negotiations for a new licence fee settlement and royal charter."

Snoddy warned that "the next new row will probably break out before long", however.

Broadcaster and media consultant Steve Hewlett said: "In a sense, he couldn't have a better start - arriving when

it's all gone wrong, and it's not your fault. If you've got an idea of what to do about it, it's not a bad position to be

in. There's the sense things can only improve.

"He knows the organisation. He's no fool. He'll get the right people around him. If anyone can do this, he's the

top of the list. I've some confidence it will go well."

Hewlett said Hall's first challenge was to build an executive team that could command staff respect, something

the new director general has already started doing. He praised the appointment of former Labour cabinet

minister James Purnell as the BBC's new director of strategy and digital, saying Hall had chosen a "smart

operator" who is a "very capable thinker, with a genuine long-term view".

Confidence from the license-paying public also has to be repaired, who expect the organisation to be run with

strong leadership, Hewlett added, with other issues Hall including the negotiation of a new royal charter.

"I think Tony Hall is onto this, and the appointment of James Purnell shows that he is," he said.

Two outstanding appointments Hall still needs to make are those of director of news and director of television,

adding to what is an already busy to-do list as he prepares to make his return to the BBC

121
12 Reference- Breaking -Nelson Mandela goes back to hospital with a lung infection
Updated: 28 Mar 2013

Nelson Mandela: Zuma Asks World To Pray

Sky News – 38 minutes ago

The former president of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, has been taken back to hospital suffering from a lung infection.

President Jacob Zuma confirmed that the 94-year-old was readmitted just before midnight on Wednesday and

said: "We appeal to the people of South Africa and the world to pray for our beloved Madiba and his family and to

keep them in their thoughts.

"We have full confidence in the medical team and know that they will do everything possible to ensure recovery."

Mr Mandela's spokesman Mac Maharaj told Sky News that the former president was "conscious".

He said: "At the moment doctors are saying it is a recurrence of an old lung infection. It is a matter of concern ... He

was admitted around midnight last night.

"They are doing everything they can to keep him comfortable and happy."

He said that last time he had seen Mr Mandela he had been frail but in a "good frame of mind".

Mr Mandela spent 18 days in hospital in December , where he was treated for a lung infection and gallstones.

He was discharged on December 27, however, doctors warned he was "not yet fully recovered" and he continued

to receive medical treatment at his Johannesburg home, including being given extra oxygen.

Mr Mandela has had recurring lung problems since contracting tuberculosis in 1988, during his 27 years in prison

under the apartheid regime.

The Nobel Peace Laureate spent a night in hospital on March 9 for what was described as a scheduled medical check-up .

However, Sky News' Special Correspondent Alex Crawford said that it was now understood that the visit was

required for further treatment of the lung infection and that on that occasion he is believed to have had his lungs drained.

She said that there were now significant concerns over his health and added: "The time of his hospitalisation

certainly suggests they were alarmed at his deterioration."

In February, Mr Mandela's granddaughters showed the first picture of him to be seen in more than seven months

as they promoted a reality television series in which they star.

He was seen with his great grandson, Zen, sitting on his lap at his Johannesburg home.

Earlier this month, George Bizos, the human rights lawyer who represented Mr Mandela at his treason trial, said

that he was suffering memory lapses and sometimes forgot his fellow anti-apartheid activists were dead.

In an interview he told Eyewitness News: "Unfortunately he sometimes forgets that one or two of them had passed

on and has a blank face when you tell him that Walter Sisulu and some others are no longer with us."

In February 2012 Mr Mandela, who is known by his tribal name of Madiba in South Africa, spent the night in hospital

after a minor exploratory procedure to investigate persistent abdominal pain.

In 2001 he had radiotherapy treatment for prostate cancer.

Mr Mandela, who was released from prison in 1990, suffered damage to his tear glands because of being forced to

smash limestone rocks in the quarry on Robben Island due to the alkalinity of the stone. He had cataract surgery at

the age of 75, in 1994, a few months after being sworn in as president.

Mr Mandela stepped down after one term as president. He has not appeared in public since South Africa's World

Cup final in 2010, six years after retiring

43
13 Reference- The Trowbridge Martyr -1783 - When the Judiciary hanged innocent protesters
Updated: 26 Mar 2013

 

Wiltshire’s little-known hero – hanged for refusing to betray his workmates

Rosie Upton recounts the tale of a young man who died rather than inform on his friends after a mill was burned to the ground in 1802

by - 22nd March 2013, 8.30 GMT

The tomb of Thomas Helliker, in Trowbridge, Wiltshire

The tomb of Thomas Helliker, in Trowbridge, Wiltshire

The story of Thomas Helliker (sometimes spelt Hilliker or Elliker) who is sometimes referred to as the Trowbridge

Martyr is little known outside Trowbridge, the county town of Wiltshire.

Born in 1783 into a local family employed as cloth workers he was apprenticed as a shearman at the age of 14

and might in time have expected significantly higher earnings than weavers or other wool workers.  

Shearmen were amongst the most skilled and highly-paid workers in the woollen industry and Trowbridge at that

time was a centre for the production of the finest broadcloth.

Their job was not to cut the cloth but to finish it by shearing it flat after it had been washed and the nap raised by

teasels.

The industrial revolution brought mechanisation and the local workers feared the introduction of shearing

frames to finish the cloth in local mills.

The shearmen stood to lose the most from the introduction of machinery and were well organised in the North of

England and the West-country in fighting this mechanisation.

When shearing frames were introduced at Littleton Mill it was burned to the ground on 22 July 1802.

It is doubtful that Thomas took any part in the destruction but despite having an alibi and protesting his

innocence he was arrested, charged and sent for trial, in Salisbury where he was subsequently found guilty.

He was hanged at Fisherton Gaol on his 19th birthday on 22 March 1803, despite public outrage.

Afterwards it was generally accepted that he was innocent, but that he had known those who burned down the

mill and had refused to inform on them.

 It is likely that he had been framed by powerful clothiers determined to make an example.

His body was carried in procession on a cart across Salisbury plain and buried in St James Churchyard in

Trowbridge. It is said that the procession grew larger as it reached his hometown and was accompanied by girls

dressed all in white who formed a guard of honour.

A fine carved chamber tombstone, the finest in the churchyard, was erected by the shearmen of Yorkshire,

Wiltshire and Somerset over the grave.

This fell into disrepair over the years and his story became largely forgotten, except within the town itself.

The tomb was restored by Trowbridge Trades Council in the 1980s and White Horse (Wiltshire) TUC hold a

commemorative wreath laying there on 22 March of each year.

A handwritten copy of the last letter allegedly written by Helliker (signed Hiliker) is on display at Trowbridge

Museum as part of a current exhibition about the woollen industry in the town.

The full story of Thomas Helliker can be found in a booklet produced by White Horse TUC – Wiltshire Industrial

History – Working Class Episodes – priced at £7.50 plus £1 p&p and available here.

* White Horse (Wiltshire) TUC is organising a wreath laying today at noon at St James’ Churchyard, Trowbridge. They have also organised a social tomorrow evening at 8pm at Village Pump, Lamb Inn, Trowbridge. Admission is £5, with singing from The Boghouse Boys, Rosie Upton and Pete McGregor

49
14 Reference-Now Britain is running out of Gas
Updated: 23 Mar 2013
 
Britain to run out of gas reserves in 36 hours

 

 
 Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:56PM GMT
 
Britain’s gas reserves are running out in 36 hours amid an unreasonable cold weather leaving the country on
 
expensive foreign imports, local media reported.


According to the British media reports the country’s gas storage has less than two days’ supplies left, with lower-
 
than-usual temperatures force millions to turn up their heating.

The shortfall could force the long-term price of gas higher, and analysts warn tariffs are likely to rise by up to 15
 
percent before next winter.

“There is no other Western economy of our size that uses as much gas as we do, but has so little storage,” the
 
Daily Mail quoted energy analyst Peter Atherton as saying.

According to the source the UK has only 15 days of storage capacity, given the current level of consumption,
 
which is less than in any of its European neighbors.

On Friday, the price of wholesale gas surged to a record high after the unexpected closure of the UK-Belgian
 
interconnector, one of the UK's biggest import pipelines.
 
The price of gas for same-day delivery jumped as much as 50 percent.

In addition to that Norway plans to reduce the capacity of its pipeline for maintenance work in April.

Under those circumstances the UK could become more dependent on imports
40
15 Reference- World Water Day -Everywhere if we share
Updated: 23 Mar 2013

World Water Day: Water, Water Everywhere, Only if We Share

It is fair to say that in the western world we take water for granted.

At home, one can turn on the tap, pour themselves a glass of tap water, and even leave it running without fear

that the flow might stop.

We are able bathe and shower in temperate water as and when we please and we can walk down to the local

shop and buy ourselves a bottle of mineral water if we are feeling thirsty.

The fact that billions struggle to survive on a daily basis due to lack of water is rarely highlighted on a global

scale.

So while today may be just another Friday to many, it is important to know that it is World Water Day.

Run by the United Nations, the day is devoted to promoting issues surrounding the world’s water resources

across the globe.

Observed every year on 22 March since 1993, awareness of the day has grown aided in recent years by social media. This year is the landmark 20th anniversary of its formation, and UN Water are determined to make it the

biggest and most widely disseminated yet, with no fewer than 450 events taking place on every continent today.

This year official festivities are taking place in The Hague, Netherlands.

Choosing the official slogan for this year was even put to a public competition with over 12,000 proposals sent in

from 180 countries. Eventually, a Ms Megha Kumar from India was the winner: “Water, Water Everywhere, Only if

We Share”.

Each year UN Water, a dedicated arm of the United Nations set up in 2003, helps countries achieve centrally

defined water preservation goals, chooses a theme, and promotes key messages to a world audience.

And 2013 is a big year for water.

Coinciding with World Water Day today, this year is also the International Year of Water Cooperation.

After a proposal by Tajikistan, the aim is to make people recognise the importance of cooperation in striking a

balance between different needs and priorities, in order to share water equitably.

The rather bold claim of the organisers is to “use water as an instrument of peace.”

 

September 2013 will mark World Water Week and will take place in Stockholm where experts will meet to discuss

the planet’s most urgent water-related issues.

All this might not whet the appetite (no pun intended) of the ordinary person.

However, it really should – the fulfilment of seven billion peoples’ basic human needs of sustenance, the

environment, socio-economic development and poverty reduction are all heavily dependent on water.

The shortage and unnecessary wastage of it is a pertinent issue.

Various NGOs have warned that as many as a billion people are without access to safe drinking water.

Rapid urbanisation, pollution and climate change threaten the resource while demands for water are increasing

in order to satisfy the needs of a growing world population.

The fact that water is a shared resource is often lost on people hence this call for cooperation.

Jacob Tompkins the managing director of Waterwise, an NGO that promotes water efficiency says: “In the UK our

water consumption is 150 litres per person per day; this is a third higher than our European neighbours.

By following these tips you will cut your water use which is good for the environment and could cut your water

and energy bills (heating water in the home is about 30 per cent of your energy bill).”

The top 10 tips for saving water:

1. Take shorter showers instead of a bath – use a shower timer and see if you can keep your showers to less than five minutes.

2. Fix leaking and dripping taps.

3. Water your garden early in the morning or late at night when evaporation is lowest.

4. Never use the toilet as a dustbin.

5. Use a Hippo or Save-a-Flush (cistern displacement device) to reduce the amount of water used in the loo.

6. Use a bowl when washing salad or veg then throw the water on your garden.

7. Only use your washing machine or dishwasher when you have got a full load.

8. Turn the tap off when you brush your teeth – in fact toothpaste works better when it’s dry!

9. Put a layer of mulch on the soil around your plants; it will suppress weeds, reduce evaporation and keep the soil moist.

10. Finally, drink tap water! Tap water is just as good as bottled water, it’s a lot cheaper and it better for the planet.

34
16 Reference - Modern Propaganda - John Pilger
Updated: 22 Mar 2013

The new propaganda is liberal. The new slavery is digital.

14 March 2013

What is modern propaganda?
 
For many, it is the lies of a totalitarian state.
 
In the 1970s, I met Leni Riefenstahl and asked her about her epic films that glorified the Nazis.
 
Using revolutionary camera and lighting techniques, she produced a documentary form that mesmerized
 
Germans; her 'Triumph of the Will' cast Hitler's spell.

She told me that the "messages" of her films were dependent not on "orders from above," but on the
 
"submissive void" of the German public.
 
Did that include the liberal, educated bourgeoisie?
 
"Everyone," she said.

Today, we prefer to believe that there is no submissive void.
 
"Choice" is ubiquitous. Phones are "platforms" that launch every half-thought.
 
There is Google from outer space if you need it.
 
Caressed like rosary beads, the precious devices are borne heads-down, relentlessly monitored and prioritised.
 
Their dominant theme is the self. Me. My needs. Riefenstahl's submissive void is today's digital slavery.

Edward Said described this wired state in 'Culture and Imperialism' as taking imperialism where navies could
 
never reach.
 
It is the ultimate means of social control because it is voluntary, addictive and shrouded in illusions of personal
 
freedom.

Today's "message" of grotesque inequality, social injustice and war is the propaganda of liberal democracies.
 
By any measure of human behaviour, this is extremism.
 
When Hugo Chavez challenged it, he was abused in bad faith; and his successor will be subverted by the same
 
zealots of the American Enterprise Institute, Harvard's Kennedy School and the "human rights" organisations
 
that have appropriated American liberalism and underpin its propaganda.
 
The historian Norman Pollack calls this "liberal fascism."
 
He wrote, "All is normality on display.
 
For [Nazi] goose-steppers, substitute the seemingly more innocuous militarisation of the total culture.
 
And for the bombastic leader, we have the reformer manque, blithely at work [in the White House], planning and
 
executing assassination, smiling all the while."

Whereas a generation ago, dissent and biting satire were allowed in the "mainstream," today their counterfeits
 
are acceptable and a fake moral zeitgeist rules.
 
"Identity" is all, mutating feminism and declaring class obsolete.
 
Just as collateral damage covers for mass murder, "austerity" has become an acceptable lie.
 
Beneath the veneer of consumerism, a quarter of Greater Manchester is reported to be living in "extreme
 
poverty."

The militarist violence perpetrated against hundreds of thousands of nameless men, women and children by
 
"our" governments is never a crime against humanity.
 
Interviewing Tony Blair 10 years on from his criminal invasion of Iraq, the BBC's Kirsty Wark gifted him a moment
 
he could only dream of.
 
She allowed Blair to agonise over his "difficult" decision rather than call him to account for the monumental lies
 
and bloodbath he launched.
 
One is reminded of Albert Speer.

Hollywood has returned to its cold war role, led by liberals.
 
Ben Affleck's Oscar-winning 'Argo' is the first feature film so integrated into the propaganda system that its
 
subliminal warning of Iran's "threat" is offered as Obama is preparing, yet again, to attack Iran.
 
That Affleck's "true story" of good-guys-vs-bad-Muslims is as much a fabrication as Obama's justification for his
 
war plans is lost in PR-managed plaudits.
 
As the independent critic Andrew O'Hehir points out, 'Argo' is "a propaganda movie in the truest sense, one that
 
claims to be innocent of all ideology."
 
That is, it debases the art of film-making to reflect an image of the power it serves.

The true story is that, for 34 years, the US foreign policy elite have seethed with revenge for the loss of the shah
 
of Iran, their beloved tyrant, and his CIA-designed state of torture.
 
When Iranian students occupied the US embassy in Tehran in 1979, they found a trove of incriminating
 
documents, which revealed that an Israeli spy network was operating inside the US, stealing top scientific and
 
military secrets.
 
Today, the duplicitous Zionist ally - not Iran - is the one and only nuclear threat in the Middle East.

In 1977, Carl Bernstein, famed for his Watergate reporting, disclosed that more than 400 journalists and
 
executives of mostly liberal US media organizations had worked for the CIA in the past 25 years.
 
They included journalists from the New York Times, Time, and the big TV broadcasters.
 
These days, such a formal nefarious workforce is quite unnecessary.
 
In 2010, the New York Times made no secret of its collusion with the White House in censoring the WikiLeaks war
 
logs.
 
The CIA has an "entertainment industry liaison office" that helps producers and directors remake its image from
 
that of a lawless gang that assassinates, overthrows governments and runs drugs. As Obama's CIA commits multiple murder by drone, Affleck lauds the "clandestine service... that is making sacrifices on behalf of Americans every day... I want to thank them very much." The 2010 Oscar-winner Kathryn Bigelow's 'Zero Dark Thirty', a torture-apology, was all but licensed by the Pentagon.

The US market share of cinema box-office takings in Britain often reaches 80 percent, and the small UK share is mainly for US co-productions. Films from Europe and the rest of the world account for a tiny fraction of those we are allowed to see. In my own film-making career, I have never known a time when dissenting voices in the visual arts are so few and silent.

For all the hand-wringing induced by the Leveson inquiry, the "Murdoch mold" remains intact. Phone-hacking was always a  distraction, a misdemeanor compared to the media-wide drumbeat for criminal wars. According to Gallup, 99 percent of Americans believe Iran is a threat to them, just as the majority believed Iraq was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. "Propaganda always wins," said Leni Riefenstahl, "if you allow it."

This article originally appeared in the New Statesman, UK
43
17 Reference-"Hugo Chavez empowered and united"
Updated: 13 Mar 2013

Hugo Chavez empowered and united

assets/Uploads/_resampled/CroppedImage6060-sam.jpg March 12 2013chavez520x2

The powerful voice of Hugo Chavez - a voice for economic justice, democracy, empowerment, national

independence, continental solidarity, peace, anti-imperialism, and socialism - has been stilled.

While local and global elites sigh in relief and belittle his life in the major media, the untimely death of Chavez is

also evoking a heartfelt cry from millions of abused, marginalized, and exploited people across the globe - none

more so than in Venezuela and throughout Latin America.

In that cry one doesn't hear a note of despair and defeat, but rather an unmistakable affirmation that the

irrepressible spirit, intellectual curiosity, and disposition to action that defined this man's life will find reflection in

the lives of struggling humanity in the years to come.

The celebrations in the seats of power of the global elite over Chavez's death are very premature. The "masters

of the universe" make the mistake of underestimating the consciousness and capacity of people in Venezuela

and elsewhere to carry forward Chavez's legacy of challenging entrenched capitalist power and injustice. This

misunderstanding is not unusual for a class that is steeped in notions of racial superiority, patriarchy, and class

entitlement, and tucked away in bubbles of privilege and opulence.

Few of us leave an individual imprint on history. For most of us, our ability to affect history lies in joining with

others in collective action.

But some individuals do play an outsized role shaping historical events - as part of the wider struggles taking place in society.

Hugo Chavez Frias falls into this category.

He was an early and unyielding opponent of neoliberal globalization - a system of political and economic

capitalist domination that grew out of the dynamics and contradictions of capitalism in its current stage of

development. This system of governance broke up traditional farming in the countryside and forced vast

numbers of peasants off the land. It created massive slums rimming South America's major cities, rolled back

social provisioning by the state, degraded the environment, generated ever wider inequalities, tore down trade

and financial barriers protecting local economies, decimated and de-nationalized industry, and condemned

millions to impoverishment and spiritual hopelessness.

Drawing inspiration from Simon Bolivar, Fidel Castro and other revolutionaries of Latin America, Chavez

challenged in words and deeds this system of exploitation and oppression.

But his fight was not a lonely one. This great leader of indigenous and African descent (a fact that fueled the

hatred of the elites even more) not only gave voice to the impoverished and rootless, but also inspired them to

become political actors in their own right. Indeed, Chavez played a singular role in transforming a fragmented

mass of people in Venezuela into an organized force challenging the profits and prerogatives of local and global

capital.

If we left it here however, we would miss the other side of the dialectic. Chavez, like other great leaders, was as

much a product of his times and the people he sought to influence as they were of him. Changing circumstances

and an aroused people remade him as much as he remade them.

Chavez was a socialist, and one whose feet were very much in this century. While he was inspired by struggles

of the past, he wasn't a prisoner of the received wisdom of earlier times. His socialism - its sensibilities, goals,

theory, program, and path - were conditioned by the particular, novel circumstances of the 21st century.

At the core of his worldview and political practice were people's needs, people's empowerment, and people's

unity at the national, regional, and global level. His politics grew out of the real movement of people and a sober

estimation of the actual balance of class and social forces.

At times, his views raised the eyebrows of those on the left who considered problematic any deviation from what

I would call their undialectical and rigid reading of Marxism.

In an interview with Tariq Ali, Chavez said,

"I don't believe in the dogmatic postulates of Marxist revolution. I don't accept that we are living in a period of

proletarian revolutions. All that must be revised. Reality is telling us that every day. Are we aiming in Venezuela

today for the abolition of private property or a classless society? I don't think so. But if I'm told that because of

that reality you can't do anything to help the poor, the people who have made this country rich through their

labor - and never forget that some of it was slave labor - then I say: 'We part company.' I will never accept that

there can be no redistribution of wealth in society.

"Our upper classes don't even like paying taxes. That's one reason they hate me. We said: 'You must pay your

taxes.' I believe it's better to die in battle, rather than hold aloft a very revolutionary and very pure banner, and do

nothing ... That position often strikes me as very convenient, a good excuse ... Try and make your revolution, go

into combat, advance a little, even if it's only a millimetre, in the right direction, instead of dreaming about

utopias."

As you can see, Chavez's theory and practice included intermediate steps and stages of struggle. It embraced

the struggle for reforms, even minor ones that would meet in some, even small, ways people's needs, and at the

same time act as a matrix for mass political participation, anti-capitalist education, and deeper and broader unity.

And it rested on a creative and flexible application of theory to changing reality.

Hugo Chavez will be greatly missed in his home country and worldwide, but the way to honor him isn't to turn

him into an icon and his words into sacred texts. We honor Hugo Chavez by embracing his passion and

courage, his curiosity about the world, his tireless struggle for unity of diverse forces, his readiness to think

independently and develop Marxism in fresh and creative ways, and his belief in the intelligence and power of an

engaged people.

Photo: Fernando Llano/AP

38
18 Reference- The 15th Cuban Cigar Festival - That Montecristo Moment ?
Updated: 13 Mar 2013

C U B A

  1. March 7, 2013
 

Havana's 15th Cigar Festival

Sheyla Delgado Guerra & Juan Diego Nusa Peñalver

CUBA has once again hosted the largest international event for aficionados of the finest

tobacco in the world, the 15th Cigar Festival, dedicated this year to two of the most prestigious

cigar brands in the country: Montecristo and Partagás.

Walfrido Hernández Mesa (Cuba) and Luis Sánchez-Harguindey Pardo de Vera (Spain), co-

presidents of Habanos S.A, extended a warm welcome to the approximately 1,500 participants

from 70-plus countries who enjoyed an exclusive early tasting of the new brands which

Habanos S.A. is to launch in 2013, and were able to discover the roots and secrets of a tobacco

tradition accumulated over centuries in Cuba.

International celebrities from the world of art, sports and culture, brought together by a

shared passion, were present at the event. They included former German tennis star Boris

Becker; Italian tenor Dario Balzanelli; considered the next Luciano Pavarotti; and Belgian

television personality Goedele Liekens.

A colorful opening ceremony marked the start of the festival at the Tres Reyes del Morro

Castle, a former colonial military fortress built in the late 16th century.

This gateway to the Port of Havana provided the venue where delegates and special guests

enjoyed an exclusive preview of the new Montecristo Petit No. 2 and the Montecristo Double

Edmundo, highly praised after their international debut.

A highlight of the Festival, in the El Laguito protocol suite in the International Convention Center

complex, was Vegueros Night, a well-deserved tribute to the world's best tobacco growers,

without whom the exquisite cigars would not be possible. It was at this event that the

Vegueros brand was re-launched, with its new lower end of the market, mid to strong

Tapados, Entretiempos and Mañanitas cigars, all completely hand-rolled, which were savored

alongside 2013 limited edition habanos.

The internationally acclaimed Cuban musician Leo Brower, a guest at this year's Festival,

named Habano Man of the Year in 2003, stated to Granma International, "The habano is a

masterpiece worthy of Mozart or Stravinsky, or even one of the many anonymous writers who

have created the world's popular culture." He added, "I smoke them as if it were a ritual. An

extremely strict, marvelous and special ritual."

The big surprise of this 15th edition was the cookery demonstration, "Tobacco and

Gastronomy," in which Croatian celebrity chefs Grgur Baksic, Zoran Simunic and Pantelija Pekic,

from Camelotd, Habanos distributor in Croatia and Slovenia, prepared a live haute cuisine

cookery demonstration of exclusive recipes featuring Cuban tobacco as the main spice.

The intense one-week program was completed by a range of activities including visits to the

finest tobacco plantations in Vuelta Abajo and Pinar del Río, the historic H.Upmann and

Partagás cigar factories, and talks, seminars, the famous "Completely hand-rolled" master

class, cigar tastings, special tastings combining Cuban cigars and liquors, and a trade fair at the

International Convention Center.

The cigar tasting competition to identify three labels by touch and taste only, was won by

Cuban Osiris Oramas, maître d' at La Barca restaurant, and the International Habano

Sommelier Award went to Pedro Tejeras, from Havana's Bodeguita del Medio.

At the closing gala night closing ceremony, in the Pabexpo Exhibition Center, beautifully

adorned in shades of red and black, the indisputable protagonist was the new Lusitanias Gran

Reserva de Partagás, 2007 harvest, the first new cigar from this famous brand to be launched

in 168 years since it was founded in 1845. No less spectacular was the cultural performance,

supported by the legendary voice of the Buena Vista Social Club diva, Cuban Omara Portuondo;

and impressive salsa musicians Mayito Rivera and Paolo FG, accompanied by singers Luna

Manzanares, Vania Borges, and the famous Italian tenor Balzanelli.

A further highlight was the auctioning of six premium tobacco humidors from Cuba's best-

known international cigar brands: Cohíba, Montecristo, Partagás, Romeo y Julieta, Hoyo de

Monterrey and H. Upmann, which raised 890,000 euros destined for the Cuban public health

service.

The event also included the awarding of the annual Habanos Prizes, which went to Osvaldo

Encarnación, production director of the TabaCuba Group, (Production category); Mauricio

Abrahamabady, Caribbean distributor for Habanos S.A., (Business); and Phoenicia Chipre, from

Phoenicia Trading, Habanos S.A, distributor for the Middle East and Africa (Communication).

A special prize of a silver sculpture by Cuban Raúl Valladares was presented to U.S. actor

Danny Glover, for his friendship with Cuba and the struggle for peace and justice.

Glover expressed his thanks for the award and his satisfaction at being able to speak on behalf

of five Cuban anti-terrorist fighters, unjustly imprisoned in the United States, and he reiterated

his commitment to doing everything in his power to help bring them back to Cuba.

The 15th anniversary humidor was also raffled at the closing event. •

FOTOS:

More than 1,500 delegates and special guests participated in the 15th Habanos Festival,

dedicated to the Montecristo and Partagás brands. (Photo: Alberto Borrego)

Osvaldo Encarnación, from the TabaCuba Group, (Production); Mauricio Abrahamabady,

Caribbean distributor for Habanos S.A, (Business), winners of the Habanos Prizes. Center:

Jorge Luis Fernández Maique, commercial vice president of Habanos S.A. (Photo: Alberto Borrego)

Omara Portuondo of the Buena Vista Social Club performed at the Gala Night in Pabexpo.

Danny Glover, with his wife, receives a special prize at the Festival. He confirmed he will

continue fighting for the release of the five Cubans incarcerated in the U.S. (Photo: Alberto Borrego)

A total of 890,000 euros was raised from the auction of six beautiful humidors. (Photo: Alberto Borrego)

Harvest time for tobacco growers in Pinar del Río. The Habanos S.A. Group has exclusive

worldwide representation of 27 Cuban cigar brands. It turned over $416 million in 2012, an

increase of 6%.

 

32
19 Reference- Nelson Mandela admitted to Hospital
Updated: 10 Mar 2013

Nelson Mandela admitted to hospital in South Africa

Spokesman says 'no reason for alarm' over 94-year-old former president and apartheid activist

  • Associated Press
  • The Observer, Saturday 9 March 2013 18.45 GMT
Nelson Mandela
 
Nelson Mandela was admitted to a hospital in Pretoria on Saturday.
 
Photograph: Siphiwe Sibeko/AFP/Getty Images

South Africa's presidency has said that Nelson Mandela has been admitted to a hospital for a scheduled medical checkup.

Presidential spokesman Mac Maharaj said in a statement that the 94-year-old former president went to a hospital

in the capital, Pretoria, on Saturday afternoon.

He said doctors are conducting tests and have indicated so far that there is "no reason for any alarm".

Mandela, a leader of the fight against apartheid, was hospitalised for nearly three weeks in December last year,

before going home on Boxing Day. At that time, he was treated for a lung infection and had a surgical procedure

to remove gallstones

46
20 Reference- Paul Robeson- Here I stand !
Updated: 08 Mar 2013

Robeson, Paul (1898–1976), influential African American singer, actor, and social activist.

Paul Robson was born in Princeton, New Jersey, and was the child of a clergyman who had been born a slave.

After winning a scholarship competition, Robeson attended Rutgers University, distinguishing himself as both

scholar and athlete. While at Rutgers he augmented his scholarship income by offering concerts and dramatic performances.

After graduating from Columbia Law School in 1923, Robeson turned to dramatic and musical theater where he

became internationally celebrated.

His roles in Eugene O'Neill's All God's Chillun Got Wings (1924) and Emperor Jones (1924 in New York and 1925 in

London) catapulted him to prominence as a serious actor when opportunities for African Americans on stage

were generally limited to the comic or to racist stereotypes. Robeson's performances in productions of

Shakespeare, particularly Othello, were enormously popular and won him enthusiastic critical acclaim.

Robeson was always acutely conscious of the complex racial politics of the American scene (even as early as his

Rutgers years).

From the mid-1930s on Robeson became increasingly interested in Communism, particularly as it seemed to

speak to the plight of African Americans.

In this respect, the trajectory of Robeson's life mirrors that of many African American artists and intellectuals,

such as Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison.

Robeson's interest in radical politics deepened over the years, even as it limited his opportunities to perform.

This limitation became especially pronounced in the early 1950s, given the advent of explicit conflict between the

United States and the Soviet Union.

Unlike Wright, who renounced Communism in favor of a more generalized anticolonialism, Robeson continued

his interest in the politics of Communism, bringing him into conflict with the government of the United States,

which revoked his passport (in 1950), though it was restored in 1958.

Robeson spent the latter years of his life in ill health, living in Europe and later in the United States.

Bibliography

  • Paul Robeson, Here I Stand, 1958.
  • Martin Duberman, Paul Robeson, 1988

Theodore O. Mason, Jr



51
21 Reference-Gift Aid- Register if you want to claim a refund if on PAYE though not with a Tax Return
Updated: 02 Mar 2013

The Gift Aid Toolkit: introduction

What is Gift Aid?

Now I am on PAYE tax I need to Register with Gift Aid to get tax a refund, which I automatically claimed and

received when making a tax return as a self employed person. Something wrong there !

Radical

Gift Aid is a simple way for your charity or Community Amateur Sports Club (CASC) to increase the value of gifts

of money you receive from UK taxpayers.

How will this toolkit help me claim Gift Aid?

This toolkit is the easiest way for you to start claiming Gift Aid from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). All you need are a computer and a printer, it has everything else you need to:

  • register for Gift Aid so that you can start claiming
  • tell HMRC if your details change
  • fill in your claim form for Gift Aid
  • obtain acceptable Gift Aid declarations from your donors
  • work out how much Gift Aid you will receive

The Gift Aid Toolkit

The resources in this toolkit are stored as Portable Document Format (PDF). PDF is a file format that lets you view and print a document in a style which matches the look and feel of the paper version - including fonts, colours, images and layout.

To view and print these documents you need to use a PDF file viewer such as Adobe Acrobat Reader which is available to download free of charge from the Adobe website. Follow the link below for more information on how to get help viewing PDFs.

Get help viewing PDFs

Top

Before you start - does your charity need to be registered?

Before you apply to be recognised for Gift Aid, you need to consider whether your charity should be registered with a charity regulator. If you are not sure whether you need to register you should contact the relevant regulator to find out.

The charity regulator for England and Wales is the Charity Commission. If your charity is established in England or Wales and your annual income is more than £5,000, you must register with the Commission before you can apply for Gift Aid (unless you are an exempt body).

Find out more about the Charity Commission website (Opens new window)

If your charity is established in Scotland, you need to apply to the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR), if you are required to register, before applying to be recognised for Gift Aid.

Find out more about OSCR - Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator

If your charity is in Northern Ireland or in England or Wales (but you do not have to register with the Charity Commission) all you need to do is write to HMRC Charities.

CASCs must be registered with HMRC Charities. If you want to register a CASC, please see 'help sheet 7 - Community Amateur Sports Clubs' below.

Contact detail for Charities and Community Amateur Sports Clubs

Top

The next step

Once you have either registered with a charity regulator (or decided that you don’t need to do so) you can apply to HMRC to be recognised for Gift Aid. To do that you need to complete the HMRC Charities Application Form (ChA1) for charities or the CASC Registration Form (CASC(A1) and send it to HMRC.

If your charity or CASC has already been accepted by HMRC for Gift Aid, you don’t need to apply again.

HMRC will check your application to see if you are entitled to claim Gift Aid, if no extra information is needed, they will write to you with your unique reference number so you can start claiming Gift Aid.

Please note that there is a different application procedure for CASCs.

Download ChA1 Charities Application form

Download the simple guide on how to complete Form CASC(A1) (PDF 1.1MB)

Detailed guide on how to complete Form CASC(A1) Community Amateur Sports Club Registration

Download CASC (A1) registration form

Top

Helpsheets that really are helpful

There are 12 helpsheets below which explain the basics and answer some frequently asked questions about Gift Aid. They also link to the HMRC website for further information.

Toolkit tips

Look out for the Toolkit tips on the helpsheets. They highlight tips that you can use to make tasks easier during the claim process.

Helpsheet 1: What is Gift Aid? (PDF 324K)
Helpsheet 2: What is a Gift Aid declaration? (PDF 169K)
Helpsheet 3: What can I claim Gift Aid on? (PDF 204K)
Helpsheet 4: What is a benefit for Gift Aid purposes? (PDF 206K)
Helpsheet 5: Do I need to keep records of Gift Aid donations? (PDF 222K)
Helpsheet 6: Is my charity a trust or a company? (PDF 289K)
Helpsheet 7: Community Amateur Sports Clubs (PDF 236K)
Helpsheet 8: How do I run a sponsored event and claim Gift Aid? (PDF 198K)
Helpsheet 9: How do I claim Gift Aid and how often can I claim? (PDF 184K)
Helpsheet 10: How should I list donations on the schedule? (PDF 194K)
Helpsheet 11: What are the time limits for claiming Gift Aid? (PDF 168K)
Helpsheet 12: What happens if my charity is selected for a Gift Aid audit? (PDF 200K)

Top

Forms

Reclaiming tax - charities and CASCs

Use form R68 to claim tax repayments for your charity or CASC. This claim form will automatically help you to claim the correct amount as you fill in the boxes. The guidance for each form gives you step-by-step help to ensure you fill in the form correctly.

Simple guide on how to complete Form R68(i) (PDF 894K)

Download form R68(i) – Gift Aid and tax Repayment claim for Charities and Community Amateur Sports Clubs

Gift Aid declaration and sponsor forms

Use the Gift Aid declaration form to make a Gift Aid donation to a charity or CASC or use the form if you’re a charity or CASC to give to your supporters.

Download the Gift Aid declaration form

Sponsorship and Gift Aid declaration - form

Use the Sponsorship and Gift Aid declaration form to make a Gift Aid donation to a charity or CASC from a sponsored event, or use the form if you're a charity or CASC to give to your supporters.

Download the Sponsorship and Gift Aid declaration form

Top

Posters and flyers

Sample posters and flyers to help you promote Gift Aid to your supporters

Posters
Poster – charitable donations version 01 (PDF 223K)
Poster – charitable donations version 02 (PDF 260K)
Poster – sponsorship 01 (PDF 196K)
Poster – sponsorship 02 (PDF 185K)

Flyers
What is Gift Aid: charitable donations flyer (PDF 694K)
What is Gift Aid: sponsorship flyer (PDF 506K)

160
22 Reference-Scap the Governments "Bum" Laws and Secret Trials where decisions are made round the back
Updated: 28 Feb 2013

Scrap 'dangerous and unnecessary' secret justice bill,

hundreds of lawyers and QCs urge the Government

  • Law professionals demand Government drop plans for new court system
  • Hearings behind closed doors 'erodes civil justice system core principles'
  • Letter signed by 702 include 38 QCs, notably Ian Macdonald

By James Chapman

| UPDATED: 22:42, 27 February 2013

Demand: Ian Macdonald QC, pictured in 2004, is one of the 702 law professionals who have signed the letter

Hundreds of lawyers, including some of the country’s most eminent QCs, today launch a devastating attack on

Government plans for secret courts as ‘contrary to the rule of law’ and demand they are dropped.

More than 700 figures from the legal profession insist that the Government’s Justice and Security Bill is

‘dangerous and unnecessary’ and will ‘fatally undermine’ the fairness of court hearings.

The group of 702, which includes 38 QCs, says in a letter published in today’s Daily Mail that the proposals to

allow a huge extension of court hearings behind closed doors will ‘erode core principles of our civil justice

system’ by undermining the right to a fair trial and open justice.

They include Nicholas Vineall QC, former chairman of the Conservative Lawyers’ Association, Reverend

Nicholas Mercer, a lieutenant colonel who was the Army’s most senior lawyer during the Iraq war, and Ian

Macdonald QC, who resigned as a security-cleared special advocate in protest at the existing use of secret justice.

The intervention of such a significant number of lawyers is a shattering blow for the Government, which had

been hoping to get the legislation through Parliament as quietly as possible following months of controversy. It

is expected to return to the Commons next week.

In another setback for the Government, a group of international organisations, including the American Civil

Liberties Union and similar bodies from Ireland, Canada, South Africa, Argentina, Egypt and Hungary, also

expressed concerns about the Bill in a joint statement.

 It warned: ‘If the UK Parliament passes this proposal into law it will be a huge setback for those of us fighting

to secure truth and fairness from our own governments and within our own justice systems across the world.’

The Daily Mail has led criticism of Government plans to allow so-called ‘closed material procedures’ (CMPs), in

which cases are conducted entirely in private, in civil hearings.

Defendants or claimants will not allowed to be present, know or challenge the case against them and must be

represented by a security-cleared special advocate, rather than their own lawyer.

Currently, such procedures are used in tiny numbers of immigration and deportation hearings, but the

Government wants to extend them across the civil courts in cases deemed to involve national security.

The legislation has been drafted in close cooperation with the security services, who have claimed other

countries may stop sharing intelligence with Britain if it risks being disclosed in open court.

But critics say the proposals are simply designed to ensure potentially embarrassing cases are conducted

behind closed doors.

Reverend Nicholas Mercer, one of the most prominent signatories of today’s letter, said: ‘The Justice and

Security Bill has one principle aim and that is to cover up UK complicity in rendition and torture.

‘The Bill is an affront to the open justice on which this country rightly prides itself and, above all, it is an affront

to human dignity. The fact that some of those individuals who are complicit in rendition and torture can not

only assist in the drafting of the Bill but also vote to cover their tracks is a constitutional scandal.

‘It is little wonder that the Bill has been heavily criticised by the UN Rapporteur on Torture and condemned by

the vast majority of lawyers and human rights organisations in this country.’

Michael Fordham QC, one of the country's leading public law specialists, warned the Government that if it

pressed ahead judges might refuse to preside over secret courts.

‘Secret trials undermine the principles of open justice and natural justice on which the rule of law is built. By

promoting the spread of secrecy, state authorities become self-immunised from proper public scrutiny, and in

relation to the very types of actions which most need it,’ he said.

‘Parliament is unwisely provoking the untapped power of our unwritten constitution which it could come to

regret. The last word will not be Parliament's, but that of judges asked to preside over secret courts. An unwise

Parliament may be about to find that it has constitutional limits, when the rule of law fights back.’

Paul Bowen QC said: ‘The extension of closed material procedures is not necessary for public protection.  The

state is already free to withhold evidence from disclosure under Public Interest Immunity procedures. 

 What is not fair, or just, is evidence being shown in secret to the judge who decides the case on the basis of

that evidence.

‘In those cases where disclosure of torture or other human rights abuses by the British government or its

agents is sought, the public interest surely requires that to be brought into the open.’

Dinah Rose QC, a former special advocate and another signatory, said: ‘Closed material procedures are alien

to British justice and will distort civil trials beyond recognition.

'What may look and sound like a trial is in fact nothing of the sort. Judges will be asked to decide cases on the

basis of "secret evidence" that would not withstand legal challenge and hand down judgments in secret. This

Bill is a dangerous perversion of our national legal system and will undermine constitutional rights.’

Shami Chakrabarti, director of civil rights group Liberty, said: ‘When will the coalition that once championed civil

liberties listen to the condemnation of its secret courts proposals?

‘Liberty was dismissed as the reactionary human rights lobby- but now legal and international communities

have joined the opposition to secret stitch-ups between government and judges, with victims, press and public

shut outside. Secret justice is a complete perversion - it is no justice at all.’

Minister without portfolio Kenneth Clarke, who is in charge of the legislation, will today table further

amendments supposed to address some of the concerns of critics.

They mean a judge must be satisfied that the Government has considered whether to make a claim for public

interest immunity before making an application for a secret hearing as one of the tests to be met. Mr Clarke is

also proposing an annual report on the operation of closed hearings and a full review after five years.

He said: ‘With these final amendments the Government has gone to extreme lengths to meet every practical

legal objection that has been made about the Bill. The judge now has total discretion over whether to order a

closed material procedure following an application either by the Government, the claimant, or from the court of

its own motion.

‘I do not believe closed material procedures are ideal, but in the very exceptional circumstances where national

security is at stake, they offer the only practical means of delivering justice where otherwise there would be none.

‘CMPs already exist in our justice system and the Government does lose in them – sometimes to the great

anger of the Daily Mail’s readers.

‘This Bill is now proportionate, sensible and necessary.  It resolves the highly unsatisfactory legal no-man’s

land we have at the moment where national security cases can be brought, but not resolved. 

‘Of course these amendments will not reassure the Bill’s hardline critics, who prefer silence to judicial

decisions on allegations of kidnap and torture, and are prepared to accept that millions of pounds could go

without challenge to individuals who could be terrorists.

These final amendments should now resolve all right thinking citizens that this is a sensible, worthwhile Bill

which they would give their support to.

'There are few Governments in the world who would go to these lengths to ensure that we will uphold justice

and the rule of law in the process of securely safeguarding the safety of our citizens and the national interest.’

52
23 Reference- Pistorius - Science or Self will Solve the Shooting
Updated: 23 Feb 2013

How forensic science will solve Pistorius shooting

  • 12:00 21 February 2013 by Helen Thomson, Washington DC
  • New Scientist

Oscar Pistorius's bail hearing is taking on the characteristics of a trial.

The athlete, dubbed the Blade Runner for the prosthetic legs he races on, was arrested after his girlfriend Reeva

Steenkamp was shot dead at his home in Pretoria, South Africa.

New Scientist canvassed experts at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences meeting in Washington DC this

week to assess how crime scene analysis is likely to proceed at Pistorius's home.

The basic forensic investigation of a crime scene is pretty similar around the world, says Frank Prieels, a forensic

pathologist at the University of Düsseldorf, Germany, although specific tests will differ.

Pistorius has said in an affidavit that he thought he detected an intruder in his bathroom on 14 February.

He said that he grabbed his pistol and fired into the door of a toilet within the bathroom, only to discover that the

person inside was his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. Steenkamp had three bullet wounds in her body – one on the

right side of her head above her ear, one on her right arm and one on her hip.

"Ballistics specialists will be key to this case," says George Hime of the Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner

Department, Florida.

"There'll also be forensic pathologists involved, blood-spatter experts and crime scene investigators to put it all together."

Investigators can use bullet entry wounds to determine exactly where a shooter was when a bullet is fired.

"They can determine the bullet's angle, direction, and distance it was fired from," says Hime.

"These facts are all vital to this case because they allow you to determine exactly where Pistorius was when the

shots were fired."

Wound patterns

That information is gleaned from the entry wound.

Bullet wounds create specific patterns depending on the speed and type of the bullet, says Prieels.

What's more, bullets burn the skin at the point of entry, and the shorter the distance from the gun to entry point,

the more energy and therefore heat the bullet has and the greater the scorching.

"The closer the distance, the smaller and more neat the hole will be, too," says Prieels.

"The further the bullet has to travel, the more movement it has so the hole isn't as neat."

It should only take investigators about an hour to do that kind of analysis, he adds.

Pathologists and ballistics experts should be able to give an indication of whether a bullet has passed through

something before hitting the victim, and whether the material was soft or hard, says Hime.

This could help to support or refute Pistorius's claims of where the shots were fired from.

Initial reports suggest the bullets passed through Steenkamp's clothes, indicating that she was dressed.

This analysis might also determine the order of impact of the bullets.

"These facts are all central the case," says Hime, but difficult to determine.

"It's not so easy to find out which shot was first because you have to take into account the way the victim falls

after the first shot," says Prieels.

Blood-spatter experts are likely to be called in. Michelle Hoffman of Biodynamics Engineering, in Pacific Palisades,

California, said that blood and bullet-path evidence – entry wounds, exit wounds, bullet strikes in wall – can be

used to determine positional information.

"That is, location of the weapon and the shooter relative to the victim, as well as the victim's body position relative

to the surroundings – on floor, standing erect – as well as body position itself – cowering, arms raised."

Blood tests

Toxicologists will also be called upon.

They will probably have tested the blood of both Pistorius and Steenkamp for drugs and alcohol.

"This will help investigators say something about the last moments of [Steenkamp's] life," says Hime.

It could, for example, help to validate or refute descriptions of the time leading up to the shooting.

"Toxicology can help to determine the likely state of mind of Pistorius and his girlfriend, which will be vital to a

premeditation argument."

DNA evidence probably isn't going to contribute much to this case, says Scott Watanabe, a forensic scientist from

Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond.

"If Pistorius was denying that he used the gun, we could swab the gun and get touch DNA to compare with his

reference sample, but I don't think that's being questioned."

Uncovering what really happened could, however, be complicated by the possibility that the crime scene was

contaminated by police on initial investigation.

The legendary investigator, Henry Lee, who was involved in the O.J. Simpson case, 9/11 forensic analysis and the

reinvestigation of the John F. Kennedy assassination, says he has been following the Pistorius case, and that

forensic science will provide the answers.

"Crime scene swabs, physical evidence, data mining and witnesses.

Get those four elements and you will solve the case."

51
24 Reference-Vicky Pryce -The Jury came to the wrong decision,The Legal Issue was not Black & White
Updated: 21 Feb 2013

Wednesday 20 February 2013

Editorial: Don't blame the jury system for this failure

Independent

Is is not truly remarkable that our randomly chosen juries work as well as they do?

With every hour and every day that the jury in the trial of Vicky Pryce failed to reach a verdict, the prospect that

they would ever agree seemed to recede.

On the face of it, the question was simple: was Ms Pryce guilty of perverting the course of justice – by taking

speeding points for her then husband, Chris Huhne – or was she to be found not guilty because she was acting

under duress?

Even after submitting 10 additional questions and being invited to reach a majority verdict, however, the jurors

remained so divided that the judge decided to dismiss them.

It was with a distinct weariness that the judge said the retrial would begin on Monday.

But he did not dismiss the jury without adding his two ha'pence worth.

In 30 years of criminal trials, he said, he did not recall receiving such a very basic list of questions at such a late stage.

Such elementary questions, he suggested, raised substantial concern about whether it was safe to permit the jury

to continue its deliberations.

In essence, the judge appeared to be blaming the jury for incompetence and hoping for a brighter lot next time around.

It is true that some of the questions they asked betray elements of confusion about what they might or might not

take into account and a temptation to stray beyond the evidence they had heard.

But at least, it might be said, they admitted this in time to be returned to the straight and narrow.

It is also true some of their questions might be considered so basic as to cast doubt on whether this jury was

capable of pronouncing sensibly on this or any other trial.

To infer from their failure, however, the jury system as such is either counterproductive or doomed would be a

conclusion far too far.

The matter should rather be addressed the other way round.

Is it not truly remarkable that the English jury system works as well as it does?

Jurors are plucked at random from the electoral registers to sit at crown courts up and down the country.

Since it became harder to claim an exemption six years ago, the jury room has become one of the few places –

with the exception, perhaps, of the GP surgery – where all manner and estates of men and women come together.

Almost half a million adults perform jury service every year, from all walks of life, and the social mix is both

intentional and necessary.

The verdict should reflect the common-sense view that an ordinary person would take, presented with the same evidence.

This is not to say that maintaining the integrity of the system has not become harder, or that there is no jury-nobbling.

It may be illegal for jurors to try to research a defendant, or a witness, say, via the internet, or to communicate with

the outside world via mobile phone, though judges have – rightly – come down heavily when they find people breaking the rules.

Some highly technical cases may also be beyond most juries' ken.

All in all, though, a system in which 12 ordinary men and women judge their fellow citizens on behalf of the rest of us still works well.

For all the complaints of the judge at Southwark Crown Court, it might just be that the failure of the jury to agree

reflected the complexity of the case and the presence of so much information already in the public domain.

And if indeed this jury was at fault, we should give thanks that such demonstrated inadequacy is so rare.

56
25 Reference-Vicky Pryce- Trial by Jury ? Not if it's dismissed
Updated: 21 Feb 2013

The Vicky Pryce jury did its duty admirably

It is hard work being a juror, and the hapless Southwark 12 do not deserve the ridicule of Twitter

How we laughed. Those questions that came in from the jury in the Vicky Pryce trial: could religion have played a part?

Is it possible to speculate on the defendant's state of mind? What does "reasonable doubt" mean? In that

electronic jury room where few if any legal niceties are observed – I am referring to Twitter – the hapless

Southwark 12 were immediately condemned to Death by Ridicule. How stupid they must have been! Why were

they even allowed to serve in the first place?

As luck would have it, I had only a couple of hours earlier finished eight days of jury service at Kingston crown

court in south-west London.

My head was still full of legal language and process. I was still coming to terms with all that I had seen and heard

over the previous week and a half.

If you haven't done jury service you haven't lived. Outside of family life, it's one of the most important things you could ever do.

The structure, order and even-handedness of the trial system are remarkable.

If you were ever sent for trial you should count yourself lucky to have it heard here, and before a jury.

Evidence, it was made plain to us, was what mattered, and only the evidence that was presented to the court.

Judges are there to guide on questions of law.

But the jury is "the judge of the facts". In my limited but freshly minted experience, jurors take their responsibilities very seriously.

They pay attention.

They wrestle with the facts.

They work as a team.

They ask good questions, in good faith, in an attempt to get to the truth. In turn, I and my fellow jurors were looked

after very well by the court staff.

We were treated with courtesy and respect, and thanked sincerely for our efforts.

Something important happens when the usher opens the door to the anteroom where you wait, and declares:

"Jury in court." It means that evidence can be heard, and that the examination and cross-examination of

witnesses can take place.

Without the "jury in court", in other words, a fair trial cannot proceed. It is meaningless until the jury is in its place.

While one or two of the Southwark jury's questions may have amused people, we cannot know everything that

prompted them, and most of them seemed to me to be perfectly sensible.

I have not heard all the evidence in this case, and neither have you.

People not in court cannot really know or understand the detail.

And far from it being ridiculous to ask what a "reasonable doubt" is, this in fact goes to the heart of the "standard

of proof" required to have a safe conviction.

Nowadays juries in criminal trials are told they have to be "sure" the prosecution has proven the defendant's guilt.

That word "sure" is used precisely to avoid any understandable confusion over what a reasonable doubt might be.

"What is truth?" Pilate asked nearly 2,000 years ago. It's not clear that anyone has come up with a really good

answer to that one yet. That is one of the reasons why it is hard work being on a jury.

It takes time. Discussions have to be handled with care.

Prosecution and defence argue their case with fluency and skill.

The judge sums up the evidence and the arguments.

The jury is asked to weigh up conflicting details.

While there must be no speculation about these details, "common sense inferences" may be drawn.

You should try it sometime. It's no laughing matter.

Mr Justice Sweeney concluded his guidance to the Southwark jury with these words:

"If, after further consideration, you find yourselves in a position where you are simply not able to agree, then you

must of course have the courage to say so."

That is what they did, and in so doing they performed their civic duty admirably.

47
26 Reference- You Gov and you !
Updated: 20 Feb 2013

YOU GOV and you

Are you a member ?

How long does it take you to earn £50 ?

An eternity ?

It feels like it !

How selective are YOU GOV in deciding who may complete which survey?

Are the questions really relevant ?

Mostly not ?

Since 25th January 2005 it is recorded that I have redeemed two x £50

And I have £46.95 earned since 30th Aug 2010

Through out  I have redeemed just 500 points for the prize draw

So it has taken me 2.5 years to earn £46.95

Points start at 25 points /pence for answering a survey.

Surveys take from 10minutes each and upwards to answer

Just thought you would like to know.

I have asked You Gov to increase the amount they pay for each survey

and be more transparent about who they select to complete any particular survey all to no avail.

Clearly people who complete the surveys are not motivated by wealth

And those who don’t are clearly not motivated by being exploited.

I really must review my decision to take part when I next receive £50

Radical

39
27 Reference- 1990 Nelson Mandela released after 27 years in prison
Updated: 13 Feb 2013

 Nelson Mandela released from prison after 27 years

The iconic activist, who went on to serve as President of South Africa for five years,

was released following a relaxation of apartheid laws in the country.

 

 

February 11: Anti-apartheid campaigner Nelson Mandela was released from prison in South Africa after 27 years on this day in 1990.

The iconic activist, who went on to serve as President of South Africa for five years, was released following a relaxation of apartheid laws in the country.

This included a lifting of the ban on leading black rights party the African National Congress by then South African president FW de Klerk.


After his release, Mandela appeared at the gates of the Victor-Verster Prison in Paarl with his wife Winnie.

He beamed at the huge crowds and punched the air with glee, before being driven to Cape Town.

On the balcony of Cape Town City Hall, he spoke to 50,000 people gathered below, telling them 'our march of freedom is irreversible'.

He said: "Now is the time to intensify the struggle on all fronts. To relax now would be a mistake which future generations would not forgive."

Mandela, now 94, has been in and out of hospital in recent years due to ongoing health problems.

In December he underwent an operation to remove gallstones, after going into hospital due to a lung infection.

72
28 Reference- Google cancels the UK only option but..they are not the only search engine!
Updated: 12 Feb 2013

Google UK HomePage.

Why has the UK only search option been removed?

How do I restore it?

Two click option not acceptable

 

 

 

   

Other recipients:

As from yesterday, I have just noticed that without warning, the "UK only Sites" option has been removed from www.google.co.uk home page.

Why has this change been made?

The option was very useful and even though you can get UK only content by clicking on "Pages from the UK"

on the search results, this is now a unconvieniant two step process and a backward step.

Please could you at least provide an option under Preferences to allow you to put back the original home page option.
Thank-you.

 

JeremyHarrisLevel 3

5/11/10

Other recipients:

Google have deliberately removed this function from the first page, so that you have to load two pages and

endure their mandatory adverts before you are allowed to make a country specific search.  You also need to

keep the side bar activated, which, if you're using a netbook with a small screen, renders the search results

unreadable.........There is a work around that seems to work at the moment. 

This URL: http://www.google.co.uk/webhp?cr=countryUK performs a UK pages only search straight from the first screen. 

It means having two Google bookmarks/favourites set up, one for the global only URL and one for the UK only

URL, but it does seem to get around the removal of this useful function.

Alternatively, other search engines are still giving users the option to search within their own country from the

first page.  Altavista, Bing and Ask Jeeves, for example, have all retained country-specific buttons on the first page.

193
29 Reference-Remembering Paul Robeson-The Fight for Freedom -"I made my choice- I had no alternative"
Updated: 30 Jan 2013

Today in Labor History: Paul Robeson dies

On January 23, 1976, noted singer and actor Paul Robeson died in Philadelphia.

Robeson was also a legendary civil rights and peace leader and athlete.

He was hounded by McCarthy-era witch-hunting committees, deprived of his livelihood and his right to travel for his actions and his beliefs.

Ironically, soon after the turn of the century, Robeson's fame was carried throughout the nation by a beautiful 37-

cent postage stamp bearing his portrait and calling him "an incomparable artist and singer, human rights

advocate, scholar and athlete, defender of Black freedom."

Many events were held in 1998 on the 100th anniversary of his birth. Calling Robeson "a great fighter for equality

and world peace, a genius who gave his heart and soul to the people," Jarvis Tyner, executive vice chair of the

Communist Party USA, said he "embraced all the advanced ideas of the CPUSA, the need for a socialist

transformation of society, for unity of Black, Brown and white.

If you look at his writings and you know the party's history and policies," Tyner added, "he was an important

figure, helping to give leadership in the party's formulation of its policies."

Paul Robeson, athlete, scholar, singer, actor and civil rights advocate, rose to fame at a time when segregation

was legal in the U.S., and Black people were being lynched by racist mobs.

Robeson's father, a runaway slave, graduated from Lincoln University, and his mother came from an abolitionist Quaker family.

Robeson attended Rutgers University on a four-year academic scholarship.

He won 15 varsity letters and was twice named to the All-American football team.

He became Phi Beta Kappa in his junior year and graduated as valedictorian.

At Columbia Law School, Robeson met and married Eslanda Cardoza Goode, who would become the first Black

woman to head a pathology laboratory.

He took a job in a law firm, but left when a white secretary refused to take dictation from him.

He then shifted to an acting and singing career.  

Because Robeson was an outspoken activist, striking workers and peace and friendship with the Soviet Union,

he was targeted by the McCarthy era witch-hunting House Un-American Activities Committee.

Robeson refused to yield to the committee, which he considered to oppose freedom of expression of those

working for international friendship and peace.

He is famously quoted: "The artist must elect to fight for Freedom or for Slavery.

I have made my choice. I had no alternative."

Sixty of his concerts were cancelled, and in 1949 two interracial outdoor concerts in Peekskill, N.Y., were attacked

by racist mobs.

"I'm going to sing wherever the people want me to sing," Robeson responded, "and I won't be

frightened by crosses burning in Peekskill or anywhere else."

In 1950 the government revoked Robeson's passport, leading to an eight-year battle to win it back and to travel again.

Beginning in 1952, the Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers Union sponsored four annual Robeson concerts at Peace

Arch Park on the U.S.-Canadian border, with as many as 40,000 in attendance.

Photo: September 1942, Paul Robeson, world famous baritone, leading Moore Shipyard [Oakland, CA] workers in

singing the Star Spangled Banner, at their lunch hour recently, after he told them: "This is a serious job---winning

this war against fascists. We have to be together." Source: Still Picture Records Section, Special Media Archives

Services Division (NWCS-S), National Archives at College Park, MD.

76
30 Reference- More on Hacker and less on Hacking
Updated: 29 Jan 2013

Jim Hacker: "Don't tell me about the press. I know exactly who reads the papers:
-

The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country;
-

The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country;
-

The Times is read by people who actually do run the country;
-

The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people who run the country;
-

The Financial Times is read by people who own the country;
-

The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country;
-

And the Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is."

Sir Humphrey: "Prime Minister, what about the people who read the Sun?"

Bernard: "Sun readers don't care who runs the country, as long as she's got big tits."

45
31 Reference- British Newspapers according to Jim Hacker -Yes ! Prime Minister
Updated: 29 Jan 2013

British Newspapers

PM Jim Hacker: "Don't tell me about the press. I know exactly who reads the papers:

  

 

Sir Humphrey: "Prime Minister, what about the people who read the Sun?"

Bernard Wooley: "Sun readers don't care who runs the country, as long as its got big tits

 

 

 

National newspapers in the UK were traditionally divided by format,

 

between the relatively respectable and intelligent broadsheets and the

 

scurrilous, gossip- and crime-obsessed tabloids.

 

The latter are generally subdivided into the 'mid-market' tabloids and, at

 

the lower end, those known colloquially as the 'red-tops' after their red-background title logos.

 Several of the broadsheet newspapers have now adopted tabloid or

 

'Berliner' physical formats, but the divide in reputation between the two types remains.

 

The UK press is collectively known as "Fleet Street" most of

 

them have now left that particular London locale in favour of Canary Wharf.

 

Circulation figures correct as of January 2013

 

The Daily Mail - 1,945,496 copies per day

WILL PENSIONS CRISIS CAUSED BY MARXIST GAY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM THE HITLER-BACKED EU CHEATING ON BENEFITS AND GETTING MARRIED CAUSE HOUSE PRICE CRASH AND CANCER IN MARGINALIZED WHITE CHRISTIANS?!?

—Every single Daily Mail issue ever, distilled into a single headline

 

The Guardian and The Observer - 215,988 copies a day

Statistics indicate that Guardian readers tend to either hole up in community theaters or sit around Starbucks sipping Frappucinos while talking about how big businesses are crushing the lower-classes.

—Uncyclopedia

 

The Daily Telegraph - 578,774 copies a day

To escape jury duty read  the Telegraph and wear a bowler hat

—John Mortimer

 

The Sun - 2,582,301 copies per day

Are you a paedo? Are you a paedo? Have a bang on her tits, 16 today!

—Russell Howard on a typical edition

 

The Morning Star

 CIRCULATION FIGURES ARE A TOOL OF THE REACTIONARY CLASS!

Down with Imperialism!

—All of them. "Imperialism" in this context may be translated as "everything I don't like."

  • For those who have read the opening quote carefully and are wondering, The Morning Star, formerly The Daily Worker, was the pro-Soviet daily newspaper of the British Communist Party.  
  • The Morning Star itself still exists and is still nominally affiliated with the British Communist Party (which also still exists) but aims itself at a broader audience among the radical left rather than focusing on the tiny minority of actual Communists remaining in the UK.
78
32 Reference-UK-"The Big Society" or The Big Lie ? - "In politics, stupidity is not a handicap"
Updated: 29 Jan 2013

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

 The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political,

economic and/or military consequences of the lie.

 It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent,

for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest

enemy of the State.”

 Joseph Goebbels quotes

 

 

In politics stupidity is not a handicap.

 Napoleon Bonaparte quotes

46
33 Reference-The Real World ? Are you living in it -Sometimes I sits and thinks & sometime I just sits
Updated: 29 Jan 2013

Are You Living In The Real World?

by Jeffrey Israel

April 13, 2012, 1:03 PM

The accusation “you are not living in the real world” is always either ideological, narcissistic, or a poorly phrased

attempt to say something else.

But it is frequently used.

I will explore its meaning here.

Let me first offer some stipulative definitions. 

By ideological I mean:

complicit in a distortion of the truth that benefits some class of people at the expense of others.

By narcissistic I mean:

characterized by an inability to perceive the lives of others as anything other than examples of one’s own

idiosyncratic preconceptions.

Political conversations are often rife with ideological usages.

“You’re not living in the real world!

Social welfare programs don’t actually help anyone –

they just waste money on government bureaucracy and get exploited by lazy people!”

“You’re not living in the real world!

Lower taxes for people in the top brackets will not boost the economy –

it is just one of the many strategies used by rich racist elites to maintain their hegemony!”       

Probably both of these are false or at least not entirely true.

In the first case, the accuser is distorting the truth that many social welfare programs provide essential services

to people who would not be disqualified even if you accept the precondition that only “hardworking” people

deserve such services.

To the extent that it succeeds, this distortion benefits those who do not want to pay higher taxes to fund social

welfare programs.

Its success would come at the expense of people who need such programs.

In the second case, the accuser is distorting the truth that some people who want lower taxes on individuals with

wealth and high incomes take this position on the basis of a principled view about how to promote the common good.

To the extent that this distortion succeeds,

it benefits those who want American politics to be widely perceived as a Manichaean struggle

in which “the Left” represents the forces of good and “the Right” represents the forces of evil.

The success of this distortion would come at the expense of those principled conservatives who are thereby

preemptively branded as evil.     

In both cases, “you’re not living in the real world!” functions as an ad hominem preface to a distortion.

Particularly nefarious, it turns a conversation that should be about political values into a conversation about

one’s credentials as a citizen of “the real world.”

Instead, all parties involved should take for granted and readily admit that they are susceptible to false beliefs about history, society, policy, and so forth.

They should also confess their predispositions.

With these background conditions in place, the conversation ought then to proceed in conditional statements: “If

X is true, then Y seems like the right policy for promoting the common good.”

This kind of conditional construction can be a paradigm for non-ideological political discourse.

You can use it to regulate your own predispositions and susceptibility to false beliefs.

And you can look for it in the rhetoric of others in order to measure the extent to which their political language is ideological.

When the conversation is thus framed it is easier to stay focused on questions of value: what is “the common good”?

What would our society look like at its best?

What is every person entitled to by virtue of being a person?

How can we measure the degree of justice in our society?

And so on.    

The phrase “you are not living in the real world” is also used in less directly political contexts.

I have often heard it deployed against “academics in the Ivory Tower,” who, it is suggested, live among abstract

theories and speak to each other in insider jargon far away from the everyday concerns and language of “real” people.

Going over to the Dark Side, a scholar might level the same accusation against his accusers:

professionals, politicians, people muddling through the daily grind cannot perceive their own lives in an

historical or comparative context or with any analytic clarity –

they are the ones so mired in the contingencies of each passing moment that they are “not living in the real world.”

Secularists and religionists likewise accuse each other of “not living in the real world.”

And we can come up with many more examples.

All such cases of ideological rhetoric pose the question: who stands to benefit from the distortion? Cui bono?

The quintessential narcissistic usage is the kind addressed by an “adult” to his younger:

“You’re not living in the real world! Majoring in Classics with a focus on ancient Greek drama is a waste of time!

Your political idealism will mature into cynical self-interest when you grow up! If you get a tattoo no one will ever take you seriously!”

There is a wonderful community of Classics scholars teaching and writing around the world and anyone would

be privileged to join it.

There are many genuine adults whose political motivations derive from moral ideals rather than cynical self-interest.

And tattoos are only taboo in very specific social sectors. In other sectors, a good tattoo will garner respect.

The response to the narcissist prescribed by the Sages is: “Yeah, well, ya know, that’s just like, uh, you’re opinion, man.”

When “you are not living in the real world” is ideological or narcissistic, is it not in fact the case that the one who

makes the accusation is the one who, ironically, is not living in the real world?

No. While this irony would undoubtedly satisfy the accused, it is not in fact the case.

Everyone who is living is living in the real world.

At the same time, life generally includes ample distortions and misperceptions of what is true and what false.

It includes acts of simple lying, the state that we describe as “in denial,” instances of believing something to be

true that you have every reason to believe is true even though it is actually false, and so on.

When “you are not living in the real world” is leveled non-ideologically and non-narcissistically I assume that the

intended meaning is usually something like: “you are making a mistake.”

The intention is to communicate to the accused that something he takes to be true is actually false or that he is

failing to perceive something appropriately.

There is nothing wrong with telling another person that you think he is making this kind of mistake.

But there are more and less tactful ways to do so.

It is always better to address the mistake directly and to set about clearing it up with further argumentation or verifiable evidence.

Telling someone that he or she is naïve is never anything more than gratuitous and insulting.     

So the ideological and narcissistic accusers should not be mocked for ironically diagnosing others with a

condition that they in fact have.

There is no such condition as “not living in the real world”!

Such an accusation should be criticized for being ideological or narcissistic.

In the other cases, the phrase is just unproductive and rude.

58
34 Reference- Letter From Scotland on Burns Night
Updated: 27 Jan 2013

LETTER FROM SCOTLAND

25th January 2013, Burns Night

John Knox 
 

Burns’ Cottage

“O wert thou in the cauld blast….”

It seems right to start with one of Burns’ wistful love-songs on this cauld Burns Day.

“Or did misfortunes bitter storms around thee blaw/

Thy bield (shelter) should be my bosom/

To share it a’.”

We’ve been having a cauld blast all week with roads snowed under, 150 schools closed in the North East and the

Borders and lots of pictures in the media of children on sledges, cars buried in snow, dented vehicles by the

roadside, pandas at the zoo making friends with snowmen, and Shetland ponies dressed in Shetland jumpers.

Even the hedgehogs have been suffering from the cold, with a rising number being handed in to the Scottish SPCA (707 last year).

The snow has led to worst tragedies too. In one of the worst mountain accidents for years, four climbers were killed in an avalanche in Glencoe.

They were swept a thousand feet down Bidean Nam Bian in what the first minister described as “an appalling accident”.

Two of the party survived, though one of them was seriously injured.

They were all experienced climbers, from various parts of the UK, and Glencoe mountain rescue team, who went

to their aid, said afterwards that the party were simply unlucky and had not done anything foolhardy.

We also learned that two Scots were among the 38 victims of last week’s terrorist attack on the gas plant in the Algerian desert.

The politicians have been saying that the attack highlights the need for greater security for oil and gas workers

and for the West to focus more attention on the threat of Al-Qaeda-inspired groups swarming through North Africa.

The unemployment figures have shown another fall, to 207,000 or 7.8 per cent of the workforce.

But it has not led to any rejoicing, since the figure disguises the fact that many people have simply given up looking for a job.

The number in work is down 24,000.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation reported that the number of young Scots out of work has doubled to 90,000

since the recession began and those in part-time employment has also doubled to 120,000.

Among the unemployed are the 5,000 Scottish construction workers who are said to be on an employers blacklist

because of their trade union activities or simply because they have raised health and safety concerns.

The blacklist only came to light when the Information Commission raided the offices in Droitwich of an agency

calling itself the Consulting Association.

Trade unions say 40 leading British companies have been using the Association to vet its prospective

employees, including firms working on the new Forth bridge. Shocking.

It’s been another referendum week – not Alex Salmond’s but David Cameron’s.

Mr Cameron promised that if re-elected, he would hold an in-or-out referendum on the European Union.

Mr Salmond used question time in the Scottish Parliament to tease the Conservatives by saying it appears the

only way Scotland could remain in the EU would be if it became independent.

He accused Mr Cameron of “making for the exit door of the European Union” while at the same time urging the

Scots to stay in the British Union.

The opposition parties brought him down to earth a little by pointing out that the latest opinion poll, based on the

annual Social Attitudes Survey, put support for independence at only 23 per cent.

That’s sharply down on the figure for last year (32 per cent) and the experts are attributing that to a rising “fear

factor” as the economy worsens.

However support for a stronger form of devolution remains high, with 67 per cent saying the Scottish Parliament

should either make all decisions or all except foreign affairs and defence.

It will be interesting to see how the two referendums play out against each other over the next few months and years.

Will they define the political debate or will they be pushed to the sidelines as people worry more directly about the economy.

Both Mr Cameron and Mr Salmond will probably have to learn the lesson of Burns’ famous mouse about best laid

schemes o’ mice and men ganging aft agley.

And if that’s not frightening enough, try the last verse of that poem, in which the mouse has the advantage over the man:


“Still, thou art blest, compared wi’ me!
The present only toucheth thee.
But och, I backward cast my e’e
On prospects drear
An’ forward tho’ I canna see
I guess and fear !”

46
35 Reference - Politicans - Fit for Purpose ? - You give £Billions for them to manage
Updated: 25 Jan 2013

 
The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner,

think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend,

but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of its releases.

A.
A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B.
A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C.
A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.

D.
A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

E.
A billion Dollars ago was only 13 hours and 12 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.


Stamp Duty
Tobacco Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Income Tax
Council Tax
Unemployment Tax
Fishing Licence Tax
Petrol/Diesel Tax
Inheritance Tax
(tax on top of tax)
Alcohol Tax
G.S.T.
Property Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Vehicle Licence / Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
Carbon Dioxide Tax
 
 

49
36 Reference- Save the Planet, Save Your Pension
Updated: 25 Jan 2013

New Scientiist

SAVE the planet, save your pension.

A new report claims that environmental problems could bust pension funds by 2050.

Aled Jones of Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, UK, and his colleagues drew together evidence about a

wide range of environmental problems, from water shortages to atmospheric pollution to climate change.

They plugged these into models used to predict the values of pension funds.

Jones ran several scenarios, varying how quickly governments and industry responded to environmental problems.

The results are published by the UK's Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFA).

In almost all cases the value of funds began to fall before 2100.

In the worst-case scenario, where governments and markets did nothing,

values dropped steeply from around 2020 and fell to zero by 2050.

"Despite strong evidence that there is a risk that resource constraints could have significant economic impacts,

these risks are not being factored in by many actors in the global economy," says Peter Tompkins of the IFA

62
37 Reference-George Bradshaw-Quaker-Canal and Railways Cartographer-Tory Portillo son of Beeching etc..
Updated: 16 Jan 2013

George Bradshaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
George Bradshaw (1801–1853), by Richard Evans, 1841

Windsor Bridge, Pendleton near Salford, Lancashire, England

Died 6 September 1853 (aged 52) Oslo, Norway

Cause of death Cholera

Known for Bradshaw's guides and timetables
Religion Society of Friends

Children 2
George Bradshaw (29 July 1801 – 6 September 1853) was an English cartographer, printer and publisher.

He is best known for developing the most successful and longest published series of combined railway timetables.

Biography

Bradshaw was born at Windsor Bridge, Pendleton, in Salford, Lancashire.

On leaving school he was apprenticed to an engraver named Beale in Manchester, and in 1820 he set up his own

engraving business in Belfast, returning to Manchester in 1822 to set up in that city as an engraver and printer,

principally of maps. [1]

He was a religious man.

Although his parents were far from wealthy, when he was young they enabled him to take lessons from a minister

devoted to the teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg.

He later joined the Society of Friends (the Quakers) and gave a considerable part of his time to philanthropic work.

[1] He worked a great deal with radical reformers such as Richard Cobden in organising peace conferences and in

setting up schools and soup kitchens for the poor of Manchester. [2] It is his belief as a Quaker that is quoted as

causing the early editions of Bradshaw's guides to have avoided using the names of months based upon Roman

deities (i.e. a "pagan" usage).

(Quaker usage was (and sometimes still is) "First month" for January, "Second month" for February and so on.

Days of the week were "First day" for Sunday and so on.)

In 1841, he founded a high quality weekly magazine, edited by George Falkner, called Bradshaw's Manchester

Journal, described as "a 16-page miscellany of art, science and literature, to sell at the cheap price of a penny-

halfpenny a week. ... After the first six months, the Journal was renamed Bradshaw’s Journal: A Miscellany of

Literature, Science and Art, and the place of publication moved to London, where the title was taken on by William

Strange", but the journal survived only until 1843.[3]

He married on 15 May 1839.

While touring Norway in 1853 he contracted cholera and died in September of that

year without being able to return to England.

He is interred in the cemetery adjoining the cathedral in Oslo.[2][4][5]

Bradshaw's railway timetables

Early history

Bradshaw's name was already known as the publisher of Bradshaw's Maps of Inland Navigation, which detailed

the canals of Lancashire and Yorkshire, when, on 19 October 1839, soon after the introduction of railways, the

world's first compilation of railway timetables was published in Manchester.

It cost sixpence (6d/2½p) and was a cloth-bound book entitled Bradshaw's Railway Time Tables and Assistant to

Railway Travelling, the title being changed in 1840 to Bradshaw's Railway Companion, and the price raised to one

shilling.[1]

A new volume was issued at occasional intervals and from time to time a supplement served to keep this up to date.

The original Bradshaw publications were before the limited introduction of standardised Railway time in November 1840, and its subsequent development into Standard time.

In December 1841, acting on a suggestion made by his London agent, William Jones Adams, Bradshaw reduced

the price of his timetables to the original sixpence, and began to issue them monthly under the title Bradshaw's

Monthly Railway Guide. [1] Many railway companies were unhappy with Bradshaw's timetable, but Bradshaw was

able to circumvent this by becoming a railway shareholder and by putting his case at company AGMs.[6] Soon the

book, in the familiar yellow wrapper,[2] became synonymous with its publisher: for Victorians and Edwardians

alike, a railway timetable was "a Bradshaw", no matter by which railway company it had been issued, or whether

Bradshaw had been responsible for its production or not.
 
 
Timetable from the 1850 Bradshaw

The eight page edition of 1841 had grown to 32 pages by 1845 and to 946 pages by 1898 although unusually, in April 1845, the issue number jumped from 40 to 141.[6]

The publisher claimed this was an innocent mistake, although it has been speculated as a commercial ploy, where

more advertising revenue could be generated by making the publication look longer-established than it really was.

Whatever the reason for the change, the numbering continued from 141.

When, in 1865, Punch praised Bradshaw's publications, it stated that "seldom has the gigantic intellect of man

been employed upon a work of greater utility."

At last, some order had been imposed on the chaos that had been created by some 150 rail companies whose

tracks criss-crossed the country and whose largely uncoordinated network was rapidly expanding.

Bradshaw minutely recorded all changes and became the standard manual for rail travel well into the 20th century.

By 1918 Bradshaw had risen in price to two shillings (2s/10p) and by 1937 to half a crown (2s-6d/12½p).

Although historic money values are difficult to calculate, this would have been equivalent to perhaps £6.00 at 2009 values.

Later history

Bradshaw became less necessary from 1923, when more than 100 surviving companies were "grouped" into the Big Four.

This change reduced dramatically the range and number of individual timetables produced by the companies themselves.

They now published a much smaller number of substantial compilations which between them covered the country.

Ironically, between 1923 and 1939 three of the Big Four transferred their timetable production to Bradshaw's

publisher Henry Blacklock & Co., and most of the official company timetables therefore became reprints of the

relevant pages from Bradshaw.

Only the Great Western Railway retained its own format.

Between the two world wars, the verb 'to Bradshaw' was a derogatory term used in the Royal Air Force to refer to

pilots who could not navigate well, perhaps related to a perceived lack of ability shown by those who navigated by

following railway lines.

Regrettably, the 20th century brought about no improvement to the cramped Victorian typography of the earlier

issues and a certain inertia became apparent.

By the 1950s Bradshaw looked distinctly old-fashioned, although the information was as good as ever.

When the railways were nationalised in 1948, five of the six British Railways Regions had followed the companies'

example by using Henry Blacklock & Co to produce their own timetable books, but production was eventually

moved to other publishers.

This change must have reduced Henry Blacklock & Co's revenue substantially.

Parts of Bradshaw began to be reset in the newer British Railways style from 1955, but modernisation of the whole

volume was never completed.

By 1961 a single Bradshaw cost 12s 6d (62½p), although a complete set of BR Regional timetables could be bought for 6s (30p).

The conclusion was inevitable, and the last edition, No. 1521, was dated May 1961.

The Railway Magazine of that month printed a valedictory article by Charles E. Lee.

Reprints of various past Bradshaws have been produced.

References in literature

19th century and early 20th century novelists make frequent references to a character's "Bradshaw".

Dickens refers it in his short story The Portrait-Painter's Story (1861).

In Around the World in 80 Days, Phileas Fogg carries a Bradshaw.

In particular, crime writers were fascinated with trains and timetables, especially as a new source of alibis.

Examples are Ronald Knox's The Footsteps at the Lock (1928) and novels by Freeman Wills Crofts.

Perhaps the most famous mention is by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in the Sherlock Holmes story The Valley of Fear:

"the vocabulary of Bradshaw is nervous and terse, but limited."

Other references include another Sherlock Holmes story The Adventure of the Copper Beeches, Lewis Carroll's

long poem Phantasmagoria, and Bram Stoker's Dracula, which makes note of Count Dracula reading an "English

Bradshaw's Guide" as part of his planning for his voyage to England. In the 1866 comic opera Cox and Box, the

following exchange takes place:

BOX: Have you read this month's Bradshaw, sir?
COX: No, sir. My wife wouldn’t let me.[7]

There is also a reference in Death in the Clouds (1935) by Agatha Christie: "Mr. Clancy, writer of detective stories ...

extracted a Continental Bradshaw from his raincoat pocket ... to work out a complicated alibi." Bradshaw is also

mentioned in The Secret Adversary by Agatha Christie. In Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca (1938), the second Mrs.

de Winter observes that "Some people have a vice of reading Bradshaws.

They plan innumerable journeys across country for the fun of linking up impossible connections." (chapter 2).

Another reference to a "Bradshaw" occurs in an aside in Riddle of the Sands (1903) by Erskine Childers: "... an

extraordinary book, Bradshaw, turned to from habit, even when least wanted, as men fondle guns and rods in the

close season."

In G. K. Chesterton's The Man Who Was Thursday, the protagonist, Gabriel Syme, praises Bradshaw as a poet of

order: "No, take your books of mere poetry and prose; let me read a time table, with tears of pride.

Take your Byron, who commemorates the defeats of man; give me Bradshaw, who commemorates his victories.

Give me Bradshaw, I say!" In Max Beerbohm's Zuleika Dobson (1911), a satirical fantasy of Oxford undergraduates,

a Bradshaw is listed as one of the two books in the "library" of the irresistible Zuleika.

Although not a direct reference to the Bradshaw railway timetable, it is also worth noting the name of the character

of Sir William Bradshaw in Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway.

Considering this character's association with rigorous quantitative measurement, it is quite possible that the name

was chosen deliberately by Woolf.[citation needed]

Bradshaw's is also mentioned in some modern novels with a period setting. It is directly mentioned in Philip

Pullman's The Shadow in the North (Sally Lockhart Quartet).
 

Bradshaw's Air Guide

In 1934 Bradshaw also began publishing a guide to the major airline routes both within Europe and those

transcontinental flights that originated from Europe and the UK.

Bradshaw's Continental Railway Guide

In June 1847 the first number of Bradshaw's Continental Railway Guide was issued, giving the timetables of the

Continental railways, just as Bradshaw's Monthly Railway Guide gave the timetables of the railways of the United Kingdom.

The Continental Railway Guide eventually grew to over 1,000 pages, including timetables, guidebook and hotel directory.

It was discontinued in 1914 at the outbreak of the First World War.

Briefly resurrected in the interwar years, it saw its final edition in 1939.

The 1913 edition was republished in September 2012.[8]

Bradshaw's and other printed timetables today

In December 2007, the Middleton Press[9] was one publisher which took advantage of Network Rail's willingness

to grant third-party publishers the right to print paper versions of the National Rail timetable.

Network Rail itself had discontinued official hard copies in favour of pdf editions, which can be downloaded without charge.

As an appropriate tribute to Bradshaw, the Middleton Press named its timetables the Bradshaw-Mitchell's Rail Times.

A competing edition of the National Rail timetable, again reproduced from Network Rail's own artwork, is

published by TSO,[10]

This is a same-size reproduction of the Network Rail artwork, although the size is only about 70% in the Middleton

Press versions to reduce the page count.

It is said that even for those with keen eyesight the Middleton Press version is physically impossible to read with the naked eye.

A third publisher, UK Rail Timetables,[11] has been set up to produce printed timetables, but announced

publishing dates (or seasons) have been repeatedly missed.

The problem faced by such publishers is that all franchised train operating companies in Britain are obliged to

produce free booklets for their own services, while many passengers also obtain timetable information from the

website of National Rail Enquiries (or third-party ticket retailers) instead.

It may well be that the majority of purchasers of the surviving hard-copy editions are railway enthusiasts rather

than ordinary rail users, although the hard copies do continue to be bought by many reference libraries.[original research?]

The main timetable for Indian Railways is still known as Newman's Indian Bradshaw.

Great British Railway Journeys/Great Continental Railway Journeys

Michael Portillo used a copy of what was described as a Bradshaw's guide (specifically the 1863 edition of

Bradshaw's Descriptive Railway Hand-Book of Great Britain and Ireland) for Great British Railway Journeys, a

BBC Two television series in which he travelled across Britain.

The first series was broadcast in early 2010, a second in early 2011, followed by a third in early 2012.

At the end of 2012, a special series, Great Continental Railway Journeys, was broadcast featuring Portillo using the

1913 edition of Bradshaw's Continental Railway Guide to make a series of journeys through various European

countries and territories

1076
38 Reference- iQue viva Chavez- Latest Hospital Report - "Favourable"
Updated: 15 Jan 2013

O U R  A M E R I C A

Havana.  January 14, 2013

 

President Chávez: favorable clinical evolution

CARACAS, January 13.—Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has shown a favorable general

clinical evolution in the last few days, with his respiratory infection under control,

Communication and Information Minister Ernesto Villegas stated today.

Speaking on national radio and television, Villegas read a communiqué on the instructions of

Vice President Nicolás Maduro.

Below is the complete text of the official communiqué circulated by Prensa Latina.

COMMUNIQUE

In spite of his delicate state of health after the complicated operation of this past December

11, his general clinical evolution in the last few days has been favorable.

The President is still strictly adhering to his medical treatment. The respiratory infection has

been controlled, although the Comandante President still requires specific measures to resolve his respiratory insufficiency.

The President is conscious, in communication with his family, his political team and the medical

team treating him, and keeping himself up to date with information of interest.

The day before the Divina Pastora procession, the Bolivarian government of Venezuela invites

Venezuelan families to come together in prayer so that the Patron Saint of Barquisimeto will fill our homeland with peace and happiness.

¡Que viva Chávez!

Caracas, January 13, 2013

45
39 Reference- Hugo "is responding well to treatment"
Updated: 14 Jan 2013
Chavez not in coma, responding well to treatment, brother says

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez

 
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
 
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:41AM GMT
 
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is not in a coma and is "responding well to his medical care," his brother says.


Adan Chavez made the remarks in a statement published on Saturday.

“Reports that the president is in a coma and that the family is discussing ending life support are totally false,"
 
the president’s brother said.

On Friday, Venezuelan Vice President Nicolas Maduro flew to Cuba to visit the ailing president.

"I'm leaving for Havana to continue that work of visiting the family, meeting with his medical team,
visiting our commander president," Maduro said on television in Caracas.

The 58-year-old Venezuelan president traveled to Havana on December 10 for a fourth operation after his cancer
 
reappeared, despite a year and a half of treatment.

In late March 2012, Chavez began radiation treatment in Cuba after an operation in February 2012 that removed
 
a second cancerous tumor from his pelvic region. Chavez’s first tumor, which was baseball-sized, was removed
 
in June 2011, and then he received chemotherapy.

Chavez, who came to power in 1999, was reelected to a new six-year term in October
40
40 Education- Feudal England - The Great Charter
Updated: 12 Jan 2013

A People's History of England-Ch.III-Feudal England-Sect.5-

The Great Charter

PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 06 October 2011 03:40

 CHAPTER III: FEUDAL ENGLAND

SECTION 5:  THE GREAT CHARTER

 
FROM THE CONQUEST TO 1200 AD, STATE POWER GREW,


BUT WITHIN THE CONDITIONS
IMPOSED ON IT BY FEUDALISM.

 

THE KING HAD CERTAIN RIGHTS AND DUTIES AND THESE WERE NOT CHALLENGED.

 

HE HAD A DUTY TO KEEP THE PEACE, LEAD THE ARMY AND COLLECT DUES FROM HIS VASSALS.

 

HE KEPT A ROYAL COURT,

WHICH BECAME VERY PROFITABLE

WHEN ITS ROLE WAS EXTENDED TO PRIVATE JURISDICTIONS.

 

THE BARONS RETAINED RIGHTS OF REBELLION,

BUT THE POWER OF THE CROWN MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR IT TO BE CHALLENGED.

 

WHEN THE FEUDAL CONTRACT WAS VIOLATED,

AS IT WAS BY JOHN WHO ATTEMPTED TO LEVY FINES NOT AUTHORISED BY CUSTOM

AND CONFISCATE LANDS BELONGING TO BARONS AND CHURCH USING THE CROWN COURTS,

THE SECTIONS OF SOCIETY THAT HAD BEEN ITS STRONGEST SUPPORTERS, PARTICULARLY

THE CHURCH, REBELLED.

 

HE MIGHT HAVE SUCCEEDED BUT FOR THE FAILURE OF HIS FOREIGN POLICY, LOSING

PROVINCES HIS FATHER HAD HELD, INCLUDING THE DUKEDOM OF NORMANDY.

 

THIS LOSS MEANT THAT THE BARONS LOST THEIR ANCESTRAL ESTATES, AND, IN THEIR EYES,
JOHN HAD FAILED TO PROTECT WHAT WAS HIS FIRST RESPONSIBILTY - THEIR LANDS.

JOHN BECAME INVOLVED IN A DISPUTE WITH POPE INNOCENT III OVER THE APPOINTMENT

OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY. JOHN WAS EXCOMMUNICATED, AND THE POPE

PERSUADED THE KING OF FRANCE AND SCOTLAND TO MAKE WAR ON HIM.

 

THE COUNTER ALLIANCE JOHN SOUGHT WAS CRUSHED AS THE BARONS REFUSED TO FIGHT ON HIS SIDE.

 

JOHN STOOD ALONE AND LOST THE NOBILITY’S SUPPORT.

 

THE REBELLION AGAINST JOHN WAS LED BY THE BARONS BUT BECAME UNIVERSAL WHEN

JOHN COULD NO LONGER DEPEND ON THE FYRD.

 

THIS POPULAR MOVEMENT WAS SUBMITTED TO, AND, AT RUNNYMEDE ON JUNE 15th 1215,

HE ACCEPTED THE PROGRAMME OF DEMANDS DRAWN UP BY THE BARONS IN THE MAGNA CARTA.

 

IT WAS THE TURNING POINT IN ENGLISH HISTORY, BUT FOR THE WRONG REASONS.

THE CHARTER WAS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENT.

 

THERE WAS NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION AND NO GUARANTEE OF

PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT, SINCE GOVERNMENT DIDN’T EXIST.

AND THERE WAS NO RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY.

 

WHAT IT DID DO, HOWEVER, WAS TO SET OUT IN DETAIL HOW JOHN HAD EXCEEDED HIS

RIGHTS AS A FEUDAL OVERLORD AND DEMANDED THE END TO HIS UNLAWFUL PRACTICES.

 

IT MARKED THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN BARON AND CITIZEN BY INSISTING ON FREEDOM OF

MERCHANTS FROM ARBITARY TAX.

 

IT CURTAILED THE ROYAL COURT’S POWERS, WHICH IN ITSELF WAS REACTIONARY.

ITS FAMOUS CLAUSE WAS: “NO FREEMAN SHALL BE TAKEN OR IMPRISONED OR DISSEISED OR

EXILED OR IN ANY WAY DESTROYED, NOR WILL WE GO UPON HIM OR SEND UPON HIM

EXCEPT BY LAWFUL JUDGEMENT OF HIS PEERS AND THE LAW OF THE LAND.”

 

‘FREEMEN’ DID NOT INCLUDE THE MASS OF THE PEOPLE WHO WERE STILL IN VILLEINAGE,

BUT AS THIS DECLINED THE CLAUSE TOOK ON A NEW MEANING AND IMPORTANCE.

 

THE COMMITTEE OF 24 BARONS SET UP TO SEE THAT JOHN KEPT HIS PROMISE WAS

SIGNIFICANT, AS IT WAS A NEW AVENUE ALONG WHICH THE BARONS COULD CONDUCT A

POLITICAL STRUGGLE AS A CLASS RATHER THAN AS INDIVIDUALS.

 

OTHER CLASSES EVOLVED TOO, LEADING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PARLIAMENT CREATED

TO DEFEND THE NOBLES’ INTERESTS.

 

BUT, AS SOON AS THE BARONS DISPERSED, JOHN DENOUNCED THE CHARTER AND RAISED AN ARMY.

 

CIVIL WAR FOLLOWED, INTERRUPTED BY JOHN’S DEATH IN 1216.

HIS SON HENRY, AGED NINE, WAS CROWNED, BUT THE BARONS RULED AND THE PRINCIPLES

OF THE CHARTER BECAME THE BASIS OF LAW.

 

THESE WERE REAFFIRMED BY KINGS, FROM HENRY III TO HENRY VI.

HISTORY NOW FALLS INTO THREE PARTS.

 

FEUDALISM DECLINED, AND THE POWER OF THE NOBLES WAS BROKEN IN THE WAR OF THE ROSES.

(WRITING HIS PLAY, KING JOHN, SHAKESPEARE NEVER REFERS TO THE MAGNA CARTA AND

QUITE POSSIBLY HAD NEVER HEARD OF IT.)

 

THE BOURGEOISIE ENTERED THEIR REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD UNDER THE STUARTS, AND THE

CHARTER WAS REDISCOVERED BUT MISREPRESENTED AND USED AS THE BASIS FOR CLAIMS

OF PARLIAMENT.

 

ONLY IN THE LAST CENTURY HAVE THE HISTORIANS EXAMINED THE CARTA CRITICALLY AS A

FEUDAL DOCUMENT AND DISCOVERED ITS REAL MEANING AND IMPORTANCE.

 

THE BARONS WON A VICTORY, BUT ONLY BY ACTING IN A WAY THAT WAS NOT STRICTLY FEUDAL.

 

THEY FORMED NEW ALLIANCES AMONG THEMSELVES AND WITH OTHER CLASSES.

 

46
41 Reference- Marilyn Monroe a Communist ?-offered Reds into her bed, & Brothers & Sisters kinship
Updated: 09 Jan 2013

The two sides of Marilyn Monroe

Tuesday 08 January 2013
 
Almost exactly 60 years ago arch-sexist Hugh Hefner launched Playboy magazine.

When it came to choosing the cover girl and first centre-spread there was no contest.

It just had to be Marilyn Monroe.

Who else appeared to match the American male dream of a shapely sex bomb who was both pliant, subservient and available?

A dizzy, bubbly blonde with no ideas or opinions of her own - for so many, that was the image they had of Marilyn Monroe.

Many still have that image today.

Just imagine how middle America might have reacted on discovering that its favourite sex icon was a communist.

Throughout her life and even more after her death, the tabloid media had a field day with Monroe's private life.

If you believe the catalogue of scurrilous stories, she had slept with President Jack Kennedy, his brother Bobby

and scores of film stars, male and female, from Marlon Brando to Elizabeth Taylor.

The lists were both comprehensive and imaginative.

Albert Einstein and the plumber who came to fix her toilet were both allegedly welcomed into her bed.

The stories, true or not, certainly fed millions of male fantasies.

But Monroe's image and the reality were as different as chalk and cheese.

The supposedly dizzy brainless blonde actually had great intelligence and a real social conscience.

She never tried to hide her left-wing political opinions. She was pro-union and anti racist. She campaigned

against nuclear weapons and for civil rights.

In segregated America she fought to get black performers onto previously white-only stages.

She got Ella Fitzgerald her first booking in a Los Angles club that had previously only booked white artists.

"Book Ella and I'll sit in the front row for every performance," she told the club owner - who wasn't slow to realise

that Monroe's presence would bring in the crowds.

At the height of the anti-communist witch hunts she worked with and eventually married communist playwright

Arthur Miller.

"Miller wouldn't have married me if I was just a dumb blonde," she told the press.

She employed communists and communist sympathisers at home and in her film production company.

Her doctors and therapists were close to the Communist Party or indeed actual members.

Whether these people actually held - or told people they held - Communist Party membership cards is of little consequence.

In the US of Joe McCarthy's witch-hunts, the House un-American activities committee hearings and the

Hollywood blacklists it wasn't the kind of information people bandied about.

After much campaigning and many Freedom of Information requests FBI files on Marilyn Monroe that could not

be located earlier this year have finally been unearthed and published.

They contain gems like this, from an anonymous male caller, who phoned the Daily News to report that the

actress's company, Marilyn Monroe Productions, was filled with communists and that money from the company

was being used to finance communist activities.

The caller said Miller's marriage to Monroe during a Jewish ceremony less than a month earlier was a cover-up.

Miller, the man said, "was still a member of the Communist Party and was their cultural front man."

The files are not just vague and anonymous - they are far from complete and have been heavily censored. Other

FBI files have not yet been released and the Bureau is still resisting anybody looking at them.

When Monroe's house was remodelled after her death an extensive network of bugging devices were discovered.

The newly released files do show how frightened the FBI was that Monroe would be revealed as a communist

sympathiser.

In fact the film star had never been ashamed of her opinions or her communist-leaning friends.

The records reveal her association with Frederick Vanderbilt Field, who was disinherited from his wealthy family

over his leftist views.

Field was universally described by the US media as a "millionaire communist."

Monroe made no secret of her friendship with the Fields.

She took a trip to Mexico where they were living in self-imposed exile with a group of other communists.

Field's autobiography devotes an entire chapter to Monroe's Mexico trip.

He tells readers: "She talked mostly about herself and some of the people who had been or still were important to her.

"She told us about her strong feelings for civil rights, for black equality, as well as her admiration for what was

being done in China, her anger at red-baiting and McCarthyism and her hatred of [FBI top dog] J Edgar Hoover."

Monroe's FBI file begins in 1955 and mostly focuses on her travels and associations, searching for signs of leftist

views and possible ties to communism.

One entry, which previously had been almost completely censored, tells us that Monroe and other entertainers

sought visas to visit Soviet Russia - a terrible crime in the eyes of Hoover's FBI.

For all the focus on Monroe's closeness to suspected communists, the bureau never found any proof she was an

actual member of the party.

"Subject's views are very positively and concisely leftist; however, if she is being actively used by the

Communist Party, it is not general knowledge among those working with the movement in Los Angeles," an entry

in Monroe's file states.

If they had simply asked Monroe could have told them that.

Just before her mysterious death in 1962 she gave a quote to a journalist.

"Please don't make me a joke.

End the interview with what I believe," she told him.

Fifty years after her death, and with her still making headlines, that is surely the least we can do for Marilyn Monroe.

We'll give her the last word because what she believed in speaks for itself.

"What I really want to say is that what the world needs is a feeling of kinship.

Everybody - stars, labourers, blacks, Jews, Arabs - we're all brothers!"

52
42 Reference-Chavez is holding his own.Venezuela and friends hold their breath.Cuba's medics fight on !
Updated: 09 Jan 2013

 

Chávez assimilating treatment and in stable condition

CARACAS, January 7.—Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is assimilating the treatment being applied with all

due rigor and has remained stable, Communication and Information Minister Ernesto Villegas stated today.

Speaking on national radio and television, Villegas noted that Chávez is in a stable condition in relation to the

situation described in the most recent medical report referring to his respiratory insufficiency.

Prensa Latina has circulated the complete text of the official communiqué on the instructions of Vice President Nicolás Maduro (PL).

COMMUNIQUE FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

The government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is informing the Venezuelan and other sister peoples of

the clinical evolution of President Hugo Chávez after the operation performed on December 11.

The Bolivarian government is in constant contact with the medical team treating Comandante Chávez, as well as

family members accompanying him in the post-operation process in Havana, Cuba.

The President is in a stable condition in relation to the situation described in the most recent report, which

informed of the respiratory insufficiency confronted by Comandante Chávez as a consequence of a post-

operative pulmonary infection.

He is receiving rigorous and constant treatment and assimilating it.

The Bolivarian government reiterates its commitment to keep the Venezuelan people informed of the health of the

President, and calls on them to ignore the messages of psychological warfare coming from abroad in order to

disturb the Venezuelan family.

The Bolivarian government congratulates the people and students, teachers and educational workers, fathers,

mothers and representatives on the recommencement of classes in the 2012-2013 school year.

At the same time, it thanks enterprises in the agribusiness sector who attended a working meeting with the Vice

President and Cabinet ministers directed at coordinating efforts to halt food hoarding and speculation, and

reiterates its commitment to guarantee stable supplies of basic products for the Venezuelan people.

¡Que viva Chávez!

Caracas, January 7, 2013.

148
43 Reference- Indian Airlines-High on the Worst Safety Record List
Updated: 05 Jan 2013

Airlines with the worst safety records

Radical - Travelled Air India - Never Again !

 
Airlines with the worst safety records (Getty)
"American Airlines has the dubious honour of being in two of the worst 10 and three of the worst 20 air crashes of all time."
 
 
that it's the world's oldest airline to have never had a fatal accident.
 
But it's not the same story worldwide — and some airlines look considerably iffier when you start looking at the crash data.

Worst overall record

Deciding which airline has the worst overall safety record depends entirely on how you define 'worst'.

Arguably the most illuminating measurement to use is Adjusted Fatal Event calculation.

This adjusts the number of air crashes depending on the percentage of passengers that died in them.

To give an example, say an airline has two accidents. In the first, all passengers die, while in the second only half die.

The Adjusted Fatal Event figure for this airline would be 1.5.

Using this measurement (and, frankly, pretty much any other measurement) for airlines that there is reliable crash

data for, the worst safety record belongs to Cubana.

According to the figures provided by OAGback Aviation Solutions for flights taken between 1985 and 2009, there

were eight fatal accidents on 320,000 Cubana flights in that period.

That's two more accidents than any other airline, and with far fewer flights taken than almost all other major airlines.

And the Cuban national airline's Adjusted Fatal Event score?

A deeply unimpressive 5.23. Other airlines with bad Adjusted Fatal Event scores include Pakistan Airlines (4.18),

American Airlines (4.04), American Eagle (3.72) and Iran Air (3.42). A full list can be found at Planecrashinfo.com.

Worst accident rate

Of course, the Adjusted Fatal Event figure doesn't give the complete picture.

It doesn't really take into account the number of flights operated.

It's hardly fair to compare Cubana's 320,000 flights to American Airlines' 20.2 million.

Using the same source, when you compare the records of airlines to the average fatal accident rate, it's a different story for some.

As an example, American Airlines' accident rate is 234 percent better than average.

For comparison, Qantas (no fatal accidents in 2.63 million flights) does 82 percent better than average and the

leading airline by this measurement is Southwest Airlines in the US (no fatal accidents in 17.87 million flights and 568 percent better than average).

Predictably enough, Cubana comes off when you compare its accident rate like this.

The Cuban airline's record is 513 percent worse than the average.

Other shockers are Iran Air (312 percent worse), Pakistan Airlines (373 percent worse) and Indian Airlines (234 percent worse).

Most deadly plane crashes of all time

The most deadly plane crashes of all time are considered to be the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.

The 2907 fatalities listed by Planecrashinfo.com include those who died on the ground, as well as the passengers

of the American Airlines and United Airlines planes.

September 11 does skew the stats for American and United somewhat, as the deaths can hardly be attributed to

human or mechanical error on behalf of the airline.

Otherwise, the worst air disaster of all time took place at Tenerife airport in the Canary Islands. A total of 578

passengers died when a KLM flight collided with a Pan Am plane on the runway in 1977.

The worst accident involving a single plane was when Japan Airlines flight 123 from Tokyo to Osaka smashed

into the side of Mt Ogura in 1985, killing 520.

As for recent years, the worst accident of the last decade involving a passenger plane (excluding September 11)

also took place in 2001. American Airlines flight 587 crashed into a residential suburb of Queens, New York. 251

passengers, nine crew members and five people on the ground died — and this time, pilot error was the official cause.

Most regular major crashes

American Airlines has the dubious honour of being in two of the worst 10 and three of the worst 20 air crashes of

all time — although that does include September 11 as well as the Queens crash and a 1979 disaster that saw 273 die in Chicago.

Saudi Arabian Airlines also has the dubious honour of featuring in two of the top 10 most deadly air disasters — a

fire on the plane at Riyadh airport in 1980 killed all 301 aboard, whilst 349 died during a mid-air collision with a

Kazakhstan Airlines flight on the way to New Delhi in 1996.

Other airlines that don't come out smelling of roses are China Airlines (three of the top 50 most fatal accidents),

and Russia's Aeroflot (seven of the top 100).

Worst record of airlines flying to Australia

Of course, most Australians are unlikely to encounter the likes of Cubana and Pakistan Airlines, but there are

some airlines with patchy history that do fly to Australia. American Airlines is one, albeit with mitigating circumstances.

The carrier that really raises eyebrows is China Airlines.

The Taiwan-based carrier managed six fatal crashes in 910,000 flights between 1985 and 2009.

That's 469 percent worse than the average accident rate, with an Adjusted Fatal Event score of 4.98.

Thai Airways doesn't have a gleaming safety record either — four fatal crashes in 1.98 million flights, an Adjusted

Fatal Event figure of 3.69 and an accident rate that is 306 percent worse than average.

Don't freak out too much though! On the flipside, there are plenty of airlines with super-safe track records.

Do these figures deter you from flying on particular airlines?

Have you had good experiences on any of the airlines mentioned?

104
44 Reference- Pension & Pension Credit Calculator
Updated: 05 Jan 2013

AgeUK.org.uk

Pension Calculator planning for your retirement

What you need?

To get the most out of the Age UK pension calculator you should have the following documents to hand:

·                 A recent  state pension forecast

·                 Recent benefit statements from any pension schemes due to pay you a pension at retirement. Scheme

or pension providers usually send you these once a year or provide details online

·                 Information about any other savings and investments if you’re planning to use them as savings for

retirement, for example the amount built up so far and whether the savings are tax free or not.


Don’t worry if you don’t have these documents, you can still use this pension calculator.

How couples should complete the calculator

If you’re a couple, you can decide jointly how much income your household might need in retirement, but you’ll

each need to work through the calculator independently to check whether you’re on track.

This is because you each build up your own state and private pensions, depending on your personal record of

work, earnings and other circumstances.

How long will it take?

We estimate it will take you around 30 minutes to complete the whole calculator.

But this timing is only a guide. If you don’t want to complete the calculator in one go, you can save your work and come back to it at a later date.

Saving your information

You can stop and save your progress at any time.

You might find this helpful if you need to find out some more information and you don’t want to lose the information you’ve entered already.

If you use the save function, you’ll be asked for your email address and a password. You can then return to the pension calculator and complete it at a later date.

At the end you’ll get a personal summary plan that you can print out and refer to.

Your information will remain confidential at all times.

How accurate is the guidance?

The guidance provided by the calculator is as accurate as it can be, but please note the following:

The guidance you get out is dependent on the information you put in.

Your benefit statements and state pension forecast are estimates that usually change from year to year.

Therefore, it’s wise to check your savings for retirement by re-running the pension calculator every 12 months.

The pension calculator helps you plan ahead and, to do so, it has to make a number of assumptions, such as the

rate of inflation over the years until your retirement.

Click on the ‘More information’ tab at the side to read about the assumptions on which the pension calculator is based.

Confidentiality

The pension calculator ensures that the information you enter is for your eyes only.

You won’t be asked to enter your name or address, but you will be entering financial details about yourself.

When you’ve finished using the pension calculator, if you press the save button these details are saved.

However, if you’ve completed the pension calculator in one go and not saved the information then your details will not be kept

114
45 Reference- State Pension - Are you getting all you should be ?
Updated: 05 Jan 2013

State pension - how much are you entitled to?

Moneywise – Mon, Dec 31, 2012 11:21 GMT

The basic state pension is paid to people over state pension age who have made enough national insurance contributions in qualifying years.

The number of qualifying years you need to get a full basic state pension of £107.45 a week depends on your age

and sex: • Men born before 6 April 1945 usually need 44 qualifying years • Men born on or after 6 April 1945 need

30 qualifying years • Women born before 6 April 1950 usually need 39 qualifying years • Women born on or after 6

April 1950 need 30 qualifying years.

If you have reached state pension age without building up the full entitlement you will still be able to claim a portion of the state pension.

How much will depend on how many qualifying years you have built up.

You can get a state pension forecast at direct.gov.uk.

Pension Credit – who's eligible and how to claim it Pension Credit is a means-tested benefit designed to top up

low pension incomes. It is not linked to national insurance contributions and around four million people are

entitled to it, but only one in three of those eligible actually claim it.

It is made up of two parts – the Guarantee Credit and the Savings Credit.

The Guarantee Credit is designed to top up everyone's state pension to £142.70 a week if you are single, or

£217.90 for couples.

The Savings Credit is designed to reward people who have made some provision for their retirement such as savings or a second pension.

You need to have a weekly pension income of at least £111.80 for single people (£178.35 for couples) in order to

be eligible for the Savings Credit. The amount you can receive from the credit is capped at £18.54 per week for

single people and £23.73 for couples.

“Pension credit can make a significant difference to a person's quality of life”, says Michelle Mitchell, charity

director general of Age UK.

Unfortunately, at present there is a “benefits maze facing older people,” she says.

You can navigate the maze with Age UK's pension For once in credit calculator available at ageuk.org.uk

45
46 Reference- Pension Credit - 1 in 3 eligible don't claim
Updated: 05 Jan 2013

Pension Credit
 
About 4 million older people are entitled to Pension Credit, yet about 1 in 3 of those eligible are still not claiming it.

If you’re one of them, you could be missing out on hundreds or even thousands of pounds a year.

There are two parts of Pension Credit - you may be eligible to receive one or both of them.

Guarantee Credit tops up your weekly income to a guaranteed minimum level set up by the Government.

Savings Credit is extra money for people who have an income higher than the Basic State Pension or who have a small amount of savings.

Can I claim Pension Credit?

• The minimum age to qualify for Guarantee Credit is gradually rising from age 60 to 66.

The current minimum age for Savings Credit is 65.

• Pension Credit is means-tested so your income and savings are taken into account when it is worked out.

Pension Credit includes help towards mortgage payments and service charges for home owners, and extra

money for people who receive Carers Allowance or disability benefits.

It's worth claiming Pension Credit even if you are only entitled to a small amount, as it can help you qualify for other benefits.

Use our  online benefits calculator to find out whether you could be eligible for Pension Credit.

How to claim Pension Credit

Call the Pension Service on 0800 99 1234.

They will ask you questions over the phone and fill the form in for you.

Or visit the  Directgov website to download a claim form.

My story

'I’m much better off now. It is easier to make ends meet.'

Sixty-four year-old Terry had no idea he and his wife were entitled to Pension Credit and full payment of their council tax bill.

That was until the lads at the working men’s club told him to go see Amanda at Age Concern.

'I’d worked nearly all my life in the building trade and I just couldn’t do it anymore because it took its toll on my body.

'So I went to work at a recycling plant instead‚ picking things off the line‚ but the conditions were terrible.

My skin was coming out in a rash all down my back‚ arms and legs.

I was scratching all the time.

'I knew I had to pack my job in but I was worried because I was only 60 and couldn’t claim my pension yet.

But Amanda took care of me.

She filled in some forms and helped me and my wife claim Pension Credit of £202.40 a week.

We also got full Council Tax Benefit so we save over £1‚000 a year.

'When I was working I was taking home about £150 a week.

I had hit my savings because the money I was getting wasn’t enough to live on.

I’m much better off now. It is easier to make ends meet.
'If you’re like me and you don’t have a lot of money you should go and speak to Age Concern*.

They are always there to help you and give you good advice.”

*Age UK was previously known as Age Concern.
 

Download the guide:

More money in your pocket: a guide to claiming benefits for people over pension age (PDF 3 MB)
  Download the factsheet: Pension Credit (PDF 538 KB)
  Download the factsheet: Capital, income and means-tested benefits (PDF 215 KB)

61
47 Reference- Child Benefit Cuts - The Facts
Updated: 05 Jan 2013

Monday's child benefit changes: how you will be affected

Last updated: Jan 4th, 2013

Feature by Rachel Lacey 

 From Monday, more than one million families stand to lose some or all of their child benefit.

Find out if you will be affected and how to fend off the raid. Share with friends: 

You might also like:

•Child benefit: the next scandal in the making

•How to claim benefits that are rightfully yours

•Three steps to checking your benefit entitlements

•Benefits you're entitled to: working families

•Parents: are you going to be worse off?

Monday is the day thousands of middle-income families across the UK have been dreading.

Because from then all households where one parent has an income of more than £60,000 will no longer be

entitled to child benefit, while those earning between £50,000 and £60,000 will see their entitlement reduce.

The universal benefit is currently paid at a rate of £20.30 a week for the first child, with each additional sibling getting £13.40 a week.

That means higher earning families with two children could lose up to £1,752 a year, while families with three kids

stand to lose close to £2,500.

According to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), some 1.2 million families will be affected, 70% of whom will lose all their benefit.

But, confusingly, while these families are being told they're losing their benefit, the monthly payment will continue as normal.

Rather than simply taking away the money, the government has opted to reclaim it through self-assessment.

This means all affected families will have to declare their benefit on an annual tax return and pay an additional tax charge.

Will you be affected?

According to HMRC, an additional 500,000 will now have to complete an annual tax return.

For those earning £60,000 plus, the charge will wipe out the child benefit while those earning between £50,000

and £60,000 will see a proportional reduction, as Matthew Stephens, tax expert at Prudential explains.

"They will lose 1% of child benefit for every £100 of pre-tax income earned over £50,000."

HMRC has confirmed that parents will have a choice whether to pay back the child benefit either as a lump sum

or have it collected monthly through their PAYE tax code.

If you opt for the latter your code will be updated from April and the charge for the period of 7th January to 5th

April 2013 would be collected during 2013.

What do you need to do?

By now all affected families should have received guidance.

If you haven't heard anything check out HMRC's website for up to date info.

"HMRC will be writing to everyone earning £50,000 or more to say they could be facing a possible tax charge,"

says Tina Riches, technical director at the Chartered Institute of Taxation.

The first step is to work out if you are affected and, if so, establish by how much.

The good news at least is HMRC will base its calculations on your ‘net-adjusted income', which could be lower than you think.

Your net-adjusted income is your income (including your salary, work perks like company cars, share dividends,

rental income and so on) but less deductions such as pension contributions, gift aid, union subs and childcare vouchers.

So somebody who is earning £60,000 on the nose may be surprised to hear that they might be able to keep some

of their benefit, while someone earning just over £50,000 could get to keep it all.

This information can be found on your P60 and your P11D, which should be given to you each year by your employer.

Save for your child's future

If your net-adjusted income is between £50,000 and £60,000 you'll lose a proportional part of your benefit.

Tina Riches explains how to do the maths.

"Take your earnings figure, deduct £50,000 and divide that by 100 to work out the percentage of your benefit you'll lose."

So if you earn £52,000 you'll lose 20% of it, 50% if you earn £55,000, 80% if you earn £58,000 and so on.

While the wealthiest of families will be able to absorb the loss, thousands of households who earn just above the

cut-off will really feel the pinch, particularly those in the South East where housing and childcare is so expensive.

Thankfully, as HMRC will be basing its calculations on your net-adjusted income, there are ways to legally reduce

it in such a way that you not only get to keep some – or all – of your child benefit but also give your overall finances a boost.

Can you beat the hike?

One of the simplest ways to reduce your income is to increase your pension contributions.

"Take somebody with three kids earning £60,000, and claiming roughly £2,500 in child benefit," says Matthew Stephens.

"If they pay £10,000 into their pension they reduce their income to £50,000, so they don't have to pay the child benefit tax charge."

However, thanks to tax relief, investing £10,000 in your pension only costs higher-rate taxpayers £6,000.

"You pay in £8,000 and get it topped up by £2,000 in tax relief straightaway and can then claim a further £2,000 back through your tax return," he explains.

Upping your pension contributions may be painful in the short term but it does at least mean the income you

miss every month goes into your retirement savings rather than government coffers.

"In this case, it will cost £3,500 [£6,000 minus £2,500].

So you end up with £3,500 less in the bank but £10,000 in your pension in return.

"If you did nothing with that £10,000 you'd have £3,500 in the bank after tax and child benefit charges but nothing

extra in your pension," Stephens explains.

If you don't already use childcare vouchers this could be another clever way of getting your income down and

clawing back your child benefit.

Currently, higher-rate taxpayers can sacrifice £124 a month or £1,488 a year to buy childcare vouchers free of tax and NI.

Ultimate benefits guide

Lucy Payne, quality and development manager at Kiddivouchers, says that a father with three children earning

£60,000 a year could reduce his income by £1,488 by buying his maximum quota of childcare vouchers.

"With a salary of £58,512 he could expect to keep £364.44 of his child benefit award and also benefit from tax and

NI savings of £624.96 a year from his childcare vouchers," she explains.

Payne adds that childcare vouchers aren't just for parents of young children.

"A considerable number of parents don't think vouchers apply to them, that they are just for pre-school children

or low earners. You can use them to pay for nurseries and pre-schools but also after-school and holiday clubs.

Even wrap around care at private schools and school trips."

You may or may not be able to reduce the impact of January's changes – that will depend on your earnings, the

number of children you have and the amount you already spend on childcare vouchers and pension contributions.

But even if you can't beat the new tax charge, the message is don't bury your head in the sand: read the

guidance from HMRC, work out how much you'll lose, budget and put that money aside.

Otherwise you could be stung with the mother of all tax bills.

MONEYWISE'S TOP TIPS: SURVIVE THE CHILD BENEFIT TAX HIKE

•Read guidance from HMRC - you should have received a letter by now.

Contact your tax office if you haven't.

•Don't spend child benefit you'll have to repay.

Protect yourself from a hefty tax bill by calculating how much you'll owe and setting up a standing order to move

that money into a savings account each month.

Pick a high interest regular saver so you at least get to spend the interest.

•See if you can beat the tax hike by exploring ways to reduce your income - such as increasing pension

contributions or buying childcare vouchers.

•Even if you stand to lose all your child benefit don't stop claiming.

You never know when your circumstances could change.

Paying it back could be a whole lot easier than getting payments re-started if you lose your job.

99
48 Reference- Hugo Chavez still has "Severe" Respiratory problem
Updated: 04 Jan 2013

Venezuela's Chavez still has "severe" respiratory problem

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nancy Romero places a figurine on a religious altar with images of Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez in Caracas January 3, 2013. REUTERS-Carlos Garcia Rawlins
A picture of Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez rests on a religious altar in Caracas January 3, 2013. REUTERS-Carlos Garcia Rawlins
 
 
A child walks past a mural depicting Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in Caracas January 3, 2013. REUTERS-Carlos Garcia Rawlins )

 Nancy Romero places a figurine on a religious altar with images of Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez in Caracas January 3, 2013.

 Reuters/Carlos Garcia Rawlins

 

CARACAS | Fri Jan 4, 2013 2:50am GMT

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is still suffering a "severe" respiratory infection that

has hindered his breathing as he struggles to recover from cancer surgery in Cuba, the government said on Thursday.

The 58-year-old socialist leader has not been seen in public nor heard from in more than three weeks.

Officials say he is in delicate condition after his fourth operation in just 18 months for an undisclosed form of cancer in his pelvic area.

the current financial climate
Request Free Guide

"Comandante Chavez has faced complications as a result of a severe lung infection," Information Minister

Ernesto Villegas said in the latest official update on the president's condition.

"This infection has caused a breathing insufficiency that requires Comandante Chavez to comply strictly with

medical treatment," the communiqué added, giving no further details.

Vice President Nicolas Maduro had earlier returned to Venezuela on Thursday after visiting Chavez in hospital as

rumours swirled that the president could be close to death.

Flanked by senior government figures including Diosdado Cabello, the head of the National Assembly, Maduro

toured a coffee production plant in Caracas - the type of visit that the president made frequently before he fell ill.

"He is conscious of the battle that he's in, and has the same fighting spirit as always, with the same strength and

energy as always, with his confidence and security," Maduro said.

"We're going to be alongside him with the same strength and the same energy."

Maduro said Cabello, Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez and Chavez's elder brother Adan, among others, had all been

with the president in the Havana hospital.

Venezuelan bonds rallied to five-year highs earlier on Thursday on rumours that Chavez's health had taken a turn for the worse.

Foreign investors generally hope for a more business-friendly government in Venezuela, and its assets have

rallied in recent months on news of his illness.

In scenes that recalled Chavez's hours-long televised visits to building sites, hospitals and oil refineries, Maduro

told workers at the nationalized Fama de America factory that there was no "transition" taking place in the country.

"The only transition in Venezuela is the transition to socialism," he said in comments carried live by state television.

"It began six years ago, ordered by Comandante Hugo Chavez as chief and president, elected, re-elected and

ratified, much as it pains the bourgeois hucksters and the right, who have done so much damage to our fatherland."

Chavez's abrupt exit from the political scene would be a huge shock for the South American OPEC nation.

His oil-financed socialism has made him a hero to the poor majority but critics call him a dictator.

His condition is being watched closely by Latin American allies that have benefited from his help, as well as

investors attracted by Venezuela's lucrative and widely traded debt.

'MAKE NO MISTAKE'

Chavez is still set to be sworn in on January 10, as spelled out in the constitution.

If he were to die or had to step aside, new elections would be held within 30 days, with Maduro running as the

ruling Socialist Party (PSUV) candidate.

While the constitution gives January 10 as the start of a new presidential term, it does not explicitly state what

happens if a president-elect cannot take office on that date.

Top PSUV officials have suggested that Chavez's inauguration could be postponed - while the opposition says

any delay would be just the latest sign the former soldier is not fit to govern.

Cabello said the "Chavismo" movement was in pain but remained resolute, and he issued a warning to the

opposition: "Make no mistake about these people or this revolution.

It is going to cost you very, but very, dearly," he said.

On Saturday, Cabello will likely be re-elected as head of the Chavista-dominated National Assembly, a key post

that could see him assume Chavez's role temporarily while new elections are called should the president have to step down.

In the past Cabello has been considered as a rival of Maduro, but the pair have been at pains to deny that.

Their appearance side-by-side at the coffee factory on Thursday looked to be the latest effort to project a unified front.

Last year, Chavez staged what appeared to be remarkable comeback from the disease to win re-election to a new

six-year term in October despite being weakened by radiation therapy.

But he returned to Cuba for more treatment within weeks of his win.

Officials have said he suffered unexpected bleeding and then a respiratory infection after a six-hour operation on December 11.

That respiratory infection caused further complications, they have said, without giving more details.

The head of the opposition's Democratic Unity coalition, Ramon Aveledo, has accused the authorities of

breaking a pledge to keep Venezuelans informed about Chavez's health.

And one opposition leader suggested on Thursday that legislators should form an official commission to visit

Cuba and assess the president's condition for themselves.

Maduro hit back in his televised comments, saying the public had been provided with updates almost every day,

and he accused Aveledo of orchestrating a campaign of misinformation.

"We have no doubt Mr. Aveledo is behind the campaign of sick rumours that began on Twitter and Facebook," Maduro said.

(Editing by Kieran Murray and Lisa Shumaker)

56
49 Reference- A New Alternative Honours System - Shouldn't the horse get one too, Charles ?
Updated: 30 Dec 2012

Honours

alt

Republic
 
Honours should be awarded by parliament, on behalf of the people, not by the Queen, on behalf of party leaders.
 
Titles would have much greater value if they reflect modern democratic values, rather than the values of elitism and empire.
The system of honours in this country must be replaced with an alternative which simply and independently
 
recognises courage and exceptional service to the community.
 
 
The current system is now worthless, meaningless and remains dominated by civil servants, political supporters and the royals.

We believe that honours should be awarded by parliament, on behalf of the people, and not by the Queen.

We believe the titles of the honours should reflect modern democratic values, and not be couched in royalist or

imperialist language such as 'order of the British empire'.

We also believe honours should be reserved for those who have performed exemplary service above and beyond

the call of duty or who have committed significant acts of bravery.

The process should be clear and transparent and not shrouded in secrecy.

What is wrong with the honours system?

Firstly, the British honours system is utterly corrupted by the use of titles to reward political loyalty.

A simple examination of any list of recipients will reveal that many of them have actively supported political parties,

whether as politicians, donors or activists.

Secondly, the awards are dominated by those in senior positions within the armed forces and the civil service.

Civil servants are given honours with the job.

One category of honour was invented specifically for senior civil servants, utterly stripping them of any value.

The remainder are an array of awards going to people for 'services to' whatever career they have pursued, and a

rather more limited number of awards to 'unsung heroes', ordinary people who have actually done something for their community.

The 'services to' category is chock full of ageing rock stars, actors, sports people and other rich and famous

individuals who have been more than rewarded for their careers in the limelight.

All of this means that the awards given out have lost all value and meaning.

What kind of award is an MBE to someone who has given a lifetime of work to looking after disabled children, if a

higher award is given to someone who has made a fortune singing songs?

What recognition are we giving charity workers if their awards are 'out-ranked' by those handed to party donors?

A new honours system

It won't surprise you to learn that we are far from alone in believing the honours system should be radically reformed.

John Lidstone, a writer specialising in the honours system, has been calling for sweeping changes for many years (apparently since being offered an award himself).

He makes it clear there should be only one kind of honour and a simple means by which to judge potential

recipients: "those who have done signal deeds beyond their job and duty, and those who perform acts of heroism in civil or military life - and to no one else."

We also have the support of the influential Public Administration Select Committee, which investigated the whole

system and reported in 2004 (Republic gave evidence to the Committee at the time).

The PAC concluded: "we share the unease of critics who were concerned at the continued award of honours to

political donors and others who have rendered political services... [the committee has] doubts about the way

honours are distributed to state servants, including civil servants and members of the armed forces.

It was felt that the continued use of the two Orders almost exclusively conferred on state servants - the Order of the

Bath and the Order of St Michael and St George - suggested that they were receiving favourable treatment."

The main recommendations of the Select Committee were that titles should be phased out over a period of five

years, and that a national honour - Companion of Honour (CH) - should take their place.

No more automatic awards should go to civil servants, diplomats, the Armed Forces, politicians and judges.

Republic believes that while it is important to retain some kind of national honour, the current system is wholly

inappropriate in its use of royal and imperialist language and it is open to routine abuse.

It is time for a new system offering one honour for all who have earned it.

The system should be taken away from the monarch and the government.

Honours awarded by parliament, perhaps with the involvement of an independent commission (such as that

proposed by Lidstone and the PAC) would make these genuine signs of recognition by the people.

60
50 Reference- Nelson Mandela leaves hospital and goes home
Updated: 27 Dec 2012

Nelson Mandela discharged from hospital

Former South African president, who was treated for lung infection and gallstones,

will continue receiving care at home

Nelson Mandela
Nelson Mandela will now receive treatment at his home in Houghton, Johannesburg. Photograph: Jon Hrusa/EPA

Nelson Mandela has been discharged after 19 days in hospital during which he was treated for a lung infection

and gallstones, the South African government said on Wednesday.

"He will undergo home-based high care at his Houghton [Johannesburg] home until he recovers fully,'' said

presidential spokesman Mac Maharaj in a statement.

The former South African president, who is 94-years-old, was admitted on 8 December to a Pretoria hospital.

It was the longest time he had spent in hospital since his release in 1990 from 27 years in prison.

Maharaj, who was a political prisoner with Mandela in the 1970s, thanked the South African public and media for

their prayers and good wishes and for respecting the elder statesman's privacy.

"We request a continuation of the privacy in order to allow for the best possible conditions for full recovery,'' he said.

Mandela was visited in hospital by his family and President Jacob Zuma on Christmas morning but no details

were given of plans for his discharge. President Zuma said he was "in good spirits'' and looking "much better".

Mandela has been admitted to hospital in Johannesburg and Pretoria three times in the past two years, including

for an acute respiratory infection in January 2011. His eyes and lungs were damaged as a result of working in a

limestone quarry on Robben Island, off Cape Town, where he spent 16 of his 27 years as a prisoner of the apartheid state.

The Nobel Prize winner, who was president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999, retired from public life in 2004.

He was last seen in public in July 2010, during the closing ceremony of the World Cup.

The US secretary of state Hillary Clinton paid a private visit to him in August.

Mandela's current permanent home is in Qunu, a remote village in the Eastern Cape, where he spent much of his childhood.

But no announcement has been made about whether he will be able to return there.

68
51 Reference- Hugo Chavez on the mend
Updated: 27 Dec 2012
Chavez’s health improves after surgery in Cuba:
 
Venezuelan information minister

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez

 
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
 
Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:21AM GMT
The Venezuelan information minister says President Hugo Chavez has improved slightly after a cancer operation in Cuba.


"The patient has shown a slight improvement in his condition," Ernesto Villegas said during a short televised statement on Monday, Reuters reported.

The information minister added that the Venezuelan president has also maintained contact with family members.

The 58-year-old leader, who traveled to Havana on December 10, underwent a fourth round of surgery after his
cancer reappeared, despite a year and a half of treatment.

In late March 2012, Chavez began radiation treatment in Cuba after undergoing an operation in February 2012
 
that removed a second cancerous tumor from his pelvic region.
 
Chavez’s first tumor, which was baseball-sized, was removed in June 2011, and then he received chemotherapy.

Chavez, who came to power in 1999, was reelected to a new six-year term in October.

66
52 Reference- 2013 - unlucky for some- and misery for millions
Updated: 24 Dec 2012

Unlucky 2013?

Beware of the globalisation of superstition, says John Grimond

alt

Twenty-thirteen: for most people, another year, much like 2011 or 2012, nothing special.

Okay, the United Nations says it will be the International Year of Water Co-operation and also the International Year of Quinoa.

If that doesn’t seem special enough (quinoa is, after all, only a vegetable), maybe this will: 2013 will be the first year since 1987 to have all digits different from one another.

Interestingly (to some people), 20 and 13 add up to 33, which numerologists—crackpots who assign mystical significance to certain numbers—consider a “highly charged master number”, full of meaning.

But not all crackpots are numerologists. Some are triskaidekaphobiacs, and for them the prospect of 2013 is not so much interesting as terrifying.

Yes, triskaidekaphobia is a long word meaning fear of 13. Lots of people seem to have it. The Romans were spooked by 13. So were the Vikings.

To this day some people will not sit down 13 to dinner; a teddy bear may have to be introduced to push the total up to 14.

Some will not buy a house numbered 13, embark on a ship setting sail on the 13th day of the month (especially if it is a Friday) or sleep in a hotel room on the 13th floor.

Some tall buildings, notably in China and other parts of Asia, appear not to have 13 storeys at all: their numbers go from 12 to 14.

Since triskaidekaphobiacs are irrational, they may really believe their hotel has no 13th floor and sleep peacefully on the one labelled 14.

Thirteen, they may protest, is really just a name, not a number.

Triskaidekaphobia v triskaidekaphilia

Oh yes?

Those who seek explanations for the superstitious fear of 13 all seem to believe that its crucial quality is quantity.

It was Judas, the betrayer of Jesus, who brought the numbers up to 13 at the Last Supper (never mind that the same could be said of any of the other disciples, or even of Jesus himself).

It was the 13th era, the first after the dozen 1,000-year reigns of the 12 constellations, which supposedly

presaged chaos for the ancient Persians, and which even now makes modern Iranians leave their houses and go

out to cleanse their souls on Sizdah Be-dar, the 13th day of the year.

It was women’s 13 menstrual cycles a year that gave the number a bad name when the solar calendar came to

displace the 13-cycle lunar calendar.

Or so it is said by credulous expositors.  

Yet plenty of people think 13 is freighted with good associations.

The ancient Egyptians believed that, on the last rung of a 13-step ladder to eternity, the soul would find everlasting life.

The ancient Greeks—some of them, anyway—thought Herakles’s 12 labours were followed by a lucky 13th, his

killing of the lion of Kithaeron for King Thespius, for which the reward was permission to make love to each of

the king’s 50 daughters over 50 consecutive nights.

Many modern Jews believe the “collective souls” of the Jewish people can be compared to the 13-petalled rose

mentioned in the Zohar, a revered text for mystical followers of the Kabbalah school of thought.

The Romans were spooked by 13.
So were the Vikings

Those who believe that 13 brings good luck have one thing in common with those who believe that it brings

misfortune: the complete absence of reason behind their convictions.

Even so, prudent readers of The World in 2013 will tread warily in the year ahead.

The superstitious may be a minority, but they are everywhere and, with the globalisation of political correctness,

they should not, it seems, be ignored.

Sensitive souls (clearly most, if not all, of our readers) will realise that from 2013 on, neither hearts nor minds will

be won with 13-point plans, bakers’ dozens, presentations at sixes and sevens, least of all with 13 red roses.

For anyone engaged in business, or entertaining, or courtship, it will henceforth be as necessary to inquire

about numerical allergies and preferences as it already is to ask about dietary ones: 2013 seems certain to

contain nuts

70
53 Reference- Forward Oil Prices for February Rise
Updated: 20 Dec 2012
Oil prices rise amid report of shrinking US crude supplies

Brent North Sea crude for February climbed $1.52 to end at $110.36 per barrel in London trade.

 
Brent North Sea crude for February climbed $1.52 to end at $110.36 per barrel in London trade.
 
Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:46AM GMT
 
Oil prices in the global markets have risen amid news of a decline in US petroleum inventories, with Brent North
 
Sea crude for February climbing $1.52 to end at $110.36 per barrel in London trade.


Oil prices rallied on Wednesday after the US Department of Energy said the nation’s crude oil supplies fell last
 
week by a million barrels, less than analyst expectations for a drop of 1.3 million, AFP reported.

New York's main contract, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) for January, rose by $1.58 to close at $89.98 a barrel, the highest one-day price rise in a month.

“The market overall was supported by a decline in crude oil inventory this week, as well as an increase in
 
refineries runs," said Andy Lipow of Lipow Oil Associates, a consulting firm based in Houston, Texas.

The economy of the United States, which is the world's biggest consumer of crude, is forecast to tip into
 
recession if American lawmakers do not reach a deal by the end of the month to avert a fiscal cliff of tax hikes and spending cuts
64
54 Reference- The Dunny - Australian slang for a Toilet
Updated: 18 Dec 2012

Dunny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 
Dunny or dunny can is Australian slang for toilet, either the room or the specific fixture, especially an outhouse or other outdoor toilets.

It is often used to specify a distinction between a flushing toilet and a non-flushing toilet (e.g., a longdrop or thunderbox).

First used in print in 1952, the word is believed to be derived from the much older 'dunnakin' (also spelled 'dunnigin' and 'dunegan')[1] meaning privy.


 

 History

Triple seated dunny, Wauchope, NSWTraditionally an outhouse could be found in unsewered areas and consisted of little more than a seat placed over a can or cesspit.

The latter variation can be referred to more specifically as a longdrop.

The outhouse would be maintained at some distance from houses for reasons of smell and hygiene.

The sheds themselves were generally made of either wood or corrugated iron, to facilitate the moving of the outhouse if required.

In mining areas outhouses are sometimes placed over disused mine shafts.

 
Norman Park, like many areas of Brisbane was unsewered until the late 1960s, with each house having an outhouse or "dunny" in the back yard.

By the middle of the twentieth century, outhouses had become much less common as modern plumbing diminished the need to keep toilets at a distance from the house.

Nevertheless even some large cities, such as Brisbane, had unsewered suburbs where residences required outhouses into the early 1970s, and they lingered on in Tasmania until the early 1980s.

In built up areas it was unhygienic to rely on cesspits and the usual arrangement was for waste to be collected in a can placed under the dunny.

The cans would be collected, emptied, washed and replaced weekly by contractors hired by the local city or town council.

In modern times, many outhouses on old houses remained in use, but have been refitted with modern plumbing and flushing toilets.

They are also used in areas too remote to justify the expense of pumping water and sewage piping to, but where there is a need for toilet facilities, such as at remote campsites or along walking tracks.

Farmers and station owners sometimes also construct outhouses at remote but often used yards or sheds.

The Great Australian Dunny Race has become an icon during the Weerama Festival at Werribee.[2]

61
55 Reference- Corruption Index 2012-Transparency International
Updated: 14 Dec 2012
 

Corruption Perceptions Index 2012

Governments must prioritise the fight against corruption

Looking at the Corruption Perceptions Index 2012, it's clear that corruption is a major threat facing humanity. Corruption destroys lives and communities, and undermines countries and institutions.

It generates popular anger that threatens to further destabilise societies and exacerbate violent conflicts.

The Corruption Perceptions Index scores countries on a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).

While no country has a perfect score, two-thirds of countries score below 50, indicating a serious corruption problem.

Corruption translates into human suffering, with poor families being extorted for bribes to see doctors or to get access to clean drinking water.

It leads to failure in the delivery of basic services like education or healthcare. It derails the building of essential infrastructure, as corrupt leaders skim funds.

Corruption amounts to a dirty tax, and the poor and most vulnerable are its primary victims.

So, how do we counter the effects of public sector corruption?

Governments need to integrate anti-corruption actions into all aspects of decision-making. They must prioritise better rules on lobbying and political financing, make public spending and contracting more transparent, and make public bodies more accountable.

After a year with a global focus on corruption, we expected more governments to take a tougher stance against the abuse of power.

The Corruption Perceptions Index results demonstrate that there are still many societies and governments that need to give a much higher priority to this issue.

Full table and rankings

The Corruption Perceptions Index ranks countries and territories based on how corrupt their public sector is perceived to be. A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 - 100, where 0 means that a country is perceived as highly corrupt and 100 means it is perceived as very clean. A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries and territories included in the index. This year's index includes 176 countries and territories.

 
Rank
Country
Score
Surveys Used
CI: Lower
CI: Upper
 
Rank
Country
Score
Surveys Used
CI: Lower
CI: Upper
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
Denmark
90
7
87
93
 
1
Finland
90
7
85
95
 
1
New Zealand
90
7
87
94
 
4
Sweden
88
7
85
91
 
5
Singapore
87
9
83
90
 
6
Switzerland
86
6
81
90
 
7
Australia
85
8
83
86
 
7
Norway
85
7
82
87
 
9
Canada
84
7
80
87
 
9
Netherlands
84
7
81
88
 
11
Iceland
82
6
75
89
 
12
Luxembourg
80
6
75
85
 
13
Germany
79
8
75
83
 
14
Hong Kong
77
8
74
80
 
15
Barbados
76
3
65
87
 
16
Belgium
75
7
71
78
 
17
Japan
74
9
70
78
 
17
United Kingdom
74
8
72
77
 
19
United States
73
9
66
79
 
20
Chile
72
9
69
76
 
20
Uruguay
72
6
70
75
 
22
Bahamas
71
3
70
73
 
22
France
71
8
67
75
 
22
Saint Lucia
71
3
70
73
 
25
Austria
69
8
65
73
 
25
Ireland
69
6
64
75
 
27
Qatar
68
6
58
79
 
27
United Arab Emirates
68
7
61
75
 
29
Cyprus
66
4
63
70
 
30
Botswana
65
7
62
68
 
30
Spain
65
7
60
69
 
32
Estonia
64
8
59
69
 
33
Bhutan
63
3
57
69
 
33
Portugal
63
7
59
67
 
33
Puerto Rico
63
3
55
71
 
36
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
62
3
53
71
 
37
Slovenia
61
8
55
67
 
37
Taiwan
61
7
54
67
 
39
Cape Verde
60
4
54
67
 
39
Israel
60
5
55
64
 
41
Dominica
58
3
55
62
 
41
Poland
58
10
55
62
 
43
Malta
57
4
53
61
 
43
Mauritius
57
5
51
63
 
45
Korea (South)
56
10
52
60
 
46
Brunei
55
3
40
70
 
46
Hungary
55
10
49
61
 
48
Costa Rica
54
5
43
66
 
48
Lithuania
54
7
45
63
 
50
Rwanda
53
5
42
63
 
51
Georgia
52
6
42
62
 
51
Seychelles
52
4
38
65
 
53
Bahrain
51
5
44
58
 
54
Czech Republic
49
10
44
53
 
54
Latvia
49
6
42
55
 
54
Malaysia
49
9
44
55
 
54
Turkey
49
9
45
52
 
58
Cuba
48
4
41
55
 
58
Jordan
48
7
43
54
 
58
Namibia
48
6
42
54
 
61
Oman
47
5
35
60
 
62
Croatia
46
8
41
51
 
62
Slovakia
46
8
39
53
 
64
Ghana
45
9
39
51
 
64
Lesotho
45
5
38
53
 
66
Kuwait
44
5
37
50
 
66
Romania
44
8
38
50
 
66
Saudi Arabia
44
5
34
55
 
69
Brazil
43
8
38
49
 
69
FYR Macedonia
43
6
35
51
 
69
South Africa
43
9
39
48
 
72
Bosnia and Herzegovina
42
7
38
46
 
72
Italy
42
7
38
46
 
72
Sao Tome and Principe
42
3
34
50
 
75
Bulgaria
41
8
35
47
 
75
Liberia
41
7
35
47
 
75
Montenegro
41
4
34
49
 
75
Tunisia
41
7
36
45
 
79
Sri Lanka
40
7
38
42
 
80
China
39
9
34
43
 
80
Serbia
39
7
35
44
 
80
Trinidad and Tobago
39
4
32
47
 
83
Burkina Faso
38
7
31
45
 
83
El Salvador
38
6
33
43
 
83
Jamaica
38
6
35
42
 
83
Panama
38
6
33
44
 
83
Peru
38
7
35
42
 
88
Malawi
37
8
34
39
 
88
Morocco
37
8
32
43
 
88
Suriname
37
3
31
42
 
88
Swaziland
37
4
33
40
 
88
Thailand
37
8
34
40
 
88
Zambia
37
8
32
42
 
94
Benin
36
6
29
44
 
94
Colombia
36
7
32
40
 
94
Djibouti
36
3
22
50
 
94
Greece
36
7
30
42
 
94
India
36
10
33
40
 
94
Moldova
36
8
31
40
 
94
Mongolia
36
7
32
40
 
94
Senegal
36
9
33
39
 
102
Argentina
35
8
31
39
 
102
Gabon
35
5
32
38
 
102
Tanzania
35
8
31
38
 
105
Algeria
34
6
29
40
 
105
Armenia
34
6
29
38
 
105
Bolivia
34
7
28
40
 
105
Gambia
34
5
22
45
 
105
Kosovo
34
3
32
37
 
105
Mali
34
6
27
40
 
105
Mexico
34
9
31
37
 
105
Philippines
34
9
30
37
 
113
Albania
33
7
30
36
 
113
Ethiopia
33
8
30
36
 
113
Guatemala
33
6
28
37
 
113
Niger
33
5
28
38
 
113
Timor-Leste
33
3
23
42
 
118
Dominican Republic
32
6
28
37
 
118
Ecuador
32
6
28
37
 
118
Egypt
32
7
27
37
 
118
Indonesia
32
9
27
37
 
118
Madagascar
32
8
26
37
 
123
Belarus
31
5
25
37
 
123
Mauritania
31
5
25
36
 
123
Mozambique
31
7
29
34
 
123
Sierra Leone
31
8
28
34
 
123
Vietnam
31
8
27
35
 
128
Lebanon
30
6
27
34
 
128
Togo
30
5
24
35
 
130
Côte d´Ivoire
29
8
25
33
 
130
Nicaragua
29
7
26
32
 
130
Uganda
29
8
25
32
 
133
Comoros
28
3
15
40
 
133
Guyana
28
4
25
31
 
133
Honduras
28
6
24
32
 
133
Iran
28
6
20
35
 
133
Kazakhstan
28
8
21
35
 
133
Russia
28
9
25
32
 
139
Azerbaijan
27
6
23
31
 
139
Kenya
27
8
24
31
 
139
Nepal
27
5
23
31
 
139
Nigeria
27
9
22
31
 
139
Pakistan
27
8
23
31
 
144
Bangladesh
26
7
20
33
 
144
Cameroon
26
8
20
32
 
144
Central African Republic
26
4
22
30
 
144
Congo Republic
26
6
20
31
 
144
Syria
26
5
22
31
 
144
Ukraine
26
8
24
29
 
150
Eritrea
25
4
10
40
 
150
Guinea-Bissau
25
4
22
29
 
150
Papua New Guinea
25
5
18
32
 
150
Paraguay
25
5
20
29
 
154
Guinea
24
7
19
28
 
154
Kyrgyzstan
24
6
21
27
 
156
Yemen
23
6
20
27
 
157
Angola
22
7
20
25
 
157
Cambodia
22
7
17
27
 
157
Tajikistan
22
5
15
28
 
160
Democratic Republic of the Congo
21
5
16
27
 
160
Laos
21
3
19
23
 
160
Libya
21
6
14
27
 
163
Equatorial Guinea
20
3
18
22
 
163
Zimbabwe
20
8
12
27
 
165
Burundi
19
5
14
23
 
165
Chad
19
5
15
23
 
165
Haiti
19
5
14
23
 
165
Venezuela
19
7
15
22
 
169
Iraq
18
4
14
22
 
170
Turkmenistan
17
3
12
22
 
170
Uzbekistan
17
6
14
20
 
172
Myanmar
15
4
9
21
 
173
Sudan
13
6
8
17
 
174
Afghanistan
8
3
2
13
 
174
Korea (North)
8
3
2
13
 
174
Somalia
8
4
4
12
73
56 Reference-King Edward VII exposes scandalous lack of night cover by hospital managements
Updated: 12 Dec 2012

Nurse at centre of Kate Middleton phone call hoax tragedy left 'suicide note' to family

Jacintha Saldanha thought to have killed herself

after transferring a prank phone call from Australian radio DJs

John Hall  Tuesday

11 December 2012

The nurse at the centre of the royal hoax phone call scandal left a note for her family, it has been revealed.

Jacintha Saldanha is thought to have committed suicide after transferring a prank phone call from radio DJs to

the ward where the Duchess of Cambridge was being treated for acute morning sickness.

The 46-year-old was the senior duty nurse at the King Edward VII Hospital when two Australian radio presenters called pretending to be the Queen and Prince Charles.

The phone call was made at 5:30am last Tuesday,

before the hospital’s secretary had started work.

Mrs Saldanha’s family today demanded answers from the hospital over the circumstances that led to her death,

saying an internal inquiry is not enough.

Her husband Ben Barboza, 49, and their children Junal, 17 and Lisha, 14,  have demanded to “know everything”.

Labour MP Keith Vaz, who is representing the family, met the hospital’s chairman Lord Glenarthur to demand a full inquiry into her death.

The chairman of the Commons home affairs committee, said: “What the family need are the full facts.”

Mr Vaz added: “What the chairman of the hospital said to me was that there are inquiries going on in the hospital…That is not sufficient for the family.

There are unexplained circumstances. The family want to know everything.

All the facts, fully and clearly.”

He went on: “The hospital needs to be more proactive, a full inquiry is needed and the family need to be included in that.”

Mr Barboza, an NHS accountant, and his children live in Bristol, while Mrs Saldanha stayed in staff accommodation at the west London hospital.

Mr Vaz said: “They are a lovely close-knit family, a Catholic family, who will be spending their first Christmas without their mother, and for Ben, without his wife.”

He added: “They were in the dark about the hoax call. They hadn’t watched the news or seen anything about it. They didn’t know they were involved until after Jacintha’s death.”

Meanwhile, the radio station that employs the presenters that made the call came under increasing pressure explain why they gave the go-ahead.

Southern Cross Austereo, the company which owns 2Day FM, said it would be donating £320,000 to a memorial

fund set up in Mrs Saldanha’s name by King Edward VII Hospital, and added it has cancelled its Christmas party.

Rhys Holleran, Southern Cross Austereo’s chief executive, said: “We hope that by contributing to a memorial

fund we can help to provide the Saldanha family with the support they need at this very difficult time.”

The Duchess of Cambridge, who was discharged from hospital on Thursday is said to have suffered another bout of morning sickness since.

She will not be joining Prince William at The Hobbit premiere in Leicester Square tomorrow evening and will

“continue to rest privately”, a royal official said.

46
57 Reference-Census-Obsessed with Colour, Religion & Marriage, less with Inequality & Social Isolation
Updated: 12 Dec 2012

Less religious and more ethnically diverse:

Census reveals a picture of Britain today

From the number of people going to church, to the number of children in the average

household, a lot has changed in Britain since 2001.

Charlotte Philby gets behind the numbers of the latest survey

  Wednesday 12 December 2012 
 

Religion: Number of Christians down 12% in a decade

The number of people calling themselves Christian in the UK fell dramatically between 2001 and 2011.

Christianity was the only religion to see a drop-off in membership, with a 12% decrease during those 10 years.

The Methodist church described the results as “challenging but not discouraging” while the pioneering

Christian group Fresh Expressions said “The church in England and Wales needs to find new ways of

engaging those who no longer have, or never had any interest.”

The British Humanist Association spoke of a “significant cultural shift” in a society where “[r]eligious practice,

identity, belonging and belief are all in decline… and non-religious identities are on the rise”.

The number of people with no religion at all  in the UK has doubled since 2001.

Islam showed the biggest growth in the country with 1.2 million – 5% of the population – calling themselves

Muslims in 2011.

That is up 1.8% in the past decade.

Critics suggest this figure could be misleading, and in fact be a matter of more Muslims filling in the form properly.

Birth rates among the Islamic community are not out of proportion with the rate of population increase.

Marriage: For the first time in history, a majority are unmarried

For the first time ever, the majority of Britons were unmarried in 2011.

The percentage of married couples fell from 51 to 47%.

Reasons for the decline include women outliving men, leaving an increased population of widows, as well as a

greater number of younger couples choosing instead to cohabit.

As many as 35% of the population classed themselves as single at last count, that is an increase of 5% in 10 years.

Fractured communities and, ironically, the communications revolution, are among those reasons for more solo living.

Married, Civil partnered and one-person households accounted for 63% (14.8m) of all households.

Meanwhile

the number of us living in shared accommodation has grown.

In seven years since the Civil Partnership Act was introduced in 2004, the number of official same-sex unions

had reached 105,000 by 2011.

Ethnicity: Indians beat Irish as top migrant group while melting pot grows

India had replaced the Republic of Ireland as the biggest migrant community, with Pakistan retaining third position.

The success of immigrants including Rajesh Agrawal, 35, who arrived from India with £60, and is now a super-

rich entrepreneur has highlighted flaws in changes in the law in the past decade.

Had the immigration tick box system been in place when Agrawal came to the UK eight years ago, he wouldn’t have been allowed in.

Britain has proven an ever-warmer melting pot with 2.2% of the population in England and Wales calling

themselves mixed race - up from 1.27% in 2001.

According to the think tank British Future which produced ‘The Melting Pot Generation:

How Britain became more relaxed about race’, the true figure is far higher:

“Twice as many people have ethnically mixed parentage – but over half of them choose other census

categories, such as black or white”.

Wales had the largest proportion of people who listed their ethnic group as White in 2011,that was 96% of the population.

Compared to London where just 59% ticked White in 2011, and less than half of 8.2 million usual residents claimed to be White British.

At the same time, Londoners are more likely to consider themselves “British” rather than “English”, leading

commentators to report the dawning of a new cosmopolitan sense of ‘Britishness’ sweeping the Capital.

Population: There’s a lot more of us (and more of us were born elsewhere)

Of 56.1 million residents of England and Wales last year (that is 3.7m more than 10 years previously) some 7.5m

were born abroad –that is 3m more than the number reported in 2001.

Just under half of those had arrived in the past 10 years.

There are now 23.4 million households in the UK, with 2.4 residents per household.

The number of these that are mortgages has dropped while the number of renters – most acutely in London

where property prices were less affected by the property crisis – has risen in its place.

Census in numbers

14m people now consider themselves without a religion – up from 7.7m in 2001

The number of cars and vans in England and Wales rose to 23.9m

4.2m The number of people who work in the wholesale and retail sector – more than any other

Nearly 80% of people in England and Wales live in a whole house or bungalow,  rather than a flat or apartment

96% of Welsh people are white, compared with just 59% of Londoners

The number of people claiming Jedi Knights as a religion fell by 50% to 176,632

34
58 Reference-Census- Reduction in Marriages as Divorce Laws responsible for end of "traditional" family
Updated: 12 Dec 2012

Married couple households in minority for first time, 2011 census shows

Number of married people stays constant at 21.2 million

while number of single adults rises by three million compared with 2001

Randeep Ramesh, social affairs editor

The Guardian, Tuesday 11 December 2012 22.57 GMT 

Married and civilly partnered couples make up 47% of all households, according to the 2011 census.

The traditional family based around a married couple is now the preserve of a minority with the number of

single-adult households overtaking the number of couple households with dependent children, the census shows.

Figures from the official count show that married and civilly partnered couples, for the first time, now make up

under half (47%) of all households – down from 50.9% in 2001. In the decade to 2011, the number of married

people stayed constant at 21.2m but the number of single adults rose by more than 3m to 15.7m.

In the same period, the number of lone parents rose by 400,000 and the number of people who had been

divorced or had a partnership dissolved rose by 600,000.

With the census recording 105,000 civil partnerships, a status for gay people which only arrived in 2005, families

in Britain appear composed of an ever-broadening mix of relationships, despite the political furore over gay

marriage.

Most notable has been a dramatic rise in one-person households – with more than 500,000 created in the ecade covered by the census.

By contrast the number of households with married or civilly partnered couples dropped by more than 150,000 to 7.5m.

There were almost 4m working-age single person households, so-called singletons, in England – 600,000 more than there were married couples with dependent children.

The percentage of married people fell by between four and six percentage points in Wales and all England

regions except London, where it dropped by two percentage points.

In the capital less than a third of people in inner London were married, while in the outer boroughs levels of

wedlock were closer to the national average.

Large urban centres such as Manchester and Liverpool also had low levels of marriage.

In other smaller cities such as Oxford and Exeter, this reluctance to wed might be explained by large student populations.

Evidence suggests marriage has become much more selective.

This year the leftwing Institute for Public Policy Research warned that "in the postwar period of rising social

mobility, men and women were more likely to marry across class lines than they do today".

The thinktank said the result of people picking a partner similar to themselves is to concentrate "wealth and poverty".

For other experts the issue was not the makeup of marriages but the lack of them.

Samantha Callan, family policy expert at the Centre for Social Justice, warned that "our social trends are

heading in a direction that is contrary to the stability children need to thrive.

Evidence from the 2001 census

shows only 3% of all couples who are still intact by the time a child is 15 are unmarried."

She argued that the government should consider recognising that marriage confers benefits – before the last

election the Conservatives planned tax breaks for married couples.

"There are obvious exceptions but marriage tends to be associated with the durable relationships children need

to thrive.

This is true regardless of social class or education."

326
59 Reference-UK Immigrants - We are all in it together !
Updated: 12 Dec 2012

Census: almost one in eight people in England and Wales born abroad

Immigrant population increased by 2.9 million in decade to 2011,

as picture emerges of 'greater diversity and of change'

Robert Booth
guardian.co.uk,

Tuesday 11 December 2012 13.07 GMT  

According to the census, the number of people in England and Wales who describe themselves as Christian has fallen by 4.1 million, or 12%, while the number of Muslims is up from 1.55 million to 2.7 million.

The immigrant population of England and Wales increased by 2.9m in the decade to 2011, bringing the number of people born abroad close to one in eight, according to census results.

The census also revealed a fall of more than 4 million in the number of people who describe themselves as Christians.

India, Poland and Pakistan were the top three countries from where foreign-born people had arrived since 2001, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.

The biggest rise was from Poland.

Poland showed the largest percentage increase in the top 10 countries of birth, with a nine-fold increase over the last decade following its accession to the European Union in 2004.

Around half of the residents of England and Wales who were born outside the UK last arrived in the UK between 2001 and 2011.

The largest increase in non-UK born population was in London, where over a third of residents were born abroad and almost a quarter were not British nationals.

However the ONS's use of the term 'foreign-born' does not give a full picture of the changing nature of British citizenship, as it counts people born abroad who have been here for more than 12 months as foreigners for the rest of their lives.

About 60% of foreign-born residents become British citizens within five years of arrival.

The figure also includes an estimated 300,000 overseas students as well as a significant minority of Britons who

were born overseas, including around 250,000 children who were born when their parents were serving abroad in the armed forces.

People who identified themselves as Muslim in 2011 numbered 2.7 million, up from 1.55 million in 2001.

Muslims now make up 5% of the population, compared with 3% in 2001.

The change came as the number of Christians of all denominations fell 12% – a drop of 4.1 million.

The London borough of Tower Hamlets was the least Christian, while Knowsley, Merseyside, was the most.

There was a sharp rise in the number of people who said they were not religious, with 14 million putting

themselves in that category, up 6.4 million over the decade.

The student enclaves of Brighton and Norwich had the highest proportion of non-believers, with more than 40%

of residents saying they had no religious affiliation of any kind.

"Today we are painting a picture of our society, where we are born, our ethnicity, our religion, our health and

much, much more," said Guy Goodwin, census director at the ONS.

"The release is giving a picture of big change since 2011 and a population that is increasingly diverse."

The overall population of England and Wales when the census was taken on 27 March 2011 was 56.1 million, an

increase of 3.7 million (7%) since 2001.

Of that growth, 55% was due to migration, the rest was due to more births than deaths, the ONS said.

"What is your main language?" was a new question for 2011. In 91% of households everyone spoke English,

while in 1% of households no adult spoke English but at least one child did.

In 4% of households no one spoke English as the main language.

Mixed-ethnicity Britain is a growing trend.

Two million households, or 12%, in England and Wales said they had members who were of different ethnic

groups, three percentage points more than in 2001.

On housing, the proportion of mortgage holders was down six percentage points, while the proportion owning

outright was up two percentage points.

This may be down to the ageing population.

The number of people renting privately went up from 9% in 2001 to 15% in 2011.

43
60 Reference- Hugo Chavez returns to Havana for surgery on his Malignant Cancer
Updated: 10 Dec 2012
I must return to Cuba for further treatment: Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez attends a meeting at the presidential palace in Caracas, December 8, 2012.

 
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez attends a meeting at the presidential palace in Caracas, December 8, 2012.
 
Sun Dec 9, 2012 7:59AM GMT
 
 

It is absolutely necessary, absolutely essential, that I have to undergo a new surgical intervention.”

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez says his cancer has returned and he needs to return to Cuba immediately for further treatment.


Chavez said he would go back to Cuba on Sunday to undergo surgery due to the discovery of new cancer cells during his Cuba trip last week.

The announcement of departure for Havana comes on the heels of his Friday return from Cuba following ten days of treatment in the country.

“I need to, I must return to Havana tomorrow in order to confront this new battle,” Chavez said at the Miraflores presidential palace.

“Unfortunately, during these exhaustive exams they found some malignant cells in the same area.
It is absolutely necessary, absolutely essential, that I have to undergo a new surgical intervention.”

The Venezuelan president called on his supporters to vote for Vice President Nicolas Maduro in the event his
 
health failed or anything happened to him.

Chavez flew back to Cuba on the night of November 27 to undergo several sessions of hyperbaric oxygenation,
 
which is typically employed to lessen the decay of bones because of radiation therapy.

The 58-year-old has been fighting with cancer in the pelvic area.
 
He began the treatment in Cuba following a tumor removal in March 2011.

The final round of Chavez’s radiation treatment in Cuba was in April and he declared himself free of cancer in May.
79
61 Reference-Republic - Every child should have the chance ...
Updated: 09 Dec 2012
Every child should have the chance to be head of state
 
REPUBLIC

Like thousands of other parents-to-be across the country, Kate and William must be thrilled – but their news just

highlights the absurdity of hereditary office and focuses minds on what kind of future we want for Britain.

People are rightly asking: “Why doesn’t every child have the chance to be head of state?”

That’s why they’ve been signing up in droves over the last 24 hours, making donations and becoming members.

By contrast, as the media frenzy continues, the public reaction to the announcement has generally been one of

indifference.

A royal baby is great news for the republican movement as it raises serious questions about the future of the

monarchy, ones the royal family would rather avoid:

  • The next generation of royals will serve as a constant reminder of the nonsense of hereditary public office.
  • In 2013 we will be told who our head of state will be in 2063 and beyond.
  • From day one this baby will have their religion, career and whole life mapped out, pre-determined and scrutinised.
  • A young heir raises the absurd possibility of a child head of state.

We want a Britain where every child has the right to seek the highest job in the country.

That’s why Republic will be working hard over the coming months to challenge the succession, take on the most

common myths and build support across the country.

And that’s why we’re asking for your support today by joining or encouraging friends and family to join Republic,

or by making a donation to our fighting funds.

Remember, the more the royals are in the media the more people start actively thinking about the issue.

And the more opportunities we get to challenge the whole institution. 

But Republic needs your support to make our voices louder and stronger than ever before.

Supporters can join Republic via the website at www.republic.org.uk/join.

You can donate also via the website at www.republic.org.uk/donate.

Posted on: 04 Dec 2012
37
62 Reference- Cover Up Over Lack of Security at King Edward VII Hospital ?
Updated: 09 Dec 2012

" People like to have someone to blame.

But demands for their sacking, and even for charges to be laid, are ridiculous.

Greig and Christian engaged in a run-of-the-mill FM radio prank so far fetched as to be ludicrous.

The hospital staff who fell for it did so, no doubt, in a panic.

It was clear there were no protocols in place.

No recognition that the hospital housing the pregnant Duchess of Cambridge

was likely to be the target of many many calls of inquiry.

No simple set of instructions issued to direct all calls about her to a palace staff member.

No reassurance that if indeed the Queen did want information about the mother of her future great-grandchild

she wouldn’t be ringing the hospital switch".

 

Australian News

74
63 Reference-King Edward VII's Team-Who failed to protect the Nursing staff- Whose head should role ?
Updated: 08 Dec 2012

Meet The Team
 
King Edward VII's Hospital Sister Agnes Senior Management Team

 

John Lofthouse - Chief Executive
 
After completing his Bachelor's Degree at Sheffield University, John joined the Graduate NHS Management Training scheme and worked in several London NHS teaching hospitals for 10 years before joining the private hospital sector where he has since remained. He spent 19 years managing hospitals in Nottingham, Manchester and then Sheffield for BMI Healthcare. He opened and managed the Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre prior to taking up his post at King Edward VII's Hospital Sister Agnes in 2009. John has an MBA in Executive Management.

Caroline Cassels - Matron
 
Matron joined the Hospital in 1984 as a Staff Nurse. Dedication and hard work saw her promoted to a Ward Sister, and then in 1994 to the position of Matron. Matron plays an integral part in the running and efficiency of the Hospital. Her role involves staff support, patient and relative support, overseeing Hospital policies and procedures amongst many other things. In 2004, she was awarded the MVO, official recognition of her commitment and hard work. Matron joined the Senior Management Team in 1994.

Hazel Borthwick - Director of Human Resources
 
Hazel completed her nurse training in 1984 at St Thomas' Hospital after which she worked as an Anaesthetic Nurse at Kings College Hospital. She then set-up and lectured on the Anaesthetic Nursing Course at the University of Greenwich. She joined the Hospital in 1997 as a Senior Nurse in Matron's Office originally as Nurse Resource Manager and later become the Clinical Personnel & Records Manager. Hazel is now the Director of Human Resources at the Hospital and has been a member of the Senior Management Team since 2009. Hazel is a Chartered Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Jeff Hoad - Facilities Manager
 
Jeff trained as a chef in the NHS. He worked at the Lister Hospital in Stevenage as Head Chef and later worked at Contract Caterers for seven years learning a number of management skills at a variety of restaurants and organisations. He joined the Hospital in 1987 as Catering Manager and was later promoted to Hotel Services Manager. He has been a member of the Senior Management team since 2009.

Julie Watts - Theatre Manager
 
Julie qualified as a nurse in 1987 and worked in general medicine and cardiac care before moving into community nursing. She then took an NHS staff nurse role in day surgery and endoscopy from where she became interested in theatre nursing. She then became Team Leader for a split site service where she was responsible for the management of 4 day surgery theatres and 2 recovery units. She also led a team in setting up a new day surgery unit. Later she became the Registered Practice Manager with day-to-day operational responsibility for all clinical, technical and operational activities. She joined the Hospital as Theatre Manager in 2008 and was promoted to the Senior Management Team in 2009.

Cathy Simonson - Director of Finance
 
Cathy spent 10 years at GlaxoWellcome in Financial Accounting and subsequently financially supporting the tablet manufacturing and packaging division and then the Quality division across the UK. She then moved into private healthcare where she gained 7 years experience with Capio, Nuffield Health and the Guildford Clinic - a start up JV. Cathy has been an integral part of each Management team working both strategically and operationally to deliver each hospital's objectives. Cathy is highly experienced in building teams with high values ensuring a KPI and process driven focus as well as building and maintaining professional working relationships with both internal and external stakeholders. Cathy's experience with the Guildford Clinic as their FC has consolidated previous experience and added the nuances of a start up organisation encompassing both local and corporate driven activities which has provided sound grounding for her move to KEVII as Director of Finance.

Anne Jenkins - Quality and Risk Manager
 
Anne joined the Hospital 26 years ago as a Staff Nurse rising to the rank of Deputy Sister and Ward Sister before taking on the role of Clinical Nurse Manager in January 1996. Over the last 14 years her responsibilities have expanded and now she also holds the role of Quality and Risk Manager for the Hospital. She acts as Deputy Matron and assists Matron in the recruitment and development of nurses, continually improving standards in order to maintain the Hospital's accreditation and registration status. She is responsible for all areas of Health and Safety, Infection Control and Clinical Risk, manages the training programme for staff and ensures the highest standards of quality care and professionalism are always maintained. Anne became a member of the Senior Management Team in 1996.

Joe Vincent - Marketing
 
Joe studied Biological Sciences at Durham University before spending six years in the financial services sector at Robert Fleming and Cazenove. In 2003, he moved into the private healthcare sector joining Medicsight as Sales and Marketing Director promoting pre-emptive CT-scans to GPs and hospital Consultants. He joined the Cromwell Hospital in 2005 where he was the Marketing Manager for 4 years before moving to King Edward VII's Hospital in 2009. He is responsible for all marketing and fundraising activity at the Hospital and was appointed to the Senior Management Team in 2010.

David Fudge - Chief Information Officer
 
David's early career was spent in the defence industry, as an engineer and later a Project Manager at Frazer-Nash Defence Systems. In 1993 he moved to a technology company as an IT Project Manager implementing innovative IT solutions for clients. David has worked in the Healthcare sector since 2001, initially responsible for the implementation of a smart card system across the NHS for junior doctors; in 2004 he moved to Ramsay Healthcare (formerly Capio) where he was responsible for the groups IT infrastructure. In 2006 David joined MedTel as Director of IT, later acquired by the UME group. At UME, David assumed IT responsibility for the Diagnostic Imaging business and worked both in the UK and across the Middle East. David has a wealth of experience in IT and has worked in the US, Middle East and other European countries. David joined King Edward VII's Hospital in March 2011 as Chief Information Officer

194
64 Reference- Nurses job description now includes Hospital Receptionist and Royal Security Officer?
Updated: 08 Dec 2012
Hospital receptionist in UK royal prank call case found dead

alt

 
 
 
Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:9PM GMT
 
The fun surrounding a prank call to the hospital where the pregnant Duchess of Cambridge was receiving
 
medical treatment turned to a tragedy after the hospital receptionist who received the call was found dead near King Edward VII hospital.


The unnamed woman had forwarded the prank call from an Australian Radio station through to Kate Middleton’s nurse.
 
She was found unconscious at an address near King Edward VII hospital, but emergency services failed to revive her in a scenario similar to a suspected suicide.

Two Australian radio presenters, Mel Greig and Michael Christian, made fool of the hospital receptionist as they impersonated the voices of the British Queen and Prince Charles, and rang the hospital from 2Day FM.

The receptionist answered the call from the radio presenters while the Duchess was being treated for acute morning sickness at the hospital.
 
She transferred them to a nurse who, despite the pair’s poor accents and impersonation, provided updates and information about the Duchess’ condition.
 
Since then, the hospital came under fire for poor security and breach of patient confidentiality - more so, of course, given who that patient was.

Thinking it was really the British Queen and Prince Charles on the phone, the nurse told the radio hosts that the Duchess was "sleeping at the moment and she has had an uneventful night, she's been given some fluid to re-hydrate her... she's stable at the moment.”

The prank went on for several minutes as the hosts then inquired about Kate's husband, Prince William, who they referred to as “Wills”, an informal nickname for William.

The hosts later commented on their hoax, "We were very surprised that our call was put through, we thought we'd be hung up on as soon as they heard our terrible accents," according to media reports
88
65 Breaking "Hoaxing Joking or Hacking" ?- Nurse commits suicide "not suspicious" say Police- hmmm !
Updated: 07 Dec 2012

Royal baby hoax: Woman found dead

A member of staff who was working at the hospital which treated the Duchess of Cambridge when telephone

hoaxers struck earlier this week has been found dead, according to reports.

Two Australian radio DJs impersonated the Queen and the Prince of Wales to dupe staff into giving a condition

update on Kate, who was suffering severe morning sickness at the private King Edward VII Hospital in central London.

The member of staff was found at an address near the hospital.

A Scotland Yard spokesman said: "Police were called at approximately 9.35am this morning to a report of a

woman found unconscious at an address in Weymouth Street, W1.

"London Ambulance Service attended and the woman was pronounced dead at the scene.

Inquiries are continuing to establish the circumstances of the incident.

"The death is not being treated as suspicious at this stage."

80
66 Reference- Be a Casanova -Get your Oats with a Cup of Cocoa
Updated: 04 Dec 2012

Reference- Be a Casanova -Get your Oats with a Cup of Cocoa

Be a Cocoa Casanova:

Sweeten up your love life with a taste of 'Viagra chocolate'

• A chocolate with Viagra-like properties is to be introduced

• Chocolate giant Barry Callebaut is said to be weeks from having it approved

• 'Turbo charged' chocolate claims to boosts health by increasing blood flow

By Fiona Macrae

UPDATED: 01:43, 1 December 2012 
 
A mug of hot chocolate before bed is not usually seen as a prelude to an evening of whirlwind passion.

That may be about to change, though, with the introduction  of a ‘turbo-charged’ type of chocolate said to have Viagra-like properties.

The world’s largest chocolate-maker has developed a technique to concentrate levels of key plant chemicals called flavanols.
 
These are found in cocoa beans but are normally stripped out in the chocolate-making process.

Swiss-based chocolate giant Barry Callebaut is said to be just weeks away from getting the go-ahead from the EU to claim the ‘turbo-charged’ chocolate boosts health by increasing blood flow. 
 
Industry experts say it will then be only a matter of time before it is incorporated into novelty chocolates, pastes and drinks that, like Viagra, use a rush of blood to stop a man from being a flop in the bedroom.
 
Chocolate giant Barry Callebaut is said to be just weeks away from getting the chocolate approved which boosts health by increasing blood flow

The flood of feel-good hormones to the brain would be an added bonus, the International Chocolate Industry Network event heard this week.

Angus Kennedy, of trade magazine Kennedy’s Confection, said: ‘If it is cleared for use, this could see men swap chemical-packed blue pills for a turbo-charged hot chocolate.

‘It’s an all-natural ingredient which could give men the legendary staying power of some of the world’s greatest lovers. I’ve been in the business for 35 years and this is probably one of the most exciting things I’ve seen.’

Men who buy the ‘natural Viagra’ will be in good company.

Aztec ruler Montezuma is said to have downed 50 cups of a chocolate drink before visiting his harem.

Venetian arch-seducer Casanova also partook of chocolate.

Although most people have never heard of it, one in five chunks of chocolate that pass your lips is likely to have been made by Barry Callebaut.

The firm helps supply many household names including Cadbury’s, as well as caterers and chefs, and has British factories in Chester, Banbury and St Helens.

Recent research from trends analysis firm Mintel reveals men are catching up with women when it comes to munching the sweet treat, as 87 per cent of men now eat chocolate, compared with 91 per cent of women.

THE FOOD OF PASSION

Cocoa and chocolate have historically been said to increase sexual desire and improve sexual pleasure.
 
Ancient South American civilisations prized the beans in cocoa pods so much for their medicinal and aphrodisiacal properties, they even used them as currency.

This is because cocoa beans contain high levels of flavanols and an amino acid called phenylalamine, which increase the levels of endorphins and serotonin in the brain.

These chemicals occur naturally and are released by the brain into the nervous system during happy situations and feelings of love, passion and lust.

This causes a rapid mood change, a rise in blood pressure, an increase in  heart rate, and induces those feelings of well-being that are usually associated with being in love.

Chocolate is also known to give an instant energy boost and increase stamina, which explains why it has a reputation as an aphrodisiac.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2241252/Be-Cocoa-Casanova-Sweeten-love-life-taste-Viagra-chocolate.html#ixzz2Draqi200

274
67 Reference- Hugo flies into Havana for health care
Updated: 04 Dec 2012

C U B A

Havana.  November 28, 2012

 

Chávez in Havana

HUGO Chávez Frías, President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, flew into Havana in the early hours of this morning, November 28.

The President is to continue the medical treatment he is receiving as part of building up his health, which involves a number of sessions of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy.

60
68 Reference-1000 AD or 2012 AD-A Slave to the Free Market -a kind of "property" unfree and uncounted ?
Updated: 01 Dec 2012

Is this 1000 AD or 2012 AD ?

 

The Ruling Classes attitude toward the Working Classes remain's more or less unchanged.

 

A man without land was neither free nor unfree, he did not count.
 
(He might of course be a slave, but then he would be a kind of property rather than a person.)

236
69 Reference- So you think you are smart Mr Cameron ?
Updated: 29 Nov 2012

Think U are smart???
 
 New Senior School Final Exam,

you only need 4 correct out of 10 questions to pass.

(Passing requires only 4 correct answers) - no cheating

1) How long did the Hundred Years' War last?

2) Which country makes Panama hats?

3) From which animal do we get cat gut?

4) In which month do Russians celebrate the October Revolution?

5) What is a camel's hair brush made of?

6) The Canary Islands in the Pacific are named after what animal?

7) What was King George VI's first name?

8) What colour is a purple finch?

9) Where are Chinese gooseberries from?

10) What is the colour of the black box in a commercial airplane?

 

Remember, you need only 4 correct answers to pass.

Check your

  answers below

  ....
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


ANSWERS TO

  THE QUIZ

1) How long did the Hundred Years War last? 

116 years 

 
2) Which country makes Panama hats?  

  Ecuador 

 
3) From which animal do we get cat gut? 

Sheep and Horses

4) In which month do Russians celebrate the October Revolution?

November

5) What is a camel's hair brush made of? 

Squirrel fur 

 
6) The Canary Islands in the Pacific are named after what animal? 

Dogs

7) What was King George VI's first name? 

Albert

8) What colour is a purple finch? 

Crimson

9) Where are Chinese gooseberries from?  

New Zealand

10) What is the colour of the black box in a commercial airplane?

Orange (of course)
 
What do you

  mean, you failed?

96
70 Reference- Clegg- Personal Power before Party- The Poison of Parliamentarians ?
Updated: 28 Nov 2012

The View from 22 —

Nick Clegg’s martyrdom, the personal statement scam and being sacked by David Cameron

Sebastian Payne 20 September 2012 9:21

Nick Clegg: the coalition's own martyr.

Will Nick Clegg’s political career come to a crashing end in tandem with the end of the coalition?

In this week’s magazine, James Forsyth examines how the Lib Dem leader has put the coalition cause ahead of both his party and own political career.

On the latest View from 22 podcast, James examines the Lib Dem’s strategy shift back to making the coalition work:

‘I think this will be the last Lib Dem conference in which Nick Clegg receives a relatively warm reception. I think even the critics in his party know it’s far too early to change leader.

Nick Clegg has decided to double down on coalition.

Just this Monday, he was at Chequers with Danny Alexander and David Laws, hammering out what is essentially a second coalition agreement with David Cameron and George Osborne.

‘Clegg has decided the best strategy for the Lib Dems is to actually deliver in government, not to do this

differentiation strategy they’ve been attempting for the last year or so — constantly boasting what they’ve stopped the Tories from doing.

Instead they’ve decided to come together with the government to create maximalist solutions to solve their problems.’

Isabel Hardman also discusses our anonymous report from a recently sacked minister of what it is liked to be given the boot by the Prime Minister.

In particular, James discusses how some of the appointments have widened divides within the Tory party,

highlighted by the promotion of Hugo Swire:

‘His promotion [Swire] has really rankled some people in Tory circles because he was number two at the Northern

Ireland Office and largely given that job because he backed Cameron for the leadership in 2005.

He’s another old Etonian.

The Swire family and Cameron family go on holiday together and he’s now been made a Minister of State at the Foreign Office.

‘This has accelerated class war inside the Tory party – the idea that there is a circle of friends of Dave, who are always all right in the end.

I think this Minister is writing from the perspective of someone who’s never been a friend of Dave or George.

He feels he’s been cast out in the cold for it and it’s very telling at the end, when he says the one benefit of being

sacked is that it might save his own marriage and family.

But he realises he’s never been part of Dave’s family, which shows the bitterness and upset caused by this.’

70
71 Reference- Declining a British Honour is an honour in itself !
Updated: 22 Nov 2012

Declining a British honour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Radical says- And here is for all those, the unsung, except in the eyes of their fellow man, whom the "Establishment" would not even offer an award to, because of their revulsion at the outdated "System"

The following is a partial list of people who have declined a British honour, such as a knighthood or another grade of honour.

In recent times most refusals have been for appointment to the Order of the British Empire.[1]

In most cases, the offer of an honour was rejected privately; others were rejected publicly, or accepted and then returned later, as with John Lennon and Rabindranath Tagore.

Nowadays potential recipients are contacted by Downing Street, well before any public announcement is made, to confirm in writing whether they wish to be put forward for an honour.

Therefore those who now decline an honour, when it is announced, normally will have indicated acceptance beforehand, but not always (e.g. Keith Hill).

Some who reject state honours do so because they are republicans who do not believe in a monarchical system or do not want to be associated with the former British Empire.

Some believe that the honours system both reflects and reinforces social class distinctions, and diminishes the chance of a more equal and fairer society.

Some potential recipients have rejected one honour then accepted another one (such as Sir Alfred Hitchcock[2]), or have initially refused an honour then accepted it, or have accepted one honour then declined another (such as actors Robert Morley and Vanessa Redgrave[3]), or refused in the hope of another (Roald Dahl refused being decorated as Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE),[2] allegedly because he wanted a knighthood so that his wife would be Lady Dahl).[citation needed]

Some people have actively solicited the government for honours, e.g. William Golding,[citation needed] the novelist, for a knighthood, and many politicians for peerages.

Wealthy business donors have contributed to the political parties in the hope of receiving honours such as KBE's and life peerages, often successfully.

This has further undermined the coherence or morality of the honours system.

Sometimes a potential recipient will refuse a knighthood or peerage, but will accept an honour that does not bestow a title (or Precedence), such as the Order of Merit (OM) or the Order of the Companions of Honour (CH): Bertrand Russell, Paul Scofield, Doris Lessing, Harold Pinter (although Pinter's widow, Lady Antonia Fraser, was later appointed a DBE),[4] David Hockney, Ralph Vaughan Williams, Augustus John, Francis Crick and Paul Dirac are examples of this list category.

Some, like the artist Francis Bacon, have refused all honours whether titles or the OM or CH, allegedly on the grounds they "were so ageing". The record for refusing the most state honours is held by the artist L.S. Lowry.
A few people have rejected the offer of a life peerage because of opposition to an unelected House of Lords.
Many modern examples were identified in December 2003 when a confidential document containing over 300 names of such people was leaked to The Sunday Times.[5]
• 
Honours declined

Kingdom

• In 1657, Oliver Cromwell, already Head of State and Head of Government, was offered the crown by Parliament as part of a revised constitutional settlement; he had been "instrumental" in abolishing the monarchy. Cromwell agonised for six weeks over the offer. In a speech on 13 April 1657, he gave his opinion that the office of monarch, once abolished, should stay so: "I would not seek to set up that which Providence hath destroyed and laid in the dust, and I would not build Jericho again".[6]

Dukedom

• Sir Winston Churchill, KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, PC (Can), FRS, statesman and Prime Minister, was offered the Dukedom of London, but declined in order to remain in the House of Commons, and to allow his son Randolph a political career; Randolph died only three years after his father, so the dukedom would have had little time to affect his career as he had already been out of the Commons for ten years
• Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield, KG, PC, FRS, statesman and Prime Minister (in 1880; had previously accepted the Earldom of Beaconsfield)[7]
• Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, 3rd Marquess of Lansdowne, KG, PC, FRS, statesman (1857)
• Robert Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury, KG, GCVO, PC, statesman and Prime Minister in 1886[8] and 1892[citation needed] and possibly in 1901[9] - citing the prohibitive cost of the lifestyle that dukes were expected to maintain[citation needed]. According to Scribner's Magazine in 1900, "It is true that the Marquis of Salisbury might have been a Duke if he had not regarded his marquisate as a prouder title than a new dukedom could furnish."[10]

Marquessate

• Sir Alexander Cambridge, GCB, GCVO, CMG, DSO, formerly Prince Alexander of Teck (in 1917 accepted the Earldom of Athlone instead)
• Henry Lascelles, 5th Earl of Harewood, GCVO (in 1922, as he thought marquessates tended to die out more quickly than earldoms)
• John Spencer, 5th Earl Spencer, KG, PC, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland (in the 1890s).

Earldom

• Henry Addington, 1st Viscount Sidmouth, PC outgoing Prime Minister (declined the Earldom of Banbury in 1804 as he wished to remain in the Commons; later accepted the viscountcy of Sidmouth)
• Arthur Balfour, former Prime Minister (in 1919,[11] accepted the Earldom of Balfour in 1922)
• R. A. Butler, KG, CH, PC, Conservative politician (in 1964; accepted life peerage as Baron Butler of Saffron Walden in 1965)
• Henry Carey, 1st Baron Hunsdon (declined the Earldom of Wiltshire on his death bed in 1596, possibly out of delicacy to his Boleyn family members who had been tragically associated with it)
• Neville Chamberlain, after his retirement as Prime Minister in 1940 (also declined appointment as KG, October 1940)
• Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville, PC, statesman (in 1809)
• Sir Anthony Eden, KG, MC, PC (on his retirement as Prime Minister in 1957; later accepted the Earldom of Avon in 1961)
• William Ewart Gladstone, Prime Minister (in 1885)
• William Legge, had also declined a knighthood; his son was created Baron Dartmouth instead
• Harold Macmillan, OM, PC, statesman and Prime Minister (in 1963; later accepted the Earldom of Stockton in 1984)
• Sir Angus Ogilvy, KCVO, PC (in 1963 on his marriage to Princess Alexandra of Kent)
• R. H. Tawney, economic historian and ethical socialist. Twice declined in 1920s and 1940s. Replied to Ramsay MacDonald's offer by asking what harm he had ever done the Labour Party, and to the offer from Attlee surprise that Labour was still interested in such baubles. (R.H Tawney and his Times [1974])
 

Viscountcy

• Charles Booth, disenchanted with politics, declined Gladstone's overtures; created a Privy Councillor by Balfour in 1904
• Benjamin Disraeli, KG, PC, FRS, outgoing Prime Minister (in 1868; the title was instead conferred on his wife; he later did accept the Earldom of Beaconsfield)
• Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig, KT, GCB, OM, GCVO, KCIE, First World War commander, until the Government had made what he felt was sufficient provision for returned Great War veterans (later became the Earl Haig).
• John Henry Whitley, retiring Speaker of the House of Commons (in 1928).
[edit] Barony
• George Macaulay Booth, Director of the Bank of England, refused Lloyd George's offer.
• Leonard Elmhirst, Philanthropist, agriculturalist and educationist, refused Clem Attlee's offer in 1946 replying "My own work, however, as you know, has lain in the main among country people ... in India, the USA and in Devonshire ... acceptance would neither be easy for me to explain nor easy for my friends to comprehend".[12]
• Sir Edward Heath, KG, MBE, PC, preferred to retain his seat as an MP in the House of Commons and his contempt for the House of Lords
• Lord Louis Mountbatten, GCVO, KCB, DSO (in 1946, as he thought it was too low a grade; accepted the viscountcy of Mountbatten of Burma instead; later accepted the Earldom of Mountbatten of Burma)
 

Life peerage (barony)

• Sir Isaiah Berlin, OM, philosopher (in 1980)[2]
• Albert Booth, Labour MP and Cabinet Minister 1974-79, declined peerage on democratic and socialist grounds.
• John Cleese, actor/comedian (in 1999; he "did not wish to spend winters in England"; had previously declined appointment as CBE in 1996)[13]
• Edward Heath, former Prime Minister
• Michael Foot, leader, Labour Party,
• James Griffiths, Secretary of State for Wales 1964-70 refused a peerage on democratic and socialist grounds
• Sir Alan Haselhurst, MP, after being Chairman of Ways and Means, thus continuing his political career in the House of Commons.
• Sir John Major, KG, CH, outgoing Prime Minister (in 2001 as he thought a seat in the Lords was incompatible with retiring from politics; later accepted appointment as KG)[14]
• Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, in 2009, outgoing RC Archbishop of Westminster, on advice from the Vatican
• J. B. Priestley, declined in 1965.[15]

As a part of the House of Lords reform in 1999, relevant members of the Royal Family were offered Life Peerages, which would have given them the automatic right to sit in the House of Lords, so all were declined.[16] They included:
• Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh KG KT OM GBE AC QSO CD PC
• Charles, Prince of Wales
• Prince Andrew, Duke of York
• Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex
• Prince Edward, Duke of Kent
[edit] Baronetcy
• Charles Babbage, FRS, scientist, declined both a knighthood and baronetcy.[17]
• John Grubb Richardson,[18] Irish Quaker industrialist, declined due to his firm belief in equality.
• Sir Edwin Plowden, KCB, KBE (later created a Life Peer (1959)).
 

Knighthood

• T. S. Ashton, economic historian, Professor of Economic History, University of London, 1957 New Year Honours[19]
• Frank Auerbach, artist (in 2003)[3]
• Norman H. Baynes, historian, Professor of Byzantine History, University of London, 1951 Birthday Honours[19]
• Alan Bennett, playwright (in 1996; had previously declined appointment as CBE in 1988)[2]
• Arnold Bennett, novelist
• David Bowie, musician (in 2003)[20]
• Lester Brain, aviator and airline executive (in late 1960s; later accepted appointment as an Officer of the Order of Australia in 1979)[21]
• Francis Crick, physicist and Nobel Prize winner
• George Davies,fashion retailer
• Paul Dirac, Nobel Prize winner for physics in 1933, declined a knighthood in 1953 but accepted the OM in 1973.,[22][23]
• Lionel Elvin, Principal, Ruskin College Oxford, Director of Institute of Education, University of London.
• Michael Faraday, scientist
• Harry Ferguson, businessman, engineer and inventor from Ulster
• Albert Finney, actor (in 2000, had previously declined appointment as CBE in 1980)[2]
• E. M. Forster, author and essayist (in 1949)[24]
• Michael Frayn, novelist and dramatist (in 2003; had previously declined appointment as CBE in 1989)[2]
• John Galsworthy, playwright and novelist
• Graham Greene, novelist
• Calouste Gulbenkian, philanthropist, Hon KBE, 1951 New Year Honours
• Stanford G. Haughton, sound recordist (musician), 1952 New Year Honours
• Stephen Hawking, scientist[25]
• Patrick Heron, artist, declined award of Knight Bachelor 1980s in protest at government policy on Art education.
• Alistair Hetherington, newspaper editor
• Keith Hill, Labour MP (2010 Dissolution Honours)[26]
• David Hockney, CH, RA, artist (in 1990; accepted appointment as CH in 1997, and OM in 2012)[2]
• Charles Holden, architect, declined twice, in 1944 and 1951.[27]
• Trevor Howard, stage/film actor (in 1982)[2]
• Aldous Huxley, author (in 1959)[2]
• Rudyard Kipling, author
• Essington Lewis, Australian mining magnate[28]
• Eli Lobel, 1955 New Year Honours
• L. S. Lowry, artist (in 1968; had previously declined appointment as OBE in 1955 and CBE in 1961; later declined appointment as CH in 1972 and 1976; holds the record for the most honours declined)[2]
• Humphrey Lyttelton, jazz musician, broadcastor and author.
• Kingsley Martin, journalist in 1965
• Malcolm McDowell, actor in 1993
• John Loudon McAdam, Scottish road builder[29]
• Neil MacGregor, Director of the British Museum (in 1999); however, in 2010 he accepted appointment to the Order of Merit, which is in the personal gift of the British monarch[30]
• James Meade, economist, 1969 New Years Honours
• Norman Miscampbell, Conservative MP (in 1989)
• Henry Moore, sculptor, declined a knighthood in 1951[31]
• Stanley Morison, 1953 Coronation and Birthday Honours (later declined offer of CBE)
• Robert Morley, actor, 1975 Birthday Honours
• A.G.Norman, scientist, 1969
• Frank Pick, chief executive of London Transport (also declined a peerage).[32]
• William Pember Reeves, New Zealand statesman, declined knighthood three times, including GCMG[33]
• J.B. Priestley, novelist and playwright, also declined a peerage
• Gilbert Ryle, philosopher in 1965
• Amartya Sen, economist and Nobel Winner winner
• George Bernard Shaw, playwright and critic; also declined OM[34]
• Paul Scofield, actor
• Alastair Sim, actor, declined a knighthood as did his father
• Quentin Skinner, historian (in 1996).[35]
• Ralph Vaughan Williams composer
• J. Steven Watson, historian (twice, in 1960 and 1966) Principal St Andrews University 1966-86
• H.G. Wells, writer (also declined the OM)

 Appointment to the Order of Merit (OM)

• A. E. Housman, poet and classical scholar (in 1929)[36]
• George Bernard Shaw, playwright, critic, and polemicist (in 1946; Shaw replied that "merit" in authorship could only be determined by the posthumous verdict of history).[34] Shaw had also wanted to decline a Nobel Prize for literature in 1925, but accepted it at his wife's behest as honouring Ireland. He did reject the monetary award, requesting it be used to finance translation of Swedish books into English.[37]
• H.G. Wells, writer

 Appointment as a Companion of Honour (CH)

• Francis Bacon, artist (in 1977; had previously declined appointment as CBE in 1960)[2]
• Robert Graves, poet and novelist (in 1984; had previously declined appointment as CBE in 1957)[2]
• L. S. Lowry RA, artist (in 1972 and 1976; had previously declined appointment as OBE in 1955 and CBE in 1961 and a knighthood in 1968; holds the record for the most honours declined)[2]
• Ben Nicholson, artist in 1965
• Philip Noel-Baker, former Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations, 1965 New Year Honours[19] (accepted a life peerage in 1977)
• J. B. Priestley, declined in 1969.[15]
• Leonard Woolf, publisher and writer in 1966

Appointment to the Order of the Bath
 As Knight Companion (KB)

• Admiral George Cranfield Berkeley in 1812, expecting a peerage; he settled for the KB in 1813, which was converted to a GCB in 1815.[38]
 

As Companion (CB)

• Colonel Allday V. Kerrison, 1955 New Year Honours
• Bernard O'Brien, scientist, 1956 New Years Honours
 

Appointment to the Royal Victorian Order
 As a Commander (CVO)

• Craig Murray, former United Kingdom Ambassador to Uzbekistan (had previously declined appointments as LVO and OBE)[39]

 Appointment to the Order of the British Empire
 As a Knight Grand Cross (GBE)
• Charles Wilson, 1st Baron Moran, 1962 Birthday Honours

 As a Dame Commander (DBE)

• Audrey Callaghan, campaigner and fundraiser[19]
• Doris Lessing, CH, author (in 1993; also declined appointment as OBE in 1977; later accepted appointment as CH in 2000)[2]
• Geraldine McEwan, actress (in 2002; had previously declined appointment as OBE in 1986)
• Vanessa Redgrave, actress (in 1999)[2]
• Dorothy Wedderburn, academic and socialist. Principal of Royal Holloway and Bedford College London 1980-90

 As a Commander (CBE)

• Richard Ithamar Aaron, philosopher, Professor of Philosophy, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, 1962 Birthday Honours[19]
• Ian Albery, theatre producer[3]
• W. Godfrey Allen, architect, Surveyor of the Fabric of Gloucester Cathedral, 1957 New Year Honours[19]
• Alderman Nick Anstee, former Lord Mayor of London (in 2010)
• Francis Bacon, artist, 1960 New Year Honours[19] (later declined appointment as CH in 1977[citation needed])
• J. G. Ballard, author (in 2003)[2] "the honours system is a 'Ruritanian charade that helps to prop up the top-heavy monarchy"
• Nancy Banks-Smith, television critic (in 1970)[2]
• Julian Barnes, novelist
• Wilfred Beard, General Secretary, United Patternmakers' Association, 1959 New Year Honours[19]
• Alan Bennett, playwright (in 1988; later declined a knighthood in 1996)
• Michael Billington, drama critic
• Honor Blackman, actress (in 2002)[2]
• David Bowie, musician (in 2000; later declined a knighthood in 2003)[2]
• John Cleese, actor/comedian (in 1996 he reportedly thought it was "silly"; he later declined a life peerage)[2][13]
• Prunella Clough, painter, 1979 Birthday Honours[19] (previously declined an OBE in 1968)
• John Cole, journalist (in 1993)[2]
• Francis Crick, scientist, co-discoverer of DNA, 1963 Birthday Honours[19] (later also refused a knighthood,[citation needed] but accepted appointment as OM in 1991)
• Rolf Cunliffe, 2nd Baron Cunliffe, Chairman of the Board, Guy's Hospital, 1957 Birthday Honours[19]
• Julian A. Davies, chemist, 1968 Birthday Honours
• Bernie Ecclestone, owner of Formula One commercial rights (in 1996)[2]
• Albert Finney actor (in 1980; later declined a knighthood in 2000)
• C. S. Forester, novelist, in 1953
• Michael Frayn novelist and dramatist (in 1989; later declined a knighthood in 2003)
• Lucian Freud, artist (in 1977; later accepted appointment as CH in 1983 and OM in 1993)[2]
• Robert Graves, poet and novelist (in 1957; later declined appointment as CH in 1984)
• John Giffard, scientist, 1959 Birthday Honours
• Graham Greene, author, 1956 (later accepted Companion of Honour and Order of Merit, neither of which grant rank or precedence)
• Claude Herbert Grundy, Queen's Remembrancer, 1964 Birthday Honours
• Jocelyn Herbert, stage designer, 1981 Birthday Honours
• Trevor Howard (né Trevor Howard-Smith), actor
• Elgar Howarth, conductor[3]
• John Ireland, composer, 1959 New Years Honours
• Leon Kossoff, painter[3]
• Philip Larkin, poet in 1968
• F. R. Leavis, 1966 Birthday Honours (later accepted appointment as CH)
• John le Carré, author
• James Lees-Milne, writer and expert on English country houses and long-time associate of the National Trust (refused CBE in 1993 New Year Honours)[40]
• C. S. Lewis, author, theologian, Oxford professor (in 1951, declined so as to avoid association with any political issues)[41]
• William Lines, 1951 New Years Honours
• L. S. Lowry, artist (in 1961; had previously declined appointment as OBE in 1955; later declined a knighthood in 1968 and appointment as CH in 1972 and 1976; holds the record for the most honours declined)[2]
• Philip MacDonald, author, 1952 New Years Honours
• Malcolm McDowell, actor (declined CBE in 1984; declined a knighthood in 1995)[citation needed]
• Geraldine McEwan, actress[3] also declined DBE
• George Melly, musician, artist and raconteur (in 2001)[2]
• Ernest Milton, actor (in 1965)
• Stanley Morison, 1962 Birthday Honours (previously declined a knighthood)
• Ben Nicholson, artist in 1955
• Sean O'Casey, playwright, 1963 New Years Honours
• Gareth Peirce, solicitor[42] (gazetted CBE in 1999, but later she returned its insignia, blaming herself and apologizing to then P.M. Tony Blair for the misunderstanding)
• Lionel Penrose, Professor of Medical Genetics, University College London 1945-65, (in 1967)
• Ronald Pickup, actor
• Cedric Price, architect (The Guardian 2003)
• Keith Richards, guitarist (The Rolling Stones)[when?]
• Alan Rickman, actor
• Mark Rylance, actor
• Robert Simpson, composer[when?]
• Savenaca Siwatibau, Fijian academic[when?]
• Frank Swinnerton, novelist and critic in 1969
• Claire Tomalin, writer[3]
• Polly Toynbee, columnist (in 2000)[2]
• Leslie Waddington, gallery chairman[3]
• Evelyn Waugh, novelist (in 1959 wanted a KBE)[2]
• Paul Weller, musician (in 2007)
• Garfield Weston, businessman[3]
• Hugo Young, journalist

As an Officer (OBE)

• Peter Alliss, golfer and commentator (in 2002)[2]
• Jim Broadbent, actor (in 2002)[2]
• Prunella Clough, painter, 1968 Birthday Honours[19] (later declined an CBE in 1979)
• Andrew Cruickshank, actor (in 1967)
• Roald Dahl, author (in 1986 wanted a KBE)[2]
• Eleanor Farjeon, author and poet (in 1959)
• Dawn French, comedian (in 2001 together with Jennifer Saunders)[3]
• Hughie Green, TV personality, (1960)
• Graham Greene author (in 1956)[2]
• Laurence Harbottle, services to theatre[3]
• Hamish Henderson, poet and folklorist (in 1983 as protest against the Thatcher government's nuclear policies [2]
• Hattie Jacques, actress and comedian (in the 1970s)[why?]
• Jonathan Kent, theatre director[3]
• Estelle Kohler, actress
• Nigella Lawson, chef; cookery writer[3]
• Doris Lessing, CH author (in 1977; later declined appointment as DBE in 1993; later accepted appointment as CH in 2000)
• Ken Loach, director (in 1977)
• L. S. Lowry, artist (in 1955; later declined appointment as CBE in 1961, a knighthood in 1968 and appointment as CH in 1972 and 1976; holds the record for the most honours declined)[2]
• John McCormick, controller BBC Scotland[3]
• Ian McDiarmid, actor, theatre director[3]
• Geraldine McEwan, actress (in 1986; later declined appointment as DBE in 2002)
• Paul McGuigan, filmmaker
• Kenneth McKellar, tenor[43]
• Hank Marvin, guitarist (The Shadows)[why?]
• Doreen Massey, Professor of Geography
• Alan Mattingly, Ramblers' Association[3]
• Stanley Middleton, FRSL author, 1979
• Craig Murray, former United Kingdom Ambassador to Uzbekistan (had previously declined appointment as LVO; later declined appointment as CVO)
• Max Newman, mathematician and wartime codebreaker (in 1946 as protest against the inadequacy of Alan Turing's OBE)[44]
• Bill Nighy, actor
• Eric Porter, actor (1969)
• Simon Russell Beale, actor
• V. M. Sabherwall, Birmingham industrialist[when?]
• Jennifer Saunders, comedian (in 2001, together with Dawn French)
• Jon Snow, newscaster (after having declined, investigated and presented a Channel 4 documentary, Secrets of the Honours System[45])
• Grace Williams, composer[when?]
• Michael Winner, director (in 2006, saying, "An OBE is what you get if you clean the toilets well at King's Cross station."[46])
• Benjamin Zephaniah, poet, who said: "I get angry when I hear the word 'empire'; it reminds me of slavery, it reminds me of thousands of years of brutality, it reminds me of how my foremothers were raped and my forefathers brutalised."[47]

As a Member (MBE)

• Major Derek Allhusen, Olympic equestrian gold-medallist, 1969 New Year Honours (accepted CVO in 1984 as Standard Bearer of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen at Arms)[19]
• Marcel Aurousseau, Australian geologist, 1956 New Year Honours[19]
• Leonard Barden, British chess champion (declined MBE in 1954)[why?]
• Patrick Collins, sports writer[3][when?][why?]
• Joseph Corré, co-founder of Agent Provocateur (declined MBE in 2007[48])[why?]
• Emer Rose Crangle, declined MBE for aid work (in 1999)[why?]
• John Dunn, broadcaster[3][when?][why?]
• Marjorie Hebden, declined MBE for services to the Malvern Museum[3][when?][why?]
• David Heckels, refused MBE for charitable services to the arts[3][when?][why?]
• Dr Bob Holman, academic turned community activist in Easterhouse. [3]
• Gwendoline Laxon, declined MBE for services to charity[3][when?][why?]
• Susan Loppert, art historian[3][when?][why?]
• John Lydon, musician
• John Pandit, musician[3][when?][why?]
• Doris Purnell, declined MBE for services to drama[3][when?][why?]
• John Sales, head gardener[3][when?][why?]
• Joan Smith, journalist, declined MBE as she believed it went against all her views she had spoken about in her career, such as her atheism, feminism and republicanism.

 Renouncing an honour

As no official provision exists for (unilaterally) renouncing an honour, any such act is always unofficial, and the record of the appointment in the London Gazette stands.[citation needed]

However, the physical insignia can be returned to the Central Chancery of the Orders of Knighthood — though even this act is purely symbolic, as replacement insignia may be purchased for a nominal sum.

Any recipient can also request that the honour not be used officially, e.g. Donald Tsang, Chief Executive of Hong Kong, was knighted in 1997 but has not used the title since the handover to China.[citation needed]

Those who have returned insignia include:

• Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, journalist (returned MBE insignia in 2003 in her view of "a growing spirit of republicanism and partly in protest at the Labour government, particularly its conduct of the war in Iraq")
• Roy Bailey, folk singer (returned MBE insignia in August 2006 in protest at the British Government's foreign policy in Lebanon and Palestine)
• Carla Lane, television writer (appointed OBE in 1989; returned insignia in 2002 in protest at the appointment of CBE of the managing director of Huntingdon Life Sciences because of the company's testing on animals)
• John Lennon, musician (returned MBE insignia in 1969; returned with letter that read, "I am returning this MBE in protest against Britain's involvement in the Nigeria-Biafra thing, against our support of America in Vietnam, and against Cold Turkey slipping down the charts.")
• Gareth Peirce, solicitor (gazetted CBE in 1999, but later she returned its insignia, blaming herself and apologizing to then Prime Minister Tony Blair for the misunderstanding)
• Susan Wighton, AIDS worker (returned MBE insignia in 2006 in protest at the British Government's foreign policy in the Middle East)

Knights who have "renounced" their knighthoods include:

• Maharajkumar of Vizianagram, cricketer (knighted in 1936; renounced knighthood in 1947 upon India's independence)
• Rabindranath Tagore, author and poet and Nobel Prize Winner in Literature, 1913 (knighted in 1915; renounced knighthood in 1919 to protest the Jallianwala Bagh massacre)
• C. P. Ramaswami Iyer, lawyer, parliamentarian and administrator (knighted in 1926 with the KCIE and again in 1939 with the KCSI; renounced both knighthoods in 1948 following Indian independence)
• Khwaja Nazimuddin, nobleman, administrator and politician who served as the Governor-General of Pakistan from 1948 to 1951 and as the Prime Minister of Pakistan from 1951 to 1953 (knighted in 1934 with the KCIE; renounced knighthood in 1946 due to his personal belief in independence from Britain)

280
72 Reference- Friendly Fire ?- The British Army Excuted their own sick!
Updated: 23 Nov 2012

Never forget the soldiers executed by their own side

Thursday 22 November 2012

 In the first world war 306 British soldiers were executed by firing squad for desertion or leaving their posts. My uncle Private William Watts was one of the 306 executed.

Private W Watts was sent home to Liverpool for convalescence from shell shock and gas.

His doctor gave him a letter stating that he was not in a fit condition to return to the trenches.

The military police arrested my uncle at his home in Liverpool, escorted him back to France, court-martialled and sentenced him to be executed by firing squad for desertion.

He was returned to France so that the British government and the military could say no-one was executed on British soil.

The court-martial report stated that he came from the "lower class."

The 306 soldiers appealed to Earl Haig for a pardon. The 306 soldiers lost their appeal.

Earl Haig said it should be a lesson to anyone thinking of desertion.

My father Private Thomas Watts, shocked to find out his brother William had been executed, spent the rest of his life mute in Rainhill Menta Hospital.

He was still in the mental hospital when his eldest son was killed in World War II aged 20.

Sam Watts

Bootle

74
73 Reference- The Worst of British Empire (Guns Drugs & Exploitation) lives on in the Honours List
Updated: 22 Nov 2012

How did the British Empire grow? ( And Decline)

The Anglo-Saxons, Germanic tribes, entered Britain from the Angle between modern Germany and Denmark after the Romans withdrew their troops.

They expanded their area of settlement from the footholds or bridgeheads of the first period, gradually settling in the whole of England.

The language changed from Celtic to Germanic.

By stages the kingdoms they set up amalgamated and were absorbed into the kingdom of Wessex. After defeating Norsemen - mostly Danes from the same area the Angles had come from - Wessex became the only kingdom and was renamed England.

After they were invaded by Frenchified Norsemen (1066) the next conquest was in Ireland.

The landless second sons of French-speaking Norman barons crossed the Irish Sea and joined in the conflicts of the Irish kings, setting up new Norman lordships - feudal estates - where the main languages spoken were probably Norman French and Irish Gaelic.

However, king Henry the second invaded Ireland in 1171 and claimed it for the English crown (with the authorisation of the only English Pope, Nicholas Breakspear (Hadrian the fourth), who wished to bring the Irish church under Papal control).

Thus Ireland was the first state that could be regarded as an English colony. In the same period other Normans conquered large parts of southern Italy and Sicily.

Was it their habits of conquest that eventually led to the Empire?

The techniques used in Ireland in the numerous wars there were employed in other areas of the world.
A similar process occurred in Palestine where the Crusaders set up European feudal states in the area they had conquered from the Arabs (or the Turkish states) - but these were mostly French.

The Angevin Empire in France

The Norman kings were succeeded by the Angevin or Plantagenet family when Henry the second came to the throne in 1155.

As he was also the owner of several feudal domains in France he actually controlled more land there than the French king. However, most of this was lost by his son John (except for the Channel Islands and Aquitaine).

Later attempts to conquer France, with a claim to the French throne in 1337, were the Hundred Years War. However, all the lands that were conquered in this war were lost, and the last English foothold was Calais, lost by Queen Mary in 1558.

Companies
The British Empire was not built by government action. Instead it grew from chartered companies.

These were given a Royal Charter to trade in certain areas as a monopoly, in return for taxes paid to the Crown.

The earliest of these were the Merchants of the Staple - the woollen industry that traded with Flanders in the medieval period, and was the main source of England's wealth in those days.

Later there were the Merchant Venturers. In the time of Queen Mary (1555) was the Muscovy Company to trade with Russia.

The most successful was the East India Company (1600) which grew into the government of India, only being replaced by a colonial government in 1857.

But there were other Companies of this kind.

The Hudson's Bay Company was the ruler of large parts of what became the Dominion of Canada.

The British South Africa Company was Cecil Rhodes's vehicle for developing Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe and Zambia).

There was also an Imperial British East Africa Company that was influential in developing Kenya and opening up Uganda before being replaced by direct rule from the Colonial Office.

Notoriously, the South Sea Company provoked an early stock market Bubble and Crash in the 18th century.

To those who experienced the activities of these Companies they might have seemed like very big and well organised Pirate Bands.

But for the mainly younger sons of country gentlemen and the aristocracy the Companies were the road either to riches or death - much the same as what had happened in the Crusades.

In the 18th century the East India Company was the largest business in London and was an important source of government revenue.

People who ask 'how did the Empire grow?' should study the details of the history of this company - often known as "John Company".

It employed thousands of people, owned hundreds of ships, and operated in many parts of the world, from St Helena in the west to China in the east.

It started at Surat in Gujerat in India and various depots in Indonesia.

It traded spices, cotton cloth, tea and coffee, both of which it introduced to the world markets.

It was the Company's tea that sparked off the revolt in north America that led to the setting up of the United States.

In India it became a government, taking over the lands of the Mogul Empire as that empire declined - partly because it had to fight the Company's troops. It founded cities: Calcutta (Kolkata), Singapore and Hong Kong.

It ruled in Aden (South Yemen) and had influence in the Persian Gulf.

It may have been the model for all later Joint Stock companies (shareholder owned corporations), which shared its financial structure, and also its lack of ethics. John Keay - History of the Honourable East India Company
essential reading for the details of how the Company came to rule India

The Honourable Company: History of the English East India Company

  
The Corporation That Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational

First use of the term British Empire

John Dee quote

When Elizabeth took the throne in 1558, Dee became her trusted advisor on astrological and scientific matters, choosing Elizabeth's coronation date himself.

From the 1550s through the 1570s, he served as an advisor to England's voyages of discovery, providing technical assistance in navigation and ideological backing in the creation of a "British Empire", a term that he was the first to use.

Dee wrote a letter to William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley in October 1574 seeking patronage.

He claimed to have occult knowledge of treasure on the Welsh Marches, and of ancient valuable manuscripts kept at Wigmore Castle, knowing that the Lord Treasurer's ancestors came from this area.[15] In 1577, Dee published General and Rare Memorials pertayning to the Perfect Arte of Navigation, a work that set out his vision of a maritime empire and asserted English territorial claims on the New World.

Dee was acquainted with Humphrey Gilbert and was close to Sir Philip Sidney and his circle.[14]
 
John Dee is a very controversial figure as he believed in "magic" more than science at a period when what we regard as modern science had not yet separated from astrology and alchemy.(See Frances Yates - Rosicrucian Enlightenment).

Nor should we ignore Richard Hakluyt
I
n the preface to this he announced the intended publication of the first terrestrial globe made in England by Emery Molyneux.

Between 1598 and 1600 appeared the final, reconstructed and greatly enlarged edition of The Principal Navigations, Voiages, Traffiques and Discoueries of the English Nation in three volumes.

In the dedication of the second volume (1599) to his patron, Sir Robert Cecil, he strongly urged the minister as to the expediency of colonizing Virginia.

A few copies of this monumental work contain a map of great rarity, the first on the Mercator projection made in England according to the true principles laid down by Edward Wright.

Hakluyt's great collection has been called "the Prose Epic of the modern English nation" by historian James Anthony Froude.

Hakluyt was also an investor in the East India Company, thus was one of the founders of the British Empire as it became.

Does this mean the British Empire can be said to have been a project of a small group of people in the time of Queen Elizabeth?

This of course makes us think about the nature of historical change and how events come about.

The Queen did invest in the voyages of captains like Francis Drake and Walter Raleigh - whose activities from the point of view of Spain were piratical.  John Dee
Benjamin Woolley - The Queen's Conjuror

  
 
The First British Empire

After Ireland the next major expansion was to America. In the 16th century English people began to settle on the northeast coast of North America (Newfoundland, now part of Canada).

In 1583 Queen Elizabeth claimed the Sovereignty for the English Crown.

That is, by a form of words they annexed the land without regard for the people living there at the time.

This procedure, which must seem to us now rather bizarre (and illegal under International Law), led to the whole Empire being considered the property of the English (and later the British) Crown.

It had first been used in Ireland.

Some of the settlers hoped to practice their religion without interference from the royal government and church (not the same as looking for Religious Freedom for others, which most of them opposed).

Others wanted to farm new land and escape from the landowners in England.

Merchants hoped to make money from trade.

Others, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries, were deported criminals.

The result was a series of colonies along the eastern coast of what is now the United States and Canada.

After the union with Scotland, Scottish people also settled in these colonies and the Empire could be described as British.

The American colonies were a mixture of Royal and Proprietorial colonies.

That is, some of the Governors were appointed by the Crown; others by Proprietors.

The second type was a 17th century version of the feudalism that had occurred in Ireland.

The King granted land to his favourites as a cheap way of paying them.

In all those colonies local assemblies developed which disputed powers with the Governors - the earliest stage of the evolution that resulted in democracy and independence.

There was no civil service appointed from Britain other than customs officers and Navy and Army.

Until 1768 the colonies were part of the responsibilities of the Secretary of State of the Home Department.

There was no government colonial office in London responsible only for the colonies.

However, from 1768 there was a Secretary of State for the American colonies - a bit late in the day - abolished in 1782.

The Royal Navy became essential to maintain connections with the colonies and was the main instrument of government connecting them.

But the American colonists built civilian ships for trading along the coast and to hunt for whales in all the world's oceans. They also traded with the East India Company.

The end of the Seven Years war (1756-1763), and the defeat of France in north America, seemed to make the American empire secure.

However, the desire of the British government to tax the colonists to pay for their defense caused a tax revolt, that grew into a demand for independence.

The colonists used the slogan of the English Civil War - No Taxation without Representation - and the ideas of political scientists: Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu.

The subsequent war resulted in the formation of the United States, leaving only the nucleus of what was to become Canada.

At the same time as the north American colonies were being settled, English people settled in the Caribbean and developed slave-worked sugar plantations (see Barbados for a useful book on the history of sugar).

The profits from these helped fund the industrial revolution and the huge country houses built by the owners of the plantations (see the novels of Jane Austen, especially Mansfield Park) - and paid for the navy and army that defeated Napoleon.

The Second British Empire

After the independence of the United States the British continued to rule Canada, including the former French settlements in Quebec and the Caribbean Islands.

When Charles the second married Catherine of Braganza (a Portuguese princess) in 1662 her dowry included the Portuguese colony in India of Bombay (now Mumbai) (and also Tangier, now part of Morocco but this colony remained British only from 1662 until 1684 when the Moroccans made it untenable - see Linda Colley).

The formation of the East India Company began the British influence in India, which started with trade in 1613 at Surat in Gujerat.

The custom then was to build a fortified trading center known as a Factory, with soldiers to protect the merchants.

They recruited local people as soldiers. Gradually the Company treated these bases as sovereign territory - though in every case their occupancy was based on a permission from a local ruler.

In the northeast of India the Company founded the city of Calcutta (now Kolkata), and occupied Madras (Chennai). From these bases they spread their power into the lands of the decaying Mogul Empire.

The East India Company changed from being just a trading company to being partly a government.

Added to its profit from buying and selling were the taxes it collected, in theory on behalf of the local rulers, in practice for its own benefit.

The managers and governors of the Company made huge sums of money (those that survived the diseases of India) and built palaces in England.

This money too was available to invest in the new industries in England.

The area of India ruled by the company expanded as the Company's armies (Indian and British soldiers, commanded by British officers) conquered Indian kingdoms and provinces.

The French were trying to do the same but were outmaneuvered until, as in Canada, they were confined to a token colony, at Pondicherry, on the close of the Seven Years War.

A revolt in 1857 by Indian soldiers against the Company's rule (sparked off by new cartridges, rumored to be greased with pig and beef fat - offensive to Muslim and Hindu soldiers, respectively) led to an attempted uprising (war of resistance) and the British government's taking over the Company's land as a formal British colony.

A British Governor General was appointed with his capital in Calcutta, and subsidiary governors in the provinces.

The revolt was suppressed with great brutality - what would now be considered war crimes on a huge scale.

After Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli declared Queen Victoria Empress of India (successor to the Mogul Emperors, whose office was terminated after the Revolt - Indian Mutiny or War of Independence), the governor was renamed Viceroy and moved from Calcutta to Delhi, formerly the seat of the Mogul emperor.

The Indian empire had to be supplied by sea.

This led to a series of Company bases along the route to India.

One of these was at the southern tip of Africa where Cape Town and its surrounding land was taken from the Dutch (who were also building an empire, in Indonesia).

After the Suez Canal was built in Egypt the Canal Zone was a British base to protect it and Egypt itself became a protectorate, and Aden at the southern tip of Arabia was a fueling point for steam ships passing from Suez to India and a Naval base for patrolling the Red Sea and Indian Ocean.

To protect Aden a protectorate was declared over the surrounding area, which became the Aden Protectorate (south Yemen).

The government of India was also interested in keeping order in the borders of India.

To the west they exercised control over both shores of the Arabian Gulf, Baluchistan to the north and Trucial Oman to the south.

To the north they attempted to control the fringe states of Bhutan, Nepal, Sikkim and Afghanistan.

The last was never conquered (but Cricket has been taken up by the people).

From the Dutch they had taken Ceylon (Sri Lanka).

To the east British conquest extended into Burma, a kingdom of people with a different culture and language.

To the southeast the East India Company also extended to Singapore, where a trading post was built that became a city, like Calcutta.

From here British traders extended to the island of Borneo where two colonies were formed in the north: one the quasi-feudal state of Sarawak, ruled by the so-called White Rajahs of the Brooks family on behalf of the Sultan of Brunei, the other North Borneo (now Sabah).

North of Singapore the British came to rule the Malayan peninsula (called the Straits Settlements at that time).

This area was important for tin mines and later for rubber.

A colony in Hong Kong grew out of the opium wars with China.

China was not formally ruled as a colony but British and other European traders forced immunity from Chinese courts and controlled such governmental functions as the Customs and the navigation on the Yangtse.

The Opium trade and wars undermined the Chinese state (but China as a whole was never a British colony).
 Why didn't the British do to China what they had done to India?

India

When the British arrived India was in theory unified - at least the northern parts - under the Mogul emperors, in Delhi.

In practice the emperors had lost control of the provinces which were in reality more or less independent under the governors supposedly appointed by the emperor.

Beginning with Bengal the Company's forces displaced the Nawabs (governors) one province at a time.

In the absence of a central government the Indians were unable to resist the encroachments of the British and the French.
We can remember that the Britons had not been united against the Romans when Rome invaded ancient Britain, nor the Romano-Britons against the Anglo-Saxons. 

 China

China remained a unified state under a functioning government.

While it is true that its technology was stagnant in the face of the European developments - such as in Naval warfare - the central government did not lose control of the provinces until the late 19th century.

The Company never tried to rule any part of China (except Hong Kong and Weihaiwei) but wanted to trade, especially with Opium which it provided via a number of middlemen (some of them the ancestors of modern "respectable" companies such as Jardine Matheson).

Australasia

After the independence of the United States it was no longer possible to send criminals into exile in North America.

To continue the policy a new destination was needed.

The chosen destination was Botany Bay (Sydney) in what became known as New South Wales in Australia.

The whole continent was declared British land.

The inhabitants were ignored as though they were animals (the land was declared "terra nullius" = belonging to no-one and therefore free for settlement).

Like North America this was a colony of settlement rather than merely of rule and exploitation, as in India.

New Zealand was also seen as a colony of settlement, though of free workers rather than convicts.

Wars against the native Polynesians resulted in conquest and parcelling out of the land to mainly British farmers.

Africa

The empire in Africa started as slave trading depots in Ghana (Gold Coast) and other parts of the West African coast.

Then when Britain ended its slave trade - having become rich enough from industry to do without its profits - there was a need for bases for the Naval patrols trying to prevent other countries carrying on a slave trade.

In Sierra Leone there was also a base at Freetown to land freed ex-slaves - some of whom had fought on the British side in the American War of Independence and were taken from Nova Scotia.

Then there were bases for "legitimate" trade.

These grew from Lagos in Nigeria (a former Portuguese base), Accra in Ghana and Gambia. In many cases the coastal base was declared a Colony (sovereign British territory), and the interior lands were declared a Protectorate.

In the 1890s British troops pushed inland using the new technologies of steam, telegraphs and machine guns (and Quinine to prevent Malaria) until they reached the borders of the French territories.

The Berlin Conference (1884) on Colonial matters carved up Africa and gave each of the European powers their own sections. Thus Britain ended with territories in East, West and Southern Africa.

British farmers and business men settled in some of them: Kenya, Rhodesia and South Africa.

The last major conquest of the British was South Africa, where their armies fought not just the "natives" but the descendants of the Dutch settlers at the Cape.

The wars with the Boers created dissension at home, where many saw the conquest as greed and imperial over-reach.

The conquest of the Sudan in 1895 was one of the last wars of expansion - Winston Churchill took part in the last British cavalry charge there. This war derived from Britain's control of Egypt.

The Egyptian ruler claimed Sudan and Britain was making good that claim.

Sudan was therefore ruled as a joint British-Egyptian territory - a Condominium.

After the first world war those African colonies that had been awarded to Germany were mostly given to Britain - Namibia (South West Africa to South Africa), Cameroon (parts), and Togo (part) and Tanganyika (German East Africa).

Oceania

The Royal Navy and East India Company ships visited many small islands in all the oceans.

Many of these too were declared Sovereign British territory or signed treaties making them Protectorates. Some of them were useful as supply bases for water and food.

A British presence there also denied their use to other empires - mainly the French.

During the wars with the French several islands were conquered from the French.

Mauritius is the best example

At its height the Empire as an economic community was also influential in areas not formally ruled by Britain.

After China the most important of these was Argentina.

Britain was the source of capital for developing the country, especially the railways, which were owned by London investors and there were many British managers in Argentine businesses.

Britain gained by importing the beef from the Pampas.

British capital also built the railways in Colombia (though to too small a gauge).

(Compare with the way modern China proposes to build a railway in Colombia and many other territories). 
 

How the western economy affected the whole world, whether colonised or not. 
 
Thoughts on numbers

The world population as the British and other European empires grew was less than 1000 million.

Britain itself was no more than 5 million.

This certainly makes it remarkable that such a small country has had such an effect on the world.

History of population

When considering the history of the empire these figures must always be in mind.

For one thing it explains why Britain's military forces were always limited and why mercenaries were employed so much - for example the German troops who fought much of the American war of independence.

Quite a large proportion of the population was drafted into the navy, via such means as the Press Gang.

The Indian Empire was conquered by Indian troops with British officers. 

How was the British Empire ruled?

In each territory there was a Governor, representing the Crown (the monarch), that is the British government.

He was appointed by and answerable to a British cabinet member: the Secretary for India; or the Colonial Secretary.

In London there were two ministries: the India Office; the Colonial Office (founded in 1801, by splitting it off from the Home Office). The India Office replaced the Honourable East India Company after the Indian Mutiny of 1857.

In the territory there was a civil service. In the provinces or districts there were British officials - District Officers or Commissioners (In Nigeria the local officials were District Officers; in other African colonies they were District Commissioners).

In India the civil service showed its origin in the East India Company.

The local commissioners were known as Collectors, showing that their original function had been to collect the taxes for the Company.

The lowest level of administration in Africa were the Chiefs and sub-chiefs who headed Locations.

In some other colonies the lowest government employee might be the Village Headman. (See Chinua Achebe Arrow of God for the difficulties these appointments caused local people).

British colonial civil servants were encouraged to learn local languages, and received extra pay on passing competence tests.

They were expected to study carefully the needs of their subjects.

One result of the intensive study of Latin and Greek in the Public Schools was a much greater proficiency with other languages than modern students have.
 

Rory Stewart

Critics have accused this new breed of administrators (the UN representatives in such places as Afghanistan) of neo-colonialism.

But in fact their approach is not that of a nineteenth century colonial officer.

Colonial administration may have been racist and exploitative but they did at least work seriously at the business of understanding the people they were governing.

They recruited people prepared to spend their entire careers in dangerous provinces of a single alien nation.

They invested in teaching administrators and military officers the local language.

They established effective departments of state, trained a local elite and continued the countless academic studies of their subjects through institutes and museums, royal geographical societies and royal botanical gardens.

They balanced the local budget and generated fiscal revenue because if they didn't their home government would rarely bail them out. If they failed to govern fairly the population would mutiny.

(see the footnote 59 of Rory Stewart The Places in Between, his book about walking across Afghanistan).
(He says the UN people seldom understand the people they govern, and don't stay long enough).

Very early in the development of colonial administration the Governor appointed a group of officials to assist him in making laws for the colony.

This was the Legislative Council (LegCo).

It was from this organisation that the parliaments of the states grew. Once the decision was taken to evolve the colony towards self-government the LegCo began to include "native" members, at first appointed, later elected.

There was usually a period when members appointed by the governor (official members) outnumbered the elected members. Later the elected members became a majority.

At this point the governor would appoint local members as Ministers.

The next stage was Responsible Self-government when the governor ceased to exercise day to day control but had the power to suspend or abolish the assembly, dismiss the government and in general act as a back stop. In such colonies the Governor would retain control of the army and police, and would continue to deal with London.

The best example of the use of this power was in British Guiana (Guyana) where the governor refused to allow Cheddi Jagan to become Chief Minister on the grounds that the United States believed he was a communist, (illustrating the fact that the British Empire had become subordinate to the United States).

The final stage was complete independence when the Assembly became an imitation of the British House of Commons and the title of the Governor changed to Governor-General, representing the Monarch, but acting only on the advice of the local government.

This was the process originally devised for Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa (the so-called White Commonwealth).

On independence in the early Dominions the head of state was still the Monarch represented by a Governor General. Nowadays this official is always a native Australian, Canadian or other and has the same powers as the Monarch (that is, almost none).

The same method was applied to India and the African colonies.

Almost all of these colonies declared themselves Republics, with the head of state becoming a President.

In India the President has a similar role to the Governor-General - ceremonial head but not head of government. In former African colonies the President is usually also head of government.

But in subsequent history many African ex-colonies abandoned the Parliamentary system and became ruled by military dictators who came to power by means of a military coup.

In India there were two types of territory: those ruled directly by the British (British India); those ruled Indirectly. Indirect Rule was the system by which the local ruler (Maharajah, Rajah, Nawab, Sultan etc.) continued in place but after making a treaty with the British had agreed to follow British policy on the "advice" of a British Resident official.

This method was also used in other territories, such as Uganda and Nigeria - in both these cases by Sir Frederick (later Lord) Lugard who set up the administrations.

In most African former colonies the local agents of the government continue to be known as District Commissioners but are now answerable to the local government.

About 1000 British civil servants of the Indian Civil Service (ICS) ruled the whole of India (about 300 million people).

Of course they also had a large military force to enforce their rule.

This consisted of British troops and a much larger Indian Army of locally recruited troops under British officers.

The same was true of all other colonies.

Thus in Africa there were local armies, known as the King's African Rifles. David Gilmour - The Ruling Caste:about the Indian Civil Service

 
 Britain's Empire: Resistance, Repression and Revolt
Review by Richard Drayton

How did the British Empire end?

The colonies of settlement went first. Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were given local governments based on the British pattern, with a locally elected House of Commons and local ministers, answerable to the Governor.

They were labelled the Dominions.

The process of independence was completed after the first world war with the Statute of Westminster (1930), which recognised their independence but some of them, Australia for example, had signed the Versaille Treaty in 1919.

Even in the second world war they cooperated closely with Britain and sent troops in both world wars.

After 1945 their interests diverged from Britain, though there continued to be regular meetings of Heads of Government, in what has since become an institution of the Commonwealth (CHOGM = Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting).

The Empire grew originally because the British had better weapons than the "natives".

This was mainly because Britain had more advanced technology - Europe in general began to surpass the rest of the world from about the 17th century.

It was also because the British state was better organised than those states where the British were trading.

"The Plain fact is that we have got the Gatling gun and they have not."
Hilaire Belloc (from "The Modern Traveller")Gatling gun in Afghan war

Some parts at least of the lands occupied by the British were immensely profitable: especially the sugar islands and India.

Those with the better weapons could decide the terms of trade.

That is, they could control the prices in such a way that the producers in India were paid less than they would in a free market.

Wealth passed from India to the home country (and of course from the slave-worked Sugar Islands).
Drugs

All the European Empires were to some extent the result of drug trades.

The first substance traded was nutmeg, used by the rich in medieval times; the second was sugar, a substance that humans can live perfectly well without, or with very small amounts.

The next was tobacco whose bad effects were only fully recognised in the 20th century (though James the first of England wrote a pamphlet against the smoke).

Finally, the British found the trade in opium from their Indian lands very profitable when sold in China.

To some extent this trade was replaced by tea. Perhaps coffee is also a drug trade - said to have been discovered by Sufi mystics in the Yemen, wishing to stay awake.

By the end of the 20th century the newer drug trades - Cocaine and Heroin, though still immensely profitable, were conducted not by states but by criminal organisations.

See this article on the opium trade.

By the beginning of the 20th century the European technological advantages were diminishing fast.

Weapons for resistance were getting cheaper. Guerrilla war was becoming easier.

The subjects were becoming educated (missionaries and government itself encouraged modern western schools).

Undisturbed rule of such an empire needed acquiescence on the part of the ruled.

Gradually that acquiescence was withheld.

In India from the time of the Amritsar Massacre (1919) the educated group ceased to accept British rule as inevitable.

Organisations to resist British rule started in Ireland as well as in India - indeed Ireland had resistance from early in the 18th century.

The Indian National Congress was the first of the non-Irish movements.

In Africa resistance started later, and first in South Africa soon after the formation of the Union of South Africa (1910).

In the other African colonies it began with the end of the second world war when the African soldiers returned home, bringing with them their experiences of helping the British fight other Europeans and losing their awe of the "white man".

Moreover, in Britain itself there were always people opposed to the empire, even as it was being established.

Perhaps equally important was the fact that the Empire was no longer profitable. It was in the 18th and 19th centuries when the plunder was at its most profitable.

After that the costs of ruling the territories rose and the wealth available to extract diminished in comparison with the wealth produced by the new industries in Britain, except perhaps in South Africa and other territories with important mines, such as Malaya.

Incidentally, there is the question of whether the British people who worked in the later Empire grew rich.

In fact, from the 1890s onward, salaries of ordinary British people in India, were little more than they could earn in Britain. India was no longer the source for building palaces like those in the 18th century.

By 1945 the home country itself was bankrupt from having fought the second world war.

The costs of the empire were rising, not least because of the threat of guerrilla wars.

India, the core of the empire, was by 1945 nearly ungovernable.

The Indians had been promised self-government (Dominion status) during the war, to encourage recruitment into the Indian Army and support for Britain's side of the second world war.

In the years after 1945 there was a series of colonial wars.

In Malaya the British retook control of the country from the Japanese occupiers but the local people no longer accepted the right of the British to rule them.

The Chinese community imitated Mao Tse Tung and formed a guerrilla army.

In Kenya there was an uprising mainly over land ownership.

In both cases the wars led to independence in the 1960s.

But another result was that the British governing group realised the Empire was now too expensive to hold and policy changed towards preparing rapidly for independence for all the colonies.

The last colonial war was in Aden where the British had to leave by helicopter, leaving no state behind.

"Small wars" as the empire ended.

In the 19th century Britain had been the source of capital for investment.

In 1945 there was no such source.

Thus the drive for making the colonies independent was a mixture of financial necessity, military necessity and idealism.

The last came from those in Britain who campaigned for the "natives" to have the same democratic rights as British citizens at home.

There was also the rise of the Superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union.

By comparison Britain was a medium power.

Burma was the first to become independent.

India was next (1947) being split into four states: India, Pakistan (later itself split when Bangladesh left) and Sri Lanka.

In Africa more independences occurred with Sudan first (1954) at the insistence of Egypt which shared the sovereignty.

The first Black African state was Ghana (1957) formerly the Gold Coast, used as a model for the rest.

After that all the west African states went, followed by East and Central Africa.

Rhodesia, because of its settlers, was the most trouble, as the settlers refused to accept majority rule - much as the French settlers in Algeria behaved.

But the settler state of Kenya followed, after a war of independence.

The process finished with Hong Kong (1997).

There are no plans for the remaining territories (scroll down) unless they demand independence.

Suez War

The event that showed the British Empire was at an end was probably the 1956 Suez War. Britain, France and Israel had conspired to invade Egypt to regain control of the Suez Canal.

They were stopped by the United States (and Egyptian resistance), proving that only decisions by the Superpowers were important.

But the resistance also showed that the "natives" could not now be ignored as Kalashnikovs were cheap and easy to obtain.

The result was the loss of British influence in the Middle East - especially the loss of control of Iraq where a revolution against the king installed by the British occurred, leading to the Baath party victory.

Sir John Glubb had to give up his command of the army of Jordan, the Arab Legion.

The leading western power became the United States which took over some of Britain's influence.  

 How did the British Empire differ from ancient Rome?

British statesmen of the 19th century liked to think of themselves as Romans.

Their statues tend to be dressed in Roman togas.

At school they had studied Greek and Latin as the main subjects.

They began to think of the wide area of the planet under their rule as a sort of re-birth of the Roman empire.

But nevertheless the British Empire was different in important ways. Rome had been conquered by direct military force.

When a new city or province was conquered by the Roman army the conquered people were made into slaves to work for Romans for nothing.

The lands of the conquered cities were given to Romans - at first to all citizens, but later, as with the conquered Carthage, land and slaves going only to the ruling aristocracy.

The main weakness of the Roman empire had been that it collapsed when its military forces failed and the Romans failed to trade with the wider empire.

The core of the empire was not an economic and trading enterprise.

Its central economic fact was tribute - theft at the threat of the military.

The British empire had been the result of trade.

Although the slave trade was essentially theft, trade in other areas did have some elements of mutual benefit.

Whereas the British empire was not so much like Rome it was more like Venice which had been a trading empire and its influence had grown with the money its merchants made from trading with the eastern Mediterranean.

Venice of course declined when trade shifted to the Atlantic after Columbus.

Britain left its empire when it was no longer profitable.

Having said that one must remember the brutality with which the Indian uprising was suppressed - as bad as many of the atrocities committed by the Romans.

The behaviour of the British at the end of the Kenya occupation was bad.

131
74 Reference- BBC- Bullshit-Beer and Circuses
Updated: 22 Nov 2012

BBC -Bullshit Beer and Circuses

BBC - Bullshit Beer and Circuses

There I have said it again

Too many repeats ?

Not too many repeats at night.

Too little regard for intelligent viewing for the alternative

Take Political debate- Same old capitalists comment

Too little regard for viewers - What about the night workers ?

Bullshit - You would think they had never heard of some sections of society.

To bloody "Establishment" !

Up the Ruling Classes ?- Yes -one finger

Too remote from the Working Classes

Too far from the Factory or Farm floor

Too Biased - !

Too top management heavy some say.

Jobs for the boys and whopping salararies and pay offs too.

The Governors- How many members of Trade Unions ?

Time for a referendum on the BBC ?

Fit for purpose ?

If not why not ?

91
75 Reference-Swedish girls wiki leaks, US judges and an electronic cigarette
Updated: 15 Nov 2012

Wiki leaks, rape and the electronic cigarette

By: James Dunworth

 
Do you believe Assenge really raped two Swedish girls?

I have no proof that he did or didn’t.

I am sceptical, though.

The crime seems remarkably handy at a time when America needs to smear an awkward critic.

Having seen a sneaky campaign ran against the electronic cigarette by industries with competing financial interests, I am now less inclined to accept media ‘truth’ at face value.

And I find it surprising that the senior prosecutor who said there was no case against Assenge soon lost his job and position.

And that one of the girls accusing him has links to the CIA.

And that the Swedes admit that it was consensual at the time – apparently they have post-rape in Sweden where the girls change their mind about whether to have  sex after after having had sex which, apparently, then makes it rape.

I’ve mixed thoughts about whether A should have released all those leaks.

But I don’t want to see him go down for a made-up crime.

Information spreads – faster than ever before


 A visualistion of the internet - impossible for even the US government to control.

Of course, whatever happens, the information that has been released, or that Assange arranges to be released after he is arrested, will continue to circle round the net.

The US government, the world’s superpower, is powerless to stop it.

It’s the same with the electronic cigarette.

Despite the huge money being poured into a campaign against the device, the opinions of the scientists who support it are freely available to anyone with access to a search engine.

Unfortunately, it still doesn’t stop damage being done.

Thousands who would have switched to a device which scientists estimates has 1000 times less carcinogens will now stay with cigarettes.

And, innocent or not, Assange may well go to prison.

I only hope that if the crime wasn’t committed, the judges will take the same view as four US judges have done regarding the FDA case about the electronic cigarette.

And throw the case out of the window

72
76 Reference- Republic of Palau- Subsidised by US !
Updated: 14 Nov 2012

Palau

From Wikipedia,

Republic of Palau
Beluu ęr a Belau 
 
Anthem: Belau loba klisiich er a kelulul
 
Location of Palau (circled) in the western Pacific Ocean.

Capital Ngerulmud[1]


7°21′N 134°28′E / 7.35°N 134.467°E / 7.35; 134.467


Largest city Koror


Official language(s) English
Palauan

Recognised regional languages Japanese (in Angaur)


Sonsorolese (in Sonsoral)


Tobian (in Hatohobei)


Demonym Palauan


Government Unitary presidential democratic republic

 -  President Johnson Toribiong
 -  President-elect Tommy Remengesau
Legislature National Congress
Independence
 -  Compact of Free Association with the United States October 1, 1994 
Area
 -  Total 459 km2 (196th)
177 sq mi 
 -  Water (%) negligible
Population
 -  2011 estimate 20,956 (218th)
 -  Density 28.4/km2
45.5/sq mi
GDP (PPP) 2008 estimate
 -  Total $164 million[2] (not ranked)
 -  Per capita $8,100[2] (119th)
HDI (2011) 0.782[3] (high) (49th)
Currency United States dollar (USD)
Time zone (UTC+9)

Drives on the right

ISO 3166 code PW
Internet TLD .pw
Calling code +680

a. On October 7, 2006, government officials moved their offices in the former capital of Koror to Ngerulmud in State of Melekeok, located 20 km (12 mi) northeast of Koror on Babelthaup Island and 2 km (1 mi) northwest of Melekeok village.

b. GDP estimate includes US subsidy (2004 estimate).

Palau (i/pəˈlaʊ/, sometimes spelled Belau or Pelew), officially the Republic of Palau (Palauan: Beluu ęr a Belau), is an island country located in the western Pacific Ocean.

Geographically part of the larger island group of Micronesia, with the country's population of around 21,000 people spread out over 250 islands forming the western chain of the Caroline Islands.

The islands share maritime boundaries with Indonesia, the Philippines, and the Federated States of Micronesia.

The most populous island in the group is Koror, with the capital city, Ngerulmud, located on nearby Babeldaob.

The country was originally settled around 3,000 years ago by migrants from the Philippines, with a Negrito population sustained until around 900 years ago.

The islands were first visited by Europeans in the 18th century, and were made part of the Spanish East Indies in 1885. Following Spain's defeat in the Spanish–American War in 1898, the islands were sold to Imperial Germany in 1899 under the terms of the German–Spanish Treaty, where they were administered as part of German New Guinea.

The Imperial Japanese Navy conquered Palau during World War I, and the islands were later made a part of the Japanese-ruled South Pacific Mandate by the League of Nations.

During World War II, skirmishes, including the major Battle of Peleliu, were fought between American and Japanese troops as part of the Mariana and Palau Islands campaign.

Along with other Pacific Islands, Palau was made a part of the United States-governed Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands in 1947.

Having voted against joining the newly-independent Federated States of Micronesia in 1979, the islands gained full sovereignty in 1994 under a Compact of Free Association with the United States.

Politically, Palau is a presidential republic in free association with the United States, with the US providing defense, funding, and access to social services.

Legislative power is concentrated in the bicameral Palau National Congress.

Palau's economy is based mainly on tourism, subsistence agriculture, and fishing, with a significant portion of Gross National Product (GNP) derived from foreign aid.

The country's currency is the United States dollar.

The islands' culture is derived from a mixture of Japanese, Micronesian, and Melanesian elements, with the majority of citizens of mixed Micronesian, Melanesian, and Austronesian descent, with significant groups descended from Japanese and Filipino settlers.

The country's two official languages are Palauan, a member of the wider Sunda–Sulawesi language group, and English, with Japanese, Sonsorolese, and Tobian recognised as regional languages.

63
77 Reference-"The Wall "-The US in Vietnam-The Futility of War-People get Killed
Updated: 13 Nov 2012

The Wall

 

A little history most people will never know.

Interesting Veterans Statistics off the Vietnam Memorial Wall

There are 58,267 names now listed on that polished black wall, including those added in 2010.

The names are arranged in the order in which they were taken from us by date and within each date the names are alphabetized. It is hard to believe it is 36 years since the last casualties.

The first known casualty was Richard B. Fitzgibbon, of North Weymouth , Mass. Listed by the U.S. Department of Defense as having been killed on June 8, 1956. His name is listed on the Wall with that of his son, Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Richard B. Fitzgibbon III, who was killed on Sept. 7, 1965.

There are three sets of fathers and sons on the Wall.

39,996 on the Wall were just 22 or younger.

8,283 were just 19 years old.

The largest age group, 33,103 were 18 years old.
12 soldiers on the Wall were 17 years old.

5 soldiers on the Wall were 16 years old.

One soldier, PFC Dan Bullock was 15 years old.

997 soldiers were killed on their first day in Vietnam ..

1,448 soldiers were killed on their last day in Vietnam ..

31 sets of brothers are on the Wall.

Thirty one sets of parents lost two of their sons.

54 soldiers attended Thomas Edison High School in Philadelphia . I wonder why so many from one school.

8 Women are on the Wall. Nursing the wounded.

244 soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor during the Vietnam War; 153 of them are on the Wall.

Beallsville, Ohio with a population of 475 lost 6 of her sons.

West Virginia had the highest casualty rate per capita in the nation. There are 711 West Virginians on the Wall.

66
78 Reference-Candidate for Police Commissioner ? -is YOUR mugshot on the national database
Updated: 13 Nov 2012

Police launch mugshots database

to catch criminals who move around the country

Detectives say face-matching technology is a 'game changer', but doubts remain on what data should be held

Paul Peachey
Monday 12 November 2012

The photographs of millions of people are being put on a national police database for the first time next year to try to stop criminals escaping detection simply by moving around the country.

From March detectives will be able to compare suspects' images with an estimated 16 million mugshots of people taken into police custody, using Facebook-style photo technology that has never before been available to forces on a nationwide system.

However, campaigners raised concerns yesterday about breaches of civil liberties, with the pictures of people not convicted of any offence being held on the system, and police tactics changing to make use of the new photographic resource.

The system is an extension of the police national database (PND), which was established in 2011 following recommendations by a judge, prompted by the failure of intelligence sharing over the 2002 Soham murders.

Mike Barton, the Chief Constable of Durham Police and the lead on intelligence matters for the Association of Chief Police Officers, explained that with many of the 43 police forces in England and Wales using incompatible technology, police could currently compare photographs of suspects only with ones held in their own files.

"This is a game changer," he said.

"A criminal from Cornwall might get away with it in Newcastle because they don't know about him.

We're closing that door."

The PND currently holds information on millions of people who have been convicted, cautioned or arrested, as well as driving licence holders and others not suspected or convicted of crimes.

Discussions are continuing about what photographs can be kept on the database, following successful court challenges by people who have argued that their images should not be retained by the authorities.

National police guidelines introduced in 2010 say that information held on an individual "must not be excessive and must be proportionate to the risk they pose to the community".

Mr Barton said the Information Commissioner, the European Court of Human Rights and domestic court cases had all thrown up different views.

"If we have to change our rules of engagement then we will," he said.

Campaigners maintained that only those who have been convicted, or on a judge's ruling, should have their pictures on the database.
Nick Pickles, the director of Big Brother Watch, said: "For the police to make themselves judge and jury when deciding what information they should be holding is a flagrant abuse of due process and a serious threat to people's civil liberties,"

The technology is not currently good enough to match images retrieved from CCTV cameras with the database. Mr Barton said it would need a clear full-face shot for the computer to produce a list of possible matches.

He said it could be used, for example, if police were trying to identify photos seized during a raid on a passport forgery factory. Police were trying to get "ahead of the curve", he said, and to capitalise on advances in technology.

National approach: The lesson of Soham

The police national database was the key recommendation from the Bichard inquiry following the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in Soham, Cambridgeshire, in 2002.

After the murders it was found that their killer, Ian Huntley, had come to the attention of Humberside Police over eight separate sexual offences from 1995 to 1999.

This information did not emerge during the vetting check on Huntley when he moved to Cambridgeshire and was appointed caretaker at Soham Village College in 2001.

70
79 Reference-Remember- The Whites lost in Russia ? & infamous Black & Tans lost in the Free Irish State
Updated: 09 Nov 2012

Memorials are silent on both USSR and role in Easter Rising

Thursday 08 November 2012
Dave Nicholson raised an excellent point about why several World War I memorials are marked "1914-1919" due to the imperialist intervention in the infant USSR.

However it should also be mentioned that there are no mentions of the Irish war of independence which, after having its origins in the 1916 Easter Rising, continued straight after the first world war up until 1922 when the Irish Free State came into existence.

The reason for this is that the Establishment has always known that appalling brutalities and atrocities were carried out by the infamous Black and Tans in Ireland during the war.

These irregulars were recruited from British prisons both military and civillian and were established by none other than Winston Churchill himself - ask any Irish Republican and they will confirm that as a fact.

No campaign medals were issued to soldiers serving in Ireland from 1918-1922 and no memorials exist for British soldiers who died there either, because of the embarrassment to the Establishment once these brutalities became known to the general public on both sides of the Irish sea.

It was hoped that it would fade away into historical obscurity and the lack of plans to acknowledge this dark period of Anglo-Irish relations during the centenary commemorations of 1914-1918 means that it has done as such in mainstream circles.

Another whitewashed period of inconvenient history.

Phil Brand

London SW17

409
80 Reference- How many others, including Churchill,owed their lives to the USSR
Updated: 09 Nov 2012

Soviets saves British Jews from nazis

Thursday 08 November 2012
To the surprise of many fellow historians and political opponents Eric Hosbawm often said that he owed his life to the existence of the Soviet Union.

If the Russians hadn't, as Winston Churchill put it, "torn the guts out of the nazis" in the second world war Hitler would have been able to occupy Britain and he, as a Jew, would have ended up in the gas chambers, he said.

I think he was right. I have met many historians who disliked Eric Hobsbawm's views on the Soviet Union but I believe he sincerely thought he owed is life to it.

Perhaps only a Jew could understand his feelings.

Eric Gordon

London NW1

70
81 Reference-Passwords to avoid
Updated: 07 Nov 2012

The worst passwords to use online

Last updated: Mar 1st, 2011

Feature by Rebecca Atkinson 

 A study has revealed the 10 most commonly used passwords that people should avoid when online.

Rebecca Atkinson looks at the dos and don'ts of picking a password.

Thousands of consumers are leaving themselves at risk from fraud and identity theft because the shortness and simplicity of their online passwords leave them susceptible to basic, brute force password attack.

That’s the conclusion of a new report by data security expert Imperva.

It found that a third of people choose passwords made up of six or fewer characters, while 60% opt for passwords from a limited set of alpha-numeric characters.

Nearly 50% of users used names, slang words, dictionary words or trivial passwords such as consecutive digits, or adjacent keyboard keys.

With around 50% of people also using the same (or very similar) password for all the websites they use, there are concerns that they are unwittingly leaving themselves at risk of online fraud. 

The study also revealed the 10 most commonly used passwords.

The most common passwords
123456
12345
123456789
Password
iloveyou
princess
rockyou
1234567
12345678
abc123

Souce: Imperva

Avoid common passwords

Amichai Shulman, chief technical officer at Imperva, urges people to avoid using these common passwords, when using social networking, shopping and online banking sites.

"Everyone needs to understand what the combination of poor passwords means in today's world of automated cyber attacks: with only minimal effort, a hacker can gain access to one new account every second - or 17 minutes to break into 1,000 accounts," he adds.

Despite the rise in fraud and people using the internet, the problem of password secrity has changed very little over the past 20 years.

Shulman says: "It's time for everyone to take password security seriously; it's an important first step in data security.”

How to ensure your password is secure

DON’T…

As well as avoiding the 10 most common passwords detailed above, you should also be careful about picking passwords that could be easily obtained by fraudsters - for example, your mother’s maiden name, your home address or the date of your birthday.

Never use a single word that you might find in the dictionary.

Hackers often use an automated program - known as a ‘dictionary attack’ – to attempt the words of the dictionary.

Short passwords (less than seven digits long) are particularly vulnerable to dictionary attacks.

Never use the same password for different accounts.

Don’t allow your computer to remember your passwords.

Even if no one else uses your computer, if it is stolen the thieves will be able to access your private information and even hijack your identity.

DO…

Check how secure your passwords are by using Microsoft’s password checker tool.

Take advantage of the shift key; use the available characters - such as & or % -  in addition to numbers and capital letters. Mixing different types of characters will make your password much more secure.

Try to ensure your password is a decent length, say 10 to 16 characters.

If you struggle to remember even simple passwords, then create a memory device to trigger a password. Phrases tend to be more secure than single words.

Choose a sentence from your favourite song, poem or book, but mix it up by creating a password using the first (or even the last) letter from each word.

Use a different username and password for your online accounts – that way, if one is compromised you can be sure the others are still safe.

At the very least, use different passwords for sensitive accounts such as your online banking.

Change your passwords on a regular basis – experts suggest every 30 days for the most diligent of internet users.

55
82 Reference- Once in 824 years December's bunch of fives ?
Updated: 07 Nov 2012
 This year, December has 5 Saturdays, 5 Sundays and 5 Mondays.
Dec-12
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
31
       
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
This only happens once every 824 years.
 
The Chinese call it the Money Bag.
 
Send this to all your friends and enemies as well.
 
According to the legend, you will receive money in 4 days.
 
According to Feng Shui, if you do not send it you will stay poor.
 
I in particular, will not let this opportunity pass by.
 
So I send it to you with my best wishes. (Just in case it is true!)
292
83 Reference- Top Ten Misquotes
Updated: 07 Nov 2012

The top ten misquotes by British people are as follows:

1) A damp squid (a damp squib)

2) On tender hooks (on tenter hooks)

3) Nip it in the butt (nip it in the bud)

4) Champing at the bit (chomping at the bit)

5) A mute point (a moot point)

6) One foul swoop (one fell swoop)

7) All that glitters is not gold (all that glisters is not gold)

8) Adverse to (averse to)

9) Batting down the hatches (batten down the hatches)

10) Find a penny pick it up (find a pin pick it up)

54
84 Reference- 123 ? - Which were the World's First,Oldest & Second Oldest Professions
Updated: 06 Nov 2012

The World's second oldest profession?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The English idiom the World's second oldest profession is used to refer to a number of professions.

One frequent use of the phrase is to refer to spies and spying.[1] [2]

An explanation of this phrase is that it must be the second oldest profession because it is mentioned in the bible.

"Joshua son of Nun sent two spies out from Shittim secretly with orders to reconnoitre the country.

The two men came to Jericho and went to the house of a prostitute named Rahab..."

Prostitution- The World’s Oldest Profession ?

is the act or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment.

 The person who receives payment for sexual services is called a prostitute and the person who receives such services is known by a multitude of terms, including "john".

Prostitution is one of the branches of the sex industry.

The legal status of prostitution varies from country to country, from being a punishable crime to a regulated profession.

Estimates place the annual revenue generated from the global prostitution industry to be over $100 billion.[1]

 Prostitution is sometimes referred to as "the world's oldest profession".[2]

Prostitution occurs in a variety of forms. Brothels are establishments specifically dedicated to prostitution.

In escort prostitution, the act may take place at the customer's residence or hotel room (referred to as out-call), or at the escort's residence or in a hotel room rented for the occasion by the escort (called in-call).

Another form is street prostitution. Sex tourism refers to travelling, typically from developed to underdeveloped nations, to engage in sexual activity with prostitutes.

Sex trafficking, one type of human trafficking is defined as using coercion or force to transport an unwilling person into prostitution or other sexual exploitation.

Farming- The World’s first Profession

Although many people say "the oldest profession is prostitution", reality is more likely that the first jobs were hunting, gathering, farming, and cooking.

Men traditionally were the hunters and farmers; women were traditionally the gatherers and cooks.

Gathering would include things like roots, berries, and other edibles identified in a region or area

89
85 Reference- www.rightsandwrongs.co.uk
Updated: 05 Nov 2012

Reference www.rightsandwrongs.co.uk

Apologies to friends and visitors

My domain subscription ran out

All is corrected now

73
86 Reference - An inexpensive medicine worthy of note this winter
Updated: 02 Nov 2012

About Methyl salicylate/Menthol/Camphor and how it works

This medicine helps relieve the symptoms of a cold, catarrh, congestion, muscle aches, pains, sprains, and strains, as well as minor skin conditions.

It contains three ingredients which relieve pain: methyl salicylate, menthol and camphor.

Menthol and camphor also help relieve stuffiness in the nose and make breathing easier.

This medicine is available as an ointment which may be either applied on to the skin or the ointment can be added to hot but not boiling water and the vapours inhaled.

You should leave the areas of skin on to which you have applied this medicine uncovered or cover them loosely.

Before you begin treatment with this medicine, it is important you carry out a patch test to check how your skin reacts to this medicine.

Consult your doctor if your symptoms do not improve, or if they get worse during treatment with this medicine.

Before using Methyl salicylate/Menthol/Camphor

This medicine may not be suitable for everyone and some people must never have it.

Check the leaflet that comes with your medicine to make sure that the medicine is suitable before having it.

Always get advice from a healthcare professional before having this medicine if this medicine is for someone who:

  • is allergic or sensitive to or has had a reaction to any of the ingredients in the medicine
  • is allergic or sensitive to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin or ibuprofen
  • is a child under one year of age
  • has or has had asthma
  • is planning to apply this medicine on to skin that is broken or is delicate

Medicines interactions

If you are taking more than one medicine they may interact with each other.

Before taking this medicine consult your doctor or pharmacist if you are taking or have recently taken any other medicines including vitamins, mineral supplements and herbal or complementary preparations.

The following medicines may interact with this medicine:

  • coumarin anticoagulants such as warfarin

Possible side effects of Methyl salicylate/Menthol/Camphor

Most medicines can cause some side-effects but not everyone having the same medicine will get the same side-effects.

The following side-effects have been associated with people having this medicine:

  • skin reactions such as redness, burning sensations and rashes - stop using this medicine if you get irritation or any discomfort of the skin

Pregnancy and breast-feeding

If you are trying to become pregnant, are pregnant, or are breast-feeding, you should seek medical advice before having this medicine.

Other important information

Make sure that you read the leaflet that comes with your medicine to check what dose you should apply and if there is anything that you need to do if you apply more than the recommended dose.

If you are in any doubt about whether this medicine is suitable for you, speak to your doctor or pharmacist.

This medicine is for external use only. Keep this medicine away from your eyes and other sensitive areas. Wash your hands immediately after applying this medicine.

Keep all medicines out of the sight and reach of children.

This medicine may be available under brand names including:

Mentholatum Vapor rub

61
87 Reference- UK Secret Courts plans breach Human Rights
Updated: 02 Nov 2012
 
UK secret courts’ plans breach human rights, watchdog says

A government watchdog has warned that UK secret courts’ plans breach human rights.

 
A government watchdog has warned that UK secret courts’ plans breach human rights.
 
Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:48PM GMT
 
The British government’s plans for secret courts are incompatible with the Human Rights Act and the centuries-old common law right to fair trials, a government watchdog has warned.


The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said the coalition government’s proposals to extend the use of secret hearings in courts are in breach of the law, describing them as “a departure from … traditions of open justice and fairness.”

"The process is incompatible with the Human Rights Act and the principle of a common law right to a fair trial, and there is no real evidence to show how the proposals would improve the justice system," said John Wadham, the watchdog's general counsel.

The Tory-led government’s controversial changes to the British legal system, which are contained in the Justice and Security Bill, allow certain court evidence to be heard from behind closed doors.

Under secret courts’ plans that are known as Closed Material Procedures, the government could seek closed material proceedings in civil cases concerning matters of “national security,” meaning that neither victims nor their lawyers would be able to hear arguments made against them by British intelligence agencies, MI5 and MI6.

The EHRC’s report also undermined the justifications provided by the UK government ministers for the plans, as they claim the proposals are compatible with rights to a fair trial and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Earlier in September, the London-based human rights organization CagePrisoners set up a broad campaign at an event in Westminster against the British government’s plans to introduce secret trials into the country’s judicial system.
62
88 Reference-Andrew Mitchell is a Toff - and is a known to the Police
Updated: 26 Oct 2012

In British English slang, a toff is a mildly derogatory term for someone with an aristocratic background or belonging to the landed gentry, particularly someone who exudes an air of superiority.

For instance, The Toff, a character from the series of adventure novels by John Creasey is an upper-class crime sleuth, who uses a common caricature of a toff - a line drawing with a top hat, monocle, bow-tie and cigarette with a holder - as his calling card

 

 

91
89 Reference-"Fucking Pleb"or"Fucking Peasant"-I want to be a Hero !- Andrew "Toff" Mitchell
Updated: 26 Oct 2012

Working Class Hero

 

As soon as you're born they make you feel small
By giving you no time instead of it all
Till the pain is so big you feel nothing at all

A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be

They hurt you at home and they hit you at school
They hate you if you're clever and they despise a fool
Till you're so fucking crazy you can't follow their rules

A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be

When they've tortured and scared you for twenty hard years
Then they expect you to pick a career
When you can't really function you're so full of fear

A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be

Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV
And you think you're so clever and classless and free
But you're still fucking peasants as far as I can see

A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be

There's room at the top they are telling you still
But first you must learn how to smile as you kill
If you want to be like the folks on the hill

A working class hero is something to be

A working class hero is something to be

If you want to be a hero well just follow me
If you want to be a hero well just follow me

John Lennon

75
90 Reference- Who produces ? - Not most politicians
Updated: 26 Oct 2012

Most Politician’s Don’t Produce.

 

They live off people who do.

The workers, the farmers, the manufacturers

The workers know that

That is why they treat most politician’s with the contempt they deserve

The workers don’t have the time to protest

They are too busy making enough money to eat

And provide a roof over their heads

Yet the politicians tax and suppress them

Cheat and lie to them.

To care for someone you have to have a care qualification

What do politicians have ?

And the vast army of management that has evolved

Most can’t do the job they purport to manage

Their skill is their ability in spin a yarn

The quickness of the hand and mouth to deceive the eye.

Politicians are the same

They don’t run the economy

Their advisors do.

Osborne is a front

An army that never produced anything

Sometimes we see them come out of the woodwork

Like over the Hunt affair

Bliars boy Cambell

I must qualify production

Because it is more than basic manufacturing

Teachers produce

Doctors produce

Scientists produce

Inventors produce

Musicians produce

Revolutionaries produce

And so on

What does not produce?

Negativism does not produce

You can read it in the rags

The Daily this and that

But producing negativism is big business

Why ?

Because we are encouraged not to think

“We know best”

It starts and ends with most politicians

QED

70
91 Reference- Late News for Complainants ?-Savile is dead, and so it seems is BBC integrity
Updated: 24 Oct 2012


BBC under pressure over Savile scandal

The BBC faces a major crisis as questions rise about the corporation's decisions over Jimmy Savile abuse allegations.

Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:24AM GMT

The British state-run broadcaster has faced a major crisis as questions rise about the corporation's decisions over sexual abuse allegations involving former broadcaster Jimmy Savile, after a special Panorama report on the issue was aired.


The programme called Jimmy Savile - What the BBC Knew, revealed that the corporation suspected the late BBC host of being a paedophile four decades ago and there was an informal meeting between Savile and BBC Radio 1 producers about allegations of child sex abuse almost 40 years ago.

In the Panorama special, which was broadcasted on Monday 22 October, Liz Dux, a lawyer representing some of Savile’s victims said that based on evidence from people who claim to have been abused by the presenter, “there was a paedophile ring operating at the BBC.”

The corporation has been also dragged into a cover-up row after it emerged that its lawyers blocked emails on decision to drop Newsnight expose of Jimmy Savile.

The BBC stressed earlier that the decision had been made for “editorial reasons” by editor Peter Rippon with no influence from above. But after the program’s broadcast, the corporation said a blog by Rippon, in which he explained why a show about Savile was dropped in December last year, was "inaccurate or incomplete in some respects".

Furthermore, veteran BBC journalist John Simpson told Panorama that the corporation is facing “its worst crisis” in the recent 50 years.

Scotland Yard has launched a full-scale criminal investigation into the alleged sexual abuse by Savile and other people connected with him, resulting in the assessment of over 400 separate lines of inquiry and identification of more than 200 potential victims.

Meanwhile, Alan Collins, of Pannone solicitors, said credible evidence shows that former colleagues of the late BBC host were aware that he had abused children in the 1960s in locations such as the corporation's premises.

79
92 Reference- Coffee IS good for you,your tubes and drains-allegedly
Updated: 22 Oct 2012
  • Coffee Grounds are good for your drains
  •  
  • Pipe cleaner: Flush them down the toilet. 
  • Their grittiness will scrub your pipes of any slime and grime. 
  • Please note, this is not a good idea if you have a septic system.

The Truth About Coffee

Nothing like the smell of coffee to start off the day!With so many studies out there about coffee, it's hard to remember whether our morning cup of Joe does the body any good -- or harm.

IS COFFEE GOOD FOR YOU?

Well, I would have to say, all things in moderation.

There do definitely seem to be some health benefits.

The more we're learning, research is leaning on the side of it being good for you.

It lowers the risk of Parkinson's disease and Type 2 diabetes.

It mediates depression. But the benefits are dose-related.

SHOULD CHILDREN BE DRINKING COFFEE?

It's better to limit their caffeine intake.

They'll get caffeine in other things -- chocolate, sodas, but particularly in kids, it's linked to attention problems and hyperactivity, so it's better to avoid it.

COFFEE IS DEHYDRATING. TRUE OR FALSE?

It depends on the dose. We think of coffee as a diuretic.

But recent studies have shown it's only a diuretic at high doses -- above 575 milligrams.

Have some water if you exceed that amount.

HOW MUCH IS THAT?

575 milligrams is a little less than three cups of coffee, but that's three regular size cups.

But we have to remember the cups we have nowadays are big cups.

So, it's easy to have more than 575 milligrams.

COFFEE INCREASES HYPERTENSION. TRUE OR FALSE?

Coffee does increase your blood pressure, but only for a few minutes.

What's interesting is that recent studies show it doesn't increase your likelihood of getting hypertension.

I would caution that anyone who has high blood pressure that's not under control should avoid caffeine.

COFFEE HELPS WEIGHT LOSS

Unfortunately, this doesn't work.

Caffeine does speed up your metabolism for awhile but, in long-term studies, people who drank coffee had no better weight control than people who didn't.

DOES COFFEE ACCELERATE BONE LOSS?

This one is a little controversial. It doesn't make our body lose more calcium or lose calcium from the bones, but some studies have shown coffee drinkers do have more brittle bones.

I suggest all of my patients, especially women, supplement with a calcium supplement or, if you're going to have a great deal of coffee, make sure you put some milk in your coffee.

  • Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.

The Radical says -

Brew your own coffee, sit back and enjoy drinking it.

Afterall life is too short to worry !

 

65
93 Reference- Reasons why Coffee grounds should not be thrown away.
Updated: 22 Oct 2012

11 Good Reasons Why Coffee Grounds are Worth Keeping

by lifehackery -


After brewing coffee, coffee grounds are often tossed into the trash bin.

Some people regard the group of squeezed coffee beans as worthless items.

If they only knew the alternative uses for coffee grounds, they would probably store the used beans in their cupboards.

Coffee grounds have many other uses aside from producing coffee.

They can be used for gardening, repelling insects, and even as pet grooming products.

Just by using these supposed waste products, the need to buy some household products can be instantly eliminated.

Best of all, the use of coffee grounds is environment-friendly.

You better think twice if you plan to throw away your next batch of coffee grounds.

Here are 11 of the best reasons why used coffee grounds are worth keeping:


1.Compost Material –

Coffee grounds fit the standards set by gardeners for compost materials.

The grounds, when mixed with soil, release nutrients that make the ground richer and more acidic.

Plants that flourish in acidic soil will be healthier since they can get the needed nourishment from the ground. If you have a good supply of coffee grounds, just spread them evenly in your garden.

Your plants will reward you by producing robust blooms.

2.Pet Grooming Solution

Mix coffee ground extract with some water and the result is a nice grooming solution for pets.

After a few rubs, the solution softens your pet’s fur, giving it a nice sheen.

Some people even claim that the solution keeps fleas and other parasites off your pet, though it still needs testing for it to be considered a fact.


3.Fridge Deodorizer

Storing different types of food inside the fridge can produce a nasty mixture of odours.

Remove those pungent smells with a bowl filled with coffee grounds.

Place the bowl inside your fridge and your coffee ground deodorizer will gradually absorb all unwanted scents.

If your fridge is packed with stored food, just add more grounds and a few drops of vanilla to your deodorizer so that it can absorb more odors.

4.No Place for Pet Litter

You can keep your pet from defecating in your garden if you spread a mixture of coffee grounds and orange peels around the area.

Your pets will find the scent of the mixture too exotic for their defecating standards.

5.Skin Exfoliant – Rubbing your skin with coffee ground extract seems silly but it is actually a good idea.

The extract removes dead skin cells, which results in better-looking skin.

It can save you hundreds of dollars since this simple product can practically replacesseveral pricey sessions with your dermatologist.

6.Shoe Deodorizer

Active people and smelly feet are often associated with each other.

Break away from the norm by placing used coffee grounds in your shoes.

It will not relieve you of foul-smelling feet, but it will certainly get rid of the evidence.

Now, if you want to truly remove foot odor, you can always wash your feet with water and coffee ground extract.

7.Hair Shine Solution

Let’s face it, everyone wants to have shiny and bouncy hair.

Some people spend significant amounts of cash just to make their hair look better.

You can look no further than your supply of used coffee grounds to give you softer and shinier hair.

Just wash your hair with the coffee byproduct and rinse.

You will soon sport your favorite celebrity hairstyle after a few strokes.

8.Ant Repellent

Ants can be annoying, especially if they manage to make their way to your bath towel or clothes.

You can avoid these tiny pests by rubbing coffee grounds on your closet. For some reason, ants dislike the scent and the properties of coffee ground extract.

9.Fireplace Dust Regulator

Fireplace dust is always a big obstacle for someone who cleans the fireplace.

Large dust formations can sting your eyes and irritate your sinuses.

They can also make the surrounding areas dirty.

To properly regulate dust, you can toss a handful of wet coffee grounds in your fireplace after operation.

The wet grounds will hold the dust in place, lessening the appearance of dust clouds when cleaning the fireplace.


10.Coloring Ingredient

If you combine coffee ground extract with hot water, you can create brown dye for fabrics, art works and other applications.

You can also mix the extract with henna to produce brown-colored henna tattoos.

11.Scratch Remover – Coffee ground extract can erase scratches after several forceful scrubs.

Its thick slippery base, when coupled with a rug, topples the foundations of most scratches.

The scratches eventually fade in the process.

You can use coffee grounds as unconventional product substitutes for many household activities.

With their wide variety of uses, you can say that they’re even more useful than their ungrounded counterparts.

83
94 Reference- Anti - Slavery Day - Its about Exploitation - Capitalism !
Updated: 19 Oct 2012

Anti-Slavery Day:

One victim of child sex trafficking is one too many

Every year hundreds of children are trafficked for sexual exploitation and labour in the UK.

But the criminals are rarely found or punished.

 Why?

Thursday 18 October 2012

It's your twelfth birthday, and you've recently lost your mother.

You've never met your father, and as a result you are cared for by relatives.

They struggle to feed and clothe you, so out of economic necessity you must leave school to sell whatever you can on the streets.

A man befriends you and your relatives, offering a better life in another country.

There is hope when things seemed desperate. A place where you can go to school, get a good education, earn money and be successful. The offer seems too good to be true.

But you're yet to discover that it is.

When you arrive in the country, you're taken to a strange place.

It doesn't look how you imagined. The language sounds very different.

When the night is over and the men have left, you're left alone.

The bleeding has stopped, but the tears still come in sporadic bursts.

This experience is repeated daily and you've lost count for how long.

That country is the United Kingdom .

And this is the reality for hundreds of children every year.

When some children go missing from the UK , there is a prompt investigation, search, campaign, and a shared sense of shared hope that they are safely found.

The children who are trafficked into the UK are often unable to speak the language to ask for help, and there is no one in the country to report them missing.

In 2011, there were just eight convictions for human trafficking.

In 2011, there were just eight convictions for human trafficking. And this includes adult cases.

The data isn't separated between adult and child, but every year hundreds of children and young teenagers who have been trafficked are discovered by charities and local authorities – and these are just those who have managed to escape the clutches of their captors.

Today the Home Office are to release a report revealing that numbers of human trafficking are rising.

With anti-slavery day today, what better time than now for the Home Office to publicly address the issue.

Slavery sounds like it should be confined to history books, but the reality is very different for many children.

Sexual exploitation is the most prevalent type of child trafficking in the UK, but they are also forced into slave labour and organised crime.

Christine Beddoe, from the charity End Child Prostitution, Child Pornography and the Trafficking of Children for Sexual Purposes (ECPAT), feels that there is a culture of disbelief in the UK when it comes to acknowledging cases of trafficking:

"The government tend to brush cases of child trafficking under the carpet."

"The government tend to brush cases of child trafficking under the carpet," says Beddoe.

"The children are considered immigrants, and with deportation being a greater concern than justice, their perpetrators aren't punished, and are left to commit the same crimes to other children."

The June report from the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, which is part of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, acknowledged the scale of the problem:

The UK continues to be a significant transit and destination country for child trafficking, with reporting confirming the existence of child trafficking both into and within the UK.

And yet there were only eight convictions in 2011.

Described as a high-profit, low-risk crime, the EU encourages use of an independent watchdog to ensure action – but the Home Office continues to hold back. As a result, the data on child trafficking is insufficient and there are no mandatory guidelines to follow when a child is found.

As these children arrive with no family or support, ECPAT suggest that each child should have a system of legal guardianship to represent their case and be responsible for their welfare:

"Nobody chases it up when they go missing.

The government seem completely resistant to it [the introduction of legal guardians], with one major reason seeming that as many of these young people are from abroad, they are technically illegal immigrants."

How do they prove they are who they say they are?

Apart from the primary concern of deportation, there are many obstacles to identifying trafficked children.

As well as a lack of belief of their extraordinary story, they have been groomed to keep silent, and even threatened.

Even for those children who are fortunate enough to break away and tell their story, they face a further problem: how do they prove they are who they say they are?

Without a passport or identification they are then put through the unpleasant process that illegal immigrants face, without anyone to believe their story.

For one girl, Aluna* (*not her real name), this was the case.

Over the years her body reached puberty, and she was no longer considered useful to her abusers and their customers.

After being abandoned, she managed to find a police station.

When she tried to explain in broken English where she was from and what she had been through, she was thrown in a cell.

Beddoe says: "As seen with the allegations surrounding Jimmy Savile, we are still living in a culture where the adult's word is taken over the child's - so children don't come forward. And if they do, they aren't believed."

"Our concern is to keep children safe but this is often in conflict with the Border Agency who treat them as if they are asylum seekers."

"The fact is," she adds, "the legislation is there to convict criminals for child trafficking, but both the police and other professionals don't take it seriously."

There is a significantly higher number of victims than investigations and convictions.

As a result of the lack of resources, the number of victims identified via the National Referral Mechanism, who record the data on victims, shows there is a significantly higher number of victims than criminal investigations and convictions.

Beddoe describes how the legislation is difficult to pursue, and as the Crown Prosecution Service will only take cases which will prosecute, and the police struggle to meet the threshold of evidence required, the cases aren't put forward.

"The police have their hands tied if the legislation is not fit for purpose.

There's one answer to this problem: change the legislation."

"The Crown Prosecution Service are favourable to starting from scratch and re-writing the law to bring it up to date.

But there's not enough pressure internally to do this.

It takes political will."

The Independent on Sunday successfully campaigned for the UK to sign up to the EU directive on human trafficking in March last year, and the Coalition government promised vast improvements on tackling the trade and exploitation of humans, to strengthen our laws and to protect victims, making it easier to prosecute those who enslave them, but over a year and a half later, and we're yet to see the results.

There is a general acceptance within the EU that the UK isn't doing as much as we should be, and that our European neighbours are better at enforcing laws to stop trafficking, and prosecuting those involved.

The recent report from the Council of Europe's Greta (Group of Experts on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings) said we need better trained supervisors or foster carers for trafficked children.

They suggested a "significant" number of trafficked children in care go missing - and some even end up rejoining those who exploited them in the first place.

The reality is, we accommodate traffickers and the abuse of their silent victims.

We are used to hearing the word "trafficking", but it can so easily be dismissed as a foreign concept.

The reality is, in the UK, we accommodate traffickers and the abuse of their silent victims.

The problem is vast and widespread, with cases in Belfast, Derby, Portsmouth, Cardiff, London, Totness, Oxford, Croydon, Birmingham, Manchester and Bristol.

Child sex trafficking is happening, but arrests aren't, and neither are prosecutions.

And so on Anti-Slavery Day, there's a question to propose to the Home Office:

We know there are victims, but where are the perpetrators?

***

Click here to read the story of Sara, who was trafficked to the UK by a Church Pastor and forced into prostitution.

Click here for an article by Carolina Albuerne from The Poppy Project, which provides support, advocacy and accommodation to trafficked women.

Click here for Barnardo's Chief Executive Anne Marie Carrie commenting on internal trafficking in the UK.

LEGAL CASE: 7 July 2011

A man was convicted of trafficking two Nigerian girls who had been controlled by Juju magic rituals - this was the first case of its kind in Europe.

Anthony Harrison, 32, imprisoned both girls - aged 14 and 16 - at his east London home before attempting to traffic them to Spain and Greece as prostitutes.

It took police two years to persuade them to speak openly about their ordeal, due to their fear after the ritual.

It was suggested he took over from Kennedy Johnson imprisoned in 2009 for trafficking – and was even possibly related to him.

Johnson trafficked dozens of Nigerian teenagers, some as young as thirteen, into and out of the UK for sexual exploitation.

The case received minimal media coverage at the time, and the whereabouts of Johnson's child victims are still mostly unknown. Johnson was sentenced to just six years, and lessons from this case have never been circulated to Local Authorities.

WHAT ABOUT ELSEWHERE IN EUROPE?

The Netherlands are renowned as among the best in Europe for their practices in tackling trafficking. They have a dedicated National Rapporteur on Human Trafficking (as do many other countries in Europe, including Finland and Czech Republic) which the UK still lacks. Corinne Dettmeijer-Vermeulen, said:

"Children need our protection. This is well recognised in the new EU-Directive, as it should be. I have found that in the Netherlands the conviction rate where minors are concerned [in sex trafficking] is higher than average. But still, every child victim is one too many."

THE FACTS

- The 489 child potential victims who were found to have been trafficked into the UK in 2011 were from 43 countries. Romania 20%, Vietnam 13%, Nigeria 11%, internal trafficking within the UK 9%.

- Exploitation type was unknown in 22% of child cases. Sexual explitation 30%, criminal exploitation 26%, labour exploitation 13% and domestic servitude 7%.

- The SOCA assessment says: "It is likely that the true number of victims in trafficking is higher than that identified in this assessment."

48
95 Reference- Having Fun ?
Updated: 17 Oct 2012

Can you put a price on fun? Yes: £310,346

When we’re not at work or asleep, we like to keep busy.

But have you ever wondered just how much you spend entertaining yourself?

We take a look at where your money goes and what you can do to have fun for less.

By Emma-Lou Montgomery

– Fri, Oct 12, 2012 17:46 BST

Having fun, kicking back, doing what you want, we all want to let our hair down and it’s no surprise then that the entertainment industry is big business.

But before you buy another download, a season ticket to see your favourite team or add another gadget to your collection, do you ever stop to think how much you’re spending on entertainment?

Chances are, it’s a lot more than you think. Here’s how it all adds up.


Sports/hobbies £33,222


Whatever you like to get up to in your spare time, chances are it won’t come cheap.

Our sports and hobbies cost us, on average, £678 a year, according to figures from M&S Money.

On average if you keep up your chosen activities from the age of 16 up until you’re 65,

that’s 49 years you’ll have clocked up. And that adds up to a whopping £33,222 on average.

If you have to buy expensive equipment, make sure it’s insured – especially if you travel abroad with it.

 

Being a football fan £56,000

 

Those who prefer to watch rather than take part spend, somewhat surprisingly, even more.

Tyre manufacturer, eTyres, has totted up the annual spend and worked out that over their lifetime the average football fan will spend almost £56,000 when kit, tickets travel and the rest are added together.

 It’s undoubtedly an expensive business supporting your team.

Gadgets and gizmos £46,700

We’re a nation of gadget freaks. We must be – we each spend, on average, £994 on the latest must-haves every year, according to a poll carried out by Explori.com for the Gadget Show Live.

That tots up to a staggering £46,700 if we start at 18 and go on buying into the latest technology trends until we’re at least 65.

If you’re in Canterbury in Kent though you can double that figure. There, tech-heads spend almost £2,000 a year on the latest hi-tech toys and devices.

Games £12,024

If you’re a video games fan you’ll already know it’s an expensive hobby and also one that you’re unlikely to grow out of any time soon.

According to a review of our gaming habits, carried out by Playr2.com, the average gamer in the UK spends 1.8 years of their life playing video games.

And it costs an average of £334 a year to keep up to date with the latest releases, according to another survey conducted by specialist online retailer ShopTo.

The 1,452 gamers surveyed by Playr2 were aged between 18 and 40 and admitted to spending 9.2 hours a week on average in front of their games console. That’s equivalent to 478 hours a year or an average of at least 19 whole days a year. But before non-gamers get on a high horse, it should be added that the latest report from TV licensing shows that the average Brit watches three times as much television at 28 hours a week on average.

But the expense can’t be denied, the average gamer said they started playing games when they were nine and that they expected to ‘retire’ when they reached 40 or 45 ‘at the latest’, and you can see it’s as time consuming as it is cash-consuming.

Remember to trade in old games as soon as you’re finished with them. Many companies offer cash or money-off new games when you trade-in unwanted games. And make you sure take advantage of any loyalty schemes which give points for every pound spent and will soon add up to a free game for avid players.


‘Must have’ electricals £48,900

Our love of televisions and PCs is a tad costlier than even our love of gadgets and gizmos.  The average UK household will work its way through more than 250 electrical devices over a period of 60 years.

Brits replace their computers every four years, spending about £500 a time, according to product review site Reevoo.com. We tend to replace our telly every five years, following advances in technology. 



In total, we will fork out in the region of £48,940 on electrical devices over our lifetime.

With each person in the UK buying an average of 2.8 new electrical items a year, according to Tesco, there are a lot of old appliances and gadgets lying around.

Research online recycling site Weeebuy, found the average value of a recycled gadget is £30, and we each have three unwanted electrical items sitting around at home, putting almost £100 back in your pocket. 

Clear some clutter and make some cash from your unwanted gadgets by selling them to a recycling company and you’ll also be doing your bit for the environment.


Broadband and phone £65,500

Of course, the latest gadgets and gizmos would be pointless without the broadband to power them and the phones on which to organize your social life.

If you’ve ever wondered how much you spend on a lifetime on these other essential must haves we can reveal that it’s £65,564.92 to be precise. That’s according to TalkTalk which has worked out that we tend to stay tech savvy until an average age of 68, spending £970 on average, each and every year.

Nights out £27,000

When we can be dragged away from the TV, games console or iPad, it seems we like to give our wallets as much of a battering as our livers.

The Smirnoff Nightlife Index looked closely at the nation’s nightlife habits and found out that over half of 18 to 40-year-olds spend £50 a night and a fifth of party animals will splash out more than £175 to have a good time.

Little surprise then that a lifetime of partying clocks in at £27,000.


Music £21,000

We spend around £21,000 on music between the age of 16 and 64, on everything from CDs and downloads, to iPods, music festivals, gigs and music magazines, according to Prudential.

With an average of £890 worth of equipment, and annual spend of £424 on music, £211 on gigs and events, and £14 on magazines.

But it’s undoubtedly live music fans that spend the most. On average more than £1,600 getting their fix of their favourite bands.

According to the study, by MyVoucherCodes, we go to more than three gigs or music festivals a year, spending an average of £450 each year. 

Add in the £10 average spend on drinks and snacks; with rock and indie concerts owning up to spending, on average, more than £21 and you can see how it soon adds up.

So, however you like to spend your spare time, the chances are it’s costing you quite a bit more than you probably thought.

71
96 Reference- Global Crude Oil Production set rise
Updated: 17 Oct 2012

Global Oil Production Set to Skyrocket       

Written by Our Correspondent    
Tuesday, 16 October 2012 
Asia Sentinel 

Climate change or no climate change, crude production is going up spectacularly

If you are at all concerned about the effect of the consumption of fossil fuels on climate change, brace yourself.

It is inevitably going to grow dramatically, and soon.

By 2020 – just eight years, according to a little-noticed research paper for the UK-based energy company BP by Harvard University’s Leonardo Maugeri, the world will be producing 49 million more barrels per day of crude and natural gas liquids than it is today.

Peak oil, that point when the world reaches its maximum rate of extraction and production begins terminal decline, apparently is nowhere on the horizon, according to the 86-page paper, produced for Harvard’s Belford Center for Science and International Affairs and titled Oil: The next Revolution.

The global implications of Maugeri’s research are frightening. Will Hickey, a Fulbright professor of energy and human resources and associate professor of management at Solbridge International School of Business in Daejeon, South Korea, pointed out in a YaleGlobal article carried in Asia Sentinel on Oct. 12 that arctic ice is melting and altering global weather, with seas rising and wildfires increasing, governments are simply ignoring the signs.

A progressive tax on carbon emissions is absolutely essential, but no governments are willing to dare the political fallout from instituting one anywhere.

The American environmentalist and journalist Bill McKibben, writing this month in Rolling Stone Magazine, pointed out that May was the 327th consecutive month in which the temperature of the entire globe exceeded the 20th-century average, the odds of which occurring by simple chance were 3.7 x 1099, “a number considerably larger than the number of stars in the universe.”

Maugeri is hardly blind to the implications.

Indeed, he writes, “A revolution in environmental and emission-curbing technologies is required to sustain the development of most unconventional oils – along with strong enforcement of existing rules.

Without such a revolution, a continuous clash between the industry and environmental groups will force the governments to delay or constrain the development of new projects.”

 There seems to be no impetus for any such revolution, however, as both McKibben and Hickey argue. Instead, there is a wholesale campaign on the part of every country on the planet to find more fossil fuel resources and burn them. And they seem to be exceeding far beyond expectations.

Fears at the turn of the century that fossil fuel production would be in terminal decline appear to be unfounded.

Maugeri acknowledges that his analysis could be subject to a significant margin of error, brought on by a possible new worldwide recession, a drastic retraction of the Chinese economy, a sudden resolution of the major political tensions affecting a big oil producer, or a collapse of the price of oil to below US$70 per barrel for benchmark Brent crude, the price at which most new technologies, like shale oil recovery, are viable.

However, the Internattional Energy Agency's mostr recent Mid-term Report on oil through 2017, while less willing to forecast in such specific terms, indicates that so-called unconventional oil in oil shale is growing significantly in North America.

The forecast expects aggregate oil supplies to increase by 9.3 milliion barrels per day through 2017, with about 40 percent of liquids growth coming from North American oil sands or light tight oil production.

Maugeri writes that: “This oil revival is spurred by an unparalleled investment cycle that started in 2003 and has reached its climax from 2010 on, with three-year investments in oil and gas exploration and production of more than US$1.5 trillion.”

Fossil fuel production, he argues, is in for an unprecedented upsurge, with capacity of 110.6 million barrels of production per day, up from 93 million bpd in 2011.

But production is changing. Hydrological fracturing, horizontal drilling and oil shale exploitation are taking over from traditional deep well drilling.

The shale/tight oil boom is not a temporary bubble but rather the most important revolution in the oil sector in decades, Maugeri writes.

While Saudi Arabia will continue to lead the world in both reserves and production, production is shifting back to the west, with interesting political implications.

“This is a novelty, because three out of four of these countries are part of the western hemisphere, and one only – Iraq – belongs to the traditional center of gravity of the oil world, the Persian Gulf.”

That raises the possibility that the Western hemisphere could return to its pre-World War II status of theoretical oil self-sufficiency, and the United States could dramatically reduce its oil import needs.

 Over the next decades, the growing role of these so-called unconventional oils will make the Western hemisphere the new center of gravity of oil exploration and production.

The US in fact has the world’s second highest reserves after Saudi Arabia, followed by Russia.

After Iraq, which is fourth, Canada and Brazil are fifth and sixth, with China seventh.

All will have more capacity by 2020 than they have today. The four countries showing the highest potential in terms of effective production capacity growth are, in order, Iraq, the United States, Canada, and Brazil.

Only four of the current big oil suppliers – those with more than a million barrels per day of production capacity – face a net reduction of their production capacity by 2020, Maugeri writes.

They are Norway, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Iran.

For the latter two, the loss of production is primarily due to political factors.

All other producers are capable of increasing or preserving their production capacity.

In fact, by balancing depletion rates and reserve growth on a country-by-country basis, decline profiles of already producing oilfields appear less pronounced than assessed by most experts, being no higher than 2 to 3 percent on a yearly basis.

“The most surprising factor of the global picture, however, is the explosion of the US oil output,” the report notes.

“Thanks to the technological revolution brought about by the combined use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the US is now exploiting its huge and virtually untouched shale and tight oil fields, whose production – although still in its infancy – is already skyrocketing in North Dakota and Texas.”

The Bakken/Three Forks tight oil formation in North Dakota and Montana, could become as big as big as one of the Persian Gulf producers. There are more than 20 big shale oil formations, especially the Eagle Ford Shale, where the recent boom is revealing a hydrocarbon endowment comparable to that of the Bakken Shale. Most of that shale oil is profitable prices ranging from US$50 to $65 per bbl, well below current prices.

Obstacles remain that could significantly reduce the US shale output, among them the inadequate US oil transport system, its refining structure, the amount of associated natural gas produced with shale oil, and environmental doubts about hydraulic fracturing, which is coming under increasing fire from environmentalists for groundwater pollution and other problems.

However, the analysis notes, after considering the risk factors and the depletion of currently producing oilfields, the US could produce 11.6 million barrels per day of crude and natural gas liquids by 2020, making the country the second largest oil producer in the world after Saudi Arabia.

Biofuels could push up overall capacity to more than 13 million barrels per day, representing about 65 percent of current US consumption.

“Oil is not in short supply,” he concludes.

“From a purely physical point of view, there are huge volumes of conventional and unconventional oils still to be developed, with no “peak-oil” in sight.

The real problems concerning future oil production are above the surface, not beneath it, and relate to political decisions and geopolitical instability.”

74
97 Microwave is much cheaper than cooking with gas.
Updated: 13 Oct 2012

Microwave is much cheaper than cooking with gas.

Even though electricity costs approx 3 times more than gas, it is much quicker and you are not wasting heat by heating water/pans etc.

Most microwaves are between 600 to 800 watts so even on full power cost about 5p to 6p an hour to run

A 2007 report but the point still applies

70
98 Reference- Microwave your increased Gas Bill ?
Updated: 13 Oct 2012

Gas bills to soar by 6% for UK households

The annual gas and electricity bill for households in Britain will have an additional cost of 6 percent.

Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:0PM GMT

The average annual gas and electricity bill for households in Britain will have an additional cost of £80, making British Gas the second most expensive supplier in the country.


British Gas has confirmed a price rise of 6 percent for electricity and gas consumers, which will add an extra £80 to the typical household’s yearly bill.

The price rise, which starts on 16 November, will make British Gas the second most costly supplier in the UK after Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) that demands its most expensive annual bill of £1,336. SSE itself has already announced a price rise of 9 percent, which kicks in on Monday 15 October.

British Gas customers will face a bitter blow due to its previous 18 percent and 16 percent rise in gas and electricity that took effect in August 2011.

Gillian Guy, Citizens Advice chief executive said, "Many British Gas customers will find the possibility of a price rise really frightening. Bill increases throw already stretched budgets into turmoil, with people forced to find more ways to scrimp and save."

It has been estimated that a total of 8.5 million households in the UK will be hit by the gas and electricity bill increase. British Gas has blamed the new costs on rising wholesale prices as well as increasing prices that are related to environmental and social issues.

Ann Robinson, director of consumer policy at uSwitch.com, stressed, "This is a bitter blow for consumers and comes just ahead of winter when the impact on bills will be even more acute.”

57
99 Reference- 2012 Britain's Worst Tourist Season
Updated: 11 Oct 2012

UK suffers worst tourist season in decade: Study

 

A new study shows that UK suffers worst tourist season in a decade.

Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:42AM GMT

The number of visitors to Britain’s top tourist attractions has significantly decreased this year, triggering the worst trading period for the country’s key destinations in over a decade, new figures show.


According to a research conducted by the Association of Leading Visitor Attractions (Alva), some major tourist attractions in London had 60 percent fewer visitors during the two weeks of the 2012 London Olympic Games since foot and mouth disease gripped the British countryside in 2001.

Blaming the wet summer and the sports event for the worst tourist season in the UK, the study found that Alva member sites in London saw an average decrease of 15 percent in visitor numbers in May-August 2012 when compared to the same period last year.

Gardens and outdoor attractions in the UK capital suffered the largest decrease by 21.3 percent in the number of visitors this summer.

Furthermore, visitor numbers to heritage sites and cathedrals, including the Tower of London, St Paul’s Cathedral and the Houses of Parliament, as well as to museums and galleries slumped by 20.3 and 13.1 percent respectively.

Admitting that the figures made “sobering reading,” Bernard Donoghue, chief executive of Alva, which manages some 2,000 tourist sites across the UK, stressed that the Olympic period was “one of the worst trading periods in living memory” for London attractions.

“In the first couple of weeks of the Olympics, some of the key central London attractions experienced a huge fall of up to 61% in visitor numbers compared to the same weeks last year,” Donoghue added.

Earlier in August, following several warnings from businesses that the London Olympic Games have left the British capital a “ghost town,” the European Tour Operators Association also said attendance at attractions in London was down by “at least 30 percent.”

95
100 Reference-Turing recognised as a GCHQ founder after being vilified during his life
Updated: 10 Oct 2012


Alan Turing's legacy hailed by GCHQ boss

The work of codebreaker Alan Turing has had a lasting impact on how GCHQ operates today

By James Temperton

News Security

 05/10/2012

 Alan Turing was part of a team of codebreakers based at Bletchley Park during World War II

GCHQ director Iain Lobban has made a rare public speech to celebrate the centenary of the birth of codebreaker Alan Turing, describing him as one of the great minds of the twentieth century.

In a lecture at Leeds University Lobban said that there were "enduring lessons" to be taken from the life and work of Turing.

Turing's work at Bletchley Park was vital for the allied victory in World War II and also started a new era of technology in cryptography.

Lobban said it was Turing's use of technology and its application to intelligence that provided his most striking legacy:

"If I had to single out one piece of Turing's legacy to GCHQ today, it would be the way that his contribution was part of the irrevocable change that turned the Code and Cypher School from being the mainly cryptanalytic bureau it was between the wars to becoming the highly technological intelligence organisation that GCHQ is today."

While at Bletchley Park Turing worked on a Polish invention called the Bombe.

His work to speed up the process of deciphering codes using the technology was, according to Lobban an example of his ability to take an idea further than anyone else could.

Turing's work in the United States also set the tone for closer relationships between the two countries.

Towards the end of his career at the Code and Cypher School, Turing was sent to the US to investigate secure speech systems.

"The significance of sending Turing – one of our greatest minds – to the US moved the relationship towards the close partnership we enjoy today," Lobban said.

GCHQ is now focussed on unearthing the next great minds; "we must find tomorrow's Turings", Lobban argued.


Read more: http://www.computeractive.co.uk/ca/news/2214982/alan-turings-legacy-hailed-by-gchq-boss#ixzz28ravcn1m

75
101 Reference-On Top of the Poppies- but Jim Fixed it for the BBC - Arise Sir Jim !
Updated: 10 Oct 2012

Jimmy Savile

 

From Wikipedia, 
 
Sir
Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG

Jimmy Savile leading the pipe band through Fort William to the Lochaber Highland Games

in his capacity as Honorary Chieftain of the games

 

Born James Wilson Vincent Savile
(1926-10-31)31 October 1926
Leeds, England
Died 29 October 2011(2011-10-29) (aged 84)
Roundhay, Leeds, England
Nationality British
Occupation DJ, actor, columnist, television and radio personality
Years active 1958–2011
Television Jim'll Fix It, Top of the Pops
Religion Roman Catholic

Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile, OBE, KCSG (31 October 1926 – 29 October 2011), was an English disc jockey, television presenter and media personality, best known for his BBC television show Jim'll Fix It, and for being the first and last presenter of the long-running BBC music chart show Top of the Pops.

He was also known for his fundraising and support of various charities, particularly Stoke Mandeville Hospital.

He was widely described as a philanthropist and was honoured for his efforts.[1][2]

After working as a conscripted coal miner during World War II, he began a career playing records in, and later managing, dance halls.

His media career started as a disc jockey on Radio Luxembourg in 1958, and on Tyne Tees Television in 1960, developing a reputation for his flamboyant character and eccentricities.

He later worked primarily for the BBC, where he presented the first edition of Top of the Pops in 1964 and worked on BBC Radio 1 from 1968. Between 1975 and 1994 he presented Jim'll Fix It, a popular television programme in which he arranged for the wishes of viewers, mainly children, to come true.

He became noted for his charity work, including fundraising as well as personally volunteering at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Leeds General Infirmary and Broadmoor Hospital.

He was awarded the OBE in 1971 and was knighted in 1990.

After his death, allegations were made that Savile had raped and sexually abused girls and boys at the height of his fame in the 1960s and 1970s.

In October 2012, the Metropolitan Police began an assessment of the allegations, and set up a joint inquiry with the NSPCC into abuses of young teenage girls reported to have been carried out by Savile between about 1959 and the 1980s.

Early lifeSavile was born in Leeds, the youngest of seven children (Mary, Marjory, Vincent, John, Joan, Christina and James) born to devout Roman Catholics,[3] Agnes Monica (née Kelly) and Vincent Joseph Marie Savile, a bookmaker's clerk and insurance agent.[4] Savile almost died of pneumonia at the age of five months.

 He was a Bevin Boy, conscripted during World War II to work as a coal miner at South Kirkby Colliery, West Yorkshire, England.

He suffered serious spinal injuries in a mine explosion and spent a long period in recuperation.[5]

Having started playing records in dance halls in the early 1940s, Savile claimed to be the first ever disc jockey.

According to his autobiography, he was the first person to use two turntables and a microphone, at the Grand Records Ball at the Guardbridge Hotel in 1947.[6]

It was billed as 'Jimmy Saville introducing Juke Box Doubles'.

Savile is acknowledged as being one of the pioneers of using twin turntables for continuous play of music,[7] although his claim has been disputed.

(Twin turntables had been illustrated in the BBC Handbook in 1929 and were advertised for sale in Gramophone magazine in 1931.[8])

He became a semi-professional sportsman, competing in the 1951 Tour of Britain cycle race[9] and working as a professional wrestler.[10] He said:

If you look at the athletics of it, I've done over 300 professional bike races, 212 marathons and 107 pro fights. [He proudly announces that he lost all of his first 35 fights.]

No wrestler wanted to go back home and say a long-haired disc jockey had put him down.

So from start to finish I got a good hiding.

I've broken every bone in my body. I loved it.[11]

 

Savile later lived in Salford, and worked as manager of the Plaza Ballroom in Oxford Road, Manchester, in the mid-fifties.

He lived in Great Clowes Street in Higher Broughton, Salford, and was often seen sitting on his front door steps.

He also managed the Mecca Locarno ballroom in Leeds in the late 1950s and early 1960s.[12] Mecca also owned the Palais, a dance hall in Ilford, Essex, and Savile did a stint as manager there between 1955 and 1956.

His Monday evening records-only dance sessions (admission one shilling) were a huge favourite with local teens.[13]

RadioSavile started his radio career working as a Radio Luxembourg DJ from 1958 to 1967.

He ran the Teen and Twenty Disc Club (TTDC),[14] membership for life, on Radio Luxembourg.

For a small fee listeners received a certificate and a small bracelet with a disc on it, inscribed with the show's name.

He stated on the BBC television series Inside Out that the title Teen and Twenty Disc Club had been rejected by the BBC in favour of Top of the Pops as too long; also that he introduced dancing to records, so that he was the originator of the discothèque.

In 1968 he joined BBC Radio 1, where he initially presented Savile's Travels, a weekly programme broadcast each Sunday in which he was recorded travelling around the UK and talking to members of the public.[15] From 1969 to 1973 he also fronted Speakeasy, a discussion programme for teenagers.

His best-remembered contribution to Radio 1, however, is the Sunday lunchtime show Jimmy Savile's Old Record Club, where entire top tens from years gone by were played.

This was the first show to feature old charts. It began in 1973 as The Double Top Ten Show and ended in 1987 as The Triple Top Ten Show, at which point he left Radio 1 after 19 years, although he could be heard presenting The Vintage Chart Show on BBC World Service between March 1987 and October 1989, playing top tens from the years 1957 to 1987.

From March 1989 to August 1997 he was heard on various stations around the UK (mostly taking the Gold format, such as the West Midlands' Xtra AM and the original Classic Gold network in Yorkshire) where he revived his Radio 1 shows.

In 1994, satirist Chris Morris gave a fake obituary on BBC Radio 1 (as a joke), saying that Savile had collapsed and died, which allegedly drew threats of legal action from Savile and forced an apology from Morris.

On 25 December 2005, and 1 January 2007, Savile presented shows on the Real Radio network.

The Christmas 2005 show counted down the festive Top 10s of 10, 20 and 30 years previously, while the New Year 2007 show (also taken by Century Radio following its acquisition by GMG) featured Savile recounting anecdotes from his past and playing associated records, mostly from the 1960s although some were from the 1970s.

TelevisionIn 1960 he presented Tyne Tees Television's music programme Young at Heart.

Although the show was broadcast in black and white, Savile dyed his hair a different colour every week.[16]

 
Jimmy Savile presenting Top of The Pops in 1964On New Year's Day, 1964, he presented the first edition of the BBC music chart television programme Top of the Pops from a television studio – a converted church (now demolished) – in Dickenson Road, Rusholme, Manchester.

 On 30 July 2006 he also co-hosted the final edition, ending the show with the words "It's number one, it's still Top of the Pops", before being shown turning off the studio lights after the closing credits.[17]

When interviewed by the BBC on 20 November 2008 and asked about the revival of Top of The Pops for a Christmas comeback, he commented that he would welcome a "cameo role" in the programme.[18]

During the early 1960s he co-hosted (with Pete Murray) New Musical Express Poll Winners' Concert, annually held at Empire Pool, Wembley, with acts such as The Beatles, Cliff Richard and The Shadows, Joe Brown and the Bruvvers, The Who, and many others.

These were broadcast on television. On 31 December 1969, Savile hosted the BBC/ZDF co-production Pop Go The Sixties, shown across Western Europe, celebrating the hits of the 1960s.

Savile is also remembered for a series of Public Information Films promoting road safety, notably "Clunk Click Every Trip" which was promoted the use of the car seatbelts, the clunk representing the sound of the door and the click the sound of the seatbelt fastening.

This led to Savile's hosting his own Saturday night chat/variety show on BBC1 from 1973 entitled Clunk, Click, which in 1974 featured the UK heats for the Eurovision Song Contest featuring Olivia Newton-John.

He also fronted a long-running series of advertisements in the early 1980s for British Rail's InterCity 125, in which he declared "This is the age of the train".

After two series, Clunk, Click was replaced by Jim'll Fix It, which he presented from 1975 to 1994.

He was interviewed by Dr. Anthony Clare for the radio series In the Psychiatrist's Chair, where Savile appeared to be "a man without feelings".[19] In 1995 he was interviewed at length by Andrew Neil for the TV series Is This Your Life? (made by Open Media for Channel 4).[20] In April 2000, he was the subject of an in-depth documentary by Louis Theroux, in the When Louis Met... documentary series.

 "When Louis Met...Jimmy" was voted one of the top fifty documentaries of all time in a survey by Britain's Channel Four.[21]

Savile visited the Celebrity Big Brother house on 14 and 15 January 2006. During these visits he "fixed it" for some of the housemates to have their wishes granted; for example, Pete Burns received a message from his significant other and friend while Dennis Rodman was able to trade Savile's offering for a supply of cigarettes for other housemates.

In 2007 Savile returned to television with Jim'll Fix It Strikes Again, in which he showed some of the most popular 'fixits' ever, recreating them with the same people, as well as making new dreams come true.[22]

Personal life

Savile at the 1982 Leeds MarathonSavile was famous for his yodel[23] and his catchphrases included "how's about that, then?", "now then, now then, now then", "goodness gracious", "as it 'appens" and "guys and gals".

Savile was frequently spoofed for his distinctive appearance, which almost always featured a track suit or shell suit, along with gold jewellery.

 A range of licensed fancy dress costumes were released with his consent in 2009.

Savile was also known as a cigar smoker and usually smoked very expensive Cuban brands.[24][25]

He was a member of the Institute of Advanced Motorists[26] and drove a Rolls-Royce.[27]

He was also a member of Mensa.[28] He was made a life member of the British Gypsy Council in 1975, becoming the first "outsider" to be made a member.[29]

He was chieftain of the Lochaber Highland Games for many years, and owned a house in Glen Coe.

His appearance on the final edition of Top of the Pops in 2006 was pre-recorded as it clashed with the games.[30]

While still alive he arranged for a bench, in Scarborough, North Yorkshire, to be dedicated to his memory, with the words 'Jimmy Savile – but not just yet!' added as an inscription.[31][32]

A bachelor, Savile lived with his mother (whom he referred to as "The Duchess") and kept her bedroom and wardrobe exactly as it was when she died.

Every year he had her clothes dry cleaned. Savile's personal relationships were rarely the subject of media report or comment during his lifetime.

 He claimed in his autobiography that he had had many intimate relations with members of the opposite sex, describing his first introduction to women in detail and then adding that "there have been trains and, with apologies to the hit parade, boats and planes (I am a member of the 40,000 ft club) and bushes and fields, corridors, doorways, floors, chairs, slag heaps, desks and probably everything except the celebrated chandelier and ironing board."[33]

In 1989, Savile started legal proceedings against News Group Newspapers after their paper, the News of the World, published an article in January 1988 suggesting Savile had been in a position to secure the release of patients in Broadmoor Hospital who were considered "dangerous".

Savile won the case on 11 July 1989 with News Group agreeing to pay all legal costs, and received an apology from editors Kelvin MacKenzie and Patsy Chapman.[34]

On 9 August 1997, Savile underwent a three-hour quadruple heart-bypass operation at the Killingbeck Hospital in Leeds, having learnt that he had needed the operation for at least four years when attending regular check-ups.[35]

In November 2007, Sir Jimmy was robbed by a fan who made off with his glasses whilst in a Leeds hotel.

According to Savile, he was walking down a corridor of the Queens Hotel at around midnight after attending a function at the hotel when he became aware of a woman walking beside him.

He assumed the woman was going to hug him but she instead reached for his glasses before sprinting off down the corridor.

He later said "I thought it was marvellous, it was just like old times!".

 Savile promised his 'assailant' a box of chocolates for giving him a "1960s thrill in 2007".[36]

Savile would later become the voice against burglars in his home city of Leeds in January 2008.[37]

Sexual assault allegationsSavile claimed that the key to his success on Jim'll Fix It had been that he disliked children, although he later admitted to saying this to deflect scrutiny of his personal life.

He did not own a computer, explaining that he did not want anybody to think that he was downloading child pornography.[38] In October 2012 it was reported that Savile had publicly defended the convicted paedophile pop star Gary Glitter saying that "he just watched a few 'dodgy films' and was only vilified because he was a celebrity... It were for his own gratification. Whether it was right or wrong is up to him as a person. But they didn't do anything wrong."[39]

In 2007 Savile was interviewed under caution by police investigating an allegation of indecent assault in the 1970s at the now-closed Duncroft Approved School for Girls near Staines, Surrey, where he was a regular visitor. The Crown Prosecution Service advised that there was insufficient evidence to take any further action and no charges were brought.[40]

In March 2008, Savile started legal proceedings against The Sun newspaper which had, wrongly he claimed, linked him in several articles to the child abuse scandal at the Jersey children's home Haut de la Garenne.[41]

 Savile initially denied visiting Haut de la Garenne, but later admitted that he had done so, following the publication of a photograph showing him at the home surrounded by children.[42]

The States of Jersey Police said that in 2008 an allegation of an indecent assault by Savile at the home in the 1970s had been investigated, but there had been insufficient evidence to proceed.[43]

On 30 September 2012, it was reported by UK newspapers that up to ten women claimed that they had been sexually molested or raped by Savile during the 1960s and 1970s.

One of the alleged victims was reported to have been aged 14 at the time.[44]

The ITV1 documentary Exposure: The Other Side Of Jimmy Savile was broadcast on 3 October 2012.

It was researched and presented by former police detective Mark Williams-Thomas, who had been a police investigator on the successful 2001 Jonathan King child-sex prosecution. It was later claimed that Savile had abused at least one boy as well as numerous girls.[45]

In the documentary, a number of women claimed that as teenagers they had been sexually abused by Savile.

 It was claimed that Savile obtained access to teenage girls through television programmes such as Top of the Pops and Clunk, Click, and his charity work.

 Former colleagues of Savile's said that he made no attempt to hide his interest in young girls from them, while another said she had walked in on Savile French kissing an underage girl.

 One woman who claimed that Savile had sexually assaulted her at the age of 14 in 1970 explained that she had not pursued her complaint to police in 2008 after being told that it would lead to a "media circus".[46]

The founder of ChildLine, Esther Rantzen, was shown footage of the interviews by Williams-Thomas and commented that "There were always rumours that he [Savile] behaved very inappropriately sexually with children."[47]

Newspaper reports also claimed that Douglas Muggeridge, the controller of Radio 1 in the early 1970s, was aware of the allegations, and asked for a report on them in 1973.[48]

Lord Grade of Yarmouth told Channel 4 News that during his time at the BBC he had "fleetingly" heard rumours about Savile, but described claims of a cover-up as "ludicrous".[49]

The BBC stated that no evidence of any allegations of misconduct, or of actual misconduct by Savile, had been found in its files[50] and later denied that there had been a cover-up of Savile's activities.[51][52]

Following the broadcast of the ITV1 documentary, a number of people came forward and made fresh allegations about Savile's conduct towards young people.

He was claimed to have carried out indecent assaults on a nine year old girl and her eleven year old sister in 1971 when he visited Haut de la Garenne,[53][54] and to have molested children while working as a porter at the Leeds General Hospital.[55]

The Metropolitan Police stated on 4 October 2012 that their Child Abuse Investigation Command would lead a process of assessing the allegations, which was "not an investigation at this stage".[56]

The British Prime Minister, David Cameron, said that he was "truly shocked" by the published allegations, which should be "properly investigated".[57]

The Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust stated that it was considering giving funds to those working with victims of sexual abuse, and that it may change its name because of the allegations.[57]

 The Director-General of the BBC, George Entwistle, apologised on 8 October for what had happened, and said that further internal investigations would take place.[58]

The Metropolitan Police announced on 9 October that they were following up 120 lines of inquiry, covering up to 25 victims of abuse, mainly girls aged between 13 and 16.

They covered a period spanning four decades, from 1959 until the 1980s, and were on "a national scale".

An inquiry process, known as Operation Yewtree, was being set up jointly with the NSPCC, and involving other organisations including the BBC and ITV.

 Commander Peter Spindler, head of specialist crime investigations, said: "At this stage it is quite clear from what women are telling us that Savile was a predatory sex offender."[59]

Charitable worksAside from his TV and radio work, Savile carried out a considerable amount of charity work and is estimated to have raised some £40 million for charity.[60]

One of the causes for which he raised money was the Stoke Mandeville Hospital, where he worked for many years as a volunteer porter.

He raised money for the Spinal Unit, NSIC (National Spinal Injuries Centre). Savile also raised money for St Francis Ward – a ward for children and teens with spinal cord Injuries.

Savile also worked as a volunteer at Leeds General Infirmary and at Broadmoor Hospital.

In 1988 he was appointed chairman of a task force set up to advise on governing Broadmoor.

Savile had his own room at both Stoke Mandeville and Broadmoor.[61]

From 1974 to 1988 he was the honorary president of Phab (Physically Handicapped in the Able Bodied community).[62]

He also sponsored medical students at the University of Leeds to perform undergraduate research in the Leeds University Research Enterprise scholarship scheme (known as LURE), donating over £60,000 every year.[63]

In 2010 the scheme was extended with a commitment of £500,000 over the following five years.[64]

 Following Savile's death in October 2011 it was confirmed that a bequest had been made to allow continued support for the LURE programme.[65]

Savile was also well known for running marathons (many of them again for Phab, including their annual half marathon around Hyde Park).

He completed the London Marathon in 2005, at the age of 79.

HonoursIn the 1972 New Year Honours, he was appointed Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE),[66] which he always subsequently appended to his signature.

Awarded an honorary green beret by the Royal Marines in the 1970s for being one of only three civilians to date to complete the Royal Marine Commando speed march, 30 miles across Dartmoor carrying 30 lb of kit.[67]

The other civilians were former Blue Peter presenter Gethin Jones and film maker Chris Terrill.

In the 1990 Queen's Birthday Honours he was knighted "for charitable services".[68] After the allegations of sexual abuse by Savile were published, British Prime Minister David Cameron indicated in October 2012 that it would be possible for this honour to be rescinded by the Honours Forfeiture Committee.[69]

Also in 1990 he was honoured with a Papal knighthood making him a Knight Commander of the Order of Saint Gregory the Great (KCSG).[70]

He held an honorary doctorate of law (LLD) from the University of Leeds.[71]

He was an honorary fellow of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR).[72]

He had the Cross of Merit of the Order pro merito Melitensi.[73]

He was a Freeman of the Borough of Scarborough.[74]

Death

Savile's coffin on display at the Queens Hotel in Leeds, 8 November 2011

Savile was found dead at his home in Roundhay, Leeds, on 29 October 2011, two days short of his 85th birthday.[75][76]

He had recently been in hospital with pneumonia, and his death was not treated as suspicious.[75]

His closed satin gold coffin was displayed at the Queens Hotel in Leeds,[77][78] together with the last cigar he smoked and his two This Is Your Life books.[79]

 About 4,000 people visited to pay tribute.[80]

His funeral took place at Leeds Cathedral on 9 November 2011,[81] and he was buried at Woodlands Cemetery in Scarborough.[82][83]

As his will had specified, his coffin was inclined at 45 degrees to fulfil his wish to "see the sea".[83][84] The coffin was later encased in concrete "as a security measure".[85]

His headstone in Scarborough is to be dismantled out of respect for the other dead buried there, following the allegations of child abuse in October 2012.[86]

An auction of Savile's possessions on 30 July 2012 saw his silver Rolls-Royce Corniche convertible go for £130,000 to an Internet bidder.

The vehicle's number plate, JS 247, featured the original medium wave wavelength used by BBC Radio 1 (247 metres).[87][88]

A memorial plaque was placed on the wall of Savile's former home in Scarborough, but was removed in 2012 after it was defaced with graffiti.[89]

 A wooden statue of Savile installed at Scotstoun Leisure Centre in Glasgow was removed around the same time.[90]

 A sign on a footpath in Scarborough bearing Savile's surname was removed.[91]

195
102 Reference-Girls dragged kicking and screaming into Jimmy Saviles dressing room or was there a queue?
Updated: 10 Oct 2012

Nephew of Sir Jimmy Saville 'disgusted' at allegations of sexual abuse

The nephew of the late broadcaster Sir Jimmy Savile has said

his family is ''disgusted and disappointed''

that allegations his uncle sexually abused school girls

have been made when he is no longer around to defend himself. 

30 Sep 2012

The nephew of the late broadcaster Sir Jimmy Savile has said his family is ''disgusted and disappointed'' that allegations his uncle sexually abused school girls have been made when he is no longer around to defend himself.

Roger Foster was responding to allegations in a TV documentary about Sir Jimmy's behaviour from a number of women.

The programme details claims from the women dating back to the 1970s, including allegations he abused girls in his Rolls-Royce car and at BBC TV Centre.

The programme is due to be aired on ITV1 later this week.

Mr Foster, from Goole, East Yorkshire, said he was not only concerned for Sir Jimmy's reputation and legacy but also for the damage the allegations could do to his charities.

He said: ''I just get so disgusted and disappointed by it.

The guy hasn't been dead for a year yet and they're bringing these stories out.

''It could affect his legacy, his charity work, everything.

''I'm very sad and disgusted.''

 Sir Jimmy Savile

Mr Foster said: ''I just don't understand the motives behind this.

''I just think it's very, very sad you can say these things after someone's died and the law says you can't defend yourself when you're dead.''

Sir Jimmy, who was famous for TV shows like Jim'll Fix It and Top Of The Pops as well as being a DJ on Radio One, died at his home in Leeds on October 29 last year, aged 84.

Exposure: The Other Side Of Jimmy Savile is due to be shown on ITV1 at 11.10pm on Wednesday.

According to ITV, the programme, which is presented by former detective Mark Williams-Thomas, features contributions from several women who claim that Sir Jimmy was a sexual predator who sexually assaulted them while they were under age.

One woman alleges she was raped by the DJ and another says she was asked to perform a sex act on him.

ITV said one of the contributors explained how she was too frightened to speak out while Sir Jimmy was alive.

They said the programme will allege the broadcaster preyed on teenagers he invited to appear on his TV shows.

One 14-year-old girl tells the programme how she met Sir Jimmy at a school in Surrey in 1974 and he assaulted her in his caravan, which was parked in the school grounds.

The BBC responded to reports today that inappropriate behaviour by Sir Jimmy had been an ''open secret'' at the corporation by saying it had found no evidence of any misconduct by the broadcaster.

In a statement, the BBC said: ''The BBC has conducted extensive searches of its files to establish whether there is any record of misconduct or allegations of misconduct by Sir Jimmy Savile during his time at the BBC. No such evidence has been found.

''Whilst the BBC condemns any behaviour of the type alleged in the strongest terms, in the absence of evidence of any kind found at the BBC that corroborates the allegations that have been made it is simply not possible for the corporation to take any further action.''

The BBC also explained why an investigation by BBC2's Newsnight into Sir Jimmy was never broadcast.

Newsnight editor Peter Rippon said: ''It is absolutely untrue that the Newsnight investigation was dropped for anything other than editorial reasons.

''We have been very clear from the start that the piece was not broadcast because the story we were pursuing could not be substantiated.

''To say otherwise is false and very damaging to the BBC and individuals.

 The notion that internal pressure was applied appears to be a malicious rumour.''

465
103 Reference- Scandalize My Name (by Jimmy Savile)
Updated: 10 Oct 2012

Scandalize My Name

I met my brother the other day
And gave him my right hand
As soon as ever my back was turned
He scandalized my name

Now do you call that a brother?
No, no
You call that a brother?
No, no
You call that a brother
No, no
Scandalize my name

I met my sister the other day
And gave her my right hand
As soon as ever my back was turned
She too scandalized my name

87
104 Reference-What is a Groupie Girl ?- "Lets Spend the Night Together"
Updated: 10 Oct 2012

Groupie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
(January 2010) 

A groupie is a person who seeks emotional and sexual intimacy

with a musician or other celebrity or public figure.

The term groupie is derived from group, in reference to a musical group,[1]

 but the word is also used in a more general sense, especially in casual conversation,

 to mean a particular kind of female fan assumed to be more interested in sex with rock stars

than in their music.[2]

 

 In musicGroupies became prominent in the music scene in the 1960s and 1970s.

This was prior to the murder of John Lennon in December 1980, and before security levels for bands increased significantly.

Female groupies in particular have a long-standing reputation of being available to celebrities, pop stars, rock stars and other public figures.

 Led Zeppelin singer Robert Plant is quoted as distinguishing between fans who wanted brief sexual encounters, and "groupies" who traveled with musicians for extended periods of time, acting as a surrogate girlfriend or mother, often taking care of the musician's valuables, drugs, wardrobe, and social life.[3]

Nancy Spungen, who became the partner of Sid Vicious of The Sex Pistols, is one such example; women adopting this role are sometimes referred to as "road wives."

Cynthia Plaster Caster and The GTOs ("Girls Together Outrageously"), with Pamela Des Barres, in particular, as de-facto spokeswoman, are probably the best known groupies of this type.

The GTOs was organized by musician Frank Zappa in the late 1960s. The band consisted of 7 young women: Miss Pamela (Pamela Des Barres), Miss Sparky (Linda Sue Parker), Miss Lucy (Lucy McLaren), Miss Christine (Christine Frka), Miss Sandra (Sandra Leano), Miss Mercy (Mercy Fontentot) and Miss Cynderella (Cynthia Cale-Binion).

Another type of groupie were the young teenage girls who dominated the backstage scene beginning in the late sixties, sometimes referred to as the "Baby Groupies" by certain musicians.

These girls started going backstage when they were fourteen years old and set a precedent at the time.

The best known of this group were Sable Starr, Cleo Odzer, Lori Maddox, and Geraldine Edwards, who was the inspiration for Penny Lane, played by actress Kate Hudson, in the 2000 comedy-drama film Almost Famous.

Early descriptions of the groupie phenomenon were given by the Rolling Stone issue of 15 February 1969, the Time article "Manners And Morals: The Groupies" (28 February 1969), and the 1970 documentary Groupies.

A major characteristic that classifies one as a groupie is a promiscuous reputation.

Connie Hamzy, also known as “Sweet Connie”, a prominent groupie in the 1960s argues in favor of the groupie movement and defends her chosen lifestyle by saying, “Look we’re not hookers, we loved the glamour” (Pop & Hiss).

However, her openness regarding her sexual endeavors with various rock stars is exactly what has enhanced the negative connotations surrounding her type.

For example the article “Pop & Hiss”, found in the Los Angeles Times,[4] states, "Hamzy, unlike the other groupies, was never looking to build relationships.

She was after sex, and she unabashedly shared intimate moments with virtually every rock star – even their roadies – who came through Arkansas."

 Hamzy is the epitome of a stereotypical groupie: a young woman who unashamedly slept with any man involved in the music business whenever they desired.

Aside from the sexual aspect of rock and roll that was accentuated by the groupie, the women also played a huge role in the amount of drugs and alcohol consumed by the artists.

Chris O’Dell slept with rock stars such as Bob Dylan, Ringo Starr, Eric Clapton, and Mick Jagger.

O’Dell opens up about her life as a groupie to a representative from the magazine The Telegraph,[5] “Predictably, the drug consumption soared when she moved to the Stones.

O'Dell, who admits that her capacity for drugs was probably as much a factor as her easy-going personality in her popularity with rock stars, rose to the occasion.

Keith Richards admiringly told her that she took drugs "'like a man'.

Praise from the master.”

O’Dell goes on to describe the years with the Rolling Stones as her lost years because she can hardly remember anything due to her drug consumption.

She also admits that one of the reasons stars enjoyed her company so much is because she liked consuming drugs in large quantities all the time.

Des Barres, who wrote two books detailing her experiences as a groupie – I'm With The Band (1987) and Take Another Little Piece of My Heart: A Groupie Grows Up (1993) – as well as another non-fiction book, Rock Bottom: Dark Moments in Music Babylon, asserts that a groupie is to a rock band as Mary Magdalene was to Jesus.[6]

Her most recent book, Let's Spend the Night Together (2007), is a collection of wildly varied interviews with classic "old school" groupies including Catherine James, Connie Hamzy, Cherry Vanilla, DeeDee Keel, Margaret Moser, and Patti Johnsen as well as modern groupies like Mandy Murders, Lexa Vonn and the Plastics. Des Barres, who married rock star-actor Michael Des Barres, also persuaded cult actress Tura Satana, muse Bebe Buell, actress Patti D'Arbanville, and Cassandra Peterson, better known as Elvira, Mistress of the Dark to talk about their relationships with musicians.

According to Des Barres' book, there is at least one verified male groupie, Pleather, who followed female celebrities such as Courtney Love and members of the 80s pop group The Bangles.

"Apple Scruffs", from George Harrison's album All Things Must Pass, refers to the Apple scruffs, a group of teenage girls who staked out The Beatles' Apple Corps offices, Abbey Road Studios, and Paul McCartney's home, often sleeping outside in rough weather, waiting for a glimpse of a Beatle.

The Beatles' song "She Came in Through the Bathroom Window" refers to the day a few Scruffs climbed into Paul McCartney's house through an upstairs bathroom window and raided his closet for a pair of trousers, which they took turns wearing.

They also took a framed photograph, which they later returned at McCartney's request. The movie Almost Famous revolves around the life of groupies (although they call themselves 'band aids' in the film).

The famous "band aid" comment originated from a statement that Bebe Buell made in an interview in the seventies.

Cameron Crowe incorporated it into his screenplay. In 1970 Groupie Girl was released by American International Pictures and was written by director Derek Ford and Suzanne Mercer based on Mercer's experiences as a groupie.

Michael Jackson was known to say that his number one hit song Dirty Diana was written about a groupie.[7]

114
105 Reference -Do Misogynist Dinosaurs Dream of Pussys Galore?
Updated: 07 Oct 2012

Do Misogynist Dinosaurs Dream of Pussys Galore?

In a famous moment from Pierce Brosnan’s terrific Bond debut, Goldeneye, Judie Dench’s “M” chastises Bond for being a misogynist dinosaur

This is supposed to be a witty, meta-textual moment summing up attitudes within the Bond franchise to date ,

affirming that it has had its issues with female empowerment in the past and that it has moved on from them.

 Yet personally I’m struggling to ascertain exactly just what it is about Bond that M is actually referring to here.

 Is it Connery’s smooth, casual, sexual charm, broken by occasional flashes of misogynist violence,

Roger Moore’s humorous nudge-nudge wink-wink approach so often sees women as beautiful and stupid playthings.

Other trait exuded by either Dalton or Lazenby during their short stints as the character?

Responses to the James Bond franchise these days seem very mixed.

 I’ve been watching my way through the entire Bond canon and I’m willing to confess that I’ve found it an enjoyable experience and that there’s not a Bond movie that I didn’t take at least something positive away from.

Yet my enthusiasm for the franchise has been met mostly with bewilderment from others, both male and female, who tend to view Bond in the same light as M.

I’ve had a number of conversations with both genders who feel that the concept of Bond is horrificially outdated.

Inevitably a franchise spanning 50 years and 22 movies is briefly summed up with the comment that Bond is “a tired, misogynist, alpha male fantasy and that the movies are clichéd, obvious and overstuffed with gadgets and action sequences”.

 Women, in particular don’t generally like James Bond.

At least, they didn’t until Daniel Craig emerged from the sea in a moment that is regarded as “for the ladies” and a piece of all too rare reverse objectification.

Craig’s physique is something that a lot of women apparently find pretty hot.

 I can’t say that I don’t appreciate the eye candy either.

71
106 Reference- Republic -Anti -Monarchy Campaign
Updated: 03 Oct 2012

REPUBLIC

Dear Friend

Last week showed us that this campaign is absolutely winnable - we attracted widespread media coverage in response to the Queen's apparent interference and our own Duchy campaign. 

And once again, in a university debate, we saw a big swing of votes in our favour proving the arguments can be won.

Together we can win this campaign - the challenge is to get the right campaigns in place and to get our messages heard.

That's why I'm asking you to make a donation to the campaign fund today - it's quick, easy and secure via our online donation page at www.republic.org.uk/donate.

Media coverage

Following our strong response to revelations about the Queen's meddling in politics early last week Republic was featured in every national newspaper and we were on key Radio 4 flagship programes such as PM and Today. 

Earlier that week our Duchy campaign had been reported in the Evening Standard and the Express.

This coverage resulted in a number of interviews and debates on various local radio stations, including London's LBC.  The BBC also ran a report on their website.

Later in the week our Duchy campaign was reported in the Independent and a report on Republic's recent growth appeared in the Observer on Sunday. 

The launch meeting of the Duchy campaign - held in Truro on Saturday - led to widespread coverage throughout the South West, in local newspapers and on BBC Devon and BBC Cornwall, as well as the local ITV News.

All this coverage is a direct result of the hard work put in by our team of staff, directors, local campaigners and volunteers.

If we're to maintain the momentum we need your support - please donate to our campaign fund today at www.republic.org.uk/donate.

Winning the debate

On Friday evening I took part in a debate at Exeter University. 

A vote was held at the start and at the end of the evening which showed a significant swing in our favour, with un-decided and pro-monarchy voters switching to our side. 

This follows a debate in Bath recently where we secured another strong swing in our favour.

These results show this is a debate we can win. 

 When people hear the arguments about democratic principles, the failures of the royal household and the royal powers used by our politicians they start to think seriously about the issue for the first time.

Our challenge is to make our voices heard louder and more often, to keep building a stronger movement.  We have the arguments on our side, we know what has to be done, we just have to get on with the hard work of campaigning for change. 

There are no magic bullets - we have a lot of work ahead of us and to get that work done I need your support.

You can make a real contribution to the campaign by donating today via www.republic.org.uk/donate

Your donation will help us carry on developing our media profile, attending debates, expanding our network of local campaigns, raising the issues and challenging the monarchy.

Help me make monarchy history, please donate today via www.republic.org.uk/donate.

Thank you for your support.

All the best
 
Graham Smith
Chief Executive Officer

86
107 Reference- A Gromit ?
Updated: 30 Sep 2012

"He was advised to have a Gromit placed in his left ear to potentially help alleviate his dizzyness.

 
He was told that there isn’t much Science behind this treatment,

but that it has just been reported to help people with MP's Disease"

65
108 Reference- A History of the Coop Movement
Updated: 26 Sep 2012

A new take on a great co-operative classic

Tuesday 25 September 2012
That well-known TV face John Henshaw has a key role in a new adaptation of the classic story of the Rochdale Pioneers.

It's brought to our screens by the British Young Film Academy (BYFA) and supported by the Co-operative Group.

This splendid initiative to give the pioneers' story a contemporary twist is one of the highlights of the celebrations of 2012 as UN Year of Co-operatives.

All social movements have their mythologies, the stories they tell themselves to explain their purpose and origins.

The co-operative movement is no exception and one of the most powerful in the working-class movement is the mythology surrounding the Rochdale Pioneers.

While we know quite a lot about the pioneers and the formation of the shop at Toad Lane, Rochdale, in 1844, the creation of their story is the work of one man.

That man was one of the greatest propagandists for working-class emancipation that we have ever seen, George Jacob Holyoake - memorialised in the headquarters of the co-operative movement, Holyoake House in Hanover Street, Manchester.

There were many early co-operative societies before Rochdale and very many around at the same time, but there can be no doubt that Rochdale was lifted into prominence by the work of Holyoake.

His history of the Rochdale Pioneers written in 1857 made Rochdale the key place for modern co-operation.

It was followed by The History of Co-operation in England in 1875 and The Co-operative Movement Today in 1891.

These works made him the outstanding co-operative propagandist.

Holyoake, born in Birmingham, had been an Owenite and a follower of the early sociologist August Comte.

In his newspaper the Reasoner he developed the idea of secularism before becoming a co-operative activist.

His story of the pioneers became a great way of explaining co-operative principles and practices in a way that was easy to understand and follow.

Thousands followed the pioneers' example. Holyoake's storytelling was a tremendous boost to the spread of co-operation.

Being a predominantly consumer movement in Britain co-operators have not been averse to a bit of marketing and the use of every tool available to sell co-operation.

When film first came on the scene they quickly took it up to spread the message.

In the National Co-operative Film Archive there is a stunning collection of those early films, but the art form really took off in the 1930s and '40s with such gems as Co-operette (1937) starring Stanley Holloway to promote Co-operative Wholsesale Society (CWS) products and films that also had important political messages like Peace Parade (1937) or Advance Democracy (1938).

The Scottish CWS was not to be outdone and made Out of the Box (1942) about the earliest documented co-operative society - the Fenwick Weavers of 1769.

Probably the jewel in the collection is the film the Men of Rochdale, made in 1944 at the then enormous cost of £15,000 to mark the pioneers' centenary.

This is a beautifully crafted film with a script written by Reg Groves, who had written books about Conrad Noel and the Thaxted Movement, Victory Grayson and the Agricultural Workers Union.

Groves was probably most famous in communist circles for being expelled from the Communist Party in 1932 as a leading light in the Trotskyite International Left Opposition.

 But the film was based almost exclusively on Holyoake's book.

The film has very high production values.

Sydney Box was the co-producer, Compton Bennett director and Reg Wyer was cinematographer.

These three went on to work on the 1945 hit The Seventh Veil with Sydney Box becoming head of production at Gainsborough Studios.

The score was provided by John Greenwood, who worked at Ealing Studios and was played by the London Symphony Orchestra which had formed itself as a co-operative in the 1940s.

The star of the production, easily recognised today, was John Laurie, familiar from all those Dad's Army reruns.

The film was easily the most popular co-op film they ever produced, seen in co-op halls up and down the country. It no doubt contributed to the spirit that swept Labour to power in 1945.

The new film is essentially a remake of the 1944 classic and is now being shown in cinemas around the country for Co-operative Group members to enjoy.

It is directed by John Montegrande and Adam Lee Hamilton, whose last BYFA movie Julius Caesar was nominated for an award at the prestigious Raindance Film Festival.

The film-making process has been truly co-operative, with extras recruited from the local community to play supporting roles alongside professional actors including John McArdle and John Henshaw.

The fact is that whether the story is myth or reality, the arguments the film presents are as relevant today as ever and this is a terrific piece of work which is credit to everyone involved in its production - just like the Men of Rochdale was all those years ago.

This is a lasting legacy of the international year of the co-op, making the story of the Rochdale Pioneers accessible to a new generation.

So if you are a Co-operative Group member get along to one of the free screenings ahead of the film's official premiere during the International Year of Co-operatives celebrations in Manchester.

If you can't make it be sure to watch out for its TV debut in November on Film4 as part of the channel's British Connection Season.

To book your place or find a screening go to: www.co-operative.coop/2012/latest-news/conference-and-events/vipscreening/

90
109 Reference- JBB Sports - Newcastle Utd boss Mike Ashley's company, goes into administration
Updated: 25 Sep 2012

JJB Sports goes into administration .

 

Hundreds of jobs under threat

Monday, September 24, 2012

AlexColman


Shares in the chain were suspended from the stock market on September 24 after falling 93% this year.

.The company has 180 stores across the UK, employing around 4,000 workers.

All of the outlets will remain open while administrators attempt to sell the remaining assets.

On August 30, JJB announced a formal sale process but it has since failed to attract any buyers or investors.

KPMG administrators will now attempt to sell off the company's assets and brands.

Sports Direct is at the forefront of eight bidders to take over the stores and it is expected that owner, Mike Ashley will shut around half the sites if his bid is successful.

Over the administration period it will remain unclear as to which stores will be closed and how many jobs will be lost.

144
110 Reference- Venezuelan Oil for Chinese development of their Gold Fields
Updated: 22 Sep 2012

Venezuela, China agree to develop gold mine


Venezuela and China signed an agreement to develop together one of the world's biggest gold mines, with plans to exploit both the yellow metal and cooper there.

President Hugo Chavez made the announcement on Friday after meeting at the Miraflores presidential palace with a delegation from China's state-run International Trust and Investment Corp. (CITIC) headed by its president, Chang Zhenming, about the deal to develop Las Cristinas mine in southern Venezuela.

Last year, the Canadian firm Crystallex sought international arbitration against Venezuela after Caracas canceled its contract to develop Las Cristinas. Crystallex obtained the concession in 2002.

Chavez, whose statement was carried on official VTV television, said that a second agreement was reached to produce a mineral deposits map for Venezuela, which he called a "high-caliber project" for the country's development.

Energy (NYSEArca: JJE - news) and Petroleum Minister Rafael Ramirez later said the map was a five-year project.

Ramirez also said that Venezuela has contracts with CITIC to build 30,000 homes -- 24,000 of which are already being built -- as part of an ambitious government plan to make a dent in the country's desperate lack of housing.

Beijing has extended some $30 billion in credit to Caracas over the past years. Caracas in turn sells some 640,000 barrels of oil a day to China, of which 264,000 are destined to pay debt.

70
111 Reference- Republic- Prince Charles -Out of Order
Updated: 21 Sep 2012

REPUBLIC

Dear Friend

Did you know that prince Charles has the power to veto and change laws before parliament gets to debate them?

Did you know that Charles receives over £18m a year from land that he doesn't own, money that should be spent on public services?

Did you know that Charles is exempt from Freedom of Information laws, which means he can lobby our elected politicians without any of us ever finding out?

It's time Charles was stopped. 

The key to his lobbying and his lavish lifestyle is the Duchy of Cornwall, a large landed estate and property portfolio that parliament makes available to the heir to the throne. 

The Duchy is not the personal property of Charles or his mother, it rightly belongs to the nation.

That's why Republic is about to launch a new campaign to have the Duchy abolished, to clip the wings of the meddling prince and challenge one of the monarchy's key privileges.

He